Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: learning from experiences of participatory biodiversity assessment
- 2 Monitoring and assessment of biodiversity under the Convention on Biological Diversity and other international agreements
- 3 The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: a multi-scale assessment for global stakeholders
- 4 Conservation of biological diversity in El Salvador shade coffee: the importance of taxonomic capacity for participatory assessments
- 5 Taking stock of nature in species-rich but economically poor areas: an emerging discipline of locally based monitoring
- 6 Researching local perspectives on biodiversity in tropical landscapes: lessons from ten case studies
- 7 Participatory resources monitoring in SW China: lessons after five years
- 8 Forest inventory in Nepal – technical power or social empowerment?
- 9 Perceptions of landscape change in British Columbia's Northwest: implications for biodiversity and participatory management
- 10 How thousands planned for a billion: lessons from India on decentralized, participatory planning
- 11 Inside monitoring: a comparison of bird monitoring groups in Slovenia and the United Kingdom
- 12 The personal and political of volunteers' data: towards a national biodiversity database for the UK
- 13 Improving forest management through participatory monitoring: a comparative case study of four community-based forestry organizations in the Western United States
- Index
- References
3 - The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: a multi-scale assessment for global stakeholders
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2010
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: learning from experiences of participatory biodiversity assessment
- 2 Monitoring and assessment of biodiversity under the Convention on Biological Diversity and other international agreements
- 3 The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: a multi-scale assessment for global stakeholders
- 4 Conservation of biological diversity in El Salvador shade coffee: the importance of taxonomic capacity for participatory assessments
- 5 Taking stock of nature in species-rich but economically poor areas: an emerging discipline of locally based monitoring
- 6 Researching local perspectives on biodiversity in tropical landscapes: lessons from ten case studies
- 7 Participatory resources monitoring in SW China: lessons after five years
- 8 Forest inventory in Nepal – technical power or social empowerment?
- 9 Perceptions of landscape change in British Columbia's Northwest: implications for biodiversity and participatory management
- 10 How thousands planned for a billion: lessons from India on decentralized, participatory planning
- 11 Inside monitoring: a comparison of bird monitoring groups in Slovenia and the United Kingdom
- 12 The personal and political of volunteers' data: towards a national biodiversity database for the UK
- 13 Improving forest management through participatory monitoring: a comparative case study of four community-based forestry organizations in the Western United States
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Government requests for information about the implications of ecosystem change for achieving social and economic goals piled up in the wake of four international environmental conventions, leading researchers and policy advisers to conduct ‘one of the most ambitious ecological studies’ to date, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) between 2001 and 2005 (Tallis and Kareiva, 2006a). The aim was to assess the consequences of ecosystem change for human well-being and to establish the scientific basis for actions needed to enhance the conservation and sustainable use of ecosystems. Principle users were the international environmental conventions, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), but the multi-disciplinary group of assessment leaders designed it to also meet the needs of the business community, the health sector, non-governmental organizations, and indigenous peoples. About 1300 participants contributed to the process as authors, and the end products included technical reports and summaries aimed at specific user groups.1
The MA was conceived as a multi-scale assessment, with interlinked assessments undertaken at local, watershed, national, regional, and global scales. Thus, in addition to providing global-scale information, 33 subglobal assessments aimed to meet the information needs of users2 in the regions where they were undertaken. By conducting the assessment at multiple scales, the assessment team hoped to both improve the quality of information and increase the relevance of the findings for decision-makers working at different levels of governance (Zermoglio et al., 2005; Wilbanks, 2006).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Taking Stock of NatureParticipatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice, pp. 49 - 68Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, and (2005). Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecology Letters 8, 1218–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2005). Looking to the future of ecosystem services. Ecosystems 8, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Biodiversity, traditional management systems, and cultural landscapes: examples from the boreal forest of Canada. International Social Science Journal 58, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and. (2006). Knowledge, learning and the evolution of conservation practice for social-ecological system resilience. Human Ecology 34, 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). A biodiversity intactness score for South Africa. South African Journal of Science 102, 277–283.Google Scholar
, , . et al. (2007). Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multi-scale scenarios. Ecology and Society 12(1), 17. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art17/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Evaluating responses in complex adaptive systems: Insights on water management from the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA). Ecology and Society 10. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art11/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Future ecosystem services in a Southern African river basin: a scenario planning approach to uncertainty. Conservation Biology 20, 1051–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Linking future ecosystem services and future human well-being. Ecology and Society 11. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art30/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006a). Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview. Ecology and Society 11. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art32/Google Scholar
, , et al. (2006b). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Research needs. Science 314, 257–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , et al. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 8086–8091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2007). Available at http://biodiv.org/programmes/cross-cutting/ecosystem/background.asp
, , , and (2006). Conservation planning for ecosystem services. Plos Biology 4, 2138–2152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1999). The global environmental assessment project: learning from efforts to link science and policy in an interdependent world. Acclimations 8, 6–7.Google Scholar
and (2006). Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Biology 20, 420–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2006). Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. Ambio 35, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2005). Foghorns to the future: using knowledge and transdisciplinarity to navigate complex systems. Ecology and Society 10. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art8/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 113, A591–A591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist (2005). Rescuing Environmentalism. Economist.
, and (1977). Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2004). The dynamics of social-ecological systems in urban landscapes – Stockholm and the National Urban Park, Sweden. In Urban Biosphere and Society: Partnership of Cities, eds. , and . New York: New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 308–322.Google ScholarPubMed
, , et al. (2006). Field Guide to the Future: Four Ways for Communities to Think Ahead. Nairobi: CIFOR, ASB, ICRAF.Google Scholar
, and (2001). Environmental assessments: four under-appreciated elements of design. Global Environmental Change 11, 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Assessments of Regional and Global Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decisionmaking. Washingon D.C.: RFF Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2005). Communities, ecosystems and livelihoods. In Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Volume 4 – Multiscale Assessments. Washington D.C.: Island Press, pp. 261–277.Google Scholar
, , , and (2005). Assessment Process. In Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Volume 4 – Multiscale Assessments. Washington D.C.: Island Press, pp. 119–140.Google Scholar
, , and (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 57, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (1995). Global Biodiversity Assessment. UNEP. New York: Cambridge University Press.
, and (2004). Central Coast Coarse Filter Ecosystem Trends Risk Assessment. Vancouver: Coast Information Team.Google Scholar
and (2005). A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3, 540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). The politics of scale in environmental assessments. In Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems, eds. , , , and . Washington D.C.: Island Press, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
, and (2002). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Sythesis and Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington D.C.: Island Press. Available at: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Framework.aspxGoogle Scholar
(2005a). Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Volume 4: Multiscale Assessments: Findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group. Washington D.C.: Island Press. Available at: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Multiscale.aspxGoogle Scholar
(2005b). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington D.C: World Resources Institute. Available at: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Multiscale.aspxGoogle Scholar
(2005c). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington D.C.: Island Press. Available at: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Condition.aspxGoogle Scholar
(2005d). Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Volume 1: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Washington D.C.: Island Press. Available at: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Condition.aspxGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, and (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2005a). Ecosystem services and human well-being: a participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology and Society 10. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2005b). Condition and trends of ecosystem services and biodiversity. In Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Volume 4 – Multiscale Assessments. Washington D.C.: Island Press, pp. 171–203.Google Scholar
, and (1998). Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2003). Assessing future ecosystem services a case study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin. Conservation Ecology 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environmental Science & Policy 9, 317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss. Biological Conservation 100, 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006a). Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2006b). Nature: the many benefits of ecosystem services. Nature 443, 749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Incorporating potential land-use threats into regional biodiversity evaluation and conservation area prioritisation. Biological Conservation 118, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2006). Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Southern African Millennium Assessment: Gariep Basin Local Scale Assessments. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.Google Scholar
and (2006a). Shaping global environmental decisions using socio-ecological models. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 562–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , et al. (2005). Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 360, 425–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2006). How scale matters: some concepts and findings. In Bridging scales and knowledge systems, ed. , , , and . Washington D.C.: Island Press, pp. 21–36.Google Scholar
, van , , , , and (2005). The multiscale approach. In Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Volume 4 – Multiscale Assessments, MA, editor. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by