Dispute Settlement under NAFTA Chapter 11: A Response to the Critics in the United States

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819759.013

12 - Dispute Settlement under NAFTA Chapter 11: A Response to the Critics in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Susan L. Karamanian

Edited by

Cesare P. R. Romano

Show author details

Cesare P. R. Romano: Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The United States has authorized certain investor-state disputes arising under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to be resolved through arbitration. The arbitral tribunals, which apply the NAFTA and applicable rules of international law to the disputes, have come under substantial attack. Critics charge that the tribunals act as super-appellate courts and tower over domestic courts. Others have pointed out the tribunals' alleged lack of “democratic legitimacy.” Tribunal procedures are believed to be shrouded in secrecy. The legal soundness of tribunal awards has been questioned.

These challenges should not be taken lightly. In addition to raising nagging issues that threaten dispute resolution, the assault reflects a concern from both within and outside of the United States about the loss of sovereign control over matters essential to governance. As more nations enter into bilateral investment treaties (BITs) or free trade agreements (FTAs), which may authorize arbitration of investor-state disputes, the criticism is likely to mount and come from a wider range of sources.

A measured and objective response to the criticism, which sorts the wheat from the chaff and constructively identifies areas of concern and means to address the concerns, is in order. This is the objective of this chapter. It also examines the response to the criticism to date, which has led to reforms of the arbitral process.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Sword and the Scales
The United States and International Courts and Tribunals
, pp. 395 - 418

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819759.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bradley, Curtis A., International Delegations, the Structural Constitution, and Non-Self-Execution, 55 Stan. L. Rev.1557, 1576 (2003)Google Scholar

Been, Vicki and Beauvais, Joel C., The Global Fifth Amendment? NAFTA's Investment Protections and the Misguided Quest for an International “Regulatory Takings” Doctrine, 78 N.Y.U.L. Rev.30, 137 (2003)Google Scholar

Shapren, Andrew J., Note, NAFTA Chapter 11: A Step Forward in International Trade Law or a Step Backward for Democracy?, 17 Temp. Int'l & Comp. L. J.323, 346–47 (2003)Google Scholar

Livshiz, David, Note, Public Participation in Disputes under Regional Trade Agreements: How Much Is Too Much – The Case for a Limited Right of Intervention, 61 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L.529, 548, 552, 554–55 (2005)Google Scholar

Gantz, David A., The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions: From NAFTA to the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement, 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev.679, 747 (2004)Google Scholar

Franck, Susan D., The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions, 73 Fordham L. Rev.1521, 1576–81 (2005)Google Scholar

Weiler, Todd (ed.), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future Prospects (Transnational Publishers, Inc., 2004)

Trakman, Leon E., Dispute Settlement under the NAFTA: Manual and Source Book (Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1997)Google Scholar

Brower, II Charles H., Structure, Legitimacy, and NAFTA's Investment Chapter, 36 Vanderbilt J. Transnt'l L.37 (2003)Google Scholar

Price, Daniel M., Some Observations on Chapter Eleven of NAFTA, 23 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.421, 427 (2000)Google Scholar

Scorecard of Adherence to Transnational Arbitration Treaties, News Notes Inst. for Transnt'l Arb. (Center Am. & Int'l Law) 12 (Autumn 2006)

Giardina, Andrea, “ICSID: A Self-Contained, Non-National Review System,” in International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Towards “Judicialization” and Uniformity? 199 (Lillich, Richard B. and Brower, Charles N., eds., Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1994)Google Scholar

Brower, Charles N., The Global Court: The Internationalization of Commercial Adjudication and Arbitration, 26 U. Balt. L. Rev.9, 11 (1997)Google Scholar

Lerner, Renee Lettow, International Pressure to Harmonize: The U.S. Civil Justice System in an Era of Global Trade, 2001 B.Y.U.L. Rev.229, 245 (2001)Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 100CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, Ernest A., Institutional Settlement in a Globalizing Judicial System, 54 Duke L. J.1143, 1193–94 (2005)Google Scholar

Liptak, Adam, “Review of U.S. Rulings by NAFTA Tribunals Stirs Worries,” New York Times, Apr. 18, 2004, 20Google Scholar

Dhooge, Lucien F., The Revenge of the Trail Smelter: Environmental Regulation as Expropriation Pursuant to the North American Free Trade Agreement, 38 Am. Bus. L. J.475, 478–79 (2001)CrossRef Google Scholar

Moyers, Bill, “Talking Trade in Secret,” Washington Post, Feb. 23, 2002, A19Google Scholar

Sierra, Javier, “Congress Should Say No to a New Trade Pact,” Scripps Howard News Service, May 20, 2005Google Scholar

Krueger, Dana, Note: The Combat Zone: Mondev International, Ltd. v. United States and the Backlash against NAFTA Chapter 11, 21 B.U. Int'l L. J.399, 423 (2003)Google Scholar

Atik, Jeffery, Repenser NAFTA Chapter 11: A Catalogue of Legitimacy Critiques, 3 Asper Rev. Int'l Bus. & Trade L.215, 220 (2003)Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, Transnational/Domestic Constitutional Law, 37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev.239, 254 (2003)Google Scholar

Gantz, David A., International Decision: Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada, 97 Am. J. Int'l L.937, 949–50 (2003)CrossRef Google Scholar

Bjorklund, Andrea K., NAFTA Chapter 11: Contract without Privity: Sovereign Offer and Investor Acceptance, 2 Chi. J. Int'l L.183, 186 (2001)Google Scholar

MacArthur, David, Comment & Note: NAFTA Chapter 11: On an Environmental Collision Course with the World Bank?, 2003 Utah L. Rev.913, 930 (2003)Google Scholar

Bhala, Raj, The Myth about Stare Decisis and International Trade Law (Part One of a Trilogy), 14 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev.845, 847–48 (1999)Google Scholar

Bhala, Raj, The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part Two of a Trilogy), 9 J. Transnt'l L & Pol.1, 3–4 (1999)Google Scholar

Bhala, Raj, The Power of the Past: Towards De Jure Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part Three of a Trilogy), 33 George Wash. Int'l L. Rev.873 (2001)Google Scholar

Franck, Susan D., International Decision: Occidental Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Rep. of Ecuador, 99 Am. J. Int'l L.675, 678–79 (2005)CrossRef Google Scholar