Book contents
- Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems
- Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- General Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Background
- Part II Integrative Approaches for Sustainability Assessment
- 6 A Mixed-Method, Dialogue-Based Approach to Sustainability Assessments: Fostering Learning for Sustainable Development
- 7 Sustainability Assessment: Integrative Concept, Methodology, and Examples
- 8 Sustainability Solution Spaces
- 9 Assessing Urban Sustainability through Participatory Multi-Criteria Approaches (PMCAs): An Updated Comparative Analysis
- Part III Perspectives on Urban Sustainability
- Part IV Focal Points of Urban Sustainability
- Index
- References
6 - A Mixed-Method, Dialogue-Based Approach to Sustainability Assessments: Fostering Learning for Sustainable Development
from Part II - Integrative Approaches for Sustainability Assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2020
Book contents
- Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems
- Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- General Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Background
- Part II Integrative Approaches for Sustainability Assessment
- 6 A Mixed-Method, Dialogue-Based Approach to Sustainability Assessments: Fostering Learning for Sustainable Development
- 7 Sustainability Assessment: Integrative Concept, Methodology, and Examples
- 8 Sustainability Solution Spaces
- 9 Assessing Urban Sustainability through Participatory Multi-Criteria Approaches (PMCAs): An Updated Comparative Analysis
- Part III Perspectives on Urban Sustainability
- Part IV Focal Points of Urban Sustainability
- Index
- References
Summary
Given the persistent challenges of governing natural resources sustainably, there is an urgent need for comprehensive sustainability assessments that enable holistic understanding of current and future development scenarios. To spur necessary action, these assessments must also foster joint learning among multiple stakeholders. In this chapter, we present the ‘Sustainability Wheel’, a mixed-method, dialogue-based approach for assessing the sustainability of resource governance systems. The approach combines the transparent identification of general sustainability principles, the regional contextualisation of these as subprinciples/indicators, and the scoring of the indicators based on deliberative dialogue in interdisciplinary teams, drawing on shared knowledge and understandings. Using the approach to examine sustainable water governance in the Swiss Alps, we demonstrate its effectiveness in integrating multiple perspectives, including those deriving from qualitative and quantitative research, and in facilitating communication with stakeholders. Furthermore, we explore its application to urban systems.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems , pp. 141 - 160Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E.L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15, 77–86.Google Scholar
ASCE, UNESCO (1998). Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. ASCE, Reston.Google Scholar
Babel, M., Pandey, V., Rivas, A., & Wahid, S. (2011). Indicator-based approach for assessing the vulnerability of freshwater resources in the Bagmati River Basin, Nepal. Environmental Management 48, 1044–1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binder, C. R, Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, R. (2020). System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–64.Google Scholar
Bonriposi, M. (2013). Les usages de l’eau dans la région de Crans-Montana-Sierre: description, quantification et prévisions (Doctoral thesis). University of Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
CH2011 (2011). Les scénarios du changement climatique en Suisse CH2011. www.ch2011.ch (accessed 08.05.2012).Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, L. (2006). Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: A conceptual development. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 813–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of Justice: Re-imagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24, 170–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, P. H. (1998). Water in crisis: Paths to sustainable water use. Ecological Applications, 8, 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., et al. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13, 459–471.Google Scholar
Hartmuth, G., Huber, K., & Rink, D. (2008). Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level. Sustainable Development, 16, 261–270.Google Scholar
Hill, M. (2013). Climate Change and Water Governance: Adaptive Capacity in Chile and Switzerland. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Ioris, A. A. R., Hunter, C., & Walker, S. (2008). The development and application of water management sustainability indicators in Brazil and Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1190–1201.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. DOI:http://10.1177/1558689806298224.Google Scholar
Kondratyev, S., Gronskaya, T., Ignatieva, N., Blinova, I., Telesh, I., & Yefremova, L. (2002). Assessment of present state of water resources of Lake Ladoga and its drainage basin using sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, 2, 79–92.Google Scholar
Lachavanne, B., & Juge, R. (2009). LEMANO. Pour une gestion durable de l’eau. Lémaniques, 72, 1–16.Google Scholar
Larson, K. L., Wiek, A., & Withycombe Keeler, L. (2013). A comprehensive sustainability appraisal of water governance in Phoenix, AZ. Journal of Environmental Management, 116, 58–71.Google Scholar
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013). Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 416–427.Google Scholar
McDonald, D., Bammer, G., & Deane, P. (2009). Research Integration Using Dialogue Methods. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). The value-loadedness of sustainability: Implications for the transformative potential of sustainability assessments. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino-Saum, A. (2020). Assessing sustainability through participatory multi-criteria approaches (PMCAs): An updated comparative analysis. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–238.Google Scholar
Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 18. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss11/art18/.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.Google Scholar
Reed, P. M., & Kasprzyk, J. (2009). Water resources management: The myth, the wicked, and the future. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 135, 411–413.Google Scholar
Reynard, E., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., et al. (2014.) Interdisciplinary assessment of complex regional water systems and their future evolution: How socio-economic drivers can matter more than climate. WIREs Water, 1, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rixen, C., Stoeckli, V., & Ammann, W. (2003). Does artificial snow production affect soil and vegetation of ski pistes? A review. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 5, 219–230.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., & Homewood, C. (2013). Exploring water governance arrangements in the Swiss Alps from the perspective of adaptive capacity. Mountain Research and Development, 33, 225–233.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., & Rist, S. (2014). Envisioning sustainable water futures in a transdisciplinary learning process: combining normative, explorative, and participatory scenario approaches. Sustainability Science 9, 1–19.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., et al. (2015). Assessing the sustainability of water governance systems: The sustainability wheel. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 1577–1600.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., Kläy, A., Zimmermann, A., Buser, T., Ingalls, M., & Messerli, P. How Can Science Support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development? Four Tasks to Deal with the Normative Dimension of Sustainability. Sustainability Science, 1–12.Google Scholar
Shen, L.-Y., Jorge Ochoa, J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators: A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35, 17–29.Google Scholar
Sullivan, C., & Meigh, J. (2007). Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales. Water Resources Management, 21, 111–128.Google Scholar
Tompkins, E. L., & Adger, W. (2004). Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecology and Society, 9, 10. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss12/art10.Google Scholar
Turcu, C. (2013). Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 695–719.Google Scholar
Valenzuela Montes, L. M., & Matarán Ruiz, A. (2008). Environmental indicators to evaluate spatial and water planning in the coast of Granada (Spain). Land Use Policy, 25, 95–105.Google Scholar
WCED. (1987). Our Common Future (“The Brundtland Report”). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Larson, K. (2012). Water, People, and Sustainability: A systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resources Management, 26, 3153–3171.Google Scholar
Ziegler, R., & Ott, K. (2011). The quality of sustainability science: A philosophical perspective. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 7, 31–44.Google Scholar