Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:06:39.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The internal eye position signal, psychophysics, and neurobiology

from Part I - Time–space during action: perisaccadic mislocalization and reaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2010

Romi Nijhawan
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Beena Khurana
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Summary

“Real-time sensorimotor control requires the sampling and manipulation not only of parameters representing space but also of those representing time. In particular, when the system itself has inherent processing delays, it invites a situation in which sampled parameters from a peripheral sensor may no longer be valid at the time they are to be used, due to the change in state that took place during the processing delay” (Dominey et al. 1997). In this chapter, we focus on the situation in which a visual stimulus is flashed near the time of a saccade, and the subject's task is to orient the eyes toward the site where the stimulus has been. To perform this task in complete darkness, the subject's brain has to rely on only two signals: retinal error signal and internal eye position signal (iEPS). This is one of the most interesting situations in which the brain has to compute something in the face of specific physical odds (e.g., very long latencies), and we have some hints on how it proceeds. We analyze the time course of the iEPS – which appears quite distorted – using electrical stimulation of brain structures, instead of natural visual stimuli, to provide the goal to be localized. Different hypotheses are then discussed regarding the possible source and possible neural correlate of the iEPS.

Although vision is usually thought of as a continuous process – continuous in space and time – it is periodically interrupted by rapid eye movements called saccades.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bischof, N., & Kramer, E. (1968). Untersuchungen und Überlegungen zur Richtungswahrnehmung bei willkürlichen sakkadischen Augenbewegung. Psychologische Forschung 32: 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockisch, C., & Miller, J. M. (1999). Different motor systems use similar damped extraretinal eye position information. Vision Res 39: 1025–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boucher, L., Groh, J. M., & Hughes, H. C. (2001). Afferent delays and the localization of perisaccadic stimuli. Vision Res 41: 2631–2644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dassonville, P., Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (1992a). Oculomotor localization relies on a damp representation of saccadic eye displacement in human and nonhuman primates. Visual Neuroscience 9: 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dassonville, P., Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (1992b). The frontal eye field provides the goal of saccadic eye movement. Exp Brain Res 89: 300–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dassonville, P., Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (1995). The use of exocentric and egocentric location cues in saccadic programming. Vision Res 35: 2191–2199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deubel, H., Bridgeman, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2004). Different effects of eye blinks and target blanking on saccadic suppression of displacement. Perception & Psychophysics 66: 772–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, M. R., Ross, J., & Morrone, M. C. (2000). Extraretinal control of saccadic suppression. J Neurosci 20: 3449–3455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, R. (1900). Visual perception during eye movement. Physiol Rev 7: 454–465.Google Scholar
Dominey, P. F., Schlag, J., Schlag-Rey, M., & Arbib, M. A. (1997). Colliding saccades evoked by frontal eye field stimulaton: artifact or evidence for a compensatory mechanism underlying double-step saccades? Biol Cybern 76: 41–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992). The updating of the visual representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 255: 90–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüsser, O.-J., Krizic, A., & Weiss, L.-R. (1987). After-image movement during saccades in the dark. Vision Res 27: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, P. E., & Lightstone, A. D. (1976). Saccadic eye movements due to stimuli triggered during prior saccades. Vision Res 16: 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, R. M., & Skavenski, A. A. (1985). Accuracy of spatial localization near the time of saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 25: 1077–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honda, H. (1989). Perceptual localization of visual stimuli flashed during saccades. Perception & Psychophysics 45: 162–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honda, H. (1990). Eye movements to a visual stimulus flashed before, during, or after a saccade. In M., Jeannerod (ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control (567–582). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jeffries, S. M., Kusunoki, M., Cohen, I. S., & Goldberg, M. E. (2003). Localization errors in double-step saccade task are qualitatively explained by peri-saccadic response patterns in lip. Soc Neurosci Abstr 386: 13.Google Scholar
Kanai, R., Sheth, B. R., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Stopping the motion and sleughting the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization. Vision Res 44: 2605–2619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krekelberg, B., Kubischik, M., Hoffman, K.-P., & Bremmer, F. (2003). Neural correlates of visual localization and perisaccadic mislocalization. Neuron 37: 537–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusonoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (2003). The time course of perisaccadic receptive field shifts in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 89: 1519–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. F., Gaymard, B. M., & Tamargo, R. J. (1998). Efference copy provides the eye position required for visually guided reaching. J Neurophysiol 80: 1605–1608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateeff, S. (1978). Saccadic eye movements and localization of visual stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 24: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matin, L., & Pearce, D. G. (1965). Visual perception of direction for stimuli flashed during voluntary saccadic eye movement. Science 148: 1485–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostendorf, F., Fischer, C., Gaymard, B., & Ploner, C. J. (2006). Perisaccadic mislocalization without saccadic eye movements. Neuroscience 137: 737–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, J., Schlag-Rey, M., & Schlag, J. (2006). Frames of reference for saccadic command, tested by saccade collision in supplementary eye field. J Neurophysiol 95: 159–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pola, J. (1976). Voluntary saccades, eye position, and perceptive visual direction. In R. A., Monty & J. H., Senders (eds.), Eye Movements and Psychological Processes (245–254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pola, J. (2004). Models of the mechanism underlying perceived location of perisaccadic flash. Vision Res 44: 2799–2813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, D. A. (1972). Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. Vision Res 12: 1795–1808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, J., Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. C. (1997). Apparent position of visual targets during real and simulated saccadic eye movements. Nature 386: 598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, P. H., True, S. D., & Conway, J. L. (1979). Paired stimulation of the frontal eye fields and the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 179: 162–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (1987). Does microstimulation evoke fixed-vector saccades by generating their vector or by specifying their goal? Exp Brain Res 68: 442–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (1991). Spatial programming of eye movements. In J., Paillard (ed.), Brain and Space (70–78). Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperling, G. (1990). Comparison of perception in the moving and stationary eye. In E., Kowler (ed.), Eye Movements and Their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes (307–351). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stanford, T. R., Carney, L. H., & Sparks, D. L. (1990). The amplitude of visually guided saccades is specified gradually in humans. Soc Neurosci Abstr 16: 372–419.Google Scholar
Vliegen, J., van Groetel, T. J., & van Opstal, J. (2005). Gaze orienting in dynamic visual double steps. J Neurophysiol. 94: 4300–4313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×