Book contents
- Solidarity and Justice in Health and Social Care
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Solidarity and Justice in Health and Social Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Solidarity
- 2 The Origins of Solidarity as a Sociological Concept
- 3 Solidarity and Justice
- 4 Solidarity and Individual Responsibility in Dutch Health Care
- 5 Family Solidarity and Informal Care
- 6 Why We Need Solidarity
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2017
Book contents
- Solidarity and Justice in Health and Social Care
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Solidarity and Justice in Health and Social Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Solidarity
- 2 The Origins of Solidarity as a Sociological Concept
- 3 Solidarity and Justice
- 4 Solidarity and Individual Responsibility in Dutch Health Care
- 5 Family Solidarity and Informal Care
- 6 Why We Need Solidarity
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Solidarity and Justice in Health and Social Care , pp. 187 - 201Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abel, E. (1991). Who Cares for the Elderly? Public Policy and the Experiences of Adult Daughters. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Akker, P. van den, Luijkx, K. (2004). De mantelzorgontvanger. Wederkerigheid als complicerende factor. In: Knipscheer, K., ed., Dilemma’s in de Mantelzorg. Utrecht: NIZW Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Alzheimer’s Society. (2014). Dementia Report 2014. London: Alzheimer’s society. Available at: www.alzheimers.org.uk. [Accessed 7 Oct. 2016].Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1995). Translator’s Introduction. In: Honneth, A., ed., The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflict. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. x–xxi.Google Scholar
Aneshensel, C.S., Pearlin, L.I., Schuler, R.H. (1993). Stress, role captivity and the cessation of caregiving. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(1), pp. 54–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arber, S., Attias-Donfut, C., eds. (2000). The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakker, H. (2001). Ontspoorde Zorg: Overbelasting en Ontsporing in Mantelzorg aan Ouderen. Utrecht: Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn.Google Scholar
Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomée, Y., Maarse, J. (2006). Health insurance reform in the Netherlands. EuroHealth, 12(2), pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1998). Leven met Veranderlijkheid, Verscheidenheid en Onzekerheid. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z., Galecki, L. (2005). The unwinnable war: an interview with Zygmunt Bauman. Open Democracy, 2 December 2005. Available at: www.opendemocracy.net/globalization-vision_reflections/modernity_3082.jsp [Accessed 10 Oct. 2016].Google Scholar
Bayertz, K. (1999). Four uses of ‘solidarity’. In: Bayertz, K., ed., Solidarity: Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T., Childress, J. (2012). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2007). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Reprint of the 1992 Edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Beecher, J. (1986). Charles Fourier: The Visionary and His World. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American life. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bellah, R.N. (1998). Community properly understood: a defence of ‘democratic communitarianism’. In: Etzioni, A., ed., The Essential Communitarian Reader. Lanham: Rowham & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 15–19.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bergmark, A., Lindberg, E., Thorslund, M. (2001). Solidarity and Care in Sweden. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, E. (1899). Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozialdemokratie. Stuttgart: J.H.W. Dietz.Google Scholar
Bioethics (2012). Special issue: the role of solidarity in bioethics. Bioethics, 26(7), pp. ii–iv, 343–394.Google Scholar
Boer, A. De, Timmermans, J. (2007). Blijvend in Balans Een Toekomstverkenning van Informele Zorg. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Boer, A. de, ed. (2007). Toekomstverkenning Informele Zorg. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Boer, A. de, Kooiker, S. (2012). Zorg. In: Veldheer, V., Jonker, J-J., van Noije, L. & Vroman, C., eds., Een Beroep op de Burger: Minder Verzorgingsstaat, Meer Eigen Verantwoordelijkheid? Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 2012. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, pp. 140–160.Google Scholar
Boer, A. de, Klerk, M. de (2013). Informele Zorg in Nederland Een Literatuurstudie Naar Mantelzorg en Vrijwilligerswerk in de Zorg. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Boorse, Ch. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science, 44(4), pp. 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L. (1896). Solidarité. Paris: Armand Colin. Available at: http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/bourgeois_leon/solidarite/bourgeois_solidarite.pdf [Accessed 9 July 2015].Google Scholar
Broek, Th. van den (2016). Langdurige zorg in Nederland: beleid en publieke opinie. Demos, 32(1), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Bussemaker, J. (1993). Betwiste Zelfstandigheid: Individualisering, Sekse en Verzorgingsstaat. Amsterdam: SUA.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. (1988). What Kind of Life: The Limits of Medical Progress. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. (2003). Individual good and common good: a communitarian approach to bioethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(4), pp. 496–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callahan, D. (2008). Europe and the United States: contrast and convergence. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33, pp. 280–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A., Jones, S. (2001). The historical and philosophical background of ‘solidarity’ in UK social welfare. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Care Quality Commission (2016). The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England 2015/16. London: Care Quality Commission. Available at: www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20161013b_stateofcare1516_web.pdf [Accessed 14 October 2016].Google Scholar
Carrera, F., Pavolini, E., Ranci, C., Sabbatini, A. (2014). Long-term care systems in comparative perspective: care needs, informal and formal coverage, and social impacts in European countries. In: Ranzi, C., Pavolini, E., eds., Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts. Dordrecht: Springer Press, pp. 23–52.Google Scholar
Carers UK (2014). State of caring 2014. Policy briefing May 2014. London: Carers UK. Available at: www.carersuk.org/for-professionals/policy/policy-library/state-of-caring-2014. [Accessed 13 October 2016].Google Scholar
Carers UK (2015). Facts about Carers: Policy Briefing October 2015. London: Carers UK. Available at: www.carersuk.org/for-professionals/policy/policy-library/facts-about-carers-2015. [Accessed 25 October 2016].Google Scholar
CEG (2004). Mantelzorg, Kostenbeheersing en Eigen Verantwoordelijkheid: Signalering Ethiek en Gezondheid. Den Haag/Zoetermeer: Centrum voor Ethiek en Gezondheid, pp.127–151.Google Scholar
Centesimus Annus (1991). Encyclical Letter from Pope John Paul II to his Venerable Brother Bishops in the Episcopate the Priests and Deacons, Families of Men and Women Religious, all the Christian Faithful, and to all Men and Women of Good Will on the Hundredth Anniversary of Rerum Novarum. Rome: Vatican. Available at: http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus.html. [Accessed 23 Sept 2016].Google Scholar
Chadwick, R. (1999). Genetics, choice and responsibility. Health, Risk & Society, 1, pp. 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, R., Berg, K. (2001). Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Review Genetics, 2/4, pp. 318–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Mercier, J., Tjadens, F. (2011). Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care. OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Companje, K.-P., Hendriks, R., Verachtert, K., Widdershoven, B. (2009). Two Centuries of Solidarity: German, Belgian and Dutch Social Health Insurance 1770–2008. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (1976 [1832–1842]). Cours de Philosophie Positive. In: Thompson, K., Auguste Comte: The Foundation of Sociology. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Comte, A.(1998 [1825/1826]). Considerations on the Spiritual Power. In: Jones, H.S., Auguste Comte: Early Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, N. (1985). Just Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, N. (2007). Just Health. Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R., Ives, J., Dunn, M. (2015). A Systematic Review of Empirical Bioethics Methodology. BMC Medical Ethics, 16:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, J. (1996). Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism after Identity Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (1999). Caring about Carers: A National Strategy for Carers. London: HM Government Crown Office.Google Scholar
Dickenson, D. (2013). Me Medicine vs We Medicine: Reclaiming Biotechnology for the Common Good. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donzelot, J. (1994). L’Invention du social: Essai sur le déclin des passions politiques. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Doran, K. (1996). Solidarity: A Synthesis of Personalism and Communalism in the Thought of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II. New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Dorr, D. (1983). Option for the Poor: A Hundred Years of Vatican Social Teaching. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar
Duijnstee, M. A., Van den Dungen, A., Cuijpers, P., Maliepaard, R. (1998). The Role, the Burden and the Support of Informal Care. In: Schrijvers, A.J.P., ed., Health and Health Care in the Netherlands. A Critical Self-Assessment by Dutch Experts in the Medical and Health Sciences. Maarssen: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom, pp. 20–32.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1889). Ferdinand Tonnies. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Abhandlung des Communismus und des Socialismus als empirischer Cultur-formen. Leipzig, 1887: xxx–294. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 27, pp. 416–422. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/41075054. [Accessed 26 February 2015].Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1972). Selected Writings. Edited with an Introduction by Anthony Giddens. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1972 [1925]). L’Éducation morale: Cours de sociologie dispensé à la Sorbonne en 1902–1903. Avertissement de Paul Fauconnet. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (2014 [1893]). The Division of Labor in Society. Translation by Hall, W.D.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part I: equality of welfare; part II: equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10(3/4), pp. 185–246; 283–345.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P.A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T.C.M., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C., Mulder, C.H. (2006). Family Solidarity in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.Google Scholar
Ederer, R.J. (1991). Heinrich Pesch, solidarity and social encyclicals. Review of Social Economy, 49(4), pp. 596–610. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/29769586. [Accessed 21 April 2015].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, H.T. (1974). The disease of masturbation: values and the concept of disease. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 48(2), pp. 234–248.Google ScholarPubMed
Engelhardt, H.T. (1986). The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1998). Introduction. In: Etzioni, A., ed, The Essential Communitarian Reader. Lanham: Rowham & Littlefield Publishers, pp. ix–xxiv.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2015). Statistics explained. Mortality and life expectancy statistics. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Mortality_and_life_expectancy_statistics. [Accessed 4 April 2016].Google Scholar
Fokkema, T., Bekke, S. ter, Dykstra, P.A. (2008). Solidarity between Parents and Their Adult Children in Europe: Report Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demography Institute. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Academie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
Fries, J. (1980). Ageing, natural death and the compression of morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine, 303(3), pp. 130–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, J. (2005). The compression of morbidity. Milbank Quarterly, 83(4), pp. 801–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garland, M. (1993). Grenzen stellen aan de gezondheidszorg. Ervaringen uit Oregon. In: ter Meulen, R., ten Have, H., eds., Samen kiezen in de zorg. Het voorbeeld Oregon. Baarn: Ambo, pp. 34–64.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1971). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1972). Introduction: Durkheim’s writings in sociology and social philosophy. In: Emile Durkheim, Selected writings: Edited with an Introduction by Anthony Giddens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gide, Ch. (2010). Solidarité. Les œuvres de Charles Gide Volume XI. Textes présentés et annotés par Patrice Devillers. Serie Phiolosophie Sciences Politiques. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Goldsteen, M., Abma, T., Oeseburg, B., Verkerk, M., Verhey, F., Widdershoven, G. (2007). What is it to be a daughter? Identities under pressure in dementia care. Bioethics, 21(1), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Government Committee on Choices in Health Care (1992). Choices in Health Care. Rijswijk: Ministry of Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs.Google Scholar
Große Kracht, H.-J., Karcher, T., Spieß, Ch., eds. (2007). Das System des Solidarismus. Zur Auseinandersetzung mit dem Werk von Heinrich Pesch SJ. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Große Kracht, H.-J.(2007). Zwischen Soziologie und Metaphysik. Zur Solidarismus-Konzeption von Heinrich Pesch SJ. In: Große Kracht, H.-J., Karcher, T., Spieß, Ch., eds., Das System des Solidarismus. Zur Auseinandersetzung mit dem Werk von Heinrich Pesch SJ. Berlin: LIT Verlag, pp. 59–89.Google Scholar
Gruenberg, E.M. (1977). The failures of success. Milbank Memorial Quarterly/Health and Society, 55(1), pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989). De nieuwe onoverzichtelijkheid en andere opstellen. Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar
Hansen, J., Arts, W., Muffels, R. (2005a). Wie komt eerst? Een vignetonderzoek naar de solidariteitsbeleving van Nederlanders met patiënten en cliënten in de gezondheidszorg. Sociale Wetenschappen, 48 (1/2), pp. 31–60.Google Scholar
Hansen, J., Arts, W., Muffels, R. (2005b). Solidair tegen (w)elke prijs? Een quasi-experimenteel onderzoek naar de voorkeuren van Nederlanders voor ruimere of beperkter paketten in de zorgverzekering. Sociale Wetenschappen, 48 (1/2), pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
Harris, A.L. (1946). The Scholastic Revival: the Economics of Heinrich Pesch. Journal of Political Economy, 54, pp. 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattinga Verschure, J.C.M. (1972). Ontwikkeling van zorgcriteria voor herstructurering van de gezondheidszorg. Het Ziekenhuis, 2, pp. 500–504.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (2012 [1944]). The Road to Serfdom: Condensed Version with Contributions by John Blundell, Edwin J. Feulner and Walter E. Williams. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Hayward, J.E.S. (1959). Solidarity: the social history of an idea in nineteenth century France. International Review of Social History, 4(2), pp. 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, J.E.S. (1961). The official social philosophy of the French Third Republic: Léon Bourgeois and solidarism. International Review of Social History, 6(1), pp. 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
HM Government (2008). Carers at the heart of 21st-Century Families and Communities. London: HM Government, Crown Office.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogervorst, H. (2004). Speech on the OECD Conference Paris, May 13, 2004. Available at: www.minvws.nl. [Accessed 23 February 2016].Google Scholar
Horst, A. van der, Erp, F. van, Jong, J. de (2011). Zorg blijft groeien. Financiering onder druk. CPB Policy Brief /Trends in Gezondheid en Zorg. 2011/11. Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau.Google Scholar
Horst, A. van der, Rele, H. ter (2013). Solidariteit onder druk. Zorg op maat heeft de toekomst. CPB Policy Brief 2013/01. Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau.Google Scholar
Houtepen, R., Meulen, R. ter (2000a). New types of solidarity in the European welfare state. Health Care Analysis, 8, pp. 329–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houtepen, R., Meulen, R. ter (2000b). The expectations of solidarity: matters of justice, responsibility and identity in the reconstruction of the health care system. Health Care Analysis, 8, pp. 355–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houtepen, R., Meulen, R. ter, Widdershoven, G. (2001). Beyond justice and moralism; modernity and solidarity in the health care system. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity and Health Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtepen, R., Meulen, R. ter (2001). Personal budgets for the elderly: a case study in Dutch solidarity. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity and Health Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, R., Thorlby, R., Holder, H., Hall, P., Charles, A. (2016). Social Care for Older People: Home Truths. London: Kings Fund and Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
Illingworth, P., Parmet, W. (2012). Solidarity for Global Health. Bioethics, 26(7), pp. ii–iv.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Independer (2016). Overstapmonitor Available at: www.independer.nl/zorgverzekering/info/overstapmonitor.aspx. [Accessed 18 February 2016].Google Scholar
Ionescu, G. ed. (1976). The Political Thought of Saint-Simon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, R. (2001). Solidarity and Indifference. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, B. (1990). Grassroots bioethics revisited: health care priorities and community values. Special supplement. Hastings Center Report, 20(5), p. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeurissen, P. (2005). Houdbare solidariteit in de gezondheidszorg. Zoetermeer: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., Cullen, L. (2001). Solidarity and care in the United Kingdom. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H.S. (1998). Auguste Comte. Early political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kautsky, K. (1910). Ethik und materialistische Geschichtsauffassung. Stuttgart: J.H.W. Dietz.Google Scholar
Kloosterman, R. (2011). Solidariteit in de zorg. Bevolkingstrends, derde kwartaal 2011. Den Haag: CBS Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
Knipscheer, K. (1992). Demografische veranderingen en het zorgvermogen van de samenleving. In: van Nimwegen, N., de Jong Gierveld, J., eds., De demografische uitdaging: Nederland in Europa op weg naar de 21ste eeuw. Houten/Zaventem: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, pp. 89–107.Google Scholar
Knipscheer, K., ed. (2004). Dilemma’s in de Mantelzorg. Utrecht: NIZW Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn.Google Scholar
Komter, A., Burgers, J., Engbersen, G. eds. (2000). Het cement van de samenleving. Een verkennende studie naar solidariteit en cohesie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Komter, A. (2005). Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kooiker, S., Klerk, M. de. (2012). Meebetalen aan de zorg. Nederlanders over solidariteit en betaalbare zorg. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureeel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Künneman, H., Rein, M. (1999). There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19(1), pp. 93–12.Google Scholar
Kuyper, M.B. (1993). Op de achtergrond. Een onderzoek naar de problemen van partners met een chronische ziekte. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laborem excercens (1981). Encyclical of Pope John Paul II to His Venerable Brothers in the Episcopate to the Priests to the Religious Families, to the sons and daughters of the Church, and to all Men and Women of good will, on Human Work on the ninetieth anniversary of Rerum Novarum. Rome: Vatican. Available at: w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091981_laborem-exercens.html. [Accessed 23 Sept. 2016].Google Scholar
Lafortune, G., Balestat, G. (2007). Trends in Severe Disability among Elderly People: Assessing the Evidence in 12 OECD Countries and the Future Implications. OECD Working Paper 26. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Lasch, Ch. (1979). The Culture of Narcissism. American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Leroux, P. (1840). De l’Humanité, de son principe et de son avenir, où se trouve exposeé la vraie definition de la religion et où l’on explique le sens, la suite et l’enchaînement du mosaïsme et du christianisme. Published by le CDI Alsacienne. Available at: http://gallica.bnf.fr. [Accessed 9 July 2015].Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975). The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2014). Introduction to this edition. In: Durkheim, E., The Division of Labor in Society, New York: Free Press, pp. xxv–xlvi.Google Scholar
Lycke, S. van der, Morée, M. (2004). De mantelzorger. Over gevangen zitten en grenzen stellen. In: Knipscheer, K., ed., Dilemma’s in de mantelzorg. Utrecht: NIZW Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
Maarse, H., Paulus, A. (2003). Has solidarity survived? A comparative analysis of the effect of social health insurance reform in four European countries. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28(4), pp. 585–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maarse, H. (2004a). The changing balance between public and private in health care: an introduction. In: Maarse, H., ed., Privatisation in European Health Care: A Comparative Analysis in Eight Countries. Maarssen: Elsevier, pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
Maarse, H. (2004b). Towards a comparative analysis of privatisation in European health care. In: Maarse, H., ed., Privatisation in European Health Care: A Comparative Analysis in Eight Countries. Maarssen: Elsevier, pp. 169–198.Google Scholar
Maarse, H., Meulen, R. ter (2006). Consumer choice in Dutch health insurance after reform. Health Care Analysis, 14, pp. 37–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maarse, H., Groot, W. (2008). Productinnovatie en arbeidsproductiviteit in de zorg. Economisch-statistische Berichten, Jaargang 90, nr 4452.Google Scholar
Maarse, H., Jeurissen, P. (2015). The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands. Health Policy, 120(3), pp. 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maarse, H., Meulen, R. ter (2006). Consumer choice in Dutch health insurance after reform. Health Care Analysis, 14, pp. 37–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maarse, H., Okma, K. (2004). The privatisation paradox in Dutch health care. In: Maarse, H., ed., Privatisation in European Health Care: A Comparative Analysis in Eight Countries. Maarssen: Elsevier, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Maarse, H., Jeurissen, P., Ruwaard, D. (2016). Results of the market-oriented reform in the Netherlands. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 11(2), pp. 161–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Made, J., van der, Meulen, R. ter, Burg, M. van den (2001). Solidarity and care in the Netherlands. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds. Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, A. (2002). The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, A. (2010). On Compromise and Rotten Compromises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marken, S. (2016). U.S. Uninsured Rate at 11.0%, Lowest in Eight-Year Trend. Gallup Poll. Available at: www.gallup.com [Accessed 7 October 2016].Google Scholar
Mater et Magistra (1961). Encyclical of Pope John XXIII on Christianity and Social Progress. Rome: Vatican. Available at: w2.vatican.va/content/john-xxiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_15051961_mater.html. [Accessed 23 September 2016].Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (2011 [1925]). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchanges in Archaic Societies. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G.H. (1970 [1934]). Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist: Edited and with an Introduction by Charles W. Morris. 17th Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meulen, R. ter (1988). Ziel en zaligheid. De receptie van de psychologie en van de psychoanalyse onder de katholieken in Nederland 1900–1965. Nijmegen/Baarn: Ambo.Google Scholar
Meulen, R. ter (1993). Het Oregon health care plan: feiten en achtergronden. In: ter Meulen, R., ten Have, H., eds., Samen kiezen in de zorg. Het voorbeeld Oregon. Reeks Gezondheidsethiek No. 8. Baarn: Ambo, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
Meulen, R. ter (1995). Limiting solidarity in the Netherlands: a two-tier system on the way. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 20, pp. 637–646.Google Scholar
Meulen, R. ter (2000). Solidarity in health care. In: Derkse, W., van der Lans, J., Waanders, S., eds., In Quest of Humanity in an Globalising World: Dutch Contributions to the Jubilee of Universities in Rome. Leende: Damon, pp. 92–103.Google Scholar
Meulen, R. ter (2008). Is rationing the inevitable consequence of medical advance? Journal of Medicine and Law, 27(1), pp. 71–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Meulen, R. ter (2011). How ‘decent’ is a decent minimum of healthcare? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36, pp. 612–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulen, R. ter (2015). Solidarity and justice in health care: a critical analysis of their relationship. Diametros, 43, pp. 1–20. Available at: www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/issue/view/45.Google Scholar
Meulen, R. ter (2016). Solidarity, justice and recognition of the other. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 37, pp. 517–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meulen, R. ter, Made, J. van der (2000). The extent and limits of solidarity in Dutch health care. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, pp. 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulen, R. ter, Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds. (2001). Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulen, R. ter, Arts, W., Muffels, R. (2001). Solidarity, health and social care in Europe. Introduction to the volume. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulen, R. ter, Maarse, H. (2003). De diagnose behandelings combinatie. Een gevaar voor de solidariteit? Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde en Ethiek, 13(1), pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
Meulen, R. ter, Maarse, H. (2008). Increasing individual responsibility in Dutch health care: Is solidarity losing ground? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33, pp. 262–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meulen, R. ter, Houtepen, R. (2012). Solidarity. In: Chadwick, R., ed., Encyclopaedia of Applied Ethics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulen, R. ter, Wright, K. (2012). Family solidarity and informal care: the case of people with dementia. Bioethics, 26 (7), pp. 361–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezzo (2013). Panel Een vandaag: Helft is bereid tot mantelzorg. Available at: www.mezzo.nl/pagina/voor-professionals/thema-s/cijfers-informele-zorg/resultaten-nationaal-mantelzorgpanel/panel-eenvandaag-helft-is-bereid-tot-mantelzorg. [Accessed 24 October 2016].Google Scholar
Mezzo (2015). Mantelzorger wel vaker gezien, maar niet gehoord. Available at: www.mezzo.nl/artikel/mantelzorger-wel-vaker-gezien-maar-niet-gehoord. [Accessed 24 October 2016].Google Scholar
Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2013). De doe-demokratie. Kabinetsnota ter stimulering van een vitale samenleving. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.Google Scholar
Monbiot, G. (2016). Neoliberalism. The ideology at the root of all our problems. The Guardian, April 15, 2016. Available at: www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot. [Accessed 23 September 2016].Google Scholar
Muffels, R., Verburg, R. (2001). Reforms in health and social care in Europe: the challenge to policy. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Th. (1989). Rawls on justice. In: Daniels, N., ed., Reading Rawls, 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Nell-Breuning, O. von (1978). Soziallehre der Kirche. Erlaüterungen der lehramtlichen Dokumente. Wien: Katholische Sozialakademie Österreichs.Google Scholar
NIZW (2004). Vergrijzing en informele zorg. The Hague: Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2009). Dementia: ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20, pp. 202–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015) Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2015-en. [Accessed 18 February 2016].Google Scholar
Oorschot, W. van (1998). Shared Identity and Shared Utility: On Solidarity and Its Motives. Tilburg: Tilburg Institute for Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Oorschot, W. van, Komter, A. (1998). What is it that ties? Theoretical perspectives on social bond. Sociale Wetenschappen, 41(3), pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
Oudijk, J., Boer, A. de, Woittiez, I., Timmermans, J., Klerk, M. (2010). Mantelzorg uit de doeken. Een actueel beeld van het aantal mantelzorgers. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Oudijk, D., Woittiez, I., Boer, A. de (2011). More family responsibility, more informal care? The effect of motivation on the giving of informal care by people over 50 in the Netherlands compared to other European countries. Health Policy, 101, pp. 228–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasini, N., Reichlin, M. (2001). Solidarity, citizenship and selective distributive justice in health care. In ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R., eds., Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Series Philosophy & Medicine Vol. 69. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peetom, K., Lexis, M., Joore, M., Dirksen, C. Witte, L. de (2016). The perceived burden of informal caregivers of independently living elderly and their ideas about possible solutions. A mixed methods approach. Technology and Disability, 28, pp. 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, A. (2016). This deadly debt spiral was meant to destroy the NHS. There is a way to stop it. The Guardian, 5 July 2016.Google Scholar
Pommer, E., Woittiez, I., Stevens, J. (2007). Comparing Care: The Care of the Elderly in Ten EU-Countries. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Prainsack, B., Buyx, A. (2011). Solidarity: Reflections on an Emerging Concept in Bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
Prainsack, B., Buyx, A. (2017). Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983). Securing Access to Health Care: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Printing Office.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putters, K. (2014). Rijk geschakeerd. Op weg naar de participatiesamenleving. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Quadragesiomo Anno. (1931). Encyclical of Pope Pius XI on Reconstruction of the Social Order to our Venerable Brethren. The Patriarchs, Primates, Archbishops, the Bishops, and Other Ordinaries, in Peace and Communion with the Apostolic See, and Likewise to all the Faithful in the Catholic World. Rome: Vatican. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20060902085107/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19310515_quadragesimo-anno_en.html. [Accessed 19 October 2016].Google Scholar
Ram Tiktin, E. (2012). The right to health care as a right to basic human functional capabilities. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(3), pp. 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranzi, C., Pavolini, E., eds. (2013). Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts. Dordrecht: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisz, G. (2007). Der solidarische Staat. Solidaritätsdeutungen in Deutschland und Frankreich und ihre politische Bedeutung heute. In: Große Kracht, H.-J., Karcher, T., Spieß, Ch., eds., Das System des Solidarismus. Zur Auseinandersetzung mit dem Werk von Heinrich Pesch SJ. Berlin: LIT Verlag, pp. 31–58.Google Scholar
RMO/RVZ. (1999). Zorgarbeid in de toekomst. Advies over de gevolgen van demografische ontwikkeling van vraag en aanbod zorg(arbeid). The Hague/Zoetermeer: Raad voor Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling/Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). Du Contrat Social. Paris: Garnier Flammarion. Available at: http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Rousseau_jj/contrat_social/Contrat_social.pdf. [Accessed at 17 October 2016].Google Scholar
RVZ Raad voor de Volksgezonheid en Zorg (1999). De trend, de traditie en de turbulentie. Zoetermeer: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg.Google Scholar
RVZ Raad voor de Volksgezonheid en Zorg (2002). Gezondheid en gedrag. Zoetermeer: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg.Google Scholar
RVZ Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg (2006). Zinnige en duurzame zorg. Zoetermeer: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg.Google Scholar
RVZ Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg (2007). Rechtvaardige en duurzame zorg. Zoetermeer: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg.Google Scholar
RVZ Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg (2013). Het belang van wederkerigheid…solidarteit gaat niet van zelf. Den Haag: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg.Google Scholar
Sadiraj, K., Timmermans, J., Ras, M., Boer, A. de (2009). De toekomst van de mantelzorg. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1984). Introduction. In: Sandel, M., ed., Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. ed. (1984). Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1990). Freedom of conscience or freedom of choice? In: Hunter, J., Guiness, O., eds., Articles of Faith, Articles of Peace. Washington: Brookings Institute, pp. 74–92.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuyt, C. (1998). The sharing of risks and the risks of sharing: solidarity and social justice in the welfare state. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1(3), pp. 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCP Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (2004). Verpleging en Verzorging Verklaard. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1990). Justice: means versus freedoms. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(2), pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
Soares, J., Barros, H., Torres-Gonzales, F., Ioannidi-Kapolou, E., Lamura, G., Lindert, J., Dios Luna, J. de, Macassa, G., Melchiorre, M.-G., Stankunas, M. (2010). Abuse and Health Among Elderly in Europe. Kaunos: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences.Google Scholar
Stjernø, S. (2004). Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swaan, A. de (1989). Zorg en de Staat. Welzijn, onderwijs en gezondheidszorg in Europa en de Verenigde Staten in de nieuwe tijd. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Swart, K.W. (1962). ‘Individualism’ in the mid-nineteenth century (1826–1860). Journal of the History of Ideas, 23(1), pp. 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykora, P. (2009). Altruism in medical donations reconsidered: the reciprocity approach. In: Steinmann, M., Sykora, P., Wiesing, U. eds., Altruism Reconsidered: Exploring New Approaches to Property in Human Tissue. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 13–49.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ch. (1984). Hegel: history and politics. In: Sandel, M., ed., Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York University Press, pp. 177–199.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ch. (1991). The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ch. (1997). Philosophical Arguments. 2nd Ed. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2011). Does risk society erode welfare state solidarity? Policy & Politics, 39(2), pp. 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (2016). Special Issue: Solidarity and Autonomy: Two Conflicting Values in English and French Health Care and Bioethics Debates? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 37(6), pp. 441–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, J., ed. (2003). Mantelzorg. Over de hulp aan mantelzorgers. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1970). The Gift Relationship. From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Toqueville, A. de (1984 [1835/1840]) Democracy in America: Specially Edited and Abridged for the Modern Reader by Richard D. Heffner. New York: Mentor (Penguin Putnam).Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Twenge, J.M., Foster, J.D. (2008). Mapping the scale of the narcissism epidemic: Increases in narcissism 2002–2007 within ethnic groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, pp. 1619–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K. (2009). The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Verburg, R., Meulen, R. ter (2005). Solidariteit of rechtvaardigheid in de zorg? Een spanningsveld. Sociale Wetenschappen, 48 (1/2), pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Verstraeten, J. (1998). De betekenis van solidariteit en subsidiariteit in kerkelijke documenten. Ethische Perspectieven, 8, pp. 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verstraeten, J. (2005). Solidariteit in de katholieke traditie. In: de Jong, E., Buijssen, M., eds., Solidariteit onder druk? Over de grens tussen individuele en collectieve verantwoordelijkheid. Annalen van het Thijmgenootschap 93(1). Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers, pp. 26–53.Google Scholar
Volkskrant (2015). Zorg via gemeenten kan tot vijf keer duurder uitvallen. Volkskrant, 22nd of December 2015.Google Scholar
Volkskrant (2016). Familierelaties zijn vaak te slecht voor mantelzorg. Volkskrant, 6th of February 2016.Google Scholar
Wal, G. van der (1988). Solidair, hoe en waarom? Over de betekenis van solidariteit bij de bekostiging van de gezondheidszorg. In: Jacobs, F., Van der Wal, G., eds, Medische schaarste en het menselijk tekort. Reeks Gezondheidsethiek No. 3. Baarn: Ambo, pp. 79–111.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1984). Justice and the good. In: Sandel, M., ed., Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: New York University Press, pp. 200–218.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1920 [1904/1905]). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20 Band, Heft 1, 1–54; 21 Band, Heft 1, pp. 1–110; Edited and re-published in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Band 1, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 17–206.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2012 [1947]). The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. Translated by A.M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. Edited with an Introduction by Talcott Parsons. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. (1998). Fairness, respect and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27(2), pp. 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I.M. (1997). Intersecting Voices. Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar