10 - War
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2020
By
Summary
Chapter 10 describes the curious case of the social science of war, which shed its social problem framing in the early postwar era. From the interwar years through to the late 1940s, war was a public-facing problem whose solution-the eradication of armed conflict-seemed within reach for many social scientists and their internationalist allies. Quincy Wright's magisterial and multi-disciplinary 1942 A Study of War exemplified the social-scientific ambition to foster peace through an expert-guided world order. The Cold War, however, abruptly stalled war's brief career as a social problem. The Soviet threat, and the national security state erected in response, helped to reframe the social science of war in management terms. For the next two decades most social scientists of war-though split on methodology and approach-hitched their study to the Cold War struggle. By the late 1960s the Vietnam debacle had implicated Defense-sponsored work on counter-insurgency and psychological warfare, leading to a public backslash against military entanglements. Many social scientists abandoned the study of war in Vietnam's wake, ceding the domain to political science in general and international relations in particular. The result was a social science of war that remained, into the 1980s, centered on statecraft and security.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Society on the EdgeSocial Science and Public Policy in the Postwar United States, pp. 358 - 385Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Amadae, S. M. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Amadae, S. M. Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Angell, Robert C. “Sociology and the World Crisis.” American Sociological Review 16, no. 6 (1951): 749–57.Google Scholar
Ayson, Robert. Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age: Strategy as Social Science. London: Frank Cass, 2004.Google Scholar
Azar, Edward E., and Ben-Dak, Joseph D., eds. Theory and Practice of Events Research: Studies in Inter-Nation Actions and Interactions. New York: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. “Review of the World Handbook.” American Political Science Review 59, no. 1 (1965): 244.Google Scholar
Baratta, Joseph Preston. “The International History of the World Federalist Movement.” Peace and Change 14, no. 4 (1989): 372–403.Google Scholar
Baratta, Joseph Preston. “The International Federalist Movement: Toward Global Governance.” Peace and Change 24, no. 3 (1999): 340–72.Google Scholar
Bernard, Jessie. Social Problems at Midcentury: Role, Status, and Stress in a Context of Abundance. New York: Dryden Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Bessner, Daniel. “Weimar Social Science in Cold War America: The Case of the Political-Military Game.” GHI Bulletin Supplement 10 (2014): 91–111.Google Scholar
Bessner, Daniel. Democracy in Exile: Hans Speier and the Rise of the Defense Intellectual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bessner, Daniel and Guilhot, Nicolas. “How Realism Waltzed Off: Liberalism and Decisionmaking in Kenneth Waltz's Neorealism.” International Security 40, no. 2 (2015): 87–118.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. “Game Theory, Political Economy, and the Evolving Study of War and Peace.” American Political Science Review 100, no. 4 (2006): 637–42.Google Scholar
Craig, Campbell. Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Desch, Michael C. Cult of the Irrelevant: The Waning Influence of Social Science on National Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl. “In Memorium: Quincy Wright.” Political Science & Politics: PS 4, no. 1 (1971): 107–9.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. “Revolutions without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100, no. 4 (2006): 487–92.Google Scholar
Elliot, Mai. RAND in Southeast Asia: A History of the Vietnam War. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2010.Google Scholar
Erickson, Paul. The World the Game Theorists Made. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Philippe. “Stabilizing American Society: Kenneth Boulding and the Integration of the Social Sciences, 1943–1980.” Science in Context 23, no. 2 (2010): 221–65.Google Scholar
Frei, Christoph. “Politics among Nations: A Book for America.” In Hans J. Morgenthau and the American Experience, edited by Navari, Cornelia, 55–74. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Gilman, Nils. Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Udi. The Weimar Century: German Émigrés and the Ideological Foundations of the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Griggs, Emily. “A Realist before ‘Realism’: Quincy Wright and the Study of International Politics between Two World Wars.” Journal of Strategic Studies 24, no. 1 (2001): 71–103.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas, ed. The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. After the Enlightenment: Political Realism and International Relations in the Mid-Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Haas, Michael. “Three Approaches to the Study of War.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 11, no. 1 (1970): 34–47.Google Scholar
Harty, Martha, and Modell, John. “The First Conflict Resolution Movement, 1956–1971: An Attempt to Institutionalize Applied Interdisciplinary Social Science.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35, no. 4 (1991): 720–58.Google Scholar
Herman, Ellen. Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Horton, Paul B., and Leslie, Gerald R.. The Sociology of Social Problems. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1955.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Bruce. Blind Oracles: Intellectuals and War from Kennan to Kissinger. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Lester R. “War and Peace on the Sociological Agenda.” In Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Janowitz, Morris, 61–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Latham, Michael E. The Right Kind of Revolution: Modernization, Development, and U.S. Foreign Policy from the Cold War to the Present. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert J. “War as a ‘Simple Economic Problem’: The Rise of an Economics of Defense.” In Economics and National Security: A History of Their Interaction, edited by Goodwin, Crauford D., 261–83. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert J. Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory: From Chess to Social Science, 1900–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles A. “Acute International Crisis.” World Politics 14, no. 1 (1961): 182–204.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., Clark, William, Diehl, Paul F., Ray, James Lee, Sarkees, Meredith Reid, and Walker, Thomas C.. “J. David Singer.” Political Science & Politics: PS 43, no. 3 (2010): 590–93.Google Scholar
Oren, Ido. Our Enemies and Us: America's Rivalries and the Making of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Parenti, Michael. “Patricians, Professionals, and Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100, no. 4 (2006): 499–505.Google Scholar
Pooley, Jefferson. “The Remobilization of the Propaganda and Morale Network, 1947–1953.” MediArXiv, July 25, 2018. doi:10.33767/osf.io/g9rp4Google Scholar
Price, David H. Cold War Anthropology: The CIA, the Pentagon, and the Growth of Dual Use Anthropology. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Rohde, Joy. Armed with Expertise: The Militarization of American Social Research During the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Rohde, Joy. “Pax Technologica: Computers, International Affairs, and Human Reason in the Cold War.” Isis 108, no. 4 (2017): 792–813.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., Alker, Hawyard R., Deutsch, Karl W., and Lasswell, Harold D.. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Jan. “A Fetish for Measurement? Karl Deutsch in the Second Debate.” International Relations 28, no. 3 (2014): 367–84.Google Scholar
Schneider, Joseph. “Is War a Social Problem?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 3, no. 4 (1959): 353–60.Google Scholar
Selcer, Perrin. “Patterns of Science: Developing Knowledge for a World Community at UNESCO.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania, 2011.Google Scholar
Selcer, Perrin. The Postwar Origins of the Global Environment: How the United Nations Built Spaceship Earth. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Simpson, Christopher. Science of Coercion: Communication Research and Psychological Warfare. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David. “Editor's Introduction.” In Quantitative International Politics, edited by Singer, J. David, 1–13. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David. “Correlates of War.” In Encyclopedia of Peace, Violence, and Conflict, 2nd ed., edited by Kurtz, Lester, 449–57. London: Elsevier, 2008.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Small, Melvin. The Wages of War, 1816–1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York: Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Susumu, Krause, Volker, and Singer, J. David. “Correlates of War Project: A Bibliographic History of the Scientific Study of War and Peace, 1964–2000.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 19, no. 2 (2002): 69–107.Google Scholar
Tanter, Raymond. The Policy Relevance of Models in World Politics. International Data Archive Research Report No. 7. Ann Arbor: Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, October 1971.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles Lewis, Hudson, Michael C., and Russett, Bruce M.. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Throntveit, Trygve. “A Strange Fate: Quincy Wright and the Trans-War Trajectory of Wilsonian Internationalism.” White House Studies 10, no. 4 (2011): 361–77.Google Scholar
Throntveit, Trygve. Power without Victory: Woodrow Wilson and the American Internationalist Experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Tomás Rangil, Teresa. “Rebellions across the (Rice) Fields: Social Scientists and Indochina, 1965–1975.” In The Unsocial Social Science? Economics and Neighboring Disciplines since 1945, edited by Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe, 105–130. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Tomás Rangil, Teresa. “Finding Patrons for Peace Psychology: The Foundations of the Conflict Resolution Movement at the University of Michigan, 1951–1971.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 48, no. 2 (2012): 91–114.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Sharon. The Imagineers of War: The Untold History of DARPA, the Pentagon Agency That Changed the World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2017.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy, ed. Toward a History of Game Theory. Durham: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. “Project for a World Intelligence Center.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1, no. 1 (1957): 93–97.Google Scholar
Young, Robert A., Moore, James A., Moore, Vivian, et al. Utilization of ARPA-Supported Research for International Security Planning, Appendices. Springfield: Consolidated Analysis Centers, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar