Internal and External Encoding Style and Social Motivation

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511735066.013

11 - Internal and External Encoding Style and Social Motivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010

Pawel Lewicki

Edited by

Joseph P. Forgas ,

Kipling D. Williams and

Simon M. Laham

Show author details

Pawel Lewicki: Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Tulsa
Joseph P. Forgas: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Kipling D. Williams: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Simon M. Laham: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

It is probably trivial to state that the main reason for the wide variety of social motives we encounter daily is that the people we observe simply differ from each other. If so, then it is surprising to find that research on social motivation usually deals with explanatory processes that are assumed to work similarly across individuals, and that very little research attention is devoted to individual differences (for some notable exceptions, see Kernis & Goldman, and Rhodewalt, this volume).

One of the possible reasons for this paradox is the lack of success of traditional research on individual differences to offer sufficiently deep explanations (i.e., explanations in terms of underlying processes) and a preoccupation with relatively simple taxonomies that have typically been descriptive (as opposed to explanatory) in nature. Traditional research on individual differences has been of more benefit to applied areas (e.g., personnel selection in industrial-organizational psychology) than for understanding the general determinants of social motivation.

One of the potential sources of new relevant evidence that could help us understand the nature of social motivation is research on implicit cognition and knowledge acquisition. As summarized by Greenwald and Banaji (1995):

Much social cognition occurs in an implicit mode…. The missing ingredient is now available, as cognitive psychologists have succeeded in producing several varieties of unconscious cognition reliably in the laboratory (see overviews by Greenwald, 1992; Kihlstrom, 1987 …), and investigations of implicit social cognition are well underway…. Perhaps the most significant remaining challenge is to adapt these methods for efficient assessment of individual differences in implicit social cognition.

(p.20)

Type: Chapter
Information: Social Motivation
Conscious and Unconscious Processes
, pp. 194 - 209

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735066.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ascalon, E. (2001). Encoding style and the satisfaction of international students (international student survey). Technical Report, University of Tulsa

Brown, C. (1999). Internal and external encoding styles in seven year old children. Technical Report, University of Tulsa

Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 3–52). New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Combs, D. (in press). Implicit Learning and non-clinical paranoia: Does content matter? Personality and Individual Differences

Gill, T. (2000). Individual differences in schema activation, as measured by the Revised Nisroe (The Encoding Style Questionnaire). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tulsa

Greenwald, A. G. (1992). Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766–779CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2003). Affective influences on social judgments and decisions: The role of information processing strategies. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Responding to the social world: Implicit and explicit processes in social judgments and decisions. (pp. 198–226). New York: Psychology Press

Higgins, E. T., & King, G. A. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction (pp. 69–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Hill, T., Lewicki, P., Czyzewska, M., & Boss, A. (1989). Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 373–387CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hill, T., Lewicki, P., Czyzewska, M., & Schuller, G. (1990). The role of learned inferential encoding rules in the perception of faces: Effects of nonconscious self-perpetuation of a bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 350–371CrossRef Google Scholar

Hill, T., Lewicki, P., & Neubauer, R. M. (1991). The development of depressive dispositions: A case of self-perpetuation of encoding biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 392–409CrossRef Google Scholar

Kihlstrom, J. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237, 1445–1452CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kruglanski, A. W., Atash, M. N., Grada, E., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay saying: Need for closure scale and the Neuberg et al. critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1005–1016CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lewicki, P. (1985). Nonconscious biasing effects of single instances on subsequent judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 563–574CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewicki, P. (1986a). Nonconscious social information processing. New York: Academic Press

Lewicki, P. (1986b). Processing information about covariations that cannot be articulated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 135–146Google Scholar

Lewicki, P., Czyzewska, M., & Hoffman, H. (1987). Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 523–530Google Scholar

Lewicki, P., & Hill, T. (1989). On the status of nonconscious processes in human cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 239–241CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Bizot, E. (1988). Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 24–37CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of information. American Psychologist, 47, 796–801CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1994). Nonconscious indirect inference in encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 257–263CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1997). Hidden covariation detection: A robust and ubiquitous phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 221–118Google Scholar PubMed

Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Sasaki, I. (1989). Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 323–337CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McCord, M. (2002). Encoding style and perceived difficulty of rating systems: “BARS” vs. “coding rules” for the assessment center. Technical Report, University of Tulsa

Osicki, M. A. (2002). Cognitive determinants of vocational preference: The internal/external encoding styles and choice of major. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tulsa

Posner, M. I., Goldsmith, R., & Welton, K. E. Jr. (1967). Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 28–38CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407CrossRef Google Scholar

Sailor, S., & Grubb, M. (1999). The encoding style and the development of anticipatory skills in professional tennis players. Technical Report, University of Tulsa

Stadler, M. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1061–1069Google Scholar PubMed

Stamov-Rossnagel, C. (2001). Revealing hidden covariation detection: Evidence for implicit abstraction at study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4), 1276–1288Google Scholar

Vequist, D. (2001). Acquisition and self-perpetuating development of encoding dispositions: A flight simulator application. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tulsa

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Field dependence and independence. New York: International Universities Press