Book contents
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Altars of the Lares Augusti
- 3 Modelling the Emperor
- 4 Publica numina
- 5 Roman Emperors, Conquest, and Violence
- 6 Court Politics and Imperial Imagery in the Roman Principate
- 7 Local Aspirations and Statues of Emperors in Roman North Africa
- 8 The Altar of P. Perelius Hedulus in Carthage and the Social Aspects of Provincial Image-Making
- 9 Imagines et tituli
- 10 The Imperial Image in Media of Mechanical Reproduction
- 11 When Was an Imperial Image?
- Index
- References
3 - Modelling the Emperor
Representations of Power, Empire, and Dynasty among Eastern Client Kings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2020
By
Book contents
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Altars of the Lares Augusti
- 3 Modelling the Emperor
- 4 Publica numina
- 5 Roman Emperors, Conquest, and Violence
- 6 Court Politics and Imperial Imagery in the Roman Principate
- 7 Local Aspirations and Statues of Emperors in Roman North Africa
- 8 The Altar of P. Perelius Hedulus in Carthage and the Social Aspects of Provincial Image-Making
- 9 Imagines et tituli
- 10 The Imperial Image in Media of Mechanical Reproduction
- 11 When Was an Imperial Image?
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter argues that client kings played a significant, even leading role in disseminating the images associated with the princeps and the imperium Romanum at the outskirts of the empire. Dependent rulers faced a unique challenge, as they had to pay homage to the emperor as the superior authority while maintaining and communicating their own royal prestige and local legitimacy. In the context of these intricate dynamics, client kings developed a mode of representation that reflected their authority as well as the superiority of the emperor. To this end, they adopted and adapted models from the centre of the empire for their own purposes, turning modes of imperial representation into a shared idiom of power. However, the hierarchy between emperor and dependent ruler always remained clear and was reinforced through the imperial cult. Instead of undercutting the local legitimacy of client kings, the reverence of an even higher authority, elevated beyond mortality, was used to strengthen the position of dependent rulers whose power relied on the centre’s approval.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery , pp. 52 - 75Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alexandropoulos, J. 2000. Les monnaies de l’Afrique antique: 400 av. J.-C.–40 ap. J.-C. (Toulouse: Presses universitaires du Mirail).Google Scholar
Bendschus, T. 2018. ‘Tigranes V. und seine Münzen. Armenische Herrscherlegitimation des frühen 1. Jhdts. n. Chr. im Spiegel der numismatischen Zeugnisse’, NZ 124: 9–54.Google Scholar
Boube, J. 1990. ‘Une statue portrait de Ptolémée de Maurétanie à Sala (Maroc)’, RA 1990: 331–60.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 1984. Rome and the Friendly King: The Character of the Client Kingship (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Braund, D. 1997. ‘Greeks and barbarians: the Black Sea region and Hellenism under the early empire’, in Alcock, S. (ed.), The Early Empire in the East (Oxford: Oxbow Books), 121–36.Google Scholar
Bru, H. 2011. Le pouvoir impérial dans les provinces syriennes: Représentations et célébrations d’Auguste à Constantin (31 av. J.-C.–337 ap. J.-C.) (Leiden; Boston: Brill).Google Scholar
Burnett, A. 2011. ‘The Augustan revolution seen from the mints of the provinces’, JRS 101: 1–30.Google Scholar
Burrell, B. 2009. ‘Herod’s Caesarea on Sebastos: urban structures and influences’, in Jacobson, D. M. and Kokkinos, N. (eds.), Herod and Augustus: Papers Presented at the IJS Conference, 21st–23rd June 2005 (Leiden; Boston: Brill), 217–33.Google Scholar
Chankowski, A. 2010. ‘Les cultes des souverains hellénistiques après la disparition des dynasties: formes de survie et d’extinction d’une institution dans un contexte civique’, in Savalli-Lestrade, I. and Cogitore, I. (eds.), Des rois au prince: Pratiques du pouvoir monarchique dans l’Orient hellénistique et romain (IVe siècle avant J.-C.–IIe siècle après J.-C.) (Grenoble: ELLUG), 271–90.Google Scholar
Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. 1990. ‘Le monnayage des rois Juba II et Ptolémée de Maurétanie: image d’une adhésion réiterée à la politique romaine’, Karthago 22: 45–53.Google Scholar
Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. 1997. Le royaume de Maurétanie sous Juba II et Ptolémée (25 av. J.-C.–40 ap. J.-C.) (Paris: CNRS).Google Scholar
Dahmen, K. 2010. ‘With Rome in mind? Case studies in the coinage of client kings’, in Kaizer, T. and Facella, M. (eds.), Kingdoms and Principalities in the Roman Near East (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), 99–112.Google Scholar
Facella, M. 2005. ‘Φιλορώμαιος καὶ Φιλέλλην: Roman perception of Commagenian royalty’, in Hekster, O. and Fowler, R. (eds.), Imaginary Kings: Royal Images in the Ancient Near East, Greece and Rome (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), 87–104.Google Scholar
Fishwick, D. 1972. ‘The institution of the provincial cult in Roman Mauretania’, Historia 21: 698–711.Google Scholar
Fishwick, D. 1985. ‘Le culte impérial sous Juba II et Ptolémée de Maurétanie: le témoignage des monnaies’, BCTH 19: 225–34.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. 1974. ‘Bildnisse der mauretanischen Könige und ihre stadtrömischen Vorbilder’, Madrider Mitteilungen 15: 156–73.Google Scholar
Fleischer, R. 2008. ‘Augustusporträt und Klientelkönig: ein Bildnis des Antiochos III. von Kommagene’, in Kreikenbom, D., Mahler, K.-U., Schollmeyer, P., and Weber, T. M. (eds.), Augustus – Der Blick von außen: Die Wahrnehmung des Kaisers in den Provinzen des Reiches und in den Nachbarstaaten (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 321–34.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. 1978. ‘The kings of Commagene and the Greek world’, in Schwertheim, E., Şahin, S., and Wagner, J. (eds.), Studien zur Religion und Kultur Kleinasiens: Festschrift für Friedrich Karl Dörner zum 65. Geburtstag (Leiden: Brill), 359–74.Google Scholar
Frija, G. 2010. ‘Du prêtre du roi au prêtre de Rome et au grand prêtre d’Auguste: la mise en place du culte impérial civique’, in Savalli-Lestrade, I. and Cogitore, I. (eds.), Des rois au prince: Pratiques de pouvoir monarchique dans l’Orient hellénistique et romain (IVe siècle avant J.-C.–IIe siècle après J.-C.) (Grenoble: ELLUG), 291–308.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 2009. ‘Herod, Rome, and the diaspora’, in Jacobson, D. M. and Kokkinos, N. (eds.), Herod and Augustus (Leiden; Boston: Brill), 13–28.Google Scholar
Hohlfelder, R. L. 2000. ‘Beyond coincidence? Marcus Agrippa and King Herod’s harbor’, JNES 59: 241–53.Google Scholar
Hohlfelder, R. L. 2003. ‘Images of homage, images of power: King Herod and his harbour, Sebastos’, Antichthon 37: 13–31.Google Scholar
Hohlfelder, R. L., Brandon, C., and Oleson, J. P. 2007. ‘Constructing the harbour of Caesarea Palaestina, Israel: new evidence from the ROMACONS field campaign of October 2005’, IJNA 36: 409–15.Google Scholar
Holum, K. G. 2004. ‘Caesarea’s temple hill: the archaeology of sacred space in an ancient Mediterranean city’, Near Eastern Archaeology 67: 184–99.Google Scholar
Holum, K. G. 2015. ‘The gods of Sebastos: King Herod’s harbor temple at Caesarea’, Eretz-Israel 31: 51*–68*.Google Scholar
Kahn, L. C. 1996. ‘Herod’s temple of Roma and Augustus at Caesarea Maritima’, in Raban, A. and Holum, K. G. (eds.), Caesarea Maritima: A Retrospective after Two Millennia (Leiden; Boston: Brill), 130–45.Google Scholar
Kropp, A. 2009. ‘King – Caesar – God: Roman imperial cult among Near Eastern “client” kings in the Julio-Claudian period’, in Blömer, M., Facella, M., and Winter, E. (eds.), Lokale Identität im Römischen Nahen Osten: Kontexte und Perspektiven (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), 99–150.Google Scholar
Kropp, A. 2010. ‘Earring, nefesh and opus reticulatum: self-representation of the royal house of Emesa in the first century ad’, in Kaizer, T. and Facella, M. (eds.), Kingdoms and Principalities in the Roman Near East (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), 199–216.Google Scholar
Kropp, A. 2013a. Images and Monuments of Near Eastern Dynasts, 100 bc–ad 100 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kropp, A. 2013b. ‘Crowning the emperor: an unorthodox image of Claudius, Agrippa I and Herod of Chalkis’, Syria 90: 377–89.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. 2007. ‘Les portraits de Juba II, Roi de Maurétanie, et de Ptolémée, son fils et successeur’, RA 43: 65–110.Google Scholar
Lykke, A. 2013. ‘Die Münzikonographie von Herodes Agrippa I. und ihre Beziehung zur römischen Bildsprache’, in Lykke, A. (ed.), Macht des Geldes – Macht der Bilder: Kolloquium zur Ikonographie auf Münzen im ostmediterranen Raum in hellenistisch-römischer Zeit (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 150–69.Google Scholar
Meshorer, Y. 2001. A Treasury of Jewish Coins: From the Persian Period to Bar Kokhba (Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi).Google Scholar
Meshorer, Y., Bijovsky, G., and Fischer-Bossert, W. 2013. Coins of the Holy Land: The Abraham and Marian Sofaer Collection at the American Numismatic Society and the Israel Museum, edited by Hendin, D. and Meadows, A. (New York: ANS).Google Scholar
Millar, F. 1996. ‘Emperors, kings and subjects: the politics of two-level sovereignty’, SCI 15: 159–73.Google Scholar
Nawotka, K. 1989. ‘The attitude towards Rome in the political propaganda of the Bosporus monarchs’, Latomus 48: 326–38.Google Scholar
Netzer, E. 2006. The Architecture of Herod the Great Builder (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Noreña, C. 2016. ‘Ritual and memory: Hellenistic ruler cults in the Roman Empire’, in Galinsky, K. and Lapatin, K. (eds.), Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire (Los Angeles: Getty Publications), 86–100.Google Scholar
Price, S. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. 2001. ‘Imperial cult and native tradition in Roman North Africa’, CJ 96: 425–36.Google Scholar
Roller, D. W. 1998. The Building Program of Herod the Great (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, D. W. 2003. The World of Juba II and Kleopatra Selene: Royal Scholarship on Rome’s African Frontier (London; New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Salzmann, D. 2007. ‘Zur Selbstdarstellung von Klientenherrschern im griechischen Osten’, in Meyer, M. (ed.), Neue Zeiten, Neue Sitten: Zu Rezeption und Integration römischen und italischen Kulturguts in Kleinasien (Vienna: Phoibos), 47–53.Google Scholar
Schörner, G. 2011. ‘Rom jenseits der Grenze: Klientelkönigreiche und der Impact of Empire’, in Hekster, O. and Kaizer, T. (eds.), Frontiers in the Roman World: Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Leiden; Boston: Brill), 113–31.Google Scholar
Schumacher, L. 2008. ‘Glanz ohne Macht: Juba II. von Mauretanien als römischer Klientelkönig’, in Kreikenbom, D., Mahler, K.-U., Schollmeyer, P., and Weber, T. M. (eds.), Augustus – Der Blick von außen: Die Wahrnehmung des Kaisers in den Provinzen des Reiches und in den Nachbarstaaten (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 141–60.Google Scholar
Schwentzel, C.-G. 2013. Juifs et Nabatéens: Les monarchies ethniques du Proche-Orient hellénistique et romain (Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1988b. ‘Philorhomaioi: portraits of Roman client rulers in the Greek east in the 1st century bc’, in Bonacasa, N. and Rizza, G. (eds.), Ritratto ufficiale e ritratto privato: Atti della II Conferenza Internazionale sul Ritratto Romano (Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche), 493–7.Google Scholar
Suspène, A. 2015. ‘L’apport de la documentation numismatique à l’étude des foreign clientelae: le cas de Juba II de Maurétanie’, in Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Foreign Clientelae in the Roman Empire: A Reconsideration (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), 185–207.Google Scholar
Teverson, R. H. 2015. Augustan Kings: The Art and Architecture of Herod the Great of Judaea and Juba II of Mauretania. PhD Diss., Yale.Google Scholar
Vann, R. L. 1991. ‘The Drusion: a candidate for Herod’s lighthouse at Caesarea Maritima’, IJNA 20: 123–39.Google Scholar
Vitale, M. 2017. Das Imperium in Wort und Bild: Römische Darstellungsformen beherrschter Gebiete in Inschriftenmonumenten, Münzprägungen und Literatur (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag).Google Scholar
Votruba, G. F. 2007. ‘Imported building materials of Sebastos harbour, Israel’, IJNA 36: 325–35.Google Scholar
Wilker, J. 2008. ‘Principes et reges: Das persönliche Nahverhältnis zwischen Princeps und Klientelherrschern und seine Auswirkungen im frühen Prinzipat’, in Coşkun, A. (ed.), Freundschaft und Gefolgschaft in den auswärtigen Beziehungen der Römer (2. Jahrundert v. Chr.–1. Jahrhundert n. Chr.) (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang), 165–88.Google Scholar
Wilker, J. 2015. ‘Der Preis des Reiches: auswärtige Euergesien abhängiger Herrscher zur Zeit des frühen Prinzipats’, in Baltrusch, E. and Wilker, J. (eds.), Amici – socii – clientes? Abhängige Herrschaft im Imperium Romanum (Berlin: Edition Topoi), 91–121.Google Scholar