Book contents
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: social choice, agency, inclusiveness and capabilities
- Part I Social Choice and Capabilities
- 2 The many facets of social choice theory
- 3 Beyond capabilities?
- 4 Examining the challenge of communication in diffusing innovative education programmes
- 5 Nudging the capabilities for a sustainable city?
- 6 Social choice and research capacity strengthening in Nigeria
- Part II Inclusiveness, Social and Individual Agency
- Part III Social Choice and Capabilities in Action
- Index
- References
3 - Beyond capabilities?
Sen’s social choice approach and the generalizability assumption
from Part I - Social Choice and Capabilities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
By
Book contents
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: social choice, agency, inclusiveness and capabilities
- Part I Social Choice and Capabilities
- 2 The many facets of social choice theory
- 3 Beyond capabilities?
- 4 Examining the challenge of communication in diffusing innovative education programmes
- 5 Nudging the capabilities for a sustainable city?
- 6 Social choice and research capacity strengthening in Nigeria
- Part II Inclusiveness, Social and Individual Agency
- Part III Social Choice and Capabilities in Action
- Index
- References
Summary
The main objective of this chapter is to show how informational pluralism can be used within Sen’s social choice framework (SSC). In order to tackle this issue, two steps are necessary. First, it is important to spell out the ‘generalizability’ assumption behind Sen’s principle of working with broad informational spaces. Second, we need to work out a method to make sense of the need to conciliate different informational spaces. By doing so, several features and issues of the capability approach can be seen as part of a systematic story. Thus, this chapter is divided into four parts. The first part explores the generalizability issue behind the capability approach. The second provides a brief characterization of Sen’s social choice approach. The third part demonstrates how it can be used through what can be named ‘generalizability tables’. Finally, the chapter briefly concludes with some suggestions for future work.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities , pp. 42 - 61Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Alkire, S., Qizilbash, M., and Comim, F. (2008) Introduction. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., and Alkire, S. (eds.): 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anand, P., Hunter, G., Carter, I., Dowding, K., Guala, F., and Van Hees, M. (2009) The development of capability indicators. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10 (1): 125–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comim, F. (2018) Sen’s capability approach, social choice theory and the use of rankings. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Comim, F., Fennell, S., and Anand, P. B. (eds.): 179–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L., Gleser, G., Nanda, H., and Rajaratnam, N. (1972) The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Garza-Vazquez, O., and Deneulin, S. (2019) The capability approach: ethics and socio-economic development. In Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics, Drydyk, J., and Keleher, L. (eds.): 68–83. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1986) Hard Choices: Decision Making under Unresolved Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1990) Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qizilbash, M. (2007) Social choice and individual capabilities. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 6 (2): 169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1970b) The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78 (1): 152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1974) Choice, orderings and morality. In Practical Reason, Körner, S. (ed.): 54–67. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1977a) Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6 (4): 317–44.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1977b) On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis. Econometrica, 45 (7): 1539–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1979) Informational analysis of moral principles. In Rational Action: Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, Harrison, R. (ed.): 115–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1980) Plural utility. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81: 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1983) Evaluator relativity and consequential evaluation. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12 (2): 113–32.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1985) Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82 (4): 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1986) Foundations of social choice theory: an epilogue. In Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Elster, J., and Hylland, A. (eds.): 213–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2008) The economics of happiness and capability. In Capabilities and Happiness, Bruni, L., Comim, F., and Pugno, M. (eds.): 16–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar