Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Conventions on Terminology
- Part I Skew Fields and Simple Rings
- Part II Skew Fields and Brauer Groups
- 9 Brauer Groups over Fields
- 10 Cyclic Algebras
- 11 Power Norm Residue Algebras
- 12 Brauer Groups and Galois Cohomology
- 13 The Formalism of Crossed Products
- 14 Quaternion Algebras
- 15 p-Algebras
- 16 Skew Fields with Involution
- 17 Brauer Groups and K2-Theory of Fields
- 18 A Survey of some further Results
- Part III Reduced K1-Theory of Skew Fields
- Bibliography
- Thesaurus
- Index
18 - A Survey of some further Results
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Conventions on Terminology
- Part I Skew Fields and Simple Rings
- Part II Skew Fields and Brauer Groups
- 9 Brauer Groups over Fields
- 10 Cyclic Algebras
- 11 Power Norm Residue Algebras
- 12 Brauer Groups and Galois Cohomology
- 13 The Formalism of Crossed Products
- 14 Quaternion Algebras
- 15 p-Algebras
- 16 Skew Fields with Involution
- 17 Brauer Groups and K2-Theory of Fields
- 18 A Survey of some further Results
- Part III Reduced K1-Theory of Skew Fields
- Bibliography
- Thesaurus
- Index
Summary
There are many aspects of Brauer groups which we cannot discuss here for various reasons.
First, the relationship with Galois Cohomology (cf. §§12/13. where we established an isomorphism Br(L/K) ≃ H2(Gal(L/K), L*) ≕ H2(L/K) for Galois extensions L/K) leads to further results if one makes use of general Cohomology Theory: then some of our results appear as special cases of rather general constructions (such as Theorem 4 in §9. and the exact sequence (4) in §13. which are both easy consequences of the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence). A good reference for this point of view is A. Babakhanian [1972] or E. Weiss [1969].
Second, the relationship with cohomology (see above) may be generalized in the following way: one may establish an isomorphism Br(L/K) ≃ H2(L/K) even when L/K is not Galois but separable. Then, of course, H2(L/K) has to be given a new meaning: it is no more a Galois Cohomology group H2(Gal(L/K), L*) but an Adamson Cohomology group. Here we refer the reader to the original paper I. T. Adamson [1954].
Third, by introducing even more general cohomology groups – the Amitsur Cohomology groups – one can obtain for instance all our results on Br(K) without making use of Köthe's Theorem (as we do frequently).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Skew Fields , pp. 122 - 124Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1983