Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:48:23.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Ezequiel A. González-Ocantos
Ezequiel A. González-Ocantos
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Shifting Legal Visions
Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America
 , pp. 291 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrão, Paulo, and Torelly, Marcelo. 2012. “Resistance to Change: Brazil’s Persistent Amnesty and Its Alternatives for Truth and Justice.” In Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability, ed. Lessa, Francesca and Payne, Leigh. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abregú, Martín, and Courtis, Christian eds. 1997. La aplicación de los tratados sobre derechos humanor por los tribunales locales. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CELS.Google Scholar
Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo. 2007. La historia de Abuelas: 30 años de búsqueda. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Asociación Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo.Google Scholar
Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo. 2009. El papel del sistema de justicia frente a las violaciones masivas a los derechos humanos. problemáticas actuales. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Asociación Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58(2): 239–275.Google Scholar
Acuña, Carlos, and Smulovitz, Catalina. 1995. “Militares en la transición Argentina: Del gobierno a la subordinación constitucional.” In Historizar el pasado vivo en América Latina, ed. Pérotin-Dumon, Anne. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
Acuña, Carlos, and Smulovitz, Catalina. 1997. “Guarding the Guardians in Argentina: Some Lessons about the Risks and Benefits of Empowering the Courts.” In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, ed. McAdams, A. J. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
ADC (Asociación por los Derechos Civiles). 2008. La Corte Suprema y los derechos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Adler Lomnitz, Larissa, and Salazar, Rodrigo. 2002. “Cultural Elements in the Practice of Law in Mexico: Informal Networks in a Formal System.” In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Aguayo, Sergio. 2001. La Charola: Una historia de los servicios de inteligencia en Mexico. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
Aguayo, Servio, and Treviño, Javier. 2007. “Fox y el pasado: Anatomía de una capitulación.” Foro Internacional 47(4): 709–739.Google Scholar
Alcañíz, Isabella. 2012. “Democratization and Multilateral Security.” World Politics 64(2): 306–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alegre, Robert. 2013. Railroad Radicals in Mexico: Gender, Class and Memory. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Alivizatos, Nicos C., and Nikiforos Diamandouros, P.. 1997. “Politics and the Judiciary in the Greek Transition to Democracy.” In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, ed. McAdams, A. J.. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai. 2009. “The Legal Framework of Transitional Justice: A Systematic Study with a Special Focus on the Role of the ICC.” In Building a Future on Peace and Justice: Studies on Transitional Justice, Peace and Development, ed. Ambos, Kai, Large, Judith, and Wierda, Marieke. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, Kai, Large, Judith, and Wierda, Marieke, eds. 2009. Building a Future on Peace and Justice: Studies on Transitional Justice, Peace and Development. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International. 2001. Universal Jurisdiction: The Duty of States to Enact and Implement Legislation. London, UK: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2009. “International Report: Regional Overview: Americas.” www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/POL10/033/2009/en (last accessed 11 June 2012).Google Scholar
Anaya, Alejandro. 2006. “Hacia una nueva política exterior mexicana en materia de derechos humanos: Entrevista con Juan José Camacho.” Revista Iberoamericana de Derechos Humanos 2: 187–203.Google Scholar
Anaya, Alejandro. 2012. El país bajo presión: Debatiendo el paper del escrutinio internacional de derechos humanos sobre México. Mexico D.F., Mexico: CIDE.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Karina. 2007. La política desde la justicia: Cortes Supremas, gobierno y democracia en Argentina y México. Mexico D.F., Mexico: FLACSO-Fontamara.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Karina. 2010. “More Power, More Rights? The Supreme Court and Society in Mexico.” In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, ed. Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Antillón, Ximena. 2008. La desaparición forzada de Rosendo Radilla en Atoyac de Álvarez. Informe de Afectación Psicosocial. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Comisión Mexicana de Defensa y Protección de los Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
Aponte, Alejandro. 2010. “El Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos y el Derecho Internacional Humanitario: Una relación problemática.” In Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos y Derecho Penal Internacional, ed. Ambos, Kai. Montevideo, Uruguay: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
APRODEH (Asociación pro Derechos Humanos). 2008. Podrán matar las flores, Peru nunca las cantutas: Los familiares del caso La Cantuta: Actores en el proceso de búsqueda de verdad y justicia. Lima, Peru: APRODEH.Google Scholar
Baglini, Raúl and Orlandi, Hipólito. 1993. Juicio a la corte: Texto y fundamentos del pedido de juicio político promovido a los jueces de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación por Diputados Nacionales de la Unión Cívica Radical. Buenos Aires, Argentina: R. Baglini.Google Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A. 2007. Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barrena, Guadalupe. 2007. “Oportunidades y retos para el litigio estratégico en México.” In El litigio estratégico en México, ed. Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos. Mexico D.F., Mexico: OACNUDH.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1986. International Criminal Law. Ferry, Dobbs, NY: Transnational.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1996. “International Crimes: ‘Jus Cogens’ and ‘Obligatio Erga Omnes’.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59(4): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2002. Post-Conflict Justice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2003. Introduction to International Criminal Law. Ardsley, NY: Transnational.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2011. Crimes against Humanity: Historical Evolution and Contemporary Application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1994. “What Judges Want: Judges’ Goals and Judicial Behavior” Political Research Quarterly 47: 749–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergara, Mario, Richman, Barak, and Spiller, Pablo T.. 2003. “Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(2): 247–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1998. The Social Democratic Movement: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierbrauer, Gunter. 1994. “Toward an Understanding of Legal Culture: Variations in Individualism and Collectivism between Kurds, Lebanese and Germans.” Law and Society Review 28(2): 243–264.Google Scholar
Bimbi, Bruno. 2010. Matrimonio igualitario. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Grupo Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38: 805.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Culture and Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc, J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2008. The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2011. “Faithful Servants of the Regime: The Brazilian Constitutional Court’s Role under the 1988 Constitution.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., and Coppedge, Michael. 2006. “Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 39(4) (May 1): 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysk, Alison. 1990. The Political Impact of Argentina’s Human Rights Movement: Social Movements, Transition and Democratization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison. 1994. The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina: Protest, Change, and Democratization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison. 2005. Human Rights and Private Wrongs: Constructing Global Civil Society. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, and Wolchik, Sharon. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1991. “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 96(5): 1201–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Jo-Marie. 2007. Political Violence and the Authoritarian State in Peru: Silencing Civil Society. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Jo-Marie. 2009. “Guilty as Charged: The Trial of Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori for Human Rights Violations.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 3(3): 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Keith. 2010. All Judges Are Political – Except When They Are Not: Acceptable Hypocrisies and the Rule of Law. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, José Luis. 2009. La incorporación de los tratados internacionales sobre derechos humanos en España y México. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Editorial Porrúa.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2002. “Judicial Independence: How Can You Tell It When You See It?” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, ed. Burbank, Stephen and Friedman, Barry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic. 2003. Politics in Mexico: The Democratic Transformation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carbonell, Miguel. 2000. Constitución, reforma constitucional y fuentes del derecho en México. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Cardenas, Sonia. 2007. Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressures. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Carrillo Prieto, Ignacio. 2009. La fiscalía especial para movimientos sociales y políticos del pasado. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Carrió, Alejandro. 1996. La Corte Suprema y su independencia: Un análisis a través de la historia. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.Google Scholar
Carrión, Julio, ed. 2006. The Fujimori Legacy: The Rise of Electoral Authoritarianism in Peru. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, Douglass. 1996. “Lessons from the Americas: Guidelines for International Response to Amnesties for Atrocities.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, Laura. 2007. México armado 1943–1981. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
CEJIL. 2011. “Condena contra militares guatemaltecos en el caso de la masacre de las dos erres representa un avance para la justicia.” http://cejil.org/comunicados/condena-contra-militares-guatemaltecos-en-el-caso-de-la-masacre-de-las-dos-erres-represe (last accessed 11 June 2012).Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales).1995a. Informe anual sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 1995b. Informe sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 1998. Informe sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 1999 Derechos humanos en Argentina. Informe anual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales/EUDEBA.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 2000. La situación de los derechos humanos en Argentina. Informe anual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 2001. La situación de los derechos humanos en Argentina. Informe anual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 2008a. Derechos humanos en Argentina. Informe anual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 2008b. La lucha por el derecho: Litigio estratégico y derechos humanos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 2010. Derechos humanos en Argentina. Informe anual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) 2011. Derechos humanos en Argentina. Informe anual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Centro Agustín Pro et al. 2006. Esclarecimiento y sanción de los delitos del pasado durante el sexenio 2000–2006. Mexico D.F., Mexico.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales et al. 2002. “Una Corte Para La Democracia.” www.adc.org.ar/2013/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Una-Corte-para-la-Democracia-I.pdf (last accessed 11 February 2015).Google Scholar
Chávez, Rebecca Bill. 2003. “The Construction of the Rule of Law in Argentina: A Tale of Two Provinces.” Comparative Politics 35(4): 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez, Rebecca Bill. 2004. The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chávez, Rebecca Bill, Ferejohn, John, and Weingast, Barry R.. 2011. “A Theory of the Politically Independent Judiciary: A Comparative Study of the United States and Argentina.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 1997. “International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide.” European Journal of International Relations 3(4): 473–495.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2005. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59(4): 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W. 1992. The Politics of Justice: The Attorney General and the Making of Legal Policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W., and Gillman, Howard. 1999. Supreme Court Decision- Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stanley. 1995. “State Crimes of Previous Regimes: Knowledge, Accountability and the Policing of the Past.” Law and Social Inquiry 20(1): 7–50.Google Scholar
Collins, Cath. 2010. Post-Transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación. 2003. Informe final. Lima, Peru: Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación.Google Scholar
Comité 68. 2008. México: Genocidio y delitos de lesa humanidad. Documentos básicos 1968–2008. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Comité 68 pro Libertades Democráticas A.C.Google Scholar
CONADEP (Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas). 1984. Nunca Más: Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M. 1998. “The Permanent Coup: Peru’s Road to Presidential Reelection.” LASA Forum 29 1: 5–9.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M. 2002. “Cashing in on Authoritarianism: Media Collusion in Fujimori’s Peru.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 7(1): 115–125.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M., and Carlos Basombrío, Iglesias. 1996. “Public Life in the Time of Alberto Fujimori.” Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Latin American Program, Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 219.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew, and Davis, James. 2000. “Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda.” International Studies Review 2(1): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotler, Julio, and Grompone, Romeo. 2000. El Fujimorismo: Ascenso y Caída de un Régimen Autoritario. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2007. “The Role of Chile’s Legal Complex in the Configuration of a Moderate State.” In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2010. “The Transformation of Constitutional Discourse and the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America.” In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, ed. Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couso, Javier, and Hilbink, Lisa. 2011. “From Quietism to Incipient Activism: The Institutional and Ideological Roots of Rights Adjudication in Chile.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Covarrubias, Ana. 2003. “La política mexicana hacia Cuba durante el gobierno de Salinas de Gortari.” Foro Internacional 34(4): 652–682.Google Scholar
Cuneo, . Andrés. 1980. “La Corte Suprema de Chile, sus percepciones acerca del derecho, su rol en el sistema legal, y la relación de éste con el sistema político.” In La administración de justicia en América Latina, ed. Universidad de Costa Rica, . San José, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo. 2009. “Determinants of Judicial Independence: Lessons from Three ‘Cases’ of Constitutional Courts in Peru (1982–2007).” Journal of Latin American Studies 41(02): 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Barreda Solórzano, Luis. 2008. El pequeño inquisidor. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Océano.Google Scholar
De la Jara, Ernesto. 2001. Memoria y batallas en nombre de los inocentes, Perú 1992–2001. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Defensa Legal.Google Scholar
Defensoría del Pueblo. 2001. Aministías vs. Derechos Humanos: Buscando Justicia. Lima, Peru: Defensoría del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2009. “The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case.” International Organization 63(01): 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 1998. “Argentine Law at the Periphery and Law in Dependencies: Political and Economic Crisis and the Instrumentalization and Fragmentation of Law.” American Bar Foundation. Working Papers. No. 9708.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Powell, Walter, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Michael. 2002. “Assessing Judicial Reform in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 37(2): 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingo, Pilar. 1999. “Judicial Independence and Judicial Reform in Latin America.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, ed. Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry Jay, and Plattner, Marc F.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Domingo, Pilar. 2000. “Judicial Independence: The Politics of the Supreme Court in Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32(3): 705–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingo, Pilar, and Sieder, Rachel, eds. 2001. Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Dondé, Javier. 2010. “El concepto de impunidad: Amnistía y otras formas estudiadas por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.” In Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos y Derecho Penal Internacional, ed. Ambos, Kai. Montevideo, Uruguay: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1986. “International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis.” International Organization 40(03): 599–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DPLF (Due Process of Law Foundation). 2010. Digesto de jurisprudencia latinoamérica sobre crímenes de derecho internacional. Washington, DC: DPLF.Google Scholar
Dutrenit Bielous, Silvia, and Gonzalo Varela, Petito. 2010. Tramitando el pasado: Violaciones de los derechos humanos y agendas gubernamentales en casos latinoamericanos. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Flacso México/Clacso.Google Scholar
Eliaschev, Pepe. 2011. Los hombres del juicio. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2006. Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 2013. “Reconsidering Judicial Preferences.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2001a. “The Supreme Court as a Strategic National Policymaker.” Emory Law Journal 50: 583–612.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2001b. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government.” Law & Society Review 35(1): 117–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinoza, Julio. 2010. “La actividad probatoria en procesos por violaciones de derechos humanos: El juicio contra Alberto Fujimori.” In Judicialización de violaciones de derechos humanos: Aportes sustantivos y procesales, ed. Quinteros, Víctor. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Derechos Humanos de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Evans, Rebecca. 2007. “Treating Poorly Healed Wounds: Partisan Choices and Human Rights Policies in Latin America.” Human Rights Review 8(3): 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. 1998. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence.” Southern California. Law Review 72: 353.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. A., and Weingast, B. R. 1992. “A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12(2): 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Meijide, Graciela. 2009. La historia íntima de los derechos humanos en la Argentina: A Pablo. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Ferreira Rubio, Delia, and Goretti, Mateo. 1998. “When the President Governs Alone: The Decretazo in Argentina, 1989–93.” In Executive Decree Authority, ed. Carey, John and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Filippini, Leonardo. 2006. “El Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos no es un préstamo.” Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo 7(2): 191–202.Google Scholar
Filippini, Leonardo. 2007. “Argentina.” In Víctimas sin mordaza: El impacto del Sistema Interamericano en la jusiticia transicional en latinoamérica: Los casos de Argentina, Guatemala, El Salvador y Perú, ed. Fundación para el Debido Proceso Legal. Washington, D.C.: Fundación para el Debido Proceso Legal.Google Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 2003. “Supreme Court Decisions on Electoral Rules after Mexico’s 1994 Judicial Reform: An Empowered Court.” Journal of Latin American Studies 35(04): 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 2004. “Judicial Reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How Electoral Incentives Shape Institutional Change.” Latin American Research Review 39(3): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 2008. Judicial Reform as Political Insurance. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1993. “International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy.” International Organization 47(4): 565–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. M. 1993. “The Limits of Judicial Independence.” University of Miami Inter- American Law Review 25(1): 57–76.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2006. “Taking Law Seriously.” Perspectives on Politics 4(2): 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Iommi, Lucrecia. 2012. Thinking Institutions in 3-D. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
García Villegas, Mauricio, and Uprimny, Rodrigo. 2004. Corte Constitucional y emancipación social en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Norma.Google Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto, Domingo, Pilar, and Roux, Theunis, eds. 2006. Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor? Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Garro, Alejandro Miguel, and Dahl, Enrique. 1987a. “Argentine Judgment on Human Rights Violations by Former Military Leaders.” International Legal Materials 26: 317–372.Google Scholar
Garro, Alejandro Miguel, and Dahl, Enrique. 1987b. “Legal Accountability for Human Rights Violations in Argentina: One Step Forward and Two Steps Backward.” Human Rights Law Journal 8: 283–344.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun, and Brinks, Daniel M.. 2008. Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gheciu, Alexandra. 2005. “Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the New Europe.” International Organization 59(4): 973–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Lesley. 2004. The School of the Americas: Military Training and Political Violence in the Americas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1999. “The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretive Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2002. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–1891.” American Political Science Review 96(3): 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2008. “Courts and the Politics of Partisan Coalitions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, ed. Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2008. “The Global Spread of Constitutional Review.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, ed. Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glasius, Marlies. 2005. The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary A. 2008. “The Forgotten Crucible: The Latin American Influence on the Universal Human Rights Idea.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 27.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert. 2009. “History and Action: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 31(4): 856–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek. 2013. Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Randal. 2009. “What Judges Want: Judicial Self-Interest and Statutory Interpretation.” Statute Law Review 30(1): 38–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán Dálbora, José Luis. 2010. “El principio de legalidad penal en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.” In Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos y Derecho Penal Internacional, ed. Ambos, Kai. Montevideo, Uruguay: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination. Special Issue.” International Organization 46(1)Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
Hammergren, Linn A. 1998. The Politics of Justice and Justice Reform in Latin America: The Peruvian Case in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hammergren, Linn A. 2007. Envisioning Reform: Improving Judicial Performance in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria Charlotte. 1993. Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla. 2002. Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Judith. 1983. Mexico in Crisis. New York, NY: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, . 2006. “Introduction.” In Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2009. “Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Staton, Jeffrey K.. 2011. “The Puzzling Judicial Politics of Latin America: A Theory of Litigation, Judicial Decisions and Interbranch Conflict.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2007a. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2007b. “Politicizing Law to Liberalize Politics: Anti-Francoist Judges and Prosecutors in Spain’s Democratic Transition.” In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2012. “The Origins of Positive Judicial Independence.” World Politics 64(4): 587–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Florian F., and Bentes, Fernando R.. 2008. “Accountability for Social and Economic Rights in Brazil.” In Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World, ed. Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2003. Justice in Jeopardy: Why Mexico’s First Real Effort to Address Past Abuses Risks Becoming Its Latest Failure. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2006. Lost in Transition: Bold Ambitions, Limited Results for Human Rights under Fox. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2009. “Presunción Fundada.” www.hrw.org/en/reports/2005/12/20/presunci-n-fundada (last accessed 11 June 2012).Google Scholar
Humphrey, John. 1984. Human Rights and the United Nations: A Great Adventure. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2010a. “Rejecting the Inter-American Court: Judicialization, National Courts and Regional Human Rights.” In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, ed. Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2010b. “Judging from a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary’s Human Rights Turn.” Law & Social Inquiry 35(1): 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Iaryczower, Matías, Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano. 2002. “Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Matthew. 2012. “Crafting Courts in New Democracies: Ideology and Judicial Council Reforms in Three Mexican States.” Comparative Politics 44(4): 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelin, Elizabeth. 1994. “The Politics of Memory: The Human Rights Movements and the Construction of Democracy in Argentina.” Latin American Perspectives 21(2): 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., Wahlbeck, Paul J., and Spriggs, James F.. 2006. “The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 100(1): 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justicia Viva. 2006. Cambios en el sistema de justicia: Entre la expectativa y la incertidumbre. Lima, Peru: Consorcio Justicia Viva.Google Scholar
Justicia Viva. 2009. Balance 2008 del Tribunal Constitucional Peruano: El TC que se nos fue y el TC que viene. Lima, Peru: Consorcio Justicia Viva.Google Scholar
Kahn, Ronald. 1999. “Institutionalized Norms and Supreme Court Decision Making: The Rehnquist Court on Privacy and Religion.” In Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Clayton, Cornell and Gillman, Howard. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2008. “Doing Courts Justice? Studying Judicial Politics in Latin America.” Perspectives on Politics 6(04): 741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan. 2011. “Hierarchical and Collegial Politics in the US Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Politics 73(2): 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 2007. “Panel: The Justice Cascade in Latin America.” Santa Clara Journal of International Law 5(2): 345–362.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1991. “Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe.” International Social Science Journal 128(2): 267–282.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Hun Joon. 2012. “Structural Determinants of Human Rights Prosecutions after Democratic Transitions.” Journal of Peace Research 49(2): 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hun Joon, and Sikkink, Kathryh. 2010. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries.” International Studies Quarterly 54(4): 939–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, Ruth A. 2007. Statutory Limitations in International Criminal Law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopstein, Jeffrey, and Reilly, David. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Post-Communist World.” World Politics 53(1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, Christopher. 1996. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Comparative Law 44(4): 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey. 2011. “The New Judicial Politics of Legal Doctrine.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. 1997. “Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the Failure of Internationalism.” International Organization 51(1): 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessa, Francesca. 2013. Against Impunity: Memory and Transitional Justice in Argentina and Uruguay. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lessa, Francesca, Olsen, Tricia, Payne, Leigh, Pereira, Gabriel and Reiter, Andrew. 2014. “Overcoming Impunity: Pathways to Accountability in Latin America.” International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessa, Francesca, and Payne, Leigh, eds. 2012. Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2005. “Argentina: Democratic Survival amidst Economic Failure.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llanos, Mariana, and Schibber, Constanza Figueroa. 2008. “La participación de la presidencia y el senado en el nombramiento del Poder Judicial.” Desarrollo Económico 47(188): 607–637.Google Scholar
López Medina, Diego Eduardo. 2004. Teoría impura del derecho: La transformación de la cultura jurídica jatinoamerica. Bogotá, Colombia: Legis.Google Scholar
Lovatón, David. 2003. “Cambios en el sistema de justicia y sociedad civil en Perú (1990–2002), informe de Perú.” In Justicia y sociedad civil: El papel de la sociedad civil en la reforma judicial: Estudios de casos en Argentina, Chile, Colombia y Perú, ed. Pásara, Luis. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CEJA.Google Scholar
Lutz, Ellen L., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2000. “International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America.” International Organization 54(3): 633–659.Google Scholar
Lutz, Ellen L., and Kathryn, Sikkink 2001. “The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Chicago Journal of International Law 2: 1–33.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Ana Laura. 2007. “¿Por qué la Suprema Corte no ha sido un instrumento para la defensa de los derechos fundamentales?” Serie Documentos de Trabajo, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2003. “Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2007. Voting for Autocracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Enforcing Autocratic Political Order and the Role of Courts: The Case of Mexico.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2004. “The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2013. Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival and Fall. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malarino, Ezequiel. 2010. “Activismo judicial, punitivización y nacionalización. Tendencias antidemocráticas y antiliberales de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.” In Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos y Derecho Penal Internacional, ed. Ambos, Kai. Montevideo, Uruguay: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Mallinder, Louise. 2009. “Exploring the Practice of States in Introducing Amnesties.” In Building a Future on Peace and Justice: Studies on Transitional Justice, Peace and Development, ed. Ambos, Kai, Large, Judith, and Wierda, Marieke. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1993. Institutions, Parties, and Coalitions in Argentine Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Meléndez, Carlos, and León, Carlos. 2009. “Perú 2008: El juego de ajedrez de la gobernabilidad en partidas simultáneas.” Revista de Ciencia Política 29(2): 591–609.Google Scholar
Meléndez, Carlos, and León, Carlos. 2010. “Perú 2009: Los legados del autoritarismo.” Revista de Ciencia Política 30(2): 451–477.Google Scholar
Méndez, Juan. 1997. “In Defense of Transitional Justice.” In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, ed. McAdams, A. J.. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 2000. “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law.” American Journal of International Law 94(2) (April 1): 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettraux, Guénaël. 2009. The Law of Command Responsibility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignone, Emilio Fermín. 1991. Derechos humanos y sociedad: El caso argentino. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales/Ediciones del Pensamiento Nacional.Google Scholar
Ministério Publico Federal. 2013. Grupo de Trabalho Justiça de Transição: Atividades de Persecução Penal Desenvolvidas Pelo Ministério Publico Federal 2011/2013. Brsilia, Brazil: MPF, Série Relatórios de Actuação.Google Scholar
Modolell González, Juan Luis. 2010. “El crímen de desaparición forzada de personas en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.” In Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los derechos humanos y Derecho Penal Internacional, ed. Ambos, Kai. Montevideo, Uruguay: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Morales Solá, Joaquín. 1990. Asalto a la ilusión: Historia secreta del poder en la Argentina desde 1983. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, María Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions and Market Reforms in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalepa, Monika. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nobles, Melissa. 2010. “The Prosecution of Human Rights Violations.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norden, Deborah L. 1996. Military Rebellion in Argentina: Between Coups and Consolidation. Lincoln, NA: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Novaro, Marcos. 2009. Argentina en el fin de siglo: Democracia, mercado y nación (1983–2001). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.Google Scholar
Novkov, Julie. 2008. “Law and Political Ideologies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, ed. Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Rodrigo M. 2010. “Ideational Origins of Progressive Judicial Activism: The Colombian Constitutional Court and the Right to Health.” Latin American Politics and Society 52(3): 67–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1988. Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina, 1966–1973, in Comparative Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2010. Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo A., and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olásolo Alonso, Héctor. 2010. Estudios de Derecho Penal Internacional. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Penales.Google Scholar
Olsen, Tricia, Payne, Leigh and Reitner, Andrew. 2010. Transitional Justice in Balance. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.Google Scholar
Orentlicher, Diane F. 1991. “Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime.” Yale Law Journal 100: 2537–2618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1991. Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law and Liberal Development in the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark. 1986. “The Making of Human Rights Policy in Argentina: The Impact of Ideas and Interests on a Legal Conflict.” Journal of Latin American Studies 18(01): 135–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiel, Mark. 2000. “Why Prosecute: Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity.” Human Rights Quarterly 22: 118–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyhanarte, Julio. 1972. “Historia del Poder Judicial.” Todo Es Historia 61.Google Scholar
Panfichi, Aldo, ed. 2009. La ciencia política en el Perú de hoy. Lima, Peru: PUCP- CISEPA.Google Scholar
Parenti, Pablo. 2010. “La inaplicabilidad de las normas de prescripción en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.” In Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los derechos humanos y Derecho Penal Internacional, ed. Ambos, Kai. Montevideo, Uruguay: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Pásara, Luis. 2010. Tres claves de la justicia en el Perú: Jueces, justicia y poder en el Perú; La enseñanza del derecho; Los abogados en la administración de justicia. Lima, Peru: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, James. 2001. Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Leigh. 2008. Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony. 2005. Political (In)justice: Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Perdomo, Rogelio. 2006. Latin American Lawyers: A Historical Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, and Castagnola, Andrea. 2009. “Presidential Control of High Courts in Latin America: A Long-Term View (1904–2006).” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1(2): 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. J. 1992. “Whalers, Cetologists, Environmentalists, and the International Management of Whaling.” International Organization 46(1): 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2002. “Democracy from the Outside-In?: International Organizations and Democratization.” International Organization 56(3): 515–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickerill, Mitchell, and Clayton, Cornell. 2004. “The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism.” Perspectives on Politics 2(2): 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 1994. “To Prosecute or to Pardon? Human Rights Decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone.” Human Rights Quarterly 16(1): 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 1995. “To Prosecute or to Pardon?” In Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, ed. Kritz, Neil. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 1997. Through Corridors of Power: Institutions and Civil-military Relations in Argentina. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 2004. “The Pinochet Case and Human Rights Progress in Chile: Was Europe a Catalyst, Cause or Inconsequential?” Journal of Latin American Studies 36(03): 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poniatowska, Elena. 1971. La noche de Tlatelolco: Testimonios de historia oral. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Biblioteca Era.Google Scholar
Prusak, Christina. 2010. “The Trial of Alberto Fujimori: Navigating the Show Trial Dilemma in Pursuit of Transitional Justice.” NYU Law Review 85: 867–2209.Google Scholar
Quinteros, Víctor, ed. 2010. Judicialización de violaciones de derechos humanos: Aportes sustantivos y procesales. Lima, Peru: IDEHPUCP.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, and Abrams, Jason. 1997. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ríos Figueroa, Julio. 2007. “Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994–2002.” Latin American Politics and Society 49(1): 31–57.Google Scholar
Ríos Figueroa, Julio. 2011. “Institutions of Constitutional Justice in Latin America.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ríos Figueroa, Julio, and Staton, Jeffrey. 2014. “An Evaluation of Cross-National Measures of Judicial Independence.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 30(1): 104–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos Figueroa, Julio, and Taylor, Matthew. 2006. “Institutional Determinants of the Judicialisation of Policy in Brazil and Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 38(04): 739–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Ropp, Steve C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction.” In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, ed. Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Ropp, Steve C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera, Carlos. 2010. “El estado del proceso de judicialización de graves violaciones a los derechos humanos en el Perú”. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César. 2009. La globalización del estado de derecho: El neoconstitucionalismo, el neoliberalismo y la transformación institucional en América Latina. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Uniandes/Facultad de Derecho.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César. 2011a. “Latin American Constitutionalism: Social and Economic Rights: Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review 89: 1669–1977.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César. 2011b. “Toward a Sociology of the Global Rule of Law Field: Neoliberalism, Neoconstitutionalism, and the Contest over Judicial Reform in Latin America.” In Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Mungía, Jacinto. 2007. La otra guerra secreta: Los archivos prohibidos de la prensa y el poder. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Debolsillo.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Raga, Juan Carlos. 2011. “Strategic Deference in the Colombian Constitutional Court, 1992–2006.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roehrig, Terence. 2009. “Executive Leadership and the Continuing Quest for Justice in Argentina.” Human Rights Quarterly 31(3): 721–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2005. The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2006. “The New Landscape of Transitional Justice.” In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice, ed. Roht-Arriaza, Naomi and Mariezcurrena, Javier. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2015. “After Amnesties Are Gone: Latin American National Courts and the New Contours of the Fight against Impunity,” in Human Rights Quarterly 37(2): 341–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, Luis Alberto. 2002. A History of Argentina in the Twentieth Century. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roxin, Claus. 2006. “El dominio de organización como forma independiente de autoría mediata.” Revista de Estudios de la Justicia (7): 11–22.Google Scholar
Ruibal, Alba. 2009. “Self-Restraint in Search of Legitimacy: The Reform of the Argentine Supreme Court.” Latin American Politics and Society 51(3): 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, Luis. 2001. “From Law and Development to Rule of Law: New and Old Issues in Justice Reform in Latin America.” In The Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform, ed. RSieder, achel and Domingo, Pilar. London, UK: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Saltalamacchia, Natalia. 2009. “1968 y los derechos humanos en México.” Foreign Affairs: Latinoamérica 9(1): 133–142.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Arianna, Magaloni, Beatriz and Magar, Eric. 2011. “Legalist versus Interpretativist: The Supreme Court and the Democratic Transition in Mexico.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sancinetti, Marcelo. 1987. Derechos humanos en la Argentina postdictatorial: Juicio a los ex comandantes, punto final, obedencia debida, apéndice documental. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lerner Editores Asociados.Google Scholar
Sarles, Margaret. 2001. “USAID’s Support of Justice Reform in Latin America.” In The Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform, ed. Sieder, Rachel and Domingo, Pilar. London, UK: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2008. “Formalism: Legal, Constitutional, Judicial.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, ed. Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheb, John M., and Lyons, William. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 81(4): 928–940.Google Scholar
Scribner, Druscilla. 2011. “Courts, Power and Rights in Argentina and Chile.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Figueroa, Julio Ríos. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey Allan, and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seils, Peter. 2004. “Promised Unfulfilled? The Special Prosecutor’s Office in Mexico.” Occasional Papers Series. Internacional Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Eran. 2008. “Conflict, Terrorism and the Socialization of Human Rights Norms: The Spiral Model Revisited.” Social Problems 55(1): 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieder, Rachel, Line, Schjolden, and Angell, Alan, eds. 2005. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sierra, Jorge Luis. 2003. El enemigo interno: Contrainsurgencia y fuerzas armadas en Mexico. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Universidad Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America.” International Organization 47(3): 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2005. “The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, ed. Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, and Walling, Carrie Booth. 2007. “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research 44(4): 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva Meza, Juan N., and García, Fernando Silva. 2009. Derechos fundamentales: Bases para la reconstrucción de la jurisprudencia constitucional. Mexico D.F., Mexico: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaar, Elin. 2011. Judicial Independence and Human Rights in Latin America: Violations, Politics, and Prosecution. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1988. “Political Jurisprudence, the ‘New Institutionalism’ and the Future of Public Law.” American Political Science Review 82(1): 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 2008. “Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, ed. Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 1995. “Constitución y Poder Judicial en la nueva democracia Argentina: La experiencia de las instituciones.” In La nueva matriz política argentina, ed. Acuña, Carlos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 2002. “The Discovery of Law: Political Consequences in the Argentine Case.” In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano. 2009. The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina: A Transaction Costs Approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2004. “Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Mérida.” Comparative Politics 37(1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen Ann, and Longstreth, Frank, eds. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Steve J. 1998. Shining and Other Paths: War and Society in Peru, 1980–1995. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1997. “On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism.” Annual Review of Sociology 23(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struett, Michael J. 2008. The Politics of Constructing the International Criminal Court: NGOs, Discourse, and Agency. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Martín. 1998. El espejismos de la democracia: El colapso del sistema de partidos en el Perú, 1980–1995, en perspectiva comparada. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Martín. 2005. Democracia sin partidos, Perú, 2000–2005: Los problemas de representación y las propuestas de reforma política. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Martín. 2006. “From Crisis to Collapse of the Party Systems and Dilemmas of Democratic Representation: Peru and Venezuela.” In The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes, ed. Mainwaring, Scott, Bejarano, Ana María, and Leongómez, Eduardo Pizarro. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Vallinder, Torbjörn, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew. 2008. Judging Policy: Courts and Policy Reform in Democratic Brazil. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 1997. “Transitional Jurisprudence: The Role of Law in Political Transformation.” Yale Law Journal 106(7): 2009–2080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2003. “Transitional Justice Genealogy.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69–94.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2014. Globalizing Transitional Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2(1): 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, Javier. 2004. “Las ONG de derechos humanos y la redefinición de la soberanía del Estado Mexicano.” Foro Internacional 44(3): 509–539.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1994. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2004. The NAACP’s Legal Strategy against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2010. “World Drug Report 2010.” www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/WDR-2010.html (last accessed 11 June 2012).Google Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo. 2004. “The Constitutional Court and the Control of Extraordinary Powers in Colombia.” In Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies ed. Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Roberto, and Skaar, Elin. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Valadés, Diego. 2001. “La obre es una república: La tradición internacionalista mexicana.” Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 1: 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valladares, Jorge. 2010. “Unidad de los grupos parlamentarios en el congreso de la república 2006–2007.” In Estudios sobre el congreso peruano: Grupos parlamentarios, disciplina partidaria y desempeño profesional, ed. Valladares, Jorge. Lima, Peru: IDEA.Google Scholar
Van Der Voort, Karlijn, and Zwanenburg, Marten. 2001. “From Raison d’Etat to Etat de Droit International – Amnesties and the French Implementation of the Rome Statute.” International Criminal Law Review 1: 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vargas, Luis. 2010. “Tratamiento de la prueba en el delito de desaparición forzada: Especial referencia a la prueba indiciaria.” In Judicialización de violaciones de derechos humanos: Aportes sustantivos y procesales, ed. Quinteros, Víctor. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Derechos Humanos de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Vecchioli, Virginia. 2010. “Derechos Humanos y Compromiso Militante: Un Recorrido por la Constitución de Esta Causa a Través del Activismo de los Profesionales del Derecho.” Mimeo.Google Scholar
Vecchioli, Virginia. 2011. “Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Argentina: Transnational Advocacy Networks and the Transformation of the National Legal Field.” In Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verbitsky, Horacio. 1993. Hacer la corte: La construcción de un poder absoluto sin justicia ni control. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Planeta.Google Scholar
Verbitsky, Horacio. 2003. Civiles y militares: Memoria secreta de la transición. Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Verner, Joel G. 1984. “The Independence of Supreme Courts in Latin America: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Latin American Studies 16(2): 463–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, Camilo. 2012. “La conspiración de las ratas: La construcción del enemigo político en México, 1970–1980.” Naveg@mérica 9: 1–21.Google Scholar
Villarán, Susana. 2007. “Perú.” In Víctimas sin mordaza: El impacto del Sistema Interamericano en la jusiticia transicional en latinoamérica: Los casos de Argentina, Guatemala, El Salvador y Perú, ed. Fundación para el Debido Proceso Legal. Washington, D.C.: Fundación para el Debido Proceso LegalGoogle Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L. 1983. “Interest Groups and Litigation.” Policy Studies Journal 11(4): 657–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserstrom, Richard. 1968. “Lawyers and Revolution.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 30: 125–133.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Mathew. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2000. “Once More unto the Breach: Post-Behavioralist Approaches to Judicial Politics.” Law and Social Inquiry 25(2): 601–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bruce M., and Rodríguez Cordero, Juan Carlos. 2006. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 39(3): 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Patricia J. 2008. Judicial Power and National Politics: Courts and Gender in the Religious-Secular Conflict in Israel. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Woods, Patricia J., and Hilbink, Lisa. 2009. “Comparative Sources of Judicial Empowerment: Ideas and Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yacobucci, Guillermo J. 2005. “Hacia una nueva legalidad penal (a propósito del fallo ‘Espósito’ de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación.)” La Ley C (1).Google Scholar
Youngers, Coletta. 2003. Violencia política y sociedad civil en el Perú: Historia de la Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, José. 1992. “Balancing Ethical Imperatives and Political Constraints: The Dilemma of New Democracies Confronting Past Human Rights Violations.” Hastings Law Journal 43(6): 1425–1438.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, José. 1995. “Confronting Human Rights Violations Committed by Former Governments: Principles Applicable and Political Constraints.” In Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, ed. Kritz, Neil. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×