Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:30:10.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2020

Curtis Perry
Curtis Perry
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare and Senecan Tragedy , pp. 266 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, Vance. “Back to the Future: Subjectivity and Anamorphosis in Richard III.” Critical Survey 9.3 (1997): 32–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, Janet. “Iago’s Alter Ego: Race as Projection in Othello.” Shakespeare Quarterly 48.2 (1997): 125–144.Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet “Shakespeare’s Romulus and Remus: Who Does the Wolf Love?” In Identity, Otherness and Empire in Shakespeare’s Rome. Edited by Farnham, Maria Del Sapio Garbero: Ashgate, 2009. 19–34.Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Aggeler, Geoffrey. Nobler in the Mind: The Stoic–Skeptic Dialectic in English Renaissance Tragedy. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Ahl, Frederick. Sophocles’s Oedipus: Evidence and Self-Conviction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ahl, Frederick Two Faces of Oedipus: Sophocles’s Oedipus Tyrannus and Seneca’s Oedipus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Akin, Judith Popovich. German Baroque Drama. Boston: Twayne, 1982.Google Scholar
Alpers, Paul J. “King Lear and the Theory of the ‘Sight Pattern’.” In In Defense of Reading: A Reader’s Approach to Literary Criticism. Edited by Brower, Reuben A. and Poirier, Richard. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1962. 133–152.Google Scholar
Altman, Joel B. The Improbability of Othello: Rhetorical Anthropology and Shakespearean Selfhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Altman, Joel B. The Tudor Play of Mind: Rhetorical Inquiry and the Development of Elizabethan Drama. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Anon. The True Chronicle History of King Leir, and his three daughters, Gonerill, Ragan, and Cordella. London, 1605.Google Scholar
Anon. The True Tragedie of Richard the Third. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Appian of Alexandria. An Auncient Historie and Exquisite Chronicle of the Romanes Warres, Both Civile and Foren. Translated by W. B. London, 1578.Google Scholar
Arber, Edward, ed. A Transcript of the Register of the Company of Stationers of London, 1554–1640 A.D. 5 vols. London: privately printed, 1875–1894.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. “Empire and Liberty: A Republican Dilemma.” In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. 2 vols. Edited by Van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 2:29–46.Google Scholar
Armitage, David The Ideological Origins of British Empire. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Armitage, David “Literature and Empire.” In The Oxford History of the British Empire. Vol. 1, The Origins of Empire: British Overseas Enterprise to the Close of the Seventeenth Century. Edited by Canny, Nicholas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 99–123.Google Scholar
Armstrong, W. A. “The Influence of Seneca and Machiavelli on the Elizabethan Tyrant.” Review of English Studies 24 (1948): 19–35.Google Scholar
Arnold, Oliver. The Third Citizen: Shakespeare’s Theater and the Early Modern House of Commons. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth. “Seneca on Fortune and the Kingdom of God.” In Seneca and the Self. Edited by Bartsch, Shadi and Wray, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 115–138.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. “‘Domina et Regina Virtutum’: Justice and Societas in De Officiis.” Phronesis 35 (1990): 258–289.Google Scholar
Ayers, David. “A Whisper in the Ear of Early Modernists; or, Reflections on Literary Critics Writing the History of the Subject.” In Culture and History, 1350–1600: Essays on English Communities, Identities and Writing. London: Harvester, 1992. 177–202.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall, of Francis Lo. Verulam, Viscount St. Alban. London, 1625.Google Scholar
Baker, Howard. Induction to Tragedy: A Study in a Development of Form in Gorboduc, The Spanish Tragedy, and Titus Andronicus. 1939; New York: Russell & Russell Inc., 1965.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakespere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Barber, C. L. and Wheeler, Richard. The Whole Journey: Shakespeare’s Power of Development. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bartels, Emily C. Speaking of the Moor, from Alcazar to Othello. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthelemy, Anthony Gerard. Black Face, Maligned Race: The Representation of Blacks in English Drama from Shakespeare to Southerne. 1987; Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Barton, Anne. “Livy, Machiavelli, and Shakespeare’s Coriolanus.” Shakespeare Survey 38 (1986): 115–130.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi. The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi and Wray, David, eds. Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador, 1997.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan How the Classics Made Shakespeare. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan ed. Titus Andronicus. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Translated by Harry Zohn. Edited by Arendt, Hannah. New York: Schocken Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Translated by John Osborne. London: NLB, 1977.Google Scholar
Benton, Cindy. “Bringing the Other to Center Stage: Seneca’s Medea and the Anxieties of Imperialism.” Arethusa 36 (2003): 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, D. S. “‘Determined’ in Richard III I.i.30.” Shakespeare Quarterly 14 (1963): 483–484.Google Scholar
Berrigan, Joseph, ed. Mussato’s Ecerinis and Loschi’s Achilles. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1975.Google Scholar
Betteridge, Thomas. Shakespearean Fantasy and Politics. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bevington, David, Lars Engle, Katherine Eisaman Maus, and Eric Rasmussen, eds. English Renaissance Drama: A Norton Anthology. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Billings, Joshua. “Margins of Genre: Walter Benjamin and the Idea of Tragedy.” In Tragedy and the Idea of Modernity. Edited by Billings and Miriam Leonard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 266–284.Google Scholar
Binns, J. W. Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England: The Latin Writings of the Age. Leeds: Francis Cairns, 1990.Google Scholar
Black, James. “Hamlet Hears Marlowe, Shakespeare Reads Virgil.” Renaissance and Reformation, n.s., 18.4 (1994): 17–28.Google Scholar
Bliss, Lee, ed. Coriolanus. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Boose, Lynda. “‘Let it be Hid’: The Pornographic Aesthetic of Shakespeare’s Othello.” In Women, Violence and English Renaissance Literature: Essays Honoring Paul Jorgensen. Edited by Woodbridge, Linda and Beehler, Sharon. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2004. 243–268.Google Scholar
Bourus, Terri. Young Shakespeare’s Young Hamlet: Print, Piracy, and Performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Bovilsky, Lara. Barbarous Play: Race on the English Renaissance Stage. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bowers, Rick. “John Marston at the ‘mart of woe’: The Antonio Plays.” In The Drama of John Marston: Critical Re-Visions. Edited by Wharton, T. F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 14–26.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. ed. Octavia: Attributed to Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. ed. Seneca: Medea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. ed. Seneca: Oedipus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. ed. Seneca’s Phaedra. Leeds: Francis Cairns, 1987.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. ed. Seneca’s Troades. Leeds: Francis Cairns, 1994.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. ed. Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Maryborough, Australia: Aureal Publications, 1983.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Bozio, Andrew. “Embodied Thought and the Perception of Place in King Lear.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 55 (2015): 263–284.Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon. Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger’s Privilege. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon“Senecan Tragedy in the Renaissance.” Illinois Classical Studies 9 (1984): 277–292.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy. 1904; London: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
Braunmuller, A. R. George Peele. Boston: Twayne, 1983.Google Scholar
Braunmuller, A. R. Natural Fictions: George Chapman’s Major Tragedies. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Britton, Dennis Austin. Becoming Christian: Race, Reformation, and Early Modern English Romance. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1947.Google Scholar
Brooks, Harold F. “Richard III, Unhistorical Amplifications: The Women’s Scenes and Seneca.” Modern Language Review 75 (1980): 721–737.Google Scholar
Brown, Jane K. The Persistence of Allegory: Drama and Neoclassicism from Shakespeare to Wagner. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Buckley, Emma. “Matthew Gwinne’s Nero (1603): Seneca, Academic Drama, and the Politics of Polity.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 40.1 (2013): 16–33.Google Scholar
Bugliani, Francesca. “‘In the mind to suffer’: Hamlet’s Soliloquy, ‘To be or not to be’.” Hamlet Studies 17.1–2 (1995): 10–42.Google Scholar
Bullough, Geoffrey, ed. Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare. 8 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957 –1975.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. Absolute Monarchy and The Stuart Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: An Introduction to English Political Thought, 1603–1642. University Park: Penn State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Burrow, Colin. Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca W. Tragedies of Tyrants: Political Thought and Theater in the English Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cadman, Daniel. Sovereigns and Subjects in Early Modern Neo-Senecan Drama: Republicanism, Stoicism, and Authority. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Calder, III, William, M. “Seneca: Tragedian of Imperial Rome.” The Classical Journal 72.1 (1976): 1–11.Google Scholar
Cantor, Paul A. Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Champlin, Edward. Nero. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Chapman, George. The Conspiracy and Tragedy of Charles, Duke of Byron. Edited by Margeson, John. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Chapman, George The Plays of George Chapman: The Tragedies, with Sir Gyles Goosecappe. Edited by Holaday, Allen. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1987.Google Scholar
Charnes, Linda. Hamlet’s Heirs: Shakespeare and the Politics of a New Millennium. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Charnes, Linda Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Pramit. “Classical Quotation in Titus Andronicus.” ELH 81 (2014): 787–810.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick. Marlowe’s Counterfeit Profession: Ovid, Spenser, Counter-Nationhood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick Marlowe’s Republican Authorship: Lucan, Liberty, and the Sublime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick Shakespeare, National Poet-Playwright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Churchill, George Bosworth. Richard the Third up to Shakespeare. 1900; Dursley, Gloucestershire: Alan Sutton, 1976.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Officiis. Translated by Walter Miller. 1913; Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Clare, Janet. Shakespeare’s Stage Traffic: Imitation, Borrowing and Competition in Renaissance Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Clay, Diskin. “Columbus’ Senecan Prophecy.” The American Journal of Philology 113 (1992): 617–620.Google Scholar
Clemen, Wolfgang. English Tragedy before Shakespeare: The Development of Dramatic Speech. 1961; London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Clubb, Louise George. Italian Drama in Shakespeare’s Time. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. “Monster Culture (Seven Theses).” In Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Edited by Cohen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. 3–25.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Coleridge’s Essays and Lectures on Shakespeare and Some Other Old Poets and Dramatists. Edited by Rhys, Ernest. 1907; rpt. London: J. M. Dent, 1909.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Coleridge on Shakespeare: The Text of the Lectures of 1811–12. Edited by Foakes, R. A.. 1971; London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Lectures, 1808–1819, On Literature. 2 vols. Edited by Foakes, R. A.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Shorter Works and Fragments. 2 vols. Edited by Jackson, H. R and J. R. de J. Jackson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L. “The Energies of Endurance: Biblical Echo in King Lear.” In Some Facets of King Lear: Essays in Prismatic Criticism. Edited by Colie and F. T. Flahiff. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974. 117–143.Google Scholar
Collinson, Patrick. “The Monarchical Republic of Queen Elizabeth I.” Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 69 (1987): 394–424.Google Scholar
Contarini, Gasparo. The Commonwealth and Government of Venice. Translated by Lewis Lewkenor. London, 1599.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, William. Discourses Upon Seneca The Tragedian. 1601; Facsimile edition, Delmar NY: Scholars Facsimiles and Reprints, 1978.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, William Essayes. London, 1600.Google Scholar
Cox, John D. Seeming Knowledge: Shakespeare and Skeptical Faith. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cox, John D. Shakespeare and the Dramaturgy of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. Shakespeare’s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Crewe, Jonathan. “The Violence of Drama: Towards a Reading of the Senecan Phaedra.” boundary 2 17.3 (1990): 96–115.Google Scholar
Crosbie, Christopher. Revenge Tragedy and Classical Philosophy on the Early Modern Stage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, John W. The Influence of Seneca Upon Elizabethan Tragedy. 1893; Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Curley, Dan. Tragedy in Ovid: Theater, Metatheater, and the Transformation of a Genre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cust, Richard. “The ‘Public man’ in Late Tudor and Early Stuart England.” In The Politics of the Public Sphere in Early Modern England. Edited by Lake, Peter and Pincus, Steven. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007. 116–143.Google Scholar
Daalder, Joost, ed. Thyestes: Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Translated by Jasper Heywood. London: Ernest Benn Limited, 1982.Google Scholar
Damschen, Gregor and Hill, Andreas, eds. Brill’s Companion to Seneca, Philosopher and Dramatist. Leiden: Brill. 2014.Google Scholar
Davis, Nick. Early Modern Writing and the Privatization of Experience. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. Seneca: Thyestes. London: Duckworth, 2003.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. Hamlet Without Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta “The Ideology of Superfluous Things: King Lear as Period Piece.” In Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture. Edited by de Grazia, Maureen Quilligan, and Peter Stallybrass. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 17–42.Google Scholar
Dessen, Alan C. Shakespeare and the Late Moral Plays. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, Eric, ed. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy: Scholarly, Theatrical and Literary Receptions. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, Eric “Karma, Revenge, Apocalypse: Ran’s Violent Victim-Agent through Japanese and Western Contexts.” Shakespeare Bulletin 31 (2013): 233–256.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, Eric “Rending Others: Ethical Contagio in Seneca’s Thyestes.” Mouseion, Series 3, 10 (2010): 45–68.Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Dolman, John, trans. Those Fyve Questions, which Marke Tullye Cicero, Disputed in his Manor of Tusculanum. London, 1561.Google Scholar
Doran, Madeline. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Dressler, Alex. “Oedipus on Oedipus: Sophocles, Seneca, Politics, and Therapy.” In A Companion to Sophocles. Edited by Ormand, Kirk. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. 507–522.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Ungentle Shakespeare: Scenes from His Life. London: The Arden Shakespeare, 2001.Google Scholar
Dunne, Derek. Shakespeare, Revenge Tragedy, and Early Modern Law: Vindictive Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Dunworth, Felicity. Mothers and Meaning on the Early Modern English Stage. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dutton, Richard. Shakespeare, Court Dramatist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Edelman, Charles, ed. The Stukeley Plays: The Battle of Alcazar by George Peele; The Famous History of the Life and Death of Captain Thomas Stukeley. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Eden, Kathy. “Liquid Fortification and the Law in King Lear.” In Shakespeare and the Law: A Conversation Among Disciplines and Professions. Edited by Cormack, Braden, Nussbaum, Martha C., and Richard, Strier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013. 202–220.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. Introduction to Seneca His Tenne Tragedies Translated into English. Translated by Thomas Newton, et al. 2 vols. bound together. 1927; Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966. v–liv.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. Selected Essays. 1932; New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.Google Scholar
Elton, William R. King Lear and the Gods. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1988.Google Scholar
Enterline, Lynn. Shakespeare’s Schoolroom: Rhetoric, Discipline, Emotion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Erasmo, Mario. Roman Tragedy: Theatre to Theatricality. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2004Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as a Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Evett, David. Discourses of Service in Shakespeare’s England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Ewbank, Inga-Stina. “The Fiend-like Queen: A Note on ‘Macbeth’ and Seneca’s ‘Medea’.” Shakespeare Survey 19 (1967): 82–89.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine, ed. Seneca’s Troades: A Literary Introduction with Text, Translation, and Commentary. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine“Seneca’s ‘Troades’ and ‘Agamemnon’: Continuity and Sequence.” The Classical Journal 77.2 (1981): 118–129.Google Scholar
Ferri, Rolando, ed. Octavia: A Play Attributed to Seneca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fitch, John G., ed. Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Fitch, John G. ed. Seneca’s Hercules Furens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Fitch, John G. and McElduff, Siobhán. “Construction of the Self in Senecan Drama.” In Seneca. Edited by Fitch.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 157–180.Google Scholar
Florby, Gunilla. Echoing Texts: George Chapman’s Conspiracy and Tragedy of Charles Duke of Byron. Lund: Lund University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A. Hamlet Versus Lear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality. Vol. 3. Translated by Robert Hurley. 1986; New York: Vintage Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Fox, Cora. Ovid and the Politics of Emotion in Elizabethan England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Francklin, Thomas. A Dissertation on Antient Tragedy. London[?], 1760.Google Scholar
Frank, Marcia, ed. Seneca’s Phoenissae. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Gahan, John T. “Seneca, Ovid, and Exile.” The Classical World 78 (1985): 145–147.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine and Greenblatt, Stephen, Practicing New Historicism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Garber., Marjorie. Shakespeare After All. New York: Anchor Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Garber., Marjorie Shakespeare and Modern Culture. 2008; New York: Anchor Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Garber., Marjorie Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature and Uncanny Causality. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher“Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6 (1988): 169–199.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Stuart. Shakespeare’s Books: A Dictionary of Shakespeare’s Sources. London: The Athalone Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gillies, John. Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Lauren Donovan. Staging Memory, Staging Strife: Empire and Civil War in the Octavia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Girard, René. A Theater of Envy: William Shakespeare. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Gloyn, Liz. The Ethics of the Family in Seneca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. L. An Essay on King Lear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Sander. “The Fall and Rise of Roman Tragedy.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 126 (1996): 265–286.Google Scholar
Golding, Arthur. The Woorke of the Excellent Philosopher Lucius Annaeus Seneca Concerning Benefiting. London, 1578.Google Scholar
Goodland, Katherine. Female Mourning and Tragedy in Medieval and Renaissance English Drama: From the Raising of Lazarus to King Lear. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Gowing, Alain. Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Grady, Hugh. “Presentism, Walter Benjamin, and the Search for Meaning in King Lear.” Shakespeare 5.2 (2009): 145–161.Google Scholar
Grady, Hugh Shakespeare and Impure Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Margaret R. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gray, Patrick. Shakespeare and the Fall of the Roman Republic: Selfhood, Stoicism, and Civil War. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Gray, Patrick“Shakespeare and the Other Virgil: Pity and Imperium in Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Survey 69 (2016): 30–45.Google Scholar
Gray, Patrick “Shakespeare vs. Seneca: Competing Visions of Human Dignity.” In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy. Edited by Dodson-Robinson., Eric Leiden: Brill, 2016. 203–230.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen Shakespeare’s Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert. Menaphon. London, 1589.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Greville, Fulke. The Prose Works of Fulke Greville, Lord Brooke. Edited by Gouws, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Grund, Gary, ed. Humanist Tragedies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Erik. The Sublime Seneca: Ethics, Literature, Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. “A Black Reversal.” Shakespeare 4 (2008), 137–144.Google Scholar
Guy, John, ed. The Reign of Elizabeth I: Court and Culture in the Last Decade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, Thomas. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Habinek, Thomas and Schiesaro, Alessandro, eds. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew. Shakespeare and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew “Shakespeare and Republican Venice.” In Visions of Venice in Shakespeare. Edited by Tosi, Laura and Bassi, Shau. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011. 67–82.Google Scholar
Hall, Joseph. The Discovery of a New World, Or a Description of the South Indies, Hereto Unknowne, by an English Mercury. Translated by John Healey. London, 1609.Google Scholar
Hall, Kim F. Things of Darkness: Economies of Race and Gender in Early Modern England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hammond, Anthony, ed. Richard III. London: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar
Hammond, Paul. The Strangeness of Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Harbage, Alfred. Shakespeare and the Rival Traditions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Harrison, George W. M., ed. Seneca in Performance. London: Duckworth, 2000.Google Scholar
Haward, Nicholas. The Line of Liberalitie. London, 1569.Google Scholar
Heavey, Katherine. The Early Modern Medea: Medea in English Literature, 1558–1688. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar
Heilman, Robert B. This Great Stage: Image and Structure in King Lear. 1948; Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Heng, Geraldine. The Invention of Race in the European Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Henry, D. and E. Henry, . The Mask of Power: Seneca’s Tragedies and Imperial Rome. Warminster, Wiltshire: Aris and Phillios, 1985.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried von. Shakespeare. Translated by Gregory Moore. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. “Senecan Tragedy.” Arion 5 (1966): 422–471.Google Scholar
Herman, Peter C. “‘He said What?!?’: Misdeeming Gorboduc, or Problematizing Form, Service and Certainty.” Exemplaria 13 (2001): 285–321.Google Scholar
Herrick, Marvin T. Italian Tragedy in the Renaissance. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Heywood, Thomas, trans. The Two Most Worthy and Notable Histories … the Conspiracie of Cateline, Undertaken Against the Government of the Senate of Rome, and the Warre Which Jugurth for Many Yeares Maintained Against the Same State. London, 1608/9.Google Scholar
Hillier, Russell M. “‘Valor Will Weep’: The Ethics of Valor, Anger, and Pity in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus.” Studies in Philology 113 (2016): 358–396.Google Scholar
Hillman, Richard, ed. and trans. Coriolan, By Alexandre Hardy. 2009; Online: Centre d’études supérieures de la Renaissance, 2018. https://bit.ly/2RJJINo.Google Scholar
Hitchner, R. Bruce. “Globalization Avant la Lettre: Globalization and the History of the Roman Empire.” New Global Studies 2.2 (2008): 1–12.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Peter. Shakespeare’s Individualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter, ed. Coriolanus. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J., ed. Othello. Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson, 1997.Google Scholar
Huffman, Clifford Chalmers. Coriolanus in Context. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K. Dramatic Identities and Cultural Tradition: Studies in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna. Circumstantial Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hyland, Peter. “Moors, Villainy, and The Battle of Alcazar.” Parergon, 16.2 (1999): 85–99.Google Scholar
Ide, Richard S. Possessed with Greatness: The Heroic Tragedies of Shakespeare and Chapman. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Inwood, BradReview of Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology by Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Classical Philology 86.3 (1991): 248–252.Google Scholar
Isaac, Benjamin. The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Sujata. Shades of Difference: Mythologies of Skin Color in Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Jackson, Ken. “‘All the World to Nothing’: Badieu, Žižek and Pauline Subjectivity in Richard III.” Shakespeare 1 (2005): 29–52.Google Scholar
James, Heather. Shakespeare’s Troy Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jensen, Freyja Cox. Reading the Roman Republic in Early Modern England. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys. The Origins of Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys Scenic Form in Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Jones, Ernest. Hamlet and Oedipus. 1949; New York: W. W. Norton, 1976.Google Scholar
Jones, Gwilym. Shakespeare’s Storms. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Joughin, John J. “Lear’s Afterlife.” Shakespeare Survey 55 (2002): 67–81.Google Scholar
Kahn, Coppélia. Roman Shakespeare: Warriors, Wounds, and Women. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Kahn, Coppélia “The Absent Mother in King Lear.” In Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe. Edited by Ferguson, Margaret, Quilligan, Maureen, and Vickers, Nancy J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. 33–49.Google Scholar
Kallendorf, Craig. The Other Virgil: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Early Modern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, R. J. “The Seneca Perspective and The Shakespearean Poetic.” Comparative Drama 1.3 (1967): 182–198.Google Scholar
Ker, James. The Deaths of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ker, James and Jessica, Winston, eds. Elizabethan Seneca: Three Tragedies. London: Modern Humanities Research Association, 2012.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, John. Shakespeare’s Binding Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerrigan, John Shakespeare’s Originality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kewes, Paulina. “Henry Savile’s Tacitus and the Politics of Roman History in Late Elizabethan England.” Huntington Library Quarterly 74 (2011): 515–551.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Frederick P. “Senecan Influence: A Bibliographic Supplement.” Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 28 (1985): 129–42.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Frederick P.“Seneca’s Influence on Elizabethan Tragedy: An Annotated Bibliography.” Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 21 (1978): 17–34.Google Scholar
Kiséry, András. Hamlet’s Moment: Drama and Political Knowledge in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy. 1930; London: Methuen, 1967.Google Scholar
Kohn, Thomas D. The Dramaturgy of Senecan Tragedy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kragelund, Patrick. Roman Historical Drama: The Octavia in Antiquity and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kuzner, James. Open Subjects: English Renaissance Republicans, Modern Selfhoods and the Virtue of Vulnerability. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kyd, Thomas. The Spanish Tragedy. Edited by Mulryne, J. R.. 1970; London: A & C Black,1989.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. “Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet.” Translated by James Hulbert. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Yale French Studies 55/56 (1977): 11–52.Google Scholar
Lamb, Charles. The Works of Charles Lamb: Complete in One Volume. Philadelphia, 1857.Google Scholar
Larson, Victoria Tietze. The Role of Description in Senecan Tragedy. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1994.Google Scholar
Law, Robert Adger. “The Roman Background of Titus Andronicus.” Studies in Philology 40 (1943): 145–153.Google Scholar
Levao, Ronald. Renaissance Minds and their Fictions: Cusanus, Sidney, Shakespeare. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Lever, J. W. The Tragedy of State: A Study of Jacobean Drama. 1971; London: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Levin, Carole and Watkins, John. Shakespeare’s Foreign Worlds: National and Transnational Identities in the Elizabethan Age. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Levy, F. J. “Francis Bacon and the Style of Politics.” English Literary Renaissance 16 (1986): 101–122.Google Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri. Hamlet and the Vision of Darkness. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Liebler, Naomi Conn. “Getting it All Right: Titus Andronicus and Roman History.” Shakespeare Quarterly 45 (1994): 263–278.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. Sixe Bookes of Politickes or Civil Doctrine. Translated by William Jones. 1594; Facsimile edition, New York: Da Capo Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Little, Arthur Jr.. Shakespeare Jungle Fever: National-Imperial Re-Visions of Race, Rape, and Sacrifice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. A. J. “Hercules Oetaeus.” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca, Philosopher and Dramatist. Edited by Damschen, Gregor and Hill, Andreas. Leiden: Brill. 2014. 515–520.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. A. J. Self-Representation and Illusion in Senecan Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lodge, Thomas. Wits Miserie, and the Worlds Madnesse. London, 1596.Google Scholar
Lodge, Thomastrans. The Workes of Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Both Morrall and Naturall. London, 1614.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. “Seneca on the Self: Why Now?” In Seneca and the Self. Edited by Bartsch, Shadi and Wray, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 20–36.Google Scholar
Loomba, Ania. Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lopez, Jeremy. “Time and Talk in Richard III 1.4.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 45 (2005): 299–314.Google Scholar
Luckyj, Christina. “Volumnia’s Silence.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 31 (1991): 327–342.Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard and Reinhard, Kenneth. After Oedipus: Shakespeare in Psychoanalysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Discourses on Livy. Edited and translated by Julia Conaway Bondanella and Peter Bondanella. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Machielsen, Jan. “The Rise and Fall of Seneca Tragicus, c. 1365–1593.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 77 (2014): 61–85.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 1981; Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mack, Maynard. King Lear in Our Time. 1965; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mader, Gottfried. “Nec Sepultis Mixtus et Vivis Tamen / Exemptus: Rationale and Aesthetics of the ‘Fitting Punishment’ in Seneca’s ‘Oedipus’.” Hermes 123.3 (1995): 303–319.Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie. “Othello, Theatre Boundaries, and Audience Cognition.” In Othello: The State of Play. Edited by Orlin, Lena Cowen. London: Bloomsbury, 2014. 17–43.Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence and Sally-Beth, MacLean. Lord Strange’s Men and Their Plays. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Gesine. Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher, trans. Lucans First Booke. London, 1600.Google Scholar
Marshall, Cynthia. “Shakespeare, Crossing the Rubicon,” Shakespeare Survey 53 (2000): 73–88.Google Scholar
Marston, John. Antonio’s Revenge. Edited by Reavley Gair, W.. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles and Michelle Martindale, . Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity: An Introductory Essay. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles and Taylor, A. B., eds. Shakespeare and the Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mattingly, David J. Imperialism, Power, and Identity: Experiencing the Roman Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Katharine Eisaman, Maus. Ben Jonson and the Roman Frame of Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Katharine Eisaman, Maus Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Katharine Eisaman, Maus“The Will of Caesar: Choice-Making, The Death of the Roman Republic, and the Development of Shakespearean Character.” Shakespeare Survey 70 (2017): 249–258.Google Scholar
Mayer, Roland. “Personata Stoa: Neostoicism and Senecan Tragedy.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 57 (1994): 151–174.Google Scholar
Mayne, Emily. “Presenting Seneca in Print: Elizabethan Translations and Thomas Newton’s Seneca His Tenne Tragedies.” The Review of English Studies n.s., 70 (2019): 823–846.Google Scholar
McAuley, Mairéad. “Breaking Apart Like the World: Seneca and Psychoanalysis.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 40 (2013): 71–87.Google Scholar
McAuley, Mairéad Reproducing Rome: Motherhood in Virgil, Ovid, Seneca, and Statius. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McAuley, Mairéad“Specters of Medea: The Rhetoric of Stepmotherhood and Motherhood in Seneca’s Phaedra.” Helios 39 (2012), 37–72.Google Scholar
Mehl, Dieter. Shakespeare’s Tragedies: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Mejia-LaPerle, Carol. “The Crime Scene of Revenge Tragedy: Sacrificial Cannibalism in Seneca’s Thyestes and Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 38.1 (2012): 9–28.Google Scholar
Melchiori, Giorgio. “Hamlet: The Acting Version and the Wiser Sort.” In The Hamlet First Published (Q1, 1603): Origins, Form, Intertextualities. Edited by Clayton, Thomas. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992. 195–210.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Gary. “Dark Wit and Black Humor in Seneca’s Thyestes.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 118 (1988): 309–330.Google Scholar
Mentz, Steve. “Strange Weather in King Lear.” Shakespeare 6.2 (2010): 139–152.Google Scholar
Miles, Geoffrey. Shakespeare and the Constant Romans. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Miola, Robert S. “Othello Furens.” Shakespeare Quarterly 41 (1990): 49–64.Google Scholar
Miola, Robert S. Shakespeare and Classical Tragedy: The Influence of Seneca. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Miola, Robert S. Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Moore, Peter R. “The Nature of King Lear.” English Studies 87.2 (2006): 169–190.Google Scholar
Motto, Anna Lydia and Clark, John R.. “Knaves and Fools in Senecan Drama.” Illinois Classical Studies 14 (1989): 119–134.Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. The Sources of Shakespeare’s Plays. 1977; Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy. Children of the Queen’s Revels: A Jacobean Theatre Repertory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy “Coriolanus and the Little Eyases: The Boyhood of Shakespeare’s Hero.” In Shakespeare and Childhood. Edited by Chedgzoy, Kate, Greenhalgh, Susanne, and Shaughnessy, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mynott, Glen. “‘We must not be more true to kings / Than Kings are to their subjects’: France and the Politics of the Ancient Constitution in Chapman’s Byron Plays.” Renaissance Studies 9 (1995): 477–493.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, Noémie. “Aaron’s Roots: Spaniards, Englishmen, and Blackamoors in Titus Andronicus.” Early Theatre 19.2 (2016): 59–80.Google Scholar
Neill, Michael. Putting History to the Question: Power, Politics, and Society in English Renaissance Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Neill, Michael“Shakespeare’s Halle of Mirrors: Play, Politics, and Psychology in Richard III.” Shakespeare Studies 8 (1975): 99–129.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan H. and Elliott, John R. Jr., eds. Inns of Court. 3 vols. Records of Early English Drama. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2010.Google Scholar
Neville, Alexander, trans. The Lamentable Tragedie of Oedipus the Sonne of Laius Kyng of Thebes out of Seneca. London, 1563.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Lori Humphrey. “Toward a Sustainable Source Study.” In Rethinking Shakespeare Source Study: Audiences, Authors, and Digital Technologies. Edited by Britton, Dennis Austin and Walter, Melissa. New York: Routledge, 2018. 19–45.Google Scholar
Newman, Jane O. Benjamin’s Library: Modernity, Nation and the Baroque. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Newton, Thomas, et al. Seneca His Tenne Tragedies Translated into English. 2 vols. bound together. 1927; Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Nicolet, Claude. Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Translated by Hélène Leclerc. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. Poetry and Politics in the English Renaissance. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
Norland, Howard B. Neoclassical Drama in Elizabethan England. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Norton, Thomas and Sackwell, Thomas. Gorboduc; or, Ferrex and Porrex. Edited by Cauthen Jr., Irby B. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Oakley-Brown, Liz. Ovid and the Cultural Politics of Translation in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Robert. A Kingdom for a Stage: The Achievement of Shakespeare’s History Plays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Ovid. Heroides. Amores. Translated by Grant Showerman; rev. by G. P. Goold. Second edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Ovid Metamorphoses. Translated by Frank Justus Miller; rev. by G. P. Goold. 2 vols. Revised edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977,2004.Google Scholar
Ovid Tristia. Ex Ponto. Translated by A. L. Wheeler; rev. by G. P. Goold. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. Lords of All the World: Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France c.1500–c.1800. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “Dissecting the Female Body: From Women’s Secrets to the Secrets of Nature.” In Crossing Boundaries: Attending to Early Modern Women. Edited by Donawerth, Jane and Seeff, Adele F.. Newark: University of Delaware Press,2000. 29–47.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection. New York: Zone Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Paulin, Roger, ed. Great Shakespeareans. Vol. 3, Voltaire, Goethe, Schlegel, Coleridge London: Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar
Peltonen, Markku. Classical Humanism and Republicanism in English Political Thought, 1570–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis. “After Decorum: Self-Performance and Political Liminality in Antony and Cleopatra.” In Antony and Cleopatra: A Critical Reader. Edited by Lovascio, Domenico. London: Bloomsbury, 2019. 113–131.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis“British Empire on the Eve of the Armada: Revisiting The Misfortunes of Arthur.” Studies in Philology 108 (2011): 508–537.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis“Correr, Calfhill, and the Early Elizabethan Affordances of Senecan Tragedy.” Translation and Literature 29.1 (2020): 117–135.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis “Gismond of Salern and the Elizabethan Politics of Senecan Drama.” In Gender Matters: Discourses of Violence in Early Modern Literature and the Arts. Edited by Mara, R.Wade. Rodopi: Amsterdam, 2014. 279–293.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis The Making of Jacobean Culture: James I and the Renegotiation of Elizabethan Literary Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis “Seneca and English Political Culture.” In The Oxford Handbook of The Age of Shakespeare. Edited by Malcolm Smuts, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 306–321.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis “Senecan Belatedness and Titus Andronicus.” In Titus Andronicus: The State of Play. Edited by Karim-Cooper., Farah London: Bloomsbury, 2019. 15–35.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis “Vaulting Ambitions and Killing Machines: Shakespeare, Jarry, Ionesco, and the Senecan Absurd.” In Shakespeare Without Class: Misappropriations of Cultural Capital. Edited by Hedrick, Donald and Reynolds, Bryan. New York: Palgrave, 2000. 85–106.Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis and Melissa, Walter. “Staging Secret Interiors: The Duchess of Malfi as Inns of Court and Anticourt Drama.” In The Duchess of Malfi: A Critical Guide. Edited by Luckyj, Christina. London: Continuum, 2011.87–105.Google Scholar
Phillips, Bríd. “Locus Amoenus Or Locus Violens? Shakespearean Emotions Expressed through an Ovidian Model.” In Shakespeare and Emotions: Inheritances, Enactments, Legacies. Edited by White, R. S., Houlahan, Mark, and Katrina, O’Loughlin. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 29–38.Google Scholar
Pincombe, Michael. “Classical and Contemporary Sources of the ‘Gloomy Woods’ of Titus Andronicus: Ovid, Seneca, Spenser.” In Shakespearean Continuities: Essays in Honour of E. A. J. Honingmann. Edited by Batchelor, John, Cain, Tom, and Lamont, Claire. New York: St. Martin’s, 1997. 40–55.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romanes. Translated by Thomas North. London, 1579.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. 1957; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pollard, Tanya. Greek Tragic Women on Shakespearean Stages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Poole, Adrian. Tragedy: Shakespeare and the Greek Example. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Power, Andrew J. “What the Hell Is Under the Stage? Trapdoor Use in the English Senecan Tradition.” English 60 (2011): 276–296.Google Scholar
Pratt, Norman T. “From Oedipus to Lear.” The Classical Journal 61.2 (1965): 49–57.Google Scholar
Pratt, Norman T. Seneca’s Drama. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Quilligan, Maureen. Incest and Agency in Elizabeth’s England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Raber, Karen. Dramatic Difference: Gender, Class, and Genre in the Early Modern Closet Drama. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rabkin, Norman. Shakespeare and the Problem of Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis. Stages of History: Shakespeare’s English Chronicles. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Rainolde, Richard. A Booke Called the Foundacion of Rhetorike. London, 1563.Google Scholar
Rankine, Patrice D. Ulysses in Black: Ralph Ellison, Classicism, and African American Literature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J. Mirages of the Selfe: Patterns of Personhood in Ancient and Early Modern Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., ed. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Ribner, Irving. The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare. 1957; New York: Barnes & Noble, 1965.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century BC to the Second Century AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Riggs, David. Shakespeare’s Heroical Histories: Henry VI and Its Literary Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rimell, Victoria. The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics: Empire’s Inward Turn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rist, Thomas. Revenge Tragedy and the Drama of Commemoration in Reforming England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew B. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Romm, James. Dying Every Day: Seneca at the Court of Nero. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014.Google Scholar
Romm, James “New World and ‘novos orbes’: Seneca in the Renaissance Debate over Ancient Knowledge of the Americas.” In The Classical Tradition and the Americas. Vol. 1, European Images of the Americas and the Classical Tradition, Part 1. Edited by Haase, Wolfgang and Reinhold, Meyer. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1994. 77–116.Google Scholar
Rose, Jacqueline. “Hamlet – the Mona Lisa of Literature.” In Sexuality and the Field of Vision. 1986; London: Verso, 1991. 123–40.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, Thomas G. Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, Thomas G.“Stoick Seneca.” Modern Drama 29.1 (1986): 92–109.Google Scholar
Rowe, Katherine. Dead Hands: Fictions of Agency, Renaissance to Modern. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Royster, Francesca. “White-Limed Walls: Whiteness and Gothic Extremism in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 51 (2000): 432–445.Google Scholar
Rudnytsky, Peter L. Freud and Oedipus. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespeare’s Universality: Here’s Fine Revolution. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Sale, Carolyn. “Black Aeneas: Race, English Literary History, and the ‘Barbarous’ Poetics of Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 62 (2011): 25–52.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. H. M. “Seneca and Tacitus in Jacobean England.” In The Mental World of the Jacobean Court. Edited by Peck, Linda Levy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 169–188.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, Alessandro. The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, Alessandro“Seneca’s Agamemnon: The Entropy of Tragedy.” Pallas 95 (2014): 179–191. https://pallas.revues.org/1726.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm von. Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature. Translated by John Black; rev. by A. J. W. Morrison. 1846; New York: AMS Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jr., Ben Ross. “King Lear in Its Own Time: The Difference that Death Makes.” Early Modern Literary Studies 1.1 (1995): 3.1–49. https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/01-1/schnlear.html#.Google Scholar
Schubert, Warner. “Seneca the Dramatist.” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist. Edited by Damschen, Gregor and Hill, Andreas. Leiden: Brill, 2014.73–93.Google Scholar
Scott, Edward John Long, ed. Letter Book of Gabriel Harvey, 1573–1580. London: Printed for the Camden Society, 1884.Google Scholar
Segal, Charles. “Boundary Violation and the Landscape of the Self in Senecan Tragedy.” In Seneca. Edited by Fitch, John G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 36–56.Google Scholar
Segal, Charles “Dissonant Sympathy: Song, Orpheus, and the Golden Age in Seneca’s Tragedies.” In Seneca Tragicus. Edited by Boyle, A. J.. Maryborough, Australia: Aureal Publications, 1983. 229–251.Google Scholar
Segal, Charles Language and Desire in Seneca’s Phaedra. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Epistles. Translated by Richard M. Gummere, 3 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1917–1925.Google Scholar
Seneca, Moral Essays. Translated by Basore, John W.. 3 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1928–1935).Google Scholar
Seneca, Natural Questions. Translated by Corcoran, Thomas H.. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971–1972.Google Scholar
Seneca, Tragedies. Edited and translated by Fitch, John G.. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002–2004.Google Scholar
Selden, Raman. “King Lear and True Need.” Shakespeare Studies 19 (1987): 143–169.Google Scholar
Sheen, Erica. “‘These are the only men’: Seneca and Monopoly in Hamlet 2.2.” In Shakespeare and the Classics. Edited by Martindale, Charles and Taylor, A. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 156–167.Google Scholar
Shelton, Jo-Ann. “Problems of Time in Seneca’s ‘Hercules Furens’ and ‘Thyestes’.” California Studies in Classical Antiquity 8 (1975): 257–269.Google Scholar
Shelton, Jo-Ann Seneca’s Hercules Furens: Theme, Structure and Style. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. Sir Philip Sidney’s An Apology for Poetry and Astrophil and Stella: Texts and Contexts. Edited by Herman., Peter C. Allen, Glen, VA: College Publishing, 2001.Google Scholar
Siemon, James R., ed. Richard III. London: A&C Black, 2009.Google Scholar
Sinfield, Alan. Faultlines: Cultural Materialism and the Politics of Dissident Reading. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Slaney, Helen. The Senecan Aesthetic: A Performance History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Slaney, Helen “Senecan Gothic.” In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy. Edited by Dodson-Robinson., Eric Leiden: Brill, 2016. 233–254.Google Scholar
Slotkin, Joel Elliot. “Honeyed Toads: Sinister Aesthetics in Shakespeare’s Richard III.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 7.1 (2007): 5–32.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R. Ancient Scripts and Modern Experience on the English Stage, 1500–1700. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Emma. “Ghost Writing: Hamlet and the Ur-Hamlet.” In The Renaissance Text: Theory, Editing, Textuality. Edited by Murphy, Andrew. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. 177–190.Google Scholar
Smith, G. C. Moore, ed. Gabriel Harvey’s Marginalia. Statford-Upon-Avon: Shakespeare Head Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Smith, Ian. “Othello’s Black Handkerchief.” Shakespeare Quarterly 64 (2013): 1–25.Google Scholar
Smith, Ian Race and Rhetoric in the Renaissance: Barbarian Errors. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Smuts, R. Malcolm. “Court-Centered Politics and the Uses of Roman Historians, c. 1590–1630.” In Culture and Politics in Early Stuart England. Edited by Sharpe, Kevin and Lake, Peter. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993. 21–43.Google Scholar
Soellner, Rolf. “The Madness of Hercules and the Elizabethans.” Comparative Literature 10 (1958): 309–324.Google Scholar
Spencer, T. J. B. “Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Romans.” Shakespeare Survey 10 (1957): 27–38.Google Scholar
Spivack, Bernard. Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil. New York: Columbia University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Stacey, Peter. Roman Monarchy and the Renaissance Prince. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Staley, Gregory A. Seneca and the Idea of Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Stapleton, M. L. Fated Sky: The Femina Furens in Shakespeare. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Star, Christopher. The Empire of the Self: Self-Command and Political Speech in Seneca and Petronius. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Star, Christopher Seneca. London: I.B. Tauris & Co., 2017.Google Scholar
Stevens, Andrea Ria. Inventions of the Skin: The Painted Body in Early English Drama. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Stoll, Elmer Edgar. “Criminals in Shakespeare and in Science.” Modern Philology 10 (1912): 55–80.Google Scholar
Strachey, James, Anna Freud, Alix Strachey, and Alan Tyson, eds. and trans. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 vols. London: Hogarth Press, 1953–1974.Google Scholar
Strier, Richard. Resistant Structures: Particularity, Radicalism, and Renaissance Texts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Stróżyński, Mateusz. “The Hero and His Mothers in Seneca’s Hercules Furens.” Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae 23.1 (2013): 103–128.Google Scholar
Studley, John, trans. The Eyght Tragedie of Seneca. Entituled Agamemnon. London, 1566.Google Scholar
Sutton, Dana F., ed. Thomas Legge: Complete Plays. Vol. 1, Richardus Tertius. New York: Peter Lang, 1993.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Mihoko. “The Dismemberment of Hippolytus: Humanist Imitation, Shakespearean Translation.” Classical and Modern Literature 10 (1990): 103–112.Google Scholar
Tambling, Jeremy. Allegory and the Work of Melancholy: The Late Medieval and Shakespeare. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J., ed. Seneca: Agamemnon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J.“Senecan Drama and Its Antecedents.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82 (1978): 213–63.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. ed. Seneca’s Thyestes. 1985; Atlanta: Scholar Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. B. “Shakespeare, Studley, and Golding.” Review of English Studies, n.s., 39 (1988): 522–527.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History, From the Restoration to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Tempera, Mariangela. “‘Worse than Procne’: The Sister as Avenger in the English Renaissance.” In The Italian World of English Renaissance Drama: Cultural Exchange and Intertextuality. Edited by Marrapodi, Michele and Hoenselaars, A. J.. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1998. 71–88.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ayanna. Performing Race and Torture on the Early Modern Stage. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Thompson, Leslie. “The Meaning of Thunder and Lightning: Stage Directions and Audience Expectations.” Early Theatre 2 (1999): 11–24.Google Scholar
Todd, Margo. Christian Humanism and the Puritan Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Todd, Margo“Seneca and the Protestant Mind: The Influence of Stoicism on Puritan Ethics.” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 74 (1983): 182–199.Google Scholar
Tourneur, Cyril. The Transformed Metamorphosis. London, 1600.Google Scholar
Trinacty, Christopher V. Senecan Tragedy and the Reception of Augustan Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Tromley, Fred B. Playing with Desire: Christopher Marlowe and the Art of Tantalization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Turner, Henry S. “King Lear Without: The Heath.” Renaissance Drama 28 (1997): 161–193.Google Scholar
Van Es, Bart. Shakespeare in Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Virginia Mason. Performing Blackness on English Stages, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Virgil, . Aeneid: Books 7–12. Appendix Vergiliana. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough., Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1918).Google Scholar
Virgil, Eclogues. Georgics. Aeneid: Books 1–6. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1916.Google Scholar
Vitkus, Daniel. Turning Turk: English Theater and the Multicultural Mediterranean, 1570–1630. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Volk, Katharina. “Cosmic Disruption in Seneca’s Thyestes: Two ways of Looking at the Eclipse.” In Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics. Edited by Volk and Gareth D. Williams. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Volk, Katharina and Williams, Gareth D., eds. Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Waith, Eugene M. The Herculean Hero in Marlowe, Chapman, Shakespeare and Dryden. London: Chatto & Windus, 1962.Google Scholar
Waith, Eugene M. Ideas of Greatness: Heroic Drama in England. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1971.Google Scholar
Walker, Greg. The Politics of Performance in Early Renaissance Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wallace, John M. “The Senecan Context of Coriolanus.” Modern Philology 90 (1993): 465–478.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Mutatio morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution.” In The Roman Cultural Revolution. Edited by Habinek, Thomas and Schiesaro, Alessandro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 3–22.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Walsh, Brian. “Audience Engagement and the Genres of Richard III.” In Richard III: A Critical Reader. Edited by Connoly, Annaliese. London: Bloomsbury, 2013. 95–110.Google Scholar
Watling, E. F., trans. Seneca: Four Tragedies and Octavia. London: Penguin, 1966.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N. “Coriolanus and ‘The Common Part’.” Shakespeare Survey 69 (2016): 181–197.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N. Shakespeare and the Hazards of Ambition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Weller, Philip. “A Note on “The Motive-Hunting of Motiveless Malignity.” Online article. Shakespeare Navigators, (n.d.). www.shakespeare-navigators.com/othello/motiveless.html .Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley, Taylor, Gary, John Jowett, and William Montgomery, eds. The Oxford Shakespeare: Complete Works. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Richard P. “History, Character and Conscience in Richard III.” Comparative Drama 5.4 (1971/72): 301–321.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Virgil K. Shakespeare’s Use of Learning: An Inquiry into the Growth of His Mind and Art. San Marino: The Huntington Library, 1953.Google Scholar
Wierum, Ann. “‘Actors’ and ‘Play Acting’ in the Morality Tradition.” Renaissance Drama, n.s., 3 (1970): 189–214.Google Scholar
Williams, Gareth D. The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wilson, Emily R. The Greatest Empire: A Life of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wilson, Emily R. Mocked with Death: Tragic Overliving from Sophocles to Milton. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Wilson, Marcus. ed. The Tragedy of Nero’s Wife: Studies on the Octavia Praetexta. Prudentia 35.1. Auckland: Polygraphia, 2003.Google Scholar
Wilson, Marcus “The Tragic Mode of Seneca’s Troades.” In Seneca Tragicus. Edited by Boyle., A. J. Berwick, , Australia: Aureal Publications, 1983. 27–60.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica. “Early ‘English Seneca’: From ‘Coterie’ Translations to the Popular Stage.” In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy. Edited by Robinson, Eric Dodson. Leiden: Brill, 2016. 174–202.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica “English Seneca, Heywood to Hamlet.” In The Oxford Handbook of Tudor Literature, 1485–1603. Edited by Pincombe, Mike and Shrank, Cathy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 472–487.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica“Expanding the Political Nation: Gorboduc at the Inns of Court and Succession Revisited.” Early Theatre 8 (2005): 11–34.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica Lawyers at Play: Literature, Law, and Politics at the Early Modern Inns of Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica“Seneca in Early Elizabethan England.” Renaissance Quarterly 59 (2006): 29–58.Google Scholar
Wolin, Richard. Walter Benjamin: An Aesthetic of Redemption. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Linda. English Revenge Drama: Money, Resistance, Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Linda“Resistance Theory Meets Drama: Tudor Seneca.” Renaissance Drama, n.s., 38 (2010): 115–139.Google Scholar
Zanobi, Alessandra. Seneca’s Tragedies and the Aesthetics of Pantomime. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, Theodore. “Seneca: A New German Icon?” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 11.1 (2004): 47–77.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso, 1989.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Curtis Perry, University of Illinois
  • Book: Shakespeare and Senecan Tragedy
  • Online publication: 06 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866316.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Curtis Perry, University of Illinois
  • Book: Shakespeare and Senecan Tragedy
  • Online publication: 06 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866316.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Curtis Perry, University of Illinois
  • Book: Shakespeare and Senecan Tragedy
  • Online publication: 06 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866316.008
Available formats
×