Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T02:03:36.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - The History of Shaken Baby Syndrome

from Section 1 - Prologue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2023

By
Randy Papetti
Edited by
Keith A. Findley ,
Cyrille Rossant ,
Kana Sasakura ,
Leila Schneps ,
Waney Squier  and
Knut Wester
Keith A. Findley
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Cyrille Rossant
Affiliation:
University College London
Kana Sasakura
Affiliation:
Konan University, Japan
Leila Schneps
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Paris
Waney Squier
Affiliation:
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Knut Wester
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
Get access

Summary

Shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a determination, typically made by physicians, that a child or infant has been violently shaken whenever three findings are present (subdural and retinal haemorrhage, and brain swelling or dysfunction) and there is no history of major trauma or a fall from multiple stories. These beliefs serve a forensic purpose: they permit physicians and law enforcement to identify abuse in a non-verbal child where the parents or caretakers deny abuse. Globally, thousands of parents and carers have been convicted or had children taken away based on an SBS determination. Shaken baby syndrome, however, has become controversial and many of its foundational tenets have been challenged and proven unreliable. For nearly two decades, paediatric physicians and child abuse prosecutors have defended the SBS determination, while challengers continue to question its reliability in the courts, where judges and juries must sort out its reliability on a case-by-case basis. This chapter chronicles SBS’ history, as that history is helpful to understand the concerns and controversies about the hypothesis.

Keywords

controversySBS historyreliabilitymandatory reportingdiagnostic criteriajudicial recognition of controversyrebranding SBS
Type
Chapter
Information
Shaken Baby Syndrome
Investigating the Abusive Head Trauma Controversy
 , pp. 11 - 32
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wilson, EO. Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Vintage, 1998.Google Scholar
Guthkelch, AN. Infantile subdural haematoma and its relationship to whiplash injuries. BMJ. 1971;2:430.Google Scholar
Jenny, C. Medicine discovers child abuse. JAMA [Internet]. 2008;300(23):2796–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempe, CH, Silverman, FN, Steel, BF, Droegemueller, W, Silver, HK. The battered-child syndrome. JAMA. 1962;181(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1962.03050270019004.Google Scholar
Caffey, J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants: Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1972;124(2):161–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1972.02110140011001.Google Scholar
Caffey, J. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: Manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Pediatrics. 1971;54(4):396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykes, LJ. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: What has been learned? Child Abuse and Negligence. 1986;10(2):211–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(86)90082-7.Google ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Shaken baby syndrome: Inflicted cerebral trauma. Pediatrics. 1993;92(6):872–5.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics: Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Shaken baby syndrome: Rotational cranial injuries technical report. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):206–10. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.1.206. (‘The constellation of these injuries does not occur with short falls.’)Google Scholar
Blumenthal, I. Shaken baby syndrome. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2002;78(926):732–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.926.732. (‘Families of children with subdural haemorrhages should be thoroughly investigated by social welfare agencies.’)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirotnak, AP, Krugman, RD. Physical abuse of children: An update. Pediatrics Review. 1994;15(10):394–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.15-10-394. (‘Most subdural hematomas in infancy are assumed to be caused by abuse until proven otherwise.’)Google Scholar
Eisenbrey, AB. Retinal hemorrhage in the battered child. Child’s Brain. [Internet]. 1979;5(1):40–4. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119800.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, NM, Singer, J, Bolte, R, Christian, C, Selbst, SM. Retinal hemorrhage. Pediatric Emergency Care. 1994;10(5):303–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006565-19941000-00017.Google Scholar
Monteleone, JA, Giardino, AP, Brodeur, AE. Identifying, interpreting, and reporting. In Child maltreatment: A clinical guide and reference. 2nd ed. Monteleone, JA, Brodeur, AE, eds. GW Medical Publishing, 1998. p.15.Google Scholar
Dashti, SR, Decker, DD, Razzaq, A, Cohen, AR. Current patterns of inflicted head injury in children. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 1999;31(6):302–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028880.Google Scholar
Reichert, KW, Schmidt, M. Neurologic sequelae of shaken baby syndrome. In The shaken baby syndrome: A multidisciplinary approach. Lazoritz, S, Palusci, VJ, eds. Routledge, 2001, pp. 79–83.Google Scholar
Parrish, R. Battered child syndrome: Investigating physical abuse and homicide. 4th ed. US Department of Justice, 2002.Google Scholar
Case, ME, Graham, MA, Handy, TC, Jentzen, JM, Monteleone, JA. National Association of Medical Examiners ad hoc Committee on Shaken Baby Syndrome: Position paper on fatal abusive head injuries in infants and young children. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2001;22(2):112–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-200106000-00002.Google Scholar
Jentzen, JM. Pathological findings in fatal shaken impact syndrome. In The shaken baby syndrome: A multidisciplinary approach. Lazoritz, S, Palusci, VJ, eds. Routledge, 2001, p. 201 (stating that the ‘classical findings of retinal hemorrhages, subdural hematoma, and brain swelling cannot be fully explained by any other medical entity’).Google Scholar
Duhaime, AC, Alario, AJ, Lewander, WJ et al. Head injury in very young children: Mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics. 1992;90(2 Pt 1):179–85 (‘Most determinations of nonaccidental injury are based on the notion of “history insufficient to explain injuries”’).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, DL, Kirschner, RH, Reece, RM et al. Shaken baby syndrome: A forensic pediatric response. Pediatrics. 1998;101(2):321–3. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.2.321.Google Scholar
National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome [Internet]. Executive summary of the third national conference on shaken baby syndrome; 2000 p. 1. www.dontshake.org/media/k2/attachments/2000-SaltLakeCityProgram.pdf (‘Often referred to as the “triad”, the consensus appears to be that a collection of (1) damage to the brain, evidenced by severe brain swelling and/or diffuse traumatic axonal injury; (2) bleeding under the membranes which cover the brain, usually subdural and/or subarachnoid bleeding; and, (3) bleeding in the layers of the retina, often accompanied by other ocular damage, when seen in young children or infants, is virtually diagnostic of severe whiplash shaking of the head’) (on file with the author).Google Scholar
Kirschner, RH. Pathology of child abuse. In The battered child. 5th ed. Helfer, ME, Kempe, RS, Krugman, RD, eds. University of Chicago Press, 1997, pp. 248–95.Google Scholar
Holmgren, BK. Prosecuting the shaken infant case. In The shaken baby syndrome: A multidisciplinary approach. Lazoritz, S, Palusci, VJ, eds. Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Commonwealth v Woodward, No. Crim. 97-0433 (1997) 7 Mass. L. Rep 449; 1997 WL 694119.Google Scholar
Plunkett, J. Shaken baby syndrome and the death of Matthew Eappen: A forensic pathologist’s response. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 1999;20(1):17–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-199903000-00005.Google Scholar
Reece, RM. The evidence base for shaken baby syndrome: Response to editorial from 106 doctors. BMJ. 2004;328(7451):1316–17; author reply 1317. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1316 (asserting that Geddes and Plunkett ‘display a worrisome and persistent bias against the diagnosis of child abuse in general’).Google Scholar
Leestma, JE. Forensic neuropathology. 3rd ed. CRC Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Papetti, R. The forensic unreliability of the shaken baby syndrome. United States: Academic Forensic Pathology International. 2018;55–9, 120–42, 150–6, 157–71, 201–20, 242–3.Google Scholar
Duhaime, AC, Gennarelli, TA, Thibault, LE et al. The shaken baby syndrome: A clinical, pathological, and biomechanical study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1987;66(3):409–15. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1987.66.3.0409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, MD, Martin, PS, Williams, JM, Kemp, AM, Theobald, P. Development of a computational biomechanical infant model for the investigation of infant head injury by shaking. Medicine, Science, and the Law. 2015;55(4):291–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802414564495.Google Scholar
Wolfson, DR, McNally, DS, Clifford, MJ, Vloeberghs, M. Rigid-body modelling of shaken baby syndrome. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H.2005;219(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441105X9237.Google Scholar
Choudhary, AK, Servaes, S, Slovis, TL et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatric Radiology. 2018;48(8):1048–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4149-1.Google Scholar
Hall, JR, Reyes, HM, Horvat, M, Meller, JL, Stein, R. The mortality of childhood falls. Journal of Trauma. 1989;29(9):1273–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198909000-00015.Google Scholar
Aoki, N, Masuzawa, H. Infantile acute subdural hematoma: Clinical analysis of 26 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1984;61(2):273–80. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1984.61.2.0273.Google Scholar
Caffey, J. Significance of the history in the diagnosis of traumatic injury to children: Howland Award address. Journal of Pediatrics. 1965;67(5):Suppl:1008–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(65)82098-4.Google Scholar
Chadwick, DL, Chin, S, Salerno, C, Landsverk, J, Kitchen, L. Deaths from falls in children: How far is fatal? Journal of Trauma. 1991;31(10):1353–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199110000-00006.Google Scholar
People v Basuta (2001) 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 285 (‘Dr. Alexander stated studies indicated that short falls do not cause serious brain injuries. In a small percentage of short fall cases, a minor skull fracture can occur and cause no internal injury. Short falls do not cause subdural bleeding’).Google Scholar
Plunkett, J. Fatal pediatric head injuries caused by short-distance falls. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2001;22(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-200103000-00001.Google Scholar
Commonwealth v Epps (2016) 53 N.E.3d 1247.Google Scholar
Atkinson, N, Van Rijn, RR, Starling, SP. Childhood falls with occipital injuries. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2018;34(12):837–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001186.Google Scholar
Geddes, JF, Hackshaw, AK, Vowles, GH, Nickols, CD, Whitwell, HL. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I: Patterns of brain damage. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 7):1290–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.7.1290.Google Scholar
Mack, J, Squier, W, Eastman, JT. Anatomy and development of the meninges: Implications for subdural collections and CSF circulation. Pediatric Radiology. 2009;39(3):200–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1084-6.Google Scholar
Squier, W, Mack, J. The neuropathology of infant subdural haemorrhage. Forensic Science International. 2009;187(1–3):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.005.Google Scholar
Giardino, AP, Lyn, MA, Giardino, ER. A practical guide to the evaluation of child physical abuse and neglect. Springer, 1997.Google Scholar
Block, RW. Child abuse: Controversies and imposters. Current Problems in Pediatrics. 1999;29(9):249–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-9380(99)80058-9.Google Scholar
Geddes, JF. Pediatric head injury. In Developmental neuropathology. Golden, JA, Harding, B, eds. Wiley, 2006, p. 186.Google Scholar
Wittschieber, D, Karger, B, Pfeiffer, H, Hahnemann, ML. Understanding subdural collections in pediatric abusive head trauma. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2019;40(3):388–95. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5855.Google Scholar
Vaslow, DF. Chronic subdural hemorrhage predisposes to development of cerebral venous thrombosis and associated retinal hemorrhages and subdural rebleeds in infants. Neuroradiology Journal. 2022;35(1):53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009211026904.Google Scholar
Levin, AV. Retinal haemorrhages and child abuse. In Recent advances in paediatrics. David, TJ, ed. Churchill Livingstone, 2000, p. 151.Google Scholar
Levin, AV, Alexander, R, Binenbaum, G, Forbes, B, Jenny, C. Information statement: Abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome [Internet]. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2015. www.aao.org/clinical-statement/abusive-head-traumashaken-baby-syndrome.Google Scholar
Coats, B, Binenbaum, G, Smith, C et al. Cyclic head rotations produce modest brain injury in infant piglets. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2017;34(1):234–47. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4352.Google Scholar
Moshfeghi, DM. Terson syndrome in a healthy term infant: Delivery-associated retinopathy and intracranial hemorrhage. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2018;49(10):e154–e156. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20181002-20.Google Scholar
Smith, DC, Kearns, TP, Sayre, GP. Preretinal and optic nerve-sheath hemorrhage: Pathologic and experimental aspects in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. 1957;61(2):201–11.Google Scholar
Greiner, MV, Berger, RP, Thackeray, JD, Lindberg, DM. Dedicated retinal examination in children evaluated for physical abuse without radiographically identified traumatic brain injury. Journal of Pediatrics. 2013;163(2):527–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.01.063.Google Scholar
Thackeray, JD, Scribano, PV, Lindberg, DM. Yield of retinal examination in suspected physical abuse with normal neuroimaging. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):e1066–e1071. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2184.Google Scholar
Thiblin, I, Andersson, J, Wester, K, Högberg, G, Högberg, U. Retinal haemorrhage in infants investigated for suspected maltreatment is strongly correlated with intracranial pathology. Acta Paediatrica. 2022;111(4):800–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.16139.Google Scholar
Callaway, NF, Ludwig, CA, Blumenkranz, MS et al. Retinal and optic nerve hemorrhages in the newborn infant: One-year results of the Newborn Eye Screen Test Study. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1043–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.004.Google Scholar
Eris, E, Eris, D, Seymen, Z et al. Retinal haemorrhage rates and resolution time of retinal haemorrhage in newborns after hypothermic treatment for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Archives of Pediatrics. 2020;27(1):29–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2019.11.001.Google Scholar
Mattheij, M, Venstermans, C, de Veuster, I et al. Retinal haemorrhages in a university hospital: not always abusive head injury. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 2017;117(2):515–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-017-0748-0.Google Scholar
Shuman, MJ, Hutchins, KD. Severe retinal hemorrhages with retinoschisis in infants are not pathognomonic for abusive head trauma. Journal of Forensic Science. 2017;62(3):807–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13336.Google Scholar
Levin, AV. The SBU report: A different view. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1037–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13834.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, MD, Beuls, E, Jorens, PG, Parizel, P, Jacobs, W. The optic nerve sheath hemorrhage is a non-specific finding in cases of suspected child abuse. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2015;36:43–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.08.009.Google Scholar
Geddes, JF, Vowles, GH, Hackshaw, AK et al. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. II: Microscopic brain injury in infants. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 7):1299–1306. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.7.1299.Google Scholar
Shannon, P, Becker, L. Mechanisms of brain injury in infantile child abuse. Lancet. 2001;358(9283):686–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05849-4.Google Scholar
Lantz, PE, Sinal, SH, Stanton, CA, Weaver, RG Jr. Perimacular retinal folds from childhood head trauma. BMJ. 2004;328(7442):754–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7442.754.Google Scholar
Findley, KA, Barnes, PD, Moran, DA, Squier, W. Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: Getting it right. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12(2):274–5.Google Scholar
Fung, EL, Sung, RY, Nelson, EA, Poon, WS. Unexplained subdural hematoma in young children: Is it always child abuse? Pediatric International. 2002;44(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-200x.2002.01500.x.Google Scholar
Högberg, G, Colville-Ebeling, B, Högberg, U, Aspelin, P. Circularity bias in abusive head trauma studies could be diminished with a new ranking scale. Egypt Journal of Forensic Science. 2016;1(6):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2015.12.001.Google Scholar
Lynøe, N, Elinder, G, Hallberg, B et al. Authors’ overarching reply to all the responses received to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13887.Google Scholar
Vinchon, M, Defoort-Dhellemmes, S, Desurmont, M, Dhellemmes, P. Accidental and nonaccidental head injuries in infants: A prospective study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2005;102(4 Suppl):380–4. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.102.4.0380.Google Scholar
Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. Traumatic shaking. The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking: A systematic review [Internet]. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2016 Oct 26. SBU Assessment No. 255. https://bit.ly/3zON5bX.Google Scholar
Barnes, PD. Imaging of nonaccidental injury and the mimics: Issues and controversies in the era of evidence-based medicine. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 2011;49(1):205–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2010.08.001.Google Scholar
Dyer, C. Diagnosis of ‘shaken baby syndrome’ still valid, appeal court rules. BMJ. 2005;331(7511):253. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7511.253.Google Scholar
State v Edmunds (2008) 746 N.W.2d 590.Google Scholar
Goudge, S. Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in Ontario: Report. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. 2008. https://bit.ly/3NBli4q.Google Scholar
Guthkelch, AN. Problems of infant retino-dural hemorrhage with minimal external injury. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12(201):1–8.Google Scholar
Del Prete v Thompson (2014) 10 F. Supp. 3d 907.Google Scholar
Lynøe, N, Elinder, G, Hallberg, B et al. Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’: A systematic review. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1021–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13760.Google Scholar
Christian, CW, Block, R, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics. Abusive head trauma in infants and children. Pediatrics. 2009;123(5):1409–11. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0408.Google Scholar
Pediatricians to Say ‘Abusive Head Trauma’, Not ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’. USA Today [Internet]. 2009, 27 April. https://bit.ly/3WBRNDR.Google Scholar
Narang, SK, Estrada, C, Greenberg, S, Lindberg, D. Acceptance of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma as medical diagnoses. Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;177:273–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.036.Google Scholar
Saunders, D, Raissaki, M, Servaes, S et al. Written on behalf of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Child Abuse Task Force and the Society for Pediatric Radiology Child Abuse Committee. Throwing the baby out with the bath water: Response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking. Pediatric Radiology. 2017;47(11):1386–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3932-8.Google Scholar
Högberg, U, Lampa, E, Högberg, G et al. Infant abuse diagnosis associated with abusive head trauma criteria: Incidence increase due to overdiagnosis? European Journal of Public Health. 2018;28(4):641–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riggs, JE, Hobbs, GR. Infant homicide and accidental death in the United States, 1940–2005: Ethics and epidemiological classification. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2011;37(7):445–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Findley, KA, Risinger, MD, Barnes, PD et al. Feigned consensus: Usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wisconsin Law Review. 2019;2019(5):1211–1267.Google Scholar
Papetti, R, Kaneb, P, Herf, L. Outside the echo chamber: A response to the ‘Consensus Statement on Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Young Children’. Santa Clara Law Review. 2019;59(2):299–366.Google Scholar
Greeley, CS. ‘Shaken baby syndrome’ and forensic pathology. Forensic Science and Medical Pathology. 2014;10(2):253–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9540-0.Google Scholar
Moreno, JA, Holmgren, B. The Supreme Court screws up the science: There is no abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome ‘scientific’ controversy. Utah Law Review. 2013;2013(5):1357.Google Scholar
Lucas, S, Bärtås, A, Bonamy, AE et al. The way forward in addressing abusive head trauma in infants: Current perspectives from Sweden. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1033–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13840.Google Scholar
Narang, S. A Daubert analysis of abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2011;11(505):505–633.Google Scholar
Tuerkheimer, D. Flawed convictions: ‘Shaken baby syndrome’ and the inertia of injustice. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Giardino, AP, Hanson, N, Hill, KS, Leventhal, JM. Child abuse pediatrics: New specialty, renewed mission. Pediatrics. 2011;128(1):156–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0363.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×