Book contents
- Secret Government
- Secret Government
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Publicity in History
- Chapter 2 Democracy Thrives in Darkness
- Chapter 3 Open versus Closed Deliberation
- Chapter 4 Publicity and the Rule of Law
- Chapter 5 Government House Moral Theory
- Chapter 6 Seeing Justice Done
- Chapter 7 Mutual Knowledge of Justice
- Chapter 8 Putting the Philosopher in the Model
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
Conclusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2021
- Secret Government
- Secret Government
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Publicity in History
- Chapter 2 Democracy Thrives in Darkness
- Chapter 3 Open versus Closed Deliberation
- Chapter 4 Publicity and the Rule of Law
- Chapter 5 Government House Moral Theory
- Chapter 6 Seeing Justice Done
- Chapter 7 Mutual Knowledge of Justice
- Chapter 8 Putting the Philosopher in the Model
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
Summary
In this book’s introduction, I noted that the dominant view of transparency among politicians and policy wonks is that transparency is unequivocally a good thing and that more of it is always better. We now know that the true story is a far more complicated one. This book has analyzed the concept of publicity from a philosophical perspective. Of course, we found that there are compelling arguments for insisting on greater transparency in government. But there are reasons to avoid transparency as well, and these trade-offs must be carefully navigated before we come to an all-things-considered judgment of transparency’s role in government. In much of my analysis, navigating these trade-offs led me to come out in favor of greater opacity. Let me summarize my main findings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Secret GovernmentThe Pathologies of Publicity, pp. 212 - 215Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021