Book contents
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Progress
- Part II Segmental Acquisition
- Part III Acquiring Suprasegmental Features
- Chapter 9 Relating Production and Perception of L2 Tone
- Chapter 10 Production of Mandarin Tones by L1-Spanish Early Learners in a Classroom Setting
- Chapter 11 Production of English Lexical Stress by Arabic Speakers
- Chapter 12 Variability in Speaking Rate of Native and Nonnative Speech
- Part IV Accentedness and Acoustic Features
- Part V Cognitive and Psychological Variables
- Index
- References
Chapter 12 - Variability in Speaking Rate of Native and Nonnative Speech
from Part III - Acquiring Suprasegmental Features
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Progress
- Part II Segmental Acquisition
- Part III Acquiring Suprasegmental Features
- Chapter 9 Relating Production and Perception of L2 Tone
- Chapter 10 Production of Mandarin Tones by L1-Spanish Early Learners in a Classroom Setting
- Chapter 11 Production of English Lexical Stress by Arabic Speakers
- Chapter 12 Variability in Speaking Rate of Native and Nonnative Speech
- Part IV Accentedness and Acoustic Features
- Part V Cognitive and Psychological Variables
- Index
- References
Summary
The bulk of the work on non-native speech has focused on average differences between L1 and L2 speakers. However, there is growing evidence that variability also plays an important role in distinguishing L1 from L2 speech. While some studies have demonstrated greater variability for non-native than native speech (e.g., Baese-Berk & Morrill, 2015; Wade et al., 2007), others have demonstrated that under some circumstances non-native speech maybe less variable and that variability in non-native speech may shift as a function of many factors, including task (Baese-Berk & Morrill, to appear; Baese-Berk, Morrill, & Bradlow, 2016) and L1-L2 pairing (Vaughn, Baese-Berk, & Idemaru, to appear). In the present study, we ask how variability manifests in L1 and L2 speech by speakers from a variety of language backgrounds. Specifically, we ask whether a speaker whose L1 speaking rate is highly variable is also highly variable in their L2. We also ask whether variability in speaking rate in L1 or L2 differs as a function of task (e.g., read vs. spontaneous speech) and complexity of the task (e.g., more or less complicated reading passages). The results of this study will inform our understanding of the myriad complex factors that influence non-native speech.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Second Language Speech LearningTheoretical and Empirical Progress, pp. 312 - 334Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 520–529. doi:10.1037/a0013552Google Scholar
Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–EL180. doi:10.1121/1.4789864Google Scholar
Baese-Berk, M. M., & Morrill, T. H. (2015). Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(3), EL223–EL228. doi:10.1121/1.4929622CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. E., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009). Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody. Language and Speech, 52(4), 391–413. doi:10.1177/0023830909336575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. E., Baese-Berk, M., Bonnasse-Gahot, L., Kim, M., Van Engen, K. J., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Word durations in non-native English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(1), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementaries. In Bohn, O. S. (Ed.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (Vols. 1–2, pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J., & Liss, J. M. (2012). Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: A review of experimental studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 290–305. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0349)Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. (n.d.). SpeechBox. Retrieved from https://speechbox.linguistics.northwestern.eduGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Alexander, J. A. (2007). Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2339. doi:10.1121/1.2642103Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, A. R., Blasingame, M., & Lee, K. (2018). Language-independent talker-specificity in bilingual speech intelligibility: Individual traits persist across first-language and second-language speech. Laboratory Phonology, 9(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Kim, M., & Blasingame, M. (2017). Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(2), 886–899. doi:10.1121/1.4976044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3647–3658. doi:10.1121/1.1815131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. Phonology in Perception, 15, 152–190.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1241–1255. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/087)Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=related:OXsRS-F20TEJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0,5&as_ylo=1995&as_yhi=1995Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2000). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. F., & Bent, T. (2017). Children’s use of semantic context in perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 223–230. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0014Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association (IPA). (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 277–288. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003Google Scholar
Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 125–156. doi:10.1515/labphon.2011.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119–135. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7–8), 953–978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, K. B. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58(4), 502–521. doi:10.1177/0023830914565191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, D. J., & Van Engen, K. J. (2020). Task-evoked pupil response for accurately-recognized accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2), EL151–156. doi:10.31234/osf.io/vx2tyGoogle Scholar
Mok, P., & Dellwo, V. (2008). Comparing native and non-native speech rhythm using acoustic rhythmic measures: Cantonese, Beijing Mandarin and English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody (pp. 423–426). Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Morrill, T., Baese-Berk, M., & Bradlow, A. (2016). Speaking rate consistency and variability in spontaneous speech by native and non-native speakers of English. doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porretta, V., Kyröläinen, A.-J., & Tucker, B. V. (2015). Perceived foreign accentedness: Acoustic distances and lexical properties. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(7), 2438–2451. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0916-3Google Scholar
Porretta, V., Tremblay, A., & Bolger, P. (2017). Got experience? PMN amplitudes to foreign-accented speech modulated by listener experience. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 54–67. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.03.002Google Scholar
Porretta, V., Tucker, B. V., & Järvikivi, J. (2016). The influence of gradient foreign accentedness and listener experience on word recognition. Journal of Phonetics, 58, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.006Google Scholar
Romero-Rivas, C., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2015). Processing changes when listening to foreign-accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(181), Article 167. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00167Google Scholar
Schmale, R., Hollich, G., & Seidl, A. (2011). Contending with foreign accent in early word learning. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1096–1108. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3306–3316.Google Scholar
Towell, R., & Dewaele, J. M. (2005). The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fluency amongst advanced learners of French. In Dewaele, J. M. (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language (pp. 210–239). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The Wildcat corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech, 53(4), 510–540. doi:10.1177/0023830910372495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Engen, K. J., & Peelle, J. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Phelps, J. E. B., Smiljanic, R., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2014). Enhancing speech intelligibility: Interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 1908–1911. doi:10.1044/JSLHR-H-13-0076Google Scholar
Vaughn, C., Baese-Berk, M., & Idemaru, K. (2019). Re-examining phonetic variability in native and non-native speech. Phonetica, 76, 327–358. doi:10.1159/000487269Google Scholar
Wade, T., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2007). Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, 64(2–3), 122–144. doi:10.1159/000107913Google Scholar
Weinberger, S. H. (n.d.). The Speech Accent Archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from http://accent.gmu.edu/Google Scholar
Witteman, M. J., Weber, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2013). Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(2), 512–519. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0519-8Google Scholar
Xie, X., & Fowler, C. A. (2013). Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 369–378.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by