Book contents
- The Sacraments of the Law and the Law of the Sacraments
- The Sacraments of the Law and the Law of the Sacraments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Sacraments in Law and Religion
- 2 The Ritual Frame of Sacraments
- 3 Sacramental Change in Status
- 4 Sacraments as Speech Acts
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2023
Book contents
- The Sacraments of the Law and the Law of the Sacraments
- The Sacraments of the Law and the Law of the Sacraments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Sacraments in Law and Religion
- 2 The Ritual Frame of Sacraments
- 3 Sacramental Change in Status
- 4 Sacraments as Speech Acts
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Sacraments of the Law and the Law of the Sacraments , pp. 271 - 286Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Tertullian, “Address to the Martyrs,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 1: Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani Presbyteri Carthaginensis Opera Omnia, part 1, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1844, 619–628.Google Scholar
Augustine, “Letter 138,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 33: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1865, 525–535.Google Scholar
Augustine, “In Jοannis Evangelium Tractatus CXXIV,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 35: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 3, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1841, 1379–1976.Google Scholar
Augustine, “The City of God,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 41: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 7, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1864, 13–804.Google Scholar
Peter Lombard, “Sentences,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 192: P. Lombardi Magistri Sententiarum, Parisiensis Episcopi Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1855, 839–962.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, “Summa Theologiae III,” in Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 12: Tertia Pars Summae Theologiae a Quaestione LX ad Quaestionem XC ad codices manuscriptos Vaticanos exacta cum Commentariis Thomae de Vio Caietani, Ordinis Praedicatorum, S. R. E. cardinalis, et Supplemento Tertiae partis, Rome, Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1906.Google Scholar
United States Supreme Court, “Munn vs. Illinois,” argued 14–18 January 1876, decided 1 March 1877, 94 U.S. 113.Google Scholar
United States Supreme Court, “Jacobellis vs. Ohio,” argued 26 March 1963, restored to the calendar for reargument 29 April 1963, reargued 1 April 1964, decided 22 June 1964, 378 U.S. 184.Google Scholar
Argentine Senate and Chamber of Deputies, “Desaparición forzada de personas,” Ley 24.321, date of assent 11 May 1994, promulgated 8 June 1994, <http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/0-4999/719/norma.htm>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Federal Criminal Court of Cassation, “Orangutana Sandra s/recurso de casación s/habeas corpus,” no. 68831/2014/CFCP, 18 December 2014, <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2014/12/Argentina-Habeas-Corpus-Decision.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Mendoza Third Court of Guarantees, “Case Presented by A.F.A.D.A about the Chimpanzee Cecilia – Non Human Individual,” File no. P-72.254/15, 3 November 2016, English translation: <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2016/12/Chimpanzee-Cecilia_translation-FINAL-for-website.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar
New Zealand Government, “Te Awa Tupua/Whanganui River Claims Settlement Act 2017,” Public Act 2017 no. 7, date of assent 20 March 2017, <www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html>accessed 5 April 2020.accessed+5+April+2020.>Google Scholar
New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, “Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. vs. Lavery,” decided 8 June 2017, <www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/chimps.pdf>accessed 16 April 2020.accessed+16+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Fourth Lateran Council, “Profession of Faith Firmiter credimus,” 1215, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 22: Ab anno 1166, ad annum 1225, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1903, 981–982.Google Scholar
Council of Trent, “Decree on the sacraments,” Seventh Session, 3 March 1547, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 48–60.Google Scholar
Council of Trent, “Decree and canons on the Eucharist,” Thirteenth Session, 11 October 1551, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 80–85.Google Scholar
Gregory XVI, “Encyclical Mirari vos on Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism,” 15 August 1832, Acta Sanctae Sedis 4 (1868), 336–345.Google Scholar
Pius IX, “Encyclical Quanta cura Condemning Current Errors,” 8 December 1864, Acta Sanctae Sedis 3 (1867), 160–167.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Constitution Sacrosanctum concilium on the Sacred Liturgy,” 4 December 1963, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 56 (1964), 97–138.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium on the Church,” 21 November 1964, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 57 (1965), 5–75.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Declaration Dignitatis humanae on the Right of the Person and of Communities to Social and Civil Freedom in Matters Religious,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 929–946.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Decree Ad gentes on the Mission Activity of the Church,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 947–990.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes on the Church in the Modern World,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 1025–1120.Google Scholar
Paul VI, “Encyclical Humanae vitae on the Regulation of Birth,” 25 July 1968, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 60 (1968), 481–503.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity on Assuming an Office to Be Exercised in the Name of the Church,” 9 January 1989, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 81 (1989), 104–106.Google Scholar
Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), English translation for the United States of America by the United States Catholic Conference, Vatican City, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1994.Google Scholar
John Paul II, “Apostolic Letter Ordinatio sacerdotalis on Reserving Priestly Ordinatio to Men Alone,” 22 May 1994, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 86 (1994), 545–548.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Decision on the Validity of the Anaphora of Addai and Mari,” 17 January 2001, unpublished.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Circular Letter to the Presidents of the Episcopal Conferences concerning the Use of Low-Gluten Altar Breads and Mustum as Matter for the Celebration of the Eucharist,” 24 July 2003, Prot. no. 89/78-17498, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030724_pane-senza-glutine_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar
Benedict XVI, “Address to the Roman Curia Offering them his Christmas Greetings,” 22 December 2005, <www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2005/december/documents/hf_ben_xvi_spe_20051222_roman-curia.html>accessed 8 January 2020.accessed+8+January+2020.>Google Scholar
International Theological Commission, “The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die without Being Baptised,” 20 April 2007, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html>accessed 30 December 2019.accessed+30+December+2019.>Google Scholar
The Roman Missal: The General Instruction of the Roman Missal, Excerpts from the English translation of The Roman Missal (2008), London, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, 2011.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier’ and ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer’,” 1 February 2008, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20080201_validity-baptism_en.html>accessed 15 November 2018.accessed+15+November+2018.>Google Scholar
The Roman Missal: The Order of Celebrating Matrimony, English Translation According to the Second Typical Edition, for use in the Dioceses of the United States of America, approved by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and confirmed by the Apostolic See, Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN, 2016.Google Scholar
Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, “Circular Letter to Bishops on the Bread and Wine for the Eucharist,” 15 June 2017, Prot. no. 320/17, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20170615_lettera-su-pane-vino-eucaristia_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar
Francis, “Apostolic Constitution Veritatis gaudium on Ecclesiastical Universities and Faculties,” 8 December 2017, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 110 (2018), 1–34.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘We baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Doctrinal note on the modification of the sacramental formula of Baptism,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Tertullian, “Address to the Martyrs,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 1: Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani Presbyteri Carthaginensis Opera Omnia, part 1, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1844, 619–628.Google Scholar
Augustine, “Letter 138,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 33: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1865, 525–535.Google Scholar
Augustine, “In Jοannis Evangelium Tractatus CXXIV,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 35: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 3, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1841, 1379–1976.Google Scholar
Augustine, “The City of God,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 41: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 7, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1864, 13–804.Google Scholar
Peter Lombard, “Sentences,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 192: P. Lombardi Magistri Sententiarum, Parisiensis Episcopi Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1855, 839–962.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, “Summa Theologiae III,” in Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 12: Tertia Pars Summae Theologiae a Quaestione LX ad Quaestionem XC ad codices manuscriptos Vaticanos exacta cum Commentariis Thomae de Vio Caietani, Ordinis Praedicatorum, S. R. E. cardinalis, et Supplemento Tertiae partis, Rome, Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1906.Google Scholar
United States Supreme Court, “Munn vs. Illinois,” argued 14–18 January 1876, decided 1 March 1877, 94 U.S. 113.Google Scholar
United States Supreme Court, “Jacobellis vs. Ohio,” argued 26 March 1963, restored to the calendar for reargument 29 April 1963, reargued 1 April 1964, decided 22 June 1964, 378 U.S. 184.Google Scholar
Argentine Senate and Chamber of Deputies, “Desaparición forzada de personas,” Ley 24.321, date of assent 11 May 1994, promulgated 8 June 1994, <http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/0-4999/719/norma.htm>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Federal Criminal Court of Cassation, “Orangutana Sandra s/recurso de casación s/habeas corpus,” no. 68831/2014/CFCP, 18 December 2014, <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2014/12/Argentina-Habeas-Corpus-Decision.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Mendoza Third Court of Guarantees, “Case Presented by A.F.A.D.A about the Chimpanzee Cecilia – Non Human Individual,” File no. P-72.254/15, 3 November 2016, English translation: <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2016/12/Chimpanzee-Cecilia_translation-FINAL-for-website.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar
New Zealand Government, “Te Awa Tupua/Whanganui River Claims Settlement Act 2017,” Public Act 2017 no. 7, date of assent 20 March 2017, <www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html>accessed 5 April 2020.accessed+5+April+2020.>Google Scholar
New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, “Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. vs. Lavery,” decided 8 June 2017, <www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/chimps.pdf>accessed 16 April 2020.accessed+16+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Fourth Lateran Council, “Profession of Faith Firmiter credimus,” 1215, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 22: Ab anno 1166, ad annum 1225, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1903, 981–982.Google Scholar
Council of Trent, “Decree on the sacraments,” Seventh Session, 3 March 1547, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 48–60.Google Scholar
Council of Trent, “Decree and canons on the Eucharist,” Thirteenth Session, 11 October 1551, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 80–85.Google Scholar
Gregory XVI, “Encyclical Mirari vos on Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism,” 15 August 1832, Acta Sanctae Sedis 4 (1868), 336–345.Google Scholar
Pius IX, “Encyclical Quanta cura Condemning Current Errors,” 8 December 1864, Acta Sanctae Sedis 3 (1867), 160–167.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Constitution Sacrosanctum concilium on the Sacred Liturgy,” 4 December 1963, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 56 (1964), 97–138.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium on the Church,” 21 November 1964, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 57 (1965), 5–75.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Declaration Dignitatis humanae on the Right of the Person and of Communities to Social and Civil Freedom in Matters Religious,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 929–946.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Decree Ad gentes on the Mission Activity of the Church,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 947–990.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council, “Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes on the Church in the Modern World,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 1025–1120.Google Scholar
Paul VI, “Encyclical Humanae vitae on the Regulation of Birth,” 25 July 1968, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 60 (1968), 481–503.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity on Assuming an Office to Be Exercised in the Name of the Church,” 9 January 1989, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 81 (1989), 104–106.Google Scholar
Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), English translation for the United States of America by the United States Catholic Conference, Vatican City, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1994.Google Scholar
John Paul II, “Apostolic Letter Ordinatio sacerdotalis on Reserving Priestly Ordinatio to Men Alone,” 22 May 1994, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 86 (1994), 545–548.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Decision on the Validity of the Anaphora of Addai and Mari,” 17 January 2001, unpublished.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Circular Letter to the Presidents of the Episcopal Conferences concerning the Use of Low-Gluten Altar Breads and Mustum as Matter for the Celebration of the Eucharist,” 24 July 2003, Prot. no. 89/78-17498, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030724_pane-senza-glutine_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar
Benedict XVI, “Address to the Roman Curia Offering them his Christmas Greetings,” 22 December 2005, <www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2005/december/documents/hf_ben_xvi_spe_20051222_roman-curia.html>accessed 8 January 2020.accessed+8+January+2020.>Google Scholar
International Theological Commission, “The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die without Being Baptised,” 20 April 2007, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html>accessed 30 December 2019.accessed+30+December+2019.>Google Scholar
The Roman Missal: The General Instruction of the Roman Missal, Excerpts from the English translation of The Roman Missal (2008), London, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, 2011.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier’ and ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer’,” 1 February 2008, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20080201_validity-baptism_en.html>accessed 15 November 2018.accessed+15+November+2018.>Google Scholar
The Roman Missal: The Order of Celebrating Matrimony, English Translation According to the Second Typical Edition, for use in the Dioceses of the United States of America, approved by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and confirmed by the Apostolic See, Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN, 2016.Google Scholar
Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, “Circular Letter to Bishops on the Bread and Wine for the Eucharist,” 15 June 2017, Prot. no. 320/17, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20170615_lettera-su-pane-vino-eucaristia_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar
Francis, “Apostolic Constitution Veritatis gaudium on Ecclesiastical Universities and Faculties,” 8 December 2017, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 110 (2018), 1–34.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘We baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Doctrinal note on the modification of the sacramental formula of Baptism,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar
Abrams, Kathryn and Keren, Hila, “Who’s Afraid of Law and the Emotions?,” Minnesota Law Review 94 (2010), 1997–2074.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath (Homo sacer II.3), Cambridge, Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ahern, Emily, see Martin, Emily.Google Scholar
Allen, Jessie, “A Theory of Adjudication: Law as Magic,” Suffolk University Law Review 41 (2008), 773–831.Google Scholar
Allott, Nicholas and Shaer, Benjamin, “The Illocutionary Force of Laws,” Inquiry 61 (2018), 351–369.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Nakagawa, Alexis, “Law as Magic: Some Thoughts on Ghosts, Non-Humans, and Shamans,” German Law Journal 18 (2017), 1247–1275.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Nakagawa, Alexis, “Rituals of (Dis)possession: Appropriation and Performativity in the Early Modern Law of Nations,” London Review of International Law 10 (2022), 33–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amselek, Paul, “Philosophy of Law and the Theory of Speech Acts,” Ratio Juris 1 (1988), 187–223.Google Scholar
Angenendt, Arnold, “Bonifatius und das sacramentum initiationis: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Firmung,” in Flammer, Thomas and Meyer, Daniel, eds., Liturgie im Mittelalter: Ausgewählte Aufsätze zum 70. Geburtstag (Ästhetik, Theologie, Liturgik 35), Münster, LIT, 2005, 35–87.Google Scholar
Appleyard, Joseph A., “How Does a Sacrament ‘Cause by Signifying’?,” Science et Esprit 23 (1971), 167–200.Google Scholar
Austin, John L., How to Do Things with Words, The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Austin, John L., “Performative Utterances,” in Austin, John L., Philosophical Papers, edited by James O. Urmson and Geoffrey J. Warnock, 3rd ed., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1979, 233–252.Google Scholar
Balentine, Samuel E., Have You Considered My Servant Job? Understanding the Biblical Archetype of Patience, Columbia, SC, The University of South Carolina Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan A. and Blumenthal, Jeremy A., “Emotion and the Law,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8 (2012), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Catherine, Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice, Foreword by Diane Jonte-Pace, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bergesen, Albert, “Die rituelle Ordnung,” in Belliger, Andréa and Krieger, David J., eds., Ritualtheorien: Ein einführendes Handbuch, 5th ed., Wiesbaden, Springer, 2013, 49–75.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J., Law and Language: Effective Symbols of Community, edited by Witte, John, Jr., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Berti, Daniela, Good, Anthony and Tarabout, Gilles, eds., Of Doubt and Proof: Ritual and Legal Practices of Judgment (Iuris Diversitas), Farnham, Ashgate Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Bertrams, Wilhelm, “Die Bedeutung des 2. Vatikanischen Konzils für das Kirchenrecht,” Österreichisches Archiv für Kirchenrecht 23 (1972), 125–162.Google Scholar
Besson, Éric, La dimension juridique des sacrements (Tesi Gregoriana, Serie Diritto Canonico 65), Rome, Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2004.Google Scholar
Boersma, Hans and Levering, Matthew, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Sacramental Theology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Böhnke, Michael, Kirche in der Glaubenskrise: Eine pneumatologische Skizze zur Ekklesiologie und zugleich eine theologische Grundlegung des Kirchenrechts, Freiburg im Breisgau, Herder, 2013.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, “Price Formation and the Anticipation of Profits,” in Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power, edited and introduced by John B. Thompson, translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991, 66–89.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal, Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, New York, Basic Books, 2001.Google Scholar
Brinkman, Bruno R., “On Sacramental Man: I Language Patterning,” Heythrop Journal 13 (1972), 371–401.Google Scholar
Brinkman, Bruno R., “‘Sacramental Man’ and Speech Acts Again,” Heythrop Journal 16 (1975), 418–420.Google Scholar
Brion, Denis J., “The Ritual of the Judicial Opinion,” in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 1–22.Google Scholar
Cappel, Andrew J., “Bringing Cultural Practice into Law: Ritual and Social Norms Jurisprudence,” Santa Clara Law Review 43 (2003), 389–494.Google Scholar
Carlen, Pat, “Remedial Routines for the Maintenance of Control in Magistrates’ Courts,” British Journal of Law and Society 1 (1974), 101–117.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Calum M., “Religious Claims about Biblical Law,” in Huxley, Andrew, ed., Religion, Law and Tradition: Comparative Studies in Religious Law, Abingdon, Routledge, 2002, 20–33.Google Scholar
Charnock, Ross, “Overruling as a Speech Act: Performativity and Normative Discourse,” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2009), 401–426.Google Scholar
Charrow, Veda R., Crandall, Jo Ann and Charrow, Robert P., “Characteristics and Functions of Legal Language,” in Kittredge, Richard and Lehrberger, John, eds., Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1982, 175–190.Google Scholar
Chase, Oscar G., Law, Culture, and Ritual: Disputing Systems in Cross-Cultural Context, Foreword by Jerome S. Bruner, New York, NYU Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Chauvet, Louis-Marie, Symbol and Sacrament: A Sacramental Reinterpretation of Christian Existence, translated by Patrick Madigan and Madeleine Beaumont, Collegeville, MN, The Liturgical Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Clark, John H., “Abracadabras in the Law,” The North American Review 229 (1930), 584–591.Google Scholar
Corcos, Christine A., ed., Law and Magic: A Collection of Essays, Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Corcos, Christine A., “Magical Images in Law,” in Wagner, Anne and Cheng, Le, eds., Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control, Farnham, Ashgate, 2011, 131–175.Google Scholar
Croce, Mariano, Self-sufficiency of Law: A Critical-institutional Theory of Social Order (Law and Philosophy Library 99), Dordrecht, Springer, 2012.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda, “Language in the Legal Process,” Law & Society Review 14 (1980), 445–564.Google Scholar
Daniel, William L., “Juridic Acts in Book VII of the Codex Iuris Canonici,” Studia Canonica 40 (2006), 433–486.Google Scholar
Dayan, Colin, The Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dinges, William D., “Ritual Conflict as Social Conflict: Liturgical Reform in the Roman Catholic Church,” Sociological Analysis 48 (1987), 138–157.Google Scholar
Doe, Norman, The Legal Framework of the Church of England: A Critical Study in a Comparative Context, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Cathal, Maurice Blondel on the Supernatural in Human Action: Sacraments and Superstition (Brill’s Series in Catholic Theology 4), Leiden, Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Doty, Kathleen L. and Hiltunen, Risto, “Formulaic Discourse and Speech Acts in the Witchcraft Trial Records of Salem, 1692,” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2009), 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary, Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, with a new introduction, London, Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Duffy, Mervyn, How Language, Ritual and Sacraments Work: According to John Austin, Jürgen Habermas and Louis-Marie Chauvet (Tesi Gregoriana, Serie Teologia 123), Rome, Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2005.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life [1912], translated and with an introduction by Karen E. Fields, New York, The Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, “Vorwort,” in Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, Sakramentale Repräsentation: Substanz, Zeichen und Präsenz in der Frühen Neuzeit, mit einem Beitrag von Stefan Manns, Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012, 9–10.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth, “How to Do Things with Words: Performative Utterances among the Limba of Sierra Leone,” Man (New Series) 4 (1969), 537–551.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Kieran, Sociology and Liturgy: Re-presentations of the Holy, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Daniel, To Kill and Take Possession: Law, Morality, and Society in Biblical Stories, Peabody, MA, Hendrickson Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
Gallie, Walter Bryce, “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956), 167–198.Google Scholar
Garapon, Antoine, “What Should One Think of Judicial Ritual in Law?,” Summary and Translation by Vivian Grosswald Curran, in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 23–30.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. S., “Performativity in Ritual: The Mianmin Case,” Man (New Series) 18 (1983), 346–360.Google Scholar
Garrigan, Siobhán, Beyond Ritual: Sacramental Theology After Habermas, Abingdon, Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 3–30.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, “The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 33–54.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, “Religion as a Cultural System,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 87–125.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, “‘Internal Conversion’ in Contemporary Bali,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 170–189.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart, “Communication as Commitment Sharing: Speech Acts, Implicatures, Common Ground,” Theoretical Linguistics 45 (2019), 1–30.Google Scholar
Girard, René, Violence and the Sacred, translated by Patrick Gregory, London, Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, “Religion and Ritual: The Definitional Problem,” British Journal of Sociology 12 (1961), 142–164.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, “Against ‘Ritual’: Loosely Structured Thoughts on a Loosely Defined Topic,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 25–35.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio, “Text and Genre,” in Solan, Lawrence M. and Tiersma, Peter M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 52–66.Google Scholar
Graupner, Richard, Der Gottesdienst als Ritual: Entdeckung, Kritik und Neukonzeption des Ritualbegriffs in der evangelischen Liturgik (Evangelisch-Katholische Studien zu Gottesdienst und Predigt 5), Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht/Echter, 2019.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew, The Catholic Imagination, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Grimes, Ronald L., “Reinventing Ritual,” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 75 (1992), 21–41.Google Scholar
Grimes, Ronald L., The Craft of Ritual Studies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Haering, Stephan, “Liturgie und Recht,” in Klöckener, Martin, Häußling, Angelus A. and Meßner, Reinhard, eds., Theologie des Gottesdienstes: Gottesdienst im Leben der Christen. Christliche und jüdische Liturgie (Gottesdienst der Kirche 2.2), vol. 2, Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2008, 403–454.Google Scholar
Hahn, Judith, “God on Trial: Approaching a Forensic Theology based on Theodicy Reasoning,” in Ego, Beate, Gause, Ute, Margolin, Ron and Rom-Shiloni, Dalit, eds., Theodicy and Protest: Jewish and Christian Perspectives (Studien zu Kirche und Israel, Neue Folge 13), Leipzig, Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2018, 249–266.Google Scholar
Hahn, Judith, “Invalid Baptismal Formulas: A Critical View on a Current Catholic Concern,” Ecclesiastical Law Journal 23 (2021), 19–33.Google Scholar
Hahn, Judith, “Magie in Recht und Religion: Über nichtkausale Wirkungszusammenhänge in rechtlichen und religiösen Ritualen,” in Papathanasiou, Konstantina, ed., Zufall: Rechtliche, philosophische und theologische Aspekte (Philosophische Schriften 109), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2022, 146–157.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Chaya, “Encircling the Law: The Legal Boundaries of Rabbinic Judaism,” Jewish Studies Quarterly 16 (2009), 396–424.Google Scholar
Happel, Stephen, “Worship as a Grammar of Social Transformation,” Catholic Theological Society of America Proceedings 42 (1987), 60–87.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Joseph, “Law Court Patterns in Prayer,” in Heinemann, Joseph, Prayer in the Talmud: Forms and Patterns (Studia Judaica 9), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1977, 193–217.Google Scholar
Hibbitts, Bernard J., “Making Motions: The Embodiment of Law in Gesture,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 6 (1995), 51–81.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto, “The Grammar and Structure of Legal Texts,” in Solan, Lawrence M. and Tiersma, Peter M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 39–51.Google Scholar
Ho, Hock Lai, “What Does a Verdict Do? A Speech Act Analysis of Giving a Verdict,” International Commentary on Evidence 4 (2006), 1–26.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, “Introduction: Inventing Traditions,” in Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds., The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983, 1–14.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Lawrence A., “How Ritual Means: Ritual Circumcision in Rabbinic Culture and Today,” Studia Liturgica 23 (1993), 78–97.Google Scholar
Homans, George C., “Anxiety and Ritual: The Theories of Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown,” American Anthropologist 43 (1941), 164–172.Google Scholar
Huels, John M., “Interpreting Canon Law in Diverse Cultures,” The Jurist 47 (1987), 249–293.Google Scholar
Huels, John M., “A Juridical Notion of Sacramentals,” Studia Canonica 38 (2004), 345–368.Google Scholar
Huels, John M., “Review on Besson, La dimension juridique des sacrements,” Studia Canonica 39 (2005), 376–379.Google Scholar
Huels, John M., Liturgy and Law: Liturgical Law in the System of Roman Catholic Canon Law, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur, 2006.Google Scholar
Huels, John M., “Acts with a Juridic Effect in the Canons of Marriage,” Studia Canonica 49 (2015), 309–331.Google Scholar
Huizing, Peter J., “Reflections on the System of Canon Law,” The Jurist 42 (1982), 239–276.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Laidlaw, James, The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship (Oxford Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jennings, Theodore W., “On Ritual Knowledge,” The Journal of Religion 62 (1982), 111–127.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel and Bax, Marcel M. H., “In-group Ritual and Relational Work,” Journal of Pragmatics 58 (2013), 73–86.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law, translated from the 2nd (revised and enlarged) German ed. by Max Knight, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Kranemann, Benedikt, “Gottesdienst und Moderne: Liturgiewissenschaft im Gespräch mit den ‘Ritual Studies’,” Theologie und Glaube 107 (2017), 247–260.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis, It Is Hereby Performed: Explorations in Legal Speech Acts (Pragmatics & Beyond VII:6), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladrière, Jean, “The Performativity of Liturgical Language,” in Schmidt, Herman and Power, David, eds., Liturgical Experience of Faith (Concilium, Religion in the Seventies), New York, Herder and Herder, 1973, 50–62.Google Scholar
Lawler, Michael G., “Christian Rituals: An Essay in Sacramental Symbolisms,” Horizons 7 (1980), 7–35.Google Scholar
Lawler, Michael G., “Faith and Sacrament in Christian Marriage,” in Lawler, Michael G., Marriage and the Catholic Church: Disputed Questions, Collegeville, MN, The Liturgical Press, 2002, 43–65.Google Scholar
Laytner, Anson, Arguing with God: A Jewish Tradition, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1990.Google Scholar
Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy, Wedding as Text: Communicating Cultural Identities Through Ritual, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, “The Effectiveness of Symbols,” in Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Structural Anthropology, translated from the French by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf, New York, Basic Books, 1963, 186–205.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. Lowell, The Anthropology of Cultural Performance, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Lindgren, J. Ralph, “Semiosis, Ritualization and Magic,” in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 69–87.Google Scholar
Lüdecke, Norbert, “Feiern nach Kirchenrecht: Kanonistische Bemerkungen zum Verhältnis von Liturgie und Ekklesiologie,” Jahrbuch für Biblische Theologie 18 (2003), 395–456.Google Scholar
Lüdecke, Norbert and Bier, Georg, Das römisch-katholische Kirchenrecht: Eine Einführung, unter Mitarbeit von Bernhard Sven Anuth, Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 2012.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven, “Political Ritual and Social Integration,” Sociology 9 (1975), 289–308.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław K., Coral Gardens and Their Magic, vol. 1: Soil-Tilling and Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands, Introduction by Edmund R. Leach, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1935.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław K., Coral Gardens and Their Magic: A Study of the Methods of Tilling the Soil and of Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands, vol. 2: The Language of Magic and Gardening, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1935.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław K., “Magic, Science, and Religion,” in Malinowski, Bronisław K., Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays, selected, and with an introduction by Robert Redfield, Glencoe, IL, The Free Press, 1948, 1–71.Google Scholar
Marmor, Andrei, Truth in Law (USC Legal Studies Research Paper 11–3), Los Angeles, University of Southern California Law School, 2011.Google Scholar
Martinich, Aloysius P., “Sacraments and Speech Acts,” part 1 and part 2, The Heythrop Journal 16 (1975), 289–303 and 405–417.Google Scholar
Martos, Joseph, Doors to the Sacred: A Historical Introduction to Sacraments in the Catholic Church, Garden City, NY, Doubleday & Company, 1981.Google Scholar
Martos, Joseph, Sacramental Magic, Speech, The College Theology Society Annual Convention, 31 May 1987, <www.academia.edu/36563275/Sacramental_Magic>accessed 18 November 2019.accessed+18+November+2019.>Google Scholar
Martos, Joseph, Sacraments and Magic, Speech, Mount St. Mary’s College, Los Angeles, CA, 23 July 1987, <www.academia.edu/36566418/Sacraments_and_Magic>accessed 18 November 2019.accessed+18+November+2019.>Google Scholar
Martos, Joseph, Catholic Rituals and Magic, Speech, Spalding University, Louisville, KY, 13 June 1995, <www.academia.edu/36566272/Catholic_Rituals_and_Magic>accessed 12 November 2019.accessed+12+November+2019.>Google Scholar
Martos, Joseph, Religion, Ritual and Sacramentality, Landregan Lecture, University of Dallas, 6 November 2004, <www.academia.edu/36566355/Religion_Ritual_and_Sacramentality>accessed 12 November 2019.accessed+12+November+2019.>Google Scholar
Martos, Joseph, Deconstructing Sacramental Theology and Reconstructing Catholic Ritual, Eugene, OR, Resource Publications, 2015.Google Scholar
Martos, Joseph, “Why ‘Receiving the Sacraments’ Is Wrong,” 15 July 2016, <https://dailytheology.org/2016/07/15/why-receiving-the-sacraments-is-wrong>accessed 31 May 2020.accessed+31+May+2020.>Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel, A General Theory of Magic [1902], translated by Robert Brain, with a foreword by D. F. Pocock, London, Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel, The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies [1925], translated by Ian Cunnison, with an introduction by E. E. Evans-Pritchard, London, Cohen & West Ltd, 1966.Google Scholar
Mayblin, Maya, Norget, Kristin and Napolitano, Valentina, “Introduction,” in Mayblin, Maya, Norget, Kristin and Napolitano, Valentina, eds., The Anthropology of Catholicism: A Reader, Oakland, University of California Press, 2017, 1–29.Google Scholar
Michaels, Axel et al., eds., Ritual Dynamics and the Science of Ritual, vol. I: Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia; vol. II: Body, Performance, Agency and Experience; vol. III: State, Power and Violence; vol. IV: Reflexivity, Media and Visuality; vol. V: Transfer and Spaces, Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010–2011.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., “Introduction: Secular Ritual – Forms and Meanings,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 3–24.Google Scholar
Mörsdorf, Klaus, “Wort und Sakrament als Bauelemente der Kirchenverfassung,” Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht 134 (1965), 72–79.Google Scholar
Miller, Geoffrey P., “The Legal Function of Ritual,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 80 (2005), 1181–1233.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jon P., “A Catholic Body: Miracles, Secularity, and the Porous Self in Malta,” in Norget, Kristin, Napolitano, Valentina and Mayblin, Maya, eds., The Anthropology of Catholicism: A Reader, Oakland, University of California Press, 2017, 211–226.Google Scholar
Myerhoff, Barbara G., “We Don’t Wrap Herring in a Printed Page: Fusion, Fictions and Continuity in Secular Ritual,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 199–224.Google Scholar
Neumann, Thomas, “Recht und Ritual: Eine kanonistische Annäherung an den normativen Charakter der Liturgie,” Liturgisches Jahrbuch 68 (2018), 109–126.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Rostam J., “Law and Magic: A(nother) Paradox?,” Thomas Jefferson Law Review 37 (2014), 139–190.Google Scholar
Odenthal, Andreas, Liturgie als Ritual: Theologische und psychoanalytische Überlegungen zu einer praktisch-theologischen Theorie des Gottesdienstes als Symbolgeschehen (Praktische Theologie heute 60), Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 2002.Google Scholar
Odenthal, Andreas, Rituelle Erfahrung: Praktisch-theologische Konturen des christlichen Gottesdienstes (Praktische Theologie heute 161), Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 2019.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Karl, Law As Fact, Copenhagen, Einar Munksgaard/Oxford University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Karl, “Legal Language and Reality,” in Newman, Ralph A., ed., Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound, Indianapolis, IN, Bobbs-Merrill, 1962, 151–191.Google Scholar
Olson, Greta, From Law and Literature to Legality and Affect, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Peters, Edward M., The Magician, the Witch, and the Law (The Middle Ages), Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Peters, Edward N., “The Ordination of Men Bereft of Speech and the Celebration of Sacraments in Sign Language,” Studia Canonica 42 (2008), 331–345.Google Scholar
Pickstock, Catherine, “Ritual: An Introduction,” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79 (2018), 217–221.Google Scholar
Platvoet, Jan G., “Ritual in Plural and Pluralist Societies: Instruments for Analysis,” in Platvoet, Jan G. and van der Toorn, Karel, eds., Pluralism and Identity: Studies in Ritual Behaviour, Leiden, Brill, 1995, 25–51.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., “Law and the Emotions,” The Georgetown Law Journal 89 (2001), 1977–2012.Google Scholar
Pree, Helmuth, “On Juridic Acts and Liability in Canon Law: Part One,” The Jurist 58 (1998), 41–83.Google Scholar
Prodi, Paolo, Der Eid in der europäischen Verfassungsgeschichte (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs, Vorträge 33), Munich, Stiftung Historisches Kolleg, 1992.Google Scholar
Prodi, Paolo, ed., Glaube und Eid: Treueformeln, Glaubensbekenntnisse und Sozialdisziplinierung zwischen Mittelalter und Neuzeit (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs, Kolloquien 28), unter Mitarbeit von Elisabeth Müller-Luckner, Munich, R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Prodi, Paolo, Das Sakrament der Herrschaft: Der politische Eid in der Verfassungsgeschichte des Okzidents (Schriften des Italienisch-Deutschen Historischen Instituts in Trient 11), aus dem Italienischen von Judith Elze, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1997.Google Scholar
Pyle, Ransford C., “Law, Ritual and Language,” American Legal Studies Association Forum 8 (1984), 381–392.Google Scholar
Quitterer, Josef, “Liturgie als geteilte intentionale Praxis,” in Stuflesser, Martin, Geldhof, Joris and Theuer, Andy, eds., “Ein Symbol dessen, was wir sind”: Liturgische Perspektiven zur Frage der Sakramentalität (Theologie der Liturgie 13), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018, 68–82.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl, “The Theology of the Symbol,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 221–252.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl, “The Word and the Eucharist,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 253–286.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl, “The Presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 287–311.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl, “On the Duration of the Presence of Christ After Communion,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 312–320.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl, “A Theology of the Church That Seeks to Serve: Interview with Meinold Krauss for South-German Radio (SDR), Stuttgart, 14 April 1979,” in Imhof, Paul and Biallowons, Hubert, eds., Karl Rahner in Dialogue: Conversations and Interviews 1965–1982, Translation edited by Harvey D. Egan, New York, The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1986, 204–210.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Roy A., Ecology, Meaning, and Religion, Richmond, CA, North Atlantic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Roy A., Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology 110), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sallinen, Riitta, “Observations on Contractual Speech Acts,” in Kuure, Leena, Kärkkäinen, Elise and Saarenkunnas, Maarit, eds., Kieli ja sosiaalinen toiminta – Language and Social Action (AFinLAn vuosikirja 2005, Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistyksen julkaisuja 63), Jyväskylä, Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys Jyväskylä, AFinLA, 2005, 289–308.Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford, “Contract Formation as a Speech Act,” undated online document <http://grammar.ucsd.edu/courses/lign105/student-court-cases/Schane%20-%20Contracts.pdf>accessed 20 January 2019.accessed+20+January+2019.>Google Scholar
Schillebeeckx, Edward, “Hin zu einer Wiederentdeckung der christlichen Sakramente: Ritualisierung religiöser Momente im alltäglichen Leben,” in Holderegger, Adrian and Wils, Jean-Pierre, eds., Interdisziplinäre Ethik: Grundlagen, Methoden, Bereiche – Festgabe für Dietmar Mieth zum sechzigsten Geburtstag (Studien zur theologischen Ethik 69), Freiburg im Üechtland, Universitätsverlag, Herder, 2001, 309–339.Google Scholar
Schlie, Heike, “Vollzug durch das Bild: Vertrag und Eid als Sakrament,” in Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, eds., Sakramentale Repräsentation: Substanz, Zeichen und Präsenz in der Frühen Neuzeit, mit einem Beitrag von Stefan Manns, Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012, 117–143.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Roman Catholicism and Political Form, translated and annotated by G. L. Ulmen (Contributions in Political Sciences 380), Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schreiter, Robert J., Constructing Local Theologies, Foreword by Edward Schillebeeckx, Maryknoll, NY, Orbis Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts,” Language in Society 5 (1976), 1–23.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., “How Performatives Work,” Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1989), 535–558.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Seasoltz, R. Kevin, New Liturgy, New Laws, Collegeville, MN, The Liturgical Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Seasoltz, R. Kevin, “Liturgy and Ecclesiastical Law: Some Canonical and Pastoral Challenges,” The Jurist 70 (2010), 114–130.Google Scholar
Senn, Frank C., Embodied Liturgy: Lessons in Christian Ritual, Minneapolis, MN, Augsburg Fortress Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Smith, James M. and McClendon, James W., Jr., “Religious Language after J. L. Austin,” Religious Studies 8 (1972), 55–63.Google Scholar
Stacey, Robin Chapman, Dark Speech: The Performance of Law in Early Ireland (The Middle Ages Series), Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Stone, Suzanne L., “Rabbinic Legal Magic: A New Look at Honi’s Circle As the Construction of Law’s Space,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 17 (2005), 97–123.Google Scholar
Stuflesser, Martin, “‘… damit wir einst als unverhüllte Wirklichkeit empfangen, was wir jetzt in heiligen Zeichen begehen’: Anmerkungen zur Theologie der Sakramente und der Sakramentalität im ökumenischen Kontext,” in Stuflesser, Martin, Geldhof, Joris and Theuer, Andy, eds., “Ein Symbol dessen, was wir sind”: Liturgische Perspektiven zur Frage der Sakramentalität (Theologie der Liturgie 13), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018, 25–49.Google Scholar
Stuflesser, Martin and Weyler, Tobias, eds., Liturgische Normen: Begründungen, Anfragen, Perspektiven (Theologie der Liturgie 14), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018.Google Scholar
Stuflesser, Martin, Ziebertz, Hans-Georg, Weyler, Tobias and Döhnert, Susanne, “Liturgische Normen und gottesdienstliche Praxis: Ein empirisch-theologisches Forschungsprojekt zum Handeln liturgischer Akteure,” in Stuflesser, Martin and Weyler, Tobias, eds., Liturgische Normen: Begründungen, Anfragen, Perspektiven (Theologie der Liturgie 14), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018, 11–35.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J., “The Magical Power of Words,” Man (New Series) 3 (1968), 175–208.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J., “A Performative Approach to Ritual,” Proceedings of the British Academy 65 (1979), 113–169.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity, Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M., “Rites of Passage: Legal Ritual in Roman Law and Anthropological Analogues,” The Journal of Legal History 9 (1988), 3–25.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M., Legal Language, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Tinker, Melvin, “Language, Symbols and Sacraments: Was Calvin’s View of the Lord’s Supper Right?,” Churchman 112 (1998), 131–149.Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna, “Statutes and Contracts: An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in the English Language of the Law,” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1995), 31–53.Google Scholar
Turner, Terence S., “Transformation, Hierarchy and Transcendence: A Reformulation of van Gennep’s Model of the Structure of Rites De Passage,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 53–70.Google Scholar
Usher, Anton, Replenishing Ritual: Rediscovering the Place of Rituals in Western Christian Liturgy (Marquette Studies in Theology 72), Milwaukee, WI, Marquette University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, Arnold, The Rites of Passage: A Classic Study of Cultural Celebrations, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Vanhoozer, Kevin J., Is There a Meaning in This Text? The Bible, the Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge, Grand Rapids, MI, Zondervan, 1998.Google Scholar
Vermeys, Nicolas W., “Ritual, Symbolism and … Cyberjustice?: A reflection on how ritualistic practices seem to hinder the integration of technology into the legal process,” Presentation, AIJA Law & Technology Conference, 25–27 June 2008, Sydney, <https://aija.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Vermeys1.pdf>accessed 14 September 2019.accessed+14+September+2019.>Google Scholar
Vidor, Gian Marco, “Rhetorical Engineering of Emotions in the Courtroom: The Case of Lawyers in Modern France,” Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History 25 (2017), 286–295.Google Scholar
Vismann, Cornelia, Medien der Rechtsprechung, edited by Kemmerer, Alexandra and Krajewski, Markus, Frankfurt am Main, S. Fischer Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Ware, James H., Jr., “Legislating Religious Rituals: How Communion Is Regulated in Some Protestant Denominations,” in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 171–192.Google Scholar
Weidner, Daniel, “Sakramentale Repräsentation als Modell und Figur,” in Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, eds., Sakramentale Repräsentation: Substanz, Zeichen und Präsenz in der Frühen Neuzeit, mit einem Beitrag von Stefan Manns, Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012, 13–28.Google Scholar
Wendebourg, Dorothea, Essen zum Gedächtnis: Der Gedächtnisbefehl in den Abendmahlstheologien der Reformation (Beiträge zur historischen Theologie 148), Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Wheelock, Wade T., “The Problem of Ritual Language: From Information to Situation,” The Journal of the American Academy of Religion 50 (1982), 49–71.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q., The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Witte, John, Jr. and Manzer, Christopher J., “Introduction,” in Berman, Harold J., in Witte, John, ed., Law and Language: Effective Symbols of Community, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, 1–35.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, New York, The Macmillan Company, 1963 .Google Scholar