Book contents
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Communication, Society and Politics
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figure
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Living in a Datafied World
- Part II Journalism in Times of Change
- Part III Media and Problems of Inclusion
- 7 Journalism and Inclusion
- 8 Afrotechtopolis
- 9 Exploiting Subalternity in the Name of Counter-Hegemonic Communication
- Part IV Engagement with and through Media
- Part V The Role of Scholars
- Other Books in the Series (continued from page ii)
- References
9 - Exploiting Subalternity in the Name of Counter-Hegemonic Communication
Turkey’s Global Media Outreach Initiatives
from Part III - Media and Problems of Inclusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
By
Book contents
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Communication, Society and Politics
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figure
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Living in a Datafied World
- Part II Journalism in Times of Change
- Part III Media and Problems of Inclusion
- 7 Journalism and Inclusion
- 8 Afrotechtopolis
- 9 Exploiting Subalternity in the Name of Counter-Hegemonic Communication
- Part IV Engagement with and through Media
- Part V The Role of Scholars
- Other Books in the Series (continued from page ii)
- References
Summary
This chapter asks how scholars should grapple with communication initiatives that advocate for inclusion on some issues while remaining anti-democratic and highly exclusionary in other key respects. Taking the case of Turkey’s governing party, Bilge Yesil explores a wide-ranging media ecology – a state-financed public broadcaster and news agency, government aligned English language dailies, NGO digital efforts – that purport to speak on behalf of subaltern groups (Muslim refugees, African Americans, Palestinians) in the global public sphere. She argues that such efforts cannot be read as simply anti-hegemonic; rather, they must be understood as instrumental uses of “subaltern” discourses. Yesil’s analysis demonstrates why scholarship examining authoritarian and populist communication need to look beyond simply the ways such actors speak and polarize publics, and instead grasp how these efforts aim to legitimate themselves while neutralizing their critics. In doing so, she calls attention to the way inclusion-exclusion dynamics are not merely single-nation stories, but rather are constructed in part through transnational relations among nation-states.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies , pp. 119 - 136Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Akca, Ismet, Bekmen, Ahmet, and Ozden, Baris (eds.) (2014). Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Alvares, Claudia and Dahlgren, Peter (2016). “Populism, Extremism and Media: Mapping an Uncertain Terrain.” European Journal of Communication, 31(1), 46–57.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (2017) “Annual Report: Turkey 2016/2017.” www.amnesty.org/en/countries/europe-and-central-asia/turkey/report-turkey/Google Scholar
Arnold, David (2000). “Gramsci and Peasant Subalternity in India.” In Chaturvedi, Vinayak (ed.), Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial (pp. 24–49). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bakiner, Onur (2018). “A Key to Turkish Politics? The Center–Periphery Framework Revisited.” Turkish Studies, 19(4), 503–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayazit, Huseyin Kemal (2016). “Turkey.” In Noam, Eli and the International Media Concentration Collaboration (eds.), Who Owns the World’s Media (pp. 387–424). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Yochai. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, William and Livingston, Steven. (2018). “The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions.” European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139.Google Scholar
Bulut, Ergin and Yoruk, Erdem (2017). “Digital Populism: Trolls and Political Polarization of Twitter in Turkey.” International Journal of Communication, 11, 4093–4117.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. (2018). “Positioning ‘the People’ and Its Enemies: Populism and Nationalism in AfD and UKIP.” Javnost-The Public, 26(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Chattarjee, Partha. (1993). The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, Vinayak (ed.) (2000). Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Cook, Steven A. (2016). “How Erdogan Made Turkey Authoritarian Again.” The Atlantic, July 21.Google Scholar
Cottle, Simon and Rai, Mugdha (2008). “Global 24/7 News Providers: Emissaries of Global Dominance or Global Public Sphere? Global Media and Communication, 4(2), 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Hsan D. (2005). “Transformation of Islamic Political Identity in Turkey: Rethinking the West and Westernization.” Turkish Studies, 6(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, Claes, Esser, Frank, Aalberg, Toril, Reinemann, Carsten, and Stanyer, James (2018). “Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438.Google Scholar
Engesser, Sven, Ernst, Nicole, Esser, Frank, and Büchel, Florin (2017). “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn and Rosenberg, Linda Therese (2018). “Trust in the Age of Social Media: Populist Politicians Seem More Authentic.” Social Media and Society, 4(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Fact-Checking Turkey (2019a). “Independent article makes factual mistakes.” http://factcheckingturkey.com/kurdish-issue/independent-article-makes-factual-mistakes-491Google Scholar
Fact-Checking Turkey (2019b). “The actual reason was that he is not holding a passport, which the UK requires each Turkish national to apply for a visa.” https://twitter.com/FactCheckingTR/status/1086247235095093248Google Scholar
Fact Checking Turkey (2019c). “He used an anti-Semitic epithet.” https://twitter.com/FactCheckingTR/status/1085887594435629056Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1990). “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, Paolo (2018). “Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity?” Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–53.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit (ed.) (1982). Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit and Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (eds.) (1988). Selected Subaltern Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harsin, Jayson (2018). “Post-truth and Critical Communication.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. http://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irak, Daghan (2016). “A Close-Knit Bunch: Political Concentration in Turkey’s Anadolu Agency through Twitter Interactions.” Turkish Studies, 17(2), 336–60.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, Deniz (2002). “Post-colonialism Compared: Potentials and Limitations in the Middle East and Central Asia.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34(2), 279–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karatas, Duygu and Saka, Erkan (2017). “Online Political Trolling in the Context of Post-Gezi Social Media in Turkey.” International Journal of Digital Television, 8(3), 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Benjamin (2017). “Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism.” Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kismet, Sercan (2019). “Yayınlarımız uluslararasi adaletsizliğe karsi.” Milliyet, February 7.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Neil (1994). “National Consciousness and the Specificity of (Post)colonial Intellectualism.” In Barker, Francis, Hulme, Peter, and Iversen, Margaret (eds.), Colonial Discourse/Postcolonial Theory (pp.197–220). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Letsch, Constance (2016). “Turkish PM Davutoglu Resigns as Erdogan Tightens Grip.” The Guardian, May 5.Google Scholar
Lokot, Tanya (2017). “Public Networked Discourses in the Ukraine-Russia Conflict: ‘Patriotic Hackers’ and Digital Populism.” Irish Studies in International Affairs, 28, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardin, Şerif (1973). “Center-periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?” Daedalus, 102(1), 169–190.Google Scholar
Media Ownership Monitor Turkey. (2019). “Media Ownership Matters.” https://turkey.mom-rsf.org/Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Napoli, Phillip M. (2011). Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Oates, Sarah (2017). “Kompromat Goes Global? Assessing a Russian Media Tool in the United States.” Slavic Review, 76(1), 57–65.Google Scholar
Postill, John (2018). “Populism and Social Media: A Global Perspective.” Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 754–765.Google Scholar
Price, Monroe and Dayan, Daniel (eds.) (2008). Owning the Olympics: Narratives of the New China. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Saka, Erkan (2014). “The AK Party’s Social Media Strategy: Controlling the Uncontrollable.” Turkish Review, 4(4), 418–23.Google Scholar
Saka, Erkan (2018). “Social Media in Turkey as a Space for Political Battles: AKTrolls and Other Politically Motivated Trolling.” Middle East Critique, 27(2), 161–77.Google Scholar
Sakallioğlu, Umit Cizre (1998). “Rethinking the Connections between Turkey’s ‘Western’ Identity versus Islam.” Critique: Journal for Critical Studies of the Middle East, 7(12), 3–18.Google Scholar
Salgado, Susana (2018). “Online Media Impact on Politics: Views on Post-truth Politics and Postmodernism.” International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), 317–31.Google Scholar
Sheets, Penelope, Bos, Linda and Boomgaarden, Hajo G. (2016). “Media Cues and Citizen Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(3), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somer, Murat (2016). “Understanding Turkey’s Democratic Breakdown: Old vs. New and Indigenous vs. Global Authoritarianism.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sozeri, Efe Kerem (2016). “Pelikan Dernegi: Berat Albayrak, Ahmet Davutoglu’nu Neden Devirdi?” Medium, November 3. https://medium.com/@efekerem/pelikan-derneği-berat-albayrak-ahmet-davutoğlunu-neden-delirdi-5fabad6dc7deGoogle Scholar
Sozeri, Efe Kerem (2017). “These Fake ‘Fact-Checkers’ are Peddling Lies about Genocide and Censorship in Turkey.” Poynter, May 31. www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2017/these-fake-fact-checkers-are-peddling-lies-about-genocide-and-censorship-in-turkey/Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988). “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (2005). “Scattered Speculations on the Subaltern and the Popular.” Postcolonial Studies, 8(4), 475–86.Google Scholar
Tansel, Cemal Burak (2018). “Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the Narratives of Progress.” South European Society and Politics, 23(2), 197–217.Google Scholar
Thussu, Daya, De Burgh, Hugo, and Shi, Anbin, (eds.) (2017). China’s Media Go Global. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thussu, Daya (2018). International Communication: Continuity and Change. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Toprak, Binnaz (1984). “Politicisation of Islam in a Secular State: The National Salvation Party in Turkey.” In Arjomand, Said Amir (ed.), From Nationalism to Revolutionary Islam (pp. 119–133). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
TRT World Research Center (2017). “Inspiring Change in an Age of Uncertainty.” http://researchcentre.trtworld.com/images/files/TRTWorldForum2017Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Turkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaskanligi (2016, November 15). “TRT World, Kameralarinin Vizörünü Güce ve Güçlüye Degil Mazlumlara, Ezilenlere Odaklamali.”Google Scholar
Unal, Ali (2016). “TRT World CEO Ibrahim Eren: We Will Tell the Truth Even If It’s Inconvenient or Disturbing.” Daily Sabah, November 21.Google Scholar
Volkmer, Ingrid (2014). The Global Public Sphere: Public Communication in the Age of Reflective Interdependence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Weise, Zia (2018). “Fact Checker Seeks Grain of Truth in Turkey’s Fake News Onslaught.” Politico, December 21.Google Scholar
Weitz, Richard (2009). “China, Russia, and the Challenge to the Global Commons.” Pacific Focus, 24(3), 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirz, Dominique S, Wettstein, Martin, Schulz, Anne, Müller, Philipp, Schemer, Christian, Ernst, Nicole, Esser, Frank, and Wirth, Werner (2018). “The Effects of Right-Wing Populist Communication on Emotions and Cognitions toward Immigrants.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 496–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yediyıldız, Elif Merve (2014). “Anadolu Agency: Linking Turkey and the World.” Daily Sabah, April 14.Google Scholar
Yesil, Bilge (2016). Media in New Turkey: The Origins of an Authoritarian Neoliberal State. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by