Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:06:12.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The state: The bête noire of neo-liberalism or its greatest conquest?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
Vivien A. Schmidt  and
Cornelia Woll
Edited by
Vivien A. Schmidt  and
Mark Thatcher
Vivien A. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Boston University
Mark Thatcher
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Neo-liberalism has had one central message for the state: scale back, cut back, cut out, transform. This brings to mind Winston Churchill's reply to an opponent who asked, ‘How much is enough?’ to Churchill's repeated push to spend increasingly more on defence in the 1930s. Churchill's rejoinder came in the form of a story about a Brazilian banker with whom he had just had lunch. The banker had received a cable informing him of the death of his mother-in-law and asking for instructions. He cabled back: ‘embalm, cremate, bury at sea; leave nothing to chance’.

This take on neo-liberalism – as burying the state – is certainly exaggerated because neo-liberalism comes in many different forms with many different policy applications. Only the recommendations of the most radical strands come close to the Brazilian banker's response to his mother-in-law's death. Yet the story as a metaphor for neo-liberal views of the state nonetheless somehow rings true. This is largely because neo-liberals have been more anti-state in their rhetoric than in their actions.

The state has been neo-liberalism’s bête noire, as its main focus of attack, because neo-liberals – whatever their differences – have viewed the state as consistently doing too much in the wrong ways with the worst consequences not only for the markets but also for democracy, by endangering individual freedom through its interventions. As a provider of public goods, the state had to be scaled back to leave room for the market, which would assure more efficiency. However, the state has also been neo-liberalism’s greatest conquest, as its main locus of action, because it has been primarily through the state that neo-liberals have been able to realize their vision(s).

Type
Chapter
Information
Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy , pp. 112 - 142
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelal, Rawi. 2001. National Purpose in the World Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Abdelal, Rawi. 2007. Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Michel. 1991. Capitalisme contre Capitalisme. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Kenneth. 2002. ‘Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance’, European Law Journal 8 (1): 102–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, Jean-Claude. 2008. La Longue Marche vers l’Europe Sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockman, Johanna. 2011. Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosenecker, Aaron. 2008. ‘The Power of Defining Work and Welfare: Politics and Discourse in European Welfare Reform’. Paper prepared for presentation at the 16th International Conference of the Council for European Studies, Chicago, IL (March 6–8).
Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., and Walsh, P.. 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1986a. ‘Man and the State’, Mont Pèlerin Society Presidential Talk, August 31, p. 2, LAMP.
Buchanan, James M. 1986b. Liberty, Market and State. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 2007. ‘Introduction’. In The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Vol. II, The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents, The Definitive Edition, edited by Caldwell, B. (1–33). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clift, Ben, and Woll, Cornelia. 2012. ‘Economic Patriotism: Reinventing Control over Open Markets’,Journal of European Public Policy 19 (3): 307–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lagasnerie, Geoffroy. 2012. La dernière leçon de Michel Foucault. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Denord, François. 2007. Neo-Libéralisme Version Française: Histoire d'une Idéologie Politique. Paris: Demopolis.Google Scholar
Denord, François. 2009. ‘French Neo-Liberalism and Its Divisions: From the Colloque Lippmann to the Fifth Republic.’ In The Road to Mont Pèlerin, edited by Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter (45–67). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth, and Featherstone, Kevin. 1996. ‘Italy and the EMU as a “Vincolo Esterno”: Empowering the Technocrats, Transforming the State’, South European Society and Politics 1 (2): 272–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Faucher, Florence, and Le Galès, Patrick. 2010. The New Labour Experiment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2004. Naissance de la Biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979. Paris: Hautes Études/Gallimard/Seuil.Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion, and Babb, Sarah L.. 2002. ‘The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries’, American Journal of Sociology 108 (3): 533–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1980. Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 2010. Building States and Markets after Communism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Andrew. 1988. The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, Justin. 2007. ‘Organized Civil Society and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union’, British Journal of Political Science 37 (02): 333–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1986. Governing the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harberger, A. C. 1971. ‘Three Basic Postulates for Welfare Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 9, 785–97.Google Scholar
Hartwell, Ronald. 1995. A History of the Mont Pèlerin Society. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2001. ‘The “Crisis” of Keynesianism and the Rise of Neo-Liberalism in Britain: An Ideational Institutionalist Approach’. In The Rise of NeoLiberalism and Institutional Analysis, edited by Campbell, J. L. and Pedersen, O. (193–218). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin, and Rosamond, Ben. 2002. ‘Globalisation, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives’, Journal of European Public Policy 9 (2): 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin, and Smith, Nicola J.. 2010. ‘How Policy Makers Really Understand Globalization: The Internal Architecture of Anglopohone Globalisation Discourse in Europe’, Public Administration 88 (4): 903–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944 (reprinted 2007). The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents, The Definitive Edition. Edited by Caldwell, B., The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hinnsfors, Jonas, and Pierre, Jon. 1998. ‘The Politics of Currency Crises in Sweden: Policy Choice in a Globalized Economy’, West European Politics 21: 103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jabko, Nicholas. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1944. ‘Letter to Hayek, June 28’. Reprinted in John Maynard Keynes, Activities 1940–1946. Shaping the Post-War World: Employment and Commodities, edited by Moggridge, Donald, Vol. 27 (1980), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (385–86). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kinderman, Daniel. 2005. ‘Pressure from Without, Subversion from within: The Two-Pronged German Employer Offensive’, Comparative European Politics 3: 432–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranke, Matthias, and Lütz, Susanne. 2010. ‘The European Rescue of the Washington Consensus? IMF and EU Lending to Eastern European Countries’. London School of Economics, European Institute, LEQS Paper No. 22 (May).
Lane, David, and Myant, Martin (eds.). 2007. Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. First edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Leca, Jean. 2012. ‘L’EÉtat entre politics, policies et polity – ou : peut-on sortir du triangle des bermudes?”, Gouvernement et action publique 2012 (1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 2001. ‘Institutional Embedding of Market Economies: The German Model and its Impact on Japan’. In The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison, edited by Streeck, W. and Yamamura, K. (39–93). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jonah. 1999. Tocqueville's Revenge: Dilemmas of Institutional Reform in Post-Dirigiste France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Meunier, Sophie, and Jacoby, Wade. 2010. ‘Europe and the Management of Globalization’,Journal of European Public Policy 17: 299–317.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, and Plehwe, Dieter. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Moran. 2003. The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie. 2010. Constructions of Neo-Liberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1945. Origins of Our Time: The Great Transformation. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, and Bouckaert, Geert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis of New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quack, Sigrid, and Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2005. ‘Adaptation, Recombination, and Reinforcement: The Story of AntiTrust and Competition Law in Germany and Europe’. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen (255–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. 2002. ‘The Italian State and the Euro.’ In European States and the Euro, edited by Dyson, Ken (212–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosamond, Ben. 2012. ‘Supranational Governance as Economic Patriotism? The European Union, Legitimacy and the Reconstruction of State Space’,Journal of European Public Policy 19 (3): 324–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1983. ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’. In International Regimes, edited by Krasner, Stephen (195–231). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1996. ‘Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare States’. In Governance in the European Union, edited by Marks, Gary et al. (15–39). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2000. ‘Economic Changes, Vulnerabilities, and Institutional Capabilities’. In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Vol. I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, edited by Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien A. (21–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2012. ‘Legitimacy Intermediation in the Multilevel European Polity and Its Collapse in the Euro Crisis’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/6, available at .
Schmidt, Vivien A. 1996. From State to Market? The Transformation of French Business and Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2000. ‘Values and Discourse in the Politics of Adjustment’. In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: Vol. 1, edited by Scharpf, F. W. and Schmidt, V. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002a. The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002b. ‘Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?’, Comparative Political Studies 35 (2): 168–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2003. ‘How, Where, and When Does Discourse Matter in Small States’ Welfare State Adjustment?’, New Political Economy 8 (1): 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2009. ‘Putting the Political Back into Political Economy by Bringing the State Back Yet Again’,World Politics 61 (3): 516–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2012. ‘France's Postwar Model from the State in Action to a State of Mind’. Review Essay of Philip Nord's France's New Deal in French Politics 10 (2): 196–208.Google Scholar
Schnyder, Gerhard. 2012. ‘Like a Phoenix from the Ashes? Reassessing the Transformation of the Swedish Political Economy since the 1970s’, Journal of European Public Policy 19 (8): 1126–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siems, Matthias, and Skidelsky, R. Schnyder. 2005. John Maynard Keynes, 1883–1946. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Siems, Matthias, and Gerhard, Schnyder. (In press). ‘Ordoliberal Lessons for Economic Stability: Different Kinds of Regulation, Not More Regulation’. Governance.
Stiller, Sabina. 2010. Ideational Leadership in German Welfare State Reform. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 1997. ‘German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive?’. In Modern Capitalism or Modern Capitalisms, edited by Crouch, Colin and Streeck, Wolfgang (35–54). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2010. Reforming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Yamamura, K.. 2001. The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 2009. ‘Liberalism and Neo-Liberalism in Britain 1930–1980’. In The Road to Mont Pèlerin, edited by Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Vogel, Steven. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard. 2012. ‘Remembering Bill Niskanen: Pursuing Economics as a Public Science in the Service of Liberty’, Public Choice 153 (1–2): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zysman, John. 1978. ‘The French State in the International Economy’. In Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Policies of Advanced Industrial States, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. (255–93). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×