Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:17:22.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2021

Kent Roach
Kent Roach
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Remedies for Human Rights Violations
A Two-Track Approach to Supra-national and National Law
 , pp. 534 - 560
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Barak, Aharon, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, David, The Ultimate Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander, The Morality of Consent (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander, The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, David and Landau, David (eds.), The Evolution of the Separation of Powers (Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar
Birks, Peter, “Three Kinds of Objections to Discretionary Remedialism” (2000) 29 W. Aust. L. Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (New York: Banks Law Publishing, 1916).Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, “Government Responsibility in Tort VI” (1926) 36 Yale L. J. 8.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, “Tort Liability of the State” (1930) 12 J. Comparative Int’l. L. 1.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, “Judicial Relief for Peril or Insecurity” (1931) 45 Harv. L. Rev. 791.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, “Declaratory Judgments in International Relations” (1935) 98 World Affairs 3.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, Declaratory Judgments, 2nd ed. (Cleveland: Banks: Baldwin, 1941).Google Scholar
Brunée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen, Legality and Legitimacy in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, The Common Law in the Age of Statutes (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido and Bobbitt, Philip, Tragic Choices: The Conflicts Society Confronts in the Allocation of Tragically Scarce Resources (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978).Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido and Melamed, Douglas, “Property Rules and Liability Rules: One View of the Cathedral” (1972) 85 Harv. L. Rev. 1089.Google Scholar
Carozza, Paolo G., “Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law” (2003) 97(1) Am. J. Intn’l. L. 38.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation” (1976) 89 Harv. L. Rev. 7.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes Handler, Antonia, “On Compliance” in Martin, Lisa L. and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), International Institutions: An International Organization Reader (Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes Handler, Antonia, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, Ehrlich, Thomas and Lowenfeld, Andreas, International Legal Process (Boston: Little Brown, 1968).Google Scholar
Donald, Alice, Long, Debra and Speck, Anna-Katrin, “Identifying and Assessing the Implementation of Human Rights Decisions” (2020) 12 Journal of Human Rights Practice 125.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore and Yeazell, Stephen C., “The Ordinary and Extraordinary in Litigation” (1980) 93 Harv. L. Rev. 465.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen, “Forward: The Forms of Justice” (1979) 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, Owen, “Against Settlement” (1984) 93 Yale L. J. 1073.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. “Some Reflections on Legal and Economic Freedoms: A Review of Robert Hale’s Freedom through Law” (1954) 54 Colum L. Rev. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon, The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon, “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication” (1978) 92 Harv. L. Rev. 353.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. and Purdue, William R., “The Reliance Interest in Contracts” (1936) 46 Yale. L. J. 1.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Paul, “Remedies and Resistance” (1983) 92 Yale L. J. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilden, Gary, “Damages Caused by Violations of the Charter: The Relevance of American Constitutional Remedies Jurisprudence” (2009) 24 Nat’l. J. Const. L. 121.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack and Posner, Eric, The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hart, Henry and Sacks, Albert, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of the Law (Westbury: The Foundation Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hickman, Tom, “Bill of Rights Reform and the Case for Going beyond the Declaration of Incompatibility Model” (2015) 2015 N.Z. L. Rev. 35.Google Scholar
Hoole, Grant, “Proportionality as a Remedial Principle: A Framework for Suspended Declarations of Invalidity in Canadian Constitutional Law” (2011) 49 Alta. L. Rev. 107.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra, “Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights” (2011) 44 Cornell Int’l. L. J. 3.Google Scholar
Koh Hongju, Harold, “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?” (1997) 106 Yale L. J. 2599.Google Scholar
Landau, David, “Choosing between Simple and Complex Remedies in Socio-Economic Rights Cases” (2019) 69 Supp. 1 U.T.L.J. 120.Google Scholar
Levinson, Daryl J., “Rights Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration” (1999) 99 Colum. L. Rev. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leckey, Robert, “The Harms of Remedial Discretion” (2016) 14 I. Con. 3.Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert, “Remedial Practice beyond Constitutional Text” (2016) 64 Am. J. Comp. L. 1.Google Scholar
Maladonado, Daniel, Constitutionalism of the Global South (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McLachlin, Beverley, “Rights and Remedies – Remarks” in Sharpe, Robert J. and Roach, Kent (eds.), Taking Remedies Seriously (Ottawa: Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 2010).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Constitutionalizing Disrepute” (1986) 44 U. Toronto Fac. L. Rev. 209.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “What Is New and Old about the Legal Process” (1997) 47 U.T.L.J. 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Principled Remedial Discretion under the Charter” (2004) 25 S.C.L.R.(2d) 101.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, Constitutional Remedies in Canada, 2nd ed. (Aurora: Thomson Reuters, 2013).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Judicial, Legislative and Executive Role in Enforcing the Constitution: Three Manitoba Stories” in Albert, Richard and Cameron, David (eds.), Canada in the World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Dialogue in Canada and the Dangers of Simplified Comparative Law and Populism” in Sigalet, Geofferey, Webber, Gregoire and Dixon, Rosalind (eds.), Constitutional Dialogue Rights and Institutions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N., The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rudovsky, David, “Running in Place: The Paradox of Expanding Rights and Restricted Remedies” (2005) 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 5.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Clara, Leach, Philip and Murray, Rachel, “Monitoring, Cajoling and Promoting Dialogue: What Role for Supra-national Bodies in the Implementation of Individual Decisions?” (2020) 12 Journal of Human Rights Practice 71.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Sharpe, Robert J., Good Judgment: Making Judicial Decisions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Sharpe, Robert J. and Roach, Kent, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 6th ed. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2017).Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. Brian, Human Rights and the End of Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen A., “Rights and Remedies: A Complex Relationship” in Sharpe, Robert and Roach, Kent (eds.), Taking Remedies Seriously (Ottawa: Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 2010).Google Scholar
Starr, Sonja B., “Rethinking ‘Effective Remedies’ and Remedial Deterrence in International Courts” (2008) 83 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 693.Google Scholar
Thomas, Tracy A., “Proportionality and the Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence of Remedies” (2007) 59(1) Hastings L. J. 73.Google Scholar
Trindade, Antônio Augusto Cançado, Access to International Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark and Jackson, Vicki (eds.), Proportionality: New Frontiers New Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Waddams, Stephen, Principle and Policy in Contract Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Webber, Gregoire, The Negotiable Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wojtyczek, Krzysztof, “Judicial and Non-Judicial Elements in the Enforcement Mechanism of the European Convention on Human Rights” in Pinto de Albuquerque, Paula and Wojtyczek, Krzysztof (eds.), Judicial Power in a Globalized World (Berlin: Springer, 2019).Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen (ed.), Constitutional Remedies in Asia, 1st ed. (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Antkowiak, Thomas M., “An Emerging Mandate for International Courts: Victim-Centered Remedies and Restorative Justice” (2011) 47(2) Stanford J. Int’l. L. 279.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , The Nicomachean Ethics, Ross, D. (trans.), Ackrill, J. L. and Urmson, J. O. (rev. eds.), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1765).Google Scholar
Buyse, Antoine, “The Pilot Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: Possibilities and Challenges” (2009) Greek L. J. 1.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, “How Does the Constitution Establish Justice?” (1988) 101 Harv. L. Rev. 1026.Google Scholar
Contesse, Jorge, “Settling Human Rights Violations” (2019) 60 Harv. Int’l. L. J. 317.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed. (London: MacMillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R., “Implementing the Rights Revolution: Repeat Players and the Interpreting of Diffuse Legal Messages” (2008) 71 L. Contemp. Problems 2.Google Scholar
Espinosa, Manuel José Cepeda and Landau, David, Colombian Constitutional Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. and Meltzer, Daniel J., “New Law, Non-retroactivity and Constitutional Remedies” (1991) 194 Harv. L. Rev. 8.Google Scholar
Friedland, M. L., “Prospective and Retrospective Judicial Lawmaking” (1974) 24 U.T.L.J. 170.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. and Winston, Kenneth I., “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication” (1978) 92 Harv. L. Rev. 2.Google Scholar
Glas, Lize, “The European Court of Human Rights Supervising the Execution of Its Judgments” (2019) 37(3) Netherlands Q. Hum. Rts. 228.Google Scholar
Greer, Stephen, The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Greer, Stephen, “What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights” (2008) 30 Hum. Rts. Q. 680.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darrin and Jacoby, Wade, “Partial Compliance: A Comparison of the European and Inter-American American Courts for Human Rights” (2010) 6 J. Int’l. L. Int’l. Rltns. 35.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney, Domestic Politics and International Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline and Roach, Kent, “Disenfranchisement as Punishment: European Court of Human Rights, UK and Canadian Responses to Prisoner Voting” (2017) Public Law 450.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Donald, The Courts and Social Policy (Washington: Brookings Institute, 1977).Google Scholar
Keller, Hellen and Marti, Cedric, “Reconceptualizing Implementing: The Judicialization of the Execution of European Court of Human Rights Judgements” (2016) 26(4) E. J. L. 829.Google Scholar
Kurban, Dilek, “Forsaking Individual Justice: The Implications of the European Court of Human Rights Pilot Judgment Procedure for Victims of Gross and Systemic Violations” (2016) 16 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 731.Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert, “Enforcing Laws That Infringe Rights” (2016) Public Law 206.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, Sandra, “Participatory Justice in Social Rights Adjudication” (2018) 18 Hum. Rts L. Rev. 623.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L., “Bi-level Remedies for Human Rights Violations” (2014) 55 Harv. J. Int’l. L.Google Scholar
Pfander, James, “Dicey’s Nightmare: An Essay on the Rule of Law” (2019) 107 Calif. L. Rev. 737.Google Scholar
Ray, Brian, Engaging with Social Rights: Procedure, Participation and Democracy in South Africa’s Second Wave (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Polycentricity and Queue Jumping in Public Law Remedies” (2016) 66 U.T.L.J. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Remedies for Laws That Violate Human Rights” in Bell, John et al. (eds.) Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Dialogic Remedies” (2019) 17 I. Con. 860.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar and Rodriguez-Franco, Diana, Radical Deprivation on Trial: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socio-economic Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Ryder, Bruce, “Suspending the Charter” (2003) 21 S.C.L.R. (2d) 267.Google Scholar
Sachs, Albie, “The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights: The Grootboom Case” (2003) 56(1) Current Legal Problems 579.Google Scholar
Sainati, Tatiana, “Human Rights Class Actions: Rethinking the Pilot-Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights” (2015) 56(1) Harv. Int’l. L. J. 147.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo, “Civil Rights Injunctions Over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders” (2006) 81 N.Y.U L. Rev. 2.Google Scholar
Schoenbroad, David S., and Sandler, Ross, Democracy by Decree (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Sicilianos, Linos-Alexander, “The Involvement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Implementation of Its Judgments” (2014) 32 Netherlands Q. Hum. Rts. 235.Google Scholar
Steiner, Henry, “Individual Claims in a World with Massive Rights Violations: What Role for the Human Rights Committee?” in Alston, Phillip and Crawford, James (eds.), The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, “Public Law Litigation and the Ambiguities of Brown” (1992) 61 Fordham L. Rev. 23.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Courts, Weak, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Vladek, Stephen, “The New National Security Canon” (2012) 61 Amer. Univ. L. Rev. 1295.Google Scholar
Wadham, J., and Said, T., “What Price the Right of Individual Petition: Report of the Evaluation Group to the Committee of Ministers on the European Court of Human Rights” (2002) 2 Eur. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 169.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest, Corrective Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Wildhaber, Luzius, “Pilot Judgments in Cases of Structural or Systemic Problems on the National Level” in Wolfrum, Rudiger and Deutsch, Ulkrike (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions (Berlin: Springer, 2009).Google Scholar
Young, Katharine G., “Rights and Queues: On Distributive Contests in the Modern State” (2016) 55 Colum. J. Transnt’l. L. 65.Google Scholar
Bates, Bethany M., “Reconciliation after Winter: The Standard for Preliminary Injunctions in Federal Courts” (2011) 111 Colum. L. Rev. 1522.Google Scholar
Bray, Samuel, “Multiple Chancellors: Reforming the National Injunction” (2017) 131 Harv. L. Rev. 418.Google Scholar
Brewer-Carias, Allan R., Constitutional Protection of Human Rights in Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Brown, Chester, A Common Law of International Adjudication (New York City: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Burbano-Herrera, Clara, Provisional Measures in the Case Law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar
Burbano-Herrera, Clara, “The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Its Role in Preventing Violations of Human Rights through Provisional Measures” in Haeck, Yves, Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo and Burbano-Herrera, Clara (eds.), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice, Present and Future (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2015).Google Scholar
Burbano-Herrera, Clara and Haeck, Yves, “Letting States off the Hook? The Paradox of the Legal Consequences Following State Non-Compliance with Provisional Measures in the Inter-American and European Human Rights Systems” (2017) 28 Netherlands Q. Hum. Rts. 3.Google Scholar
Burgenthal, Thomas, “Interim Measures in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights” in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Interim Measures Indicated by International Courts (Berlin: Springer, 1994).Google Scholar
Cassels, Jamie, “An Inconvenient Balance: The Injunction as a Charter Remedy” in Berryman, Jeffrey (ed.), Remedies, Issues and Perspectives (Thomas Professional Publishing, 1991).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes Handler, Antonia, “Compliance without Enforcement: State Behaviour under Regulatory Treaties” (1991) 7 Negotiation Journal 311.Google Scholar
Sir Fitzmaurice, Gerald, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, Vols. I–II (Cambridge: Grotius Publications Limited, 1986).Google Scholar
Franklin, Beatrice, “Irreparability, I Presume? On Assuming Irreparable Harm for Constitutional Violations in Preliminary Injunctions” (2014) 45 Colum. Hum. Rts. Rev. 362.Google Scholar
Ghandi, Sandy, “The Human Rights Committee and Interim Measures of Relief” (2007) 12 Canterbury L. Rev. 203.Google Scholar
Gray, Christine, Judicial Remedies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Haeck, Yves, Burbano-Herrera, Clara and Zwaak, Leo, “Non-Compliance with a Provisional Measure Automatically Leads to a Violation of the Right of Individual Application… or Doesn’t It: Strasbourg Court Takes Away Any Remaining Doubts and Broadens Its Pan-American Protection” (2008) 4 Eur. Const. L. Rev. 41.Google Scholar
Haeck, Yves, Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo and Burbano-Herrera, Clara (eds.), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice, Present and Future (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2015).Google Scholar
Harrington, Joanna, “Punting Terrorists, Assassins and Other Undesirables: Canada, the Human Rights Committee and Requests for Interim Measures of Protection” (2003) 48 McGill L. J. 55.Google Scholar
Jorem, Henrik, “Protecting Human Rights in Cases of Urgency: Interim Measures and the Right of Individual Application under Article 34 ECHR” (2012) 30 Nordic J. Hum. Rts. 404.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas, The Death of the Irreparable Injury Rule (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Lee-Iwamoto, Yoshiyuki, “The Repercussions of the LaGrand Judgment: Recent ICJ Jurisprudence on Provisional Measures” (2012) 55 Japanese Y.B. Int’l. L. 237.Google Scholar
Leubsdorf, John, “The Standard for Preliminary Injunctions” (1978) 91 Harv. L. Rev. 525.Google Scholar
McCormick, Pamela, “Risk of Irreparable Damage: Interim Measures in Proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights” (2010) 12 Cambridge Y.B. Eur. Leg. Stud. 313.Google Scholar
Miles, Cameron, Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Miles, Cameron, “Provisional Measures and the ‘New’ Plausibility in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice” (2018) Br. Y.B. Intn’l L.Google Scholar
Naldi, Gino, “Interim Measures in the UN Human Rights Committee” (2004) 53 Int’l. Comp. L. Q. 445.Google Scholar
Okpaluba, Chuks and Mhango, Mtendeweka, “Between Separation of Powers and Justiciability: Rationalising the Constitutional Court’s Judgement in the Gauteng E-Tolling Litigation in South Africa” (2017) 21 L. Democ. Dvpmn’t. 1.Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo M., “Interim Measures in International Human Rights: Evolution and Harmonization” (2005) 38 Vanderbilt J. Transnt’l. L. 1.Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 2nd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Raboshakga, Ngwako, “The Separation of Powers in Interim Interdict Applications” (2014) 5 Constitutional Ct. Rev. 366.Google Scholar
Rieter, Eva, Preventing Irreparable Harm Provisional Measures in International Human Rights Adjudication (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar
Rieter, Eva, “Provisional Measures: Binding and Persuasive?” (2012) 16 Netherlands Intn’l. L. Rev. 165.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Robert J., “Interim Remedies and Constitutional Rights” (2019) 69 Supp. 1 U.T.L.J. 9.Google Scholar
Swart, Mia and Coggin, Thomas, “The Road Not Taken: Separation of Powers: Interim Interdicts, Rationality Review and E-Tolling in National Treasury v. Opposition to Urban Tolling” (2014) 5 Constitutional Ct. Rev. 346.Google Scholar
Trindade, Cançado A.A., “The Evolution of Provisional Measures of Protection under the Case-law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (1987–2002)” (2003) 24 Hum. Rts. J. 162.Google Scholar
Trindade, Cançado, International Law for Humankind, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013).Google Scholar
Berger, Benjamin, “A More Lasting Comfort? The Politics of Minimum Sentences, the Rule of Law and R v. Ferguson” (2009) 47 The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 1.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, “Foreword: Antidiscrimination and Constitutional Accountability (What the Bork-Brennan Debate Ignores)” (1991) 105 Harv. L. Rev. 80.Google Scholar
Carolan, Eoin, “A ‘Dialogue-oriented Departure’ in Constitutional Remedies? The Implications of NHV v. Minister for Justice for Inter-Branch Roles and Relationships” (2017) 40 Dublin U. L.J.(N.S.). 191.Google Scholar
Chandrachud, Chintan, Balanced Constitutionalism Courts and Legislatures in India and the United Kingdom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit and Roach, Kent, “Putting the Past behind Us? Prospective Judicial and Legislative Constitutional Remedies” (2003) 21 S.C.L.R. (2d) 205.Google Scholar
Crawford, Christopher, “Dialogue and Declarations of Incompatibility under Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998” (2013) 25 Denning L. J. 43.Google Scholar
Davis, Fergal and Mead, David, “Declarations of Incompatibility, Dialogue and the Criminal Law” (2014) 43 Common L. World Rev. 62.Google Scholar
De Londras, Fiona, “Declarations of Incompatibility under the ECHR 2003 Act: A Workable Transplant?” (2014) 35 Statute L. Rev. 50.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind, “A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia?” (2009) 37 Fed. L. Rev. 335.Google Scholar
Donald, Alice and Leach, Philip, Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Duclos, Nitya and Roach, Kent, “Constitutional Remedies as “Constitutional Hints”: A Comment on R v. Schachter” (1991) 36 McGill L. J. 1.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr., “Fact and Fiction about Facial Challenges” (2011) 99 Calif. L. Rev. 915.Google Scholar
Fish, Eric, “Severability as Conditionality” (2015) 64 Emory L. J. 1293.Google Scholar
Fish, Eric S., “Choosing Constitutional Remedies” (2016) 63 U.C.L.A L. Rev. 2.Google Scholar
Fish, Eric, “Judicial Amendment of Statutes” (2016) 84 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 3.Google Scholar
Kameny, Fred, “Are Inseverability Clauses Constitutional?” (2005) 68 Alta. L. Rev. 997.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Aileen, Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kenny, David, “Remedial Innovation, Constitutional Culture, and the Supreme Court at a Crossroads” (2017) 40 Dublin U. L. J.(N.S.) 85.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald and Miller, Russell, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 3rd ed. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Geiringer, Claudia, “The Constitutional Role of the Courts under the NZ Bill of Rights: Three Narratives from Attorney-General v. Taylor” (2017) 48 V.U.W. L. Rev. 4.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, “Some Thoughts on Judicial Authority to Repair Unconstitutional Legislation” (1979) 28 Clev. St. L. Rev. 301.Google Scholar
Hickman, Tom, Public Law after the Human Rights Act (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Jacobi, Tonja, “Sharing the Love: The Political Power of Remedial Delay in Same-Sex Marriage” (2006) 15 L. Sexuality 11.Google Scholar
King, Jeff, “Parliament’s Role Following Declarations of Incompatibility” in Hunt, Murray, Hooper, Hayley and Yowell, Paul (eds.), Parliament and Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T., “Alexander Bickel’s Philosophy of Prudence” (1985) 94 Yale L. J. 7.Google Scholar
Lau, Holning, “Comparative Perspectives on Strategic Remedial Delays” (2016) 91 Tul. L. Rev. 259.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersh, The International Bill of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert, Bills of Rights in the Common Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert, “Assisted Dying, Suspended Declarations and Dialogue’s Time” (2019) 69 Supp. 1 U.T.L.J. 64.Google Scholar
Leigh, Ian and Lustgarten, Laurence, “Making Rights Real: The Courts, Remedies, and the Human Rights Act” (1999) 58 Cambridge L. J. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Anthony, “Human Rights: Interpretation, Declarations of Inconsistency and the Limits of Judicial Power” (2011) 9 N.Z. J. Pub. Int’l L. 1.Google Scholar
Peltomaa, Arthur, Understanding Unconstitutionality (Toronto: Teja Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Petrie, Nicholas, “Indications of Inconsistency” (2019) 78 Cambridge L. J. 3.Google Scholar
Philipson, Gavin, “Deference, Discretion and Democracy in the Human Rights Era” (2007) 60 Current Legal Problems 40.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Dangers of a Charter-Proof and Crime-Based Response to Terrorism” in Daniels, Ronald et al. (eds.), The Freedom of Security: Essays on Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Bill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Remedial Consensus and Challenge: General Declarations and Delayed Declarations of Invalidity” (2002) 35 U.B.C. Law Rev. 211.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics” (2004) 23 S.C.L.R. (2d) 49.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “New and Problematic Restrictions on Constitutional Remedies” (2004) 49 C.L.Q. 253.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Constitutionalized Interpretation, Reading Down/In and the Wisdom of Schachter” (2016) 36 N.J.C.L. 2.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2016).Google Scholar
Rupp-von Brunneck, Wiltraut, “Germany: The Federal Constitutional Court” (1972) 20 Am. J. Comp. L. 3.Google Scholar
Rogerson, Carol, “The Judicial Search for Appropriate Remedies under the Charter: The Examples of Overbreadth and Vagueness” in Sharpe, Robert J. (ed.), Charter Litigation (Toronto: Butterworths, 1987).Google Scholar
Sathanapally, Aruna, Beyond Disagreement: Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Stewart, Hamish, “A Defence of Constitutionalized Interpretation” (2016) 36 N.J.C.L. 2.Google Scholar
Stiansen, Oyvind, “Delayed but Not Derailed: Legislative Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments” (2019) 23 Int’l. J. Hum. Rts. 8.Google Scholar
Sunstein, William N., “If People Would Be Outraged by Their Rulings, Should Judges Care?” (2007) 60 Stan. L. Rev. 155.Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen, “New Democracies and Novel Remedies” (2017) 2017 Public Law 30.Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen, Constitutional Remedies in Asia (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen, “Remedial Discretion and Dilemmas in Asia” (2019) 69 Supp. 1 U.T.L.J. 84.Google Scholar
Zeidler, Wolfgang, “Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany: Decisions on the Constitutionality of Legal Norms” (1986) 62 Notre Dame L. Rev. 4.Google Scholar
Aronson, Mark, “Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis” (2010) 55 McGill L. J. 615.Google Scholar
Antkowiak, James and Gonza, Alejandra, The American Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Berryman, Jeff and Carroll, Robyn, “Cy-Près as a Class Action Remedy” in Barker, Kit and Jenson, Darryn (eds.), Private Law: Key Encounters with Public Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Carroll, Robyn, “You Can’t Order Sorriness, so Is There Any Value in an Ordered Apology – An Analysis of Ordered Apologies in Anti-Discrimination Cases” (2010) 33 U.N.S.W. L.J. 2.Google Scholar
Carroll, Robyn, “Apologies as a Legal Remedy” (2013) 35(2) Sydney L. Rev. 317.Google Scholar
Chan, Johannes, “Vindicatory Damages for Violations of Constitutional Rights: A Comparative Approach” in Elliott, Mark, Varuhas, Jason and Stark, Shona (eds.), The Unity of Public Law? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Charles, W. H., Understanding Charter Damages (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2016).Google Scholar
Cichero, Agnostina and Green-Martinez, Sebastian, “Punitive Damages and the Principle of Full Reparation in the Case Law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights” in Haeck, Yves et al. (eds.), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice, Present and Future (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2015).Google Scholar
Citroni, Gabriella, “Measures of Reparation for Victims of Gross Human Rights Violations: Developments and Challenges in the Jurisprudence of Two Regional Human Rights Courts” (2012) 5 Inter-Am. Eur. Hum. Rts. J.Google Scholar
Cooper-Stephenson, Kenneth, Charter Damage Claims (Toronto: Carswell, 1990).Google Scholar
Cooper-Stephson, Kenneth Constitutional Damages Worldwide (Toronto: Thomson Reuters, 2013).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
de Albuquerque, Pinto and Van Aaken, Anne, “Punitive Damages in Strasbourg” in van Aaken, Anne and Motoc, Julia (eds.), The European Convention on Human Rights and General International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Epp, Charles, Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats and the Creation of the Legalistic State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard, “Bidding Farewell to Constitutional Torts” (2019) 107 Calif. L. Rev. 933.Google Scholar
Fikfak, Veronika, “Changing State Behaviour: Damages before the European Court of Human Rights” (2019) 29(4) E. J. I. L. 1091.Google Scholar
Flaherty, Michele, “Trends in Human Rights Damages” (2017) 20 Can. Lab. Emp. L. J. 355.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol, “Damages and Human Rights” (2004) N.Z. L. Rev. 429.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol, State Liability: Tort Liability and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ichim, Octavian, Just Satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Jeffries, John Jr., “Reversing the Order of Battle in Constitutional Torts” (2009) Sup. Ct. L. Rev. 115.Google Scholar
Jeffries, John Jr., “The Liability Rule for Constitutional Torts” (2013) 99 Virg. L. Rev. 207.Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa, “Bringing Effective Remedies Home: The Inter-American Human Rights System, Reparations and the Duty of Prevention” (2004) 22 Netherlands Q. Hum. Rts. 347.Google Scholar
Laurin, Jennifer, “Trawling for Herring: Lessons in Doctrinal Borrowing” (2011) 111 Colum. L. Rev. 670.Google Scholar
Levinson, Daryl J., “Making Government Pay: Markets Politics and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs” (2000) 67 U. Chi. L. Rev. 2.Google Scholar
Linden, Allen, “Charter Damage Claims: New Dawn or Mirage?” (2012) 39 Adv. Q. 426.Google Scholar
Lord Scott of Foscote, Holland, Randy, Justice, and Varner, Chilton, “The Role of Extra-compensatory Damages for Violations of Fundamental Human Rights in the United Kingdom and the United States” (2006) 46 Va. J. Intnl. L. 475.Google Scholar
Love, J. C., “Damages: A Remedy for the Violation of Constitutional Rights” (1979) 67 Calif. L. Rev. 1242.Google Scholar
McLay, Geoff, “Damages for Breach of the New Zealand Bill of Rights: Why Aren’t They Sufficient Remedy” (2008) 2008 N.Z. L. Rev. 333.Google Scholar
Mullan, David, “Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Does It Stand in 1959 and for What Does It Stand in 2009?” (2010) 55 McGill L. J. 587.Google Scholar
Pfander, James, Constitutional Torts and the War on Terror (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Pfander, James, Reinert, Alexander and Schwartz, Joanna, “The Myth of Personal Liability” (2020) 72 Stan. L. Rev. 561.Google Scholar
Psutska, Michelle and Sheehy, Elizabeth, “Strip Searching of Women in Canada: Wrongs and Rights” (2016) 94 Can. Bar Rev. 241.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “A Promising Late Spring for Charter Damages: Ward v. British Colombia” (2011) 29 N.J.C.L. 135.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Substitute Justice? Indirect Challenges to American Counter-Terrorism Activities in non-American Courts” (2012) 82 Miss. L. J. 4.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Blaming the Victim: Canadian Law, Causation and Residential Schools” (2014) 64 U.T.L.J. 566.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Disappointing Remedy? Damages as a Remedy for Violations of Human Rights” (2019) 69 Supp. 1 U.T.L.J. 33.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marin, Ruth (ed.), The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Rubio-Marin, Ruth, Sandoval, Clara and Diaz, Catalina, “Repairing Family Members: Gross Human Rights Violations and Communities of Harm” in Rubio-Marin, Ruth (ed.), The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Sampson-Jones, Ted, “The Myth of Ashby v. Wright” (2010) 8 St Thomas L. Rev. 40.Google Scholar
Schmeiser, Douglas, Civil Liberties in Canada (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter, Suing Government (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Joanna C., “How Qualified Immunity Fails” (2017) 127 Yale L. J. 2.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Joanna C., “The Case against Qualified Immunity” (2018) 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. 5.Google Scholar
Steele, Jenny, “Damages and Tort under the Human Rights Act” (2008) 67 C. L. J. 606.Google Scholar
Trengove, Win, “Judicial Remedies for Violations of Socio-economic Rights” (1999) 1 E.S.R. Rev. 8.Google Scholar
Trindade, Antonio Augusto Cançado, “The Human Person and International Justice” (2008) 47 Colum. J. Transn’l. L. 16.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Gijs, “The Ordered Apology” (2017) 37 Oxford J. Leg. Studies 562.Google Scholar
Varuhas, Jason, Damages and Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Varuhas, Jason, “The Development of the Damage Remedy under the New Zealand Bill of Rights: From Torts to Administrative Law” (2016) N.Z. L. Rev. 213.Google Scholar
Wagatsuma, Hiroshi and Rosett, Arthur, “The Implications of Apology: Law and Culture in Japan and the United States” (1986) 20 L. Soc’y. Rev. 461.Google Scholar
White, Brent T., “Say You’re Sorry: Court-ordered Apologies as a Civil Rights Remedy” (2006) 91 Cornell L. Rev. 6.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony, “Speedy Criminal Trial: Rights and Remedies” (1975) 27 Stan. L. Rev. 3.Google Scholar
Bettinger-Lopez, Caroline, “The Challenge of Domestic Implementation of International Human Rights Law in the Cotton Field Case” (2012) 15(2) N.Y. City L. Rev. 315, 329.Google Scholar
Bloom, Robert and Delaney, Erin, “When Rights Become Empty Promises: Promoting an Exclusionary Rule That Vindicates Personal Rights” (2012) 46 Irish Jurist (N.S.) 38.Google Scholar
Bradley, Craig, The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution (Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Bradley, Craig, Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study, 2nd ed. (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Bradley, Craig M., “Is the Exclusionary Remedy Dead?” (2012) 102 J. Crim. L. Criminology 1.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, “The Exclusionary Rule” (2003) 26 Harv. J. L. and Pub. Pol’y. 112.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise, “The Gender Injustice Cascade” (2017) 21(9) Int’l J. Hum. Rts. 1223.Google Scholar
Choo, Andrew, Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Proceedings, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Code, Michael, Trial within a Reasonable Time (Toronto: Carswell, 1992).Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. and Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, “Dialectical Federalism: Habeas Corpus and the Court” (1977) 86 Yale L. J. 1035.Google Scholar
Doernberg, Donald L., “‘The Right of the People’: Reconciling Collective and Individual Interests under the Fourth Amendment” (1983) 58 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 240.Google Scholar
Dutton, Anne and Ni Aolain, Fionnuala, “Between Reparations and Repair: Assessing the Work of the ICC Trust Fund for Victims” (2019) 19 Chi. J. Int’l. L. 490.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen, “Anti-impunity and the Turn to Criminal Law in Human Rights” (2015) 100 Cornell L. Rev. 1069.Google Scholar
Farbey, Judith, Sharpe, Robert J. and Atrill, Simon, The Law of Habeas Corpus, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Farrell, Brian, Habeas Corpus in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon, Convicting the Innocent (Cambridge: Harvard University, 2011).Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L., “Aggregation in Criminal Law” (2007) 95 Cal. L. Rev. 383.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L., “Aggregation and Constitutional Rights” (2012) 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2.Google Scholar
Giannoulopoulos, Dimitrios, Improperly Obtained Evidence in Anglo-American and Continental Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline, The Metamorphosis of Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra, “International Criminal Law by Other Means” (2013) 107 Am. J. Int’l. L. 1.Google Scholar
Jackson, John D. and Summers, Sarah, The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Jeffries, John C. Jr., “The Right-remedy Gap in Constitutional Law” (1999) 109 Yale L. J. 87.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Yale, “Does (Did) (Should) the Exclusionary Rule Rest on a ‘Principled Basis’ Rather than an ‘Empirical Proposition’” (1983) 16 Creighton L. Rev. 565.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Yale, “In Defence of the Exclusionary Rule” (2003) 26 Harv. J. L. Pub. Pol’y. 119.Google Scholar
King, Nancy and Hoffman, Joseph, Habeas for the Twenty-First Century: Uses, Abuses, and the Future of the Great Writ (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Kuijer, Martin, “The Right to a Fair Trial and the Council of Europe’s Efforts” (2013) 13 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 4.Google Scholar
Lamer, Rt. Hon Antonio, “Protecting the Administration of Justice from Disrepute” (1998) 42 St Louis U. L. J. 345.Google Scholar
Levine, Kay, Turner, Jenia and Wright, Ronald, “Evidence Laundering in a Post-Herring World” (2016) 106 J. Crim. L. Criminology 627.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Richard, “Exclusion of Evidence” in Rishworth, Paul et. al (eds.), The New Zealand Bill of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Mandel, Michael, How America Gets Away with Murder (London: Pluto Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter, “Sentence Reductions as a BORA Remedy” (2012) 2012 N.Z. L. J. 24.Google Scholar
McFadden, Patrick M., “Provincialism in United States Courts” (1995–1996) 81 Cornell L. Rev. 4.Google Scholar
McGrath, Declan, “The Exclusionary Rule in respect of Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence” (2004) 26 Dublin Univ. L. J. 108.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, “Justifying Compensation by the International Criminal Court’s Victims Trust Fund: Lessons from Domestic Compensation Schemes” (2010) 36 Brook. J. Int’l. L. 123.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric and Calderon, Jean-Paul, “The Move towards a Victim-Centred Concept of Criminal Law and the ‘Criminalization’ of Inter-American Human Rights Law: A Case of Human Rights Law Devouring Itself?” in Haeck, Yves, Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo, Burbano-Herrera, Clara (eds.), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice, Present and Future (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2015).Google Scholar
Michell, Paul, “English-Speaking Justice: Evolving Responses to Transnational Forcible Abduction after Alvarez-Machain” (1996) 29 Cornell Int’l. U. 2.Google Scholar
Moffatt, Luke, “Reparative Complemtarity” (2013) 17(3) Int’l. J. Hum. Rts. 368.Google Scholar
Naymark, Daniel, “Violations of Rights of the Accused at International Criminal Tribunals: The Problem of Remedy” (2008) 4 J. Int’l. L. Int’l. Rltns. 2.Google Scholar
Optican, Scott L. and Sankoff, Peter J., “The New Exclusionary Rule: A Preliminary Assessment of R. v. Shaheed” (2003) 2003 N.Z. L. Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Paciocco, David, “Section 24(2): Lottery or Law – The Appreciable Limits of Purposive Reasoning” (2011) 58 C.L.Q. 15.Google Scholar
Primus, Eve Brensike, “A Structural Vision of Habeas Corpus” (2010) 98 Cal. L. Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Rappaport, John, “How Private Insurers Regulate Public Police” (2017) 130 Harv. L. Rev. 6.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Constitutionalizing Disrepute: Exclusion of Evidence after Therens” (1986) 44 U. Toronto Fac. L. Rev. 209.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Evolving Fair Trial Test” (1996) 1 Can. Crim. L. Rev. 69.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, Due Process and Victims’ Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Reclaiming Prima Facie Exclusionary Rules in Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the United States: The Importance of Compensation, Proportionality and Non-Repetition” (2020) 43 Manitoba Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth and Sandoval, Clara, “Engendering the Reparations Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The Promise of the “Cotton Field” Judgment” (2011) 33 Hum. Rts. Q. 1062.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Clara and Duttwiler, Michael. “Redressing Non-Pecuniary Damages of Torture Survivors: The Practice of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights” in Gilbert, Geoff et. al. (eds.), The Delivery of Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar
Seibert-Fohr, Anja, Prosecuting Serious Human Rights Violations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Shereshevsky, Yahli, “Monetary Compensation as a Remedy for Fair Trial Violations under International Criminal Law” (2015) 18 New Crim. L. Rev. 71.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2011).Google Scholar
Starr, Sonja B., “Sentence Reduction as a Remedy for Prosecutorial Misconduct” (2009) 97 Geo. L. J. 6.Google Scholar
Stuntz, William, The Collapse of American Criminal Justice (Cambridge; Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Tomkovicz, James J., Constitutional Exclusion: The Rules, Rights, and Remedies That Strike the Balance between Freedom and Order (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Turner, Jenia Iontcheva, “Policing International Prosecutors” (2012) 45 N.Y.U. J. Int’l. L. Pol’y. 1.Google Scholar
Turner, Jenia Iontcheva, “The Accountability of International Prosecutors” in Stahn, Carsten (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), Chapter 17.Google Scholar
Viebig, Petra, Illicitly Obtained Evidence in the International Criminal Court (Berlin: Springer, 2016).Google Scholar
Attaran, Amir and Khan, Jon, “Solving the ‘Khadr’ Problem: Retention of Jurisdiction- A Comparative Analysis” (2015) 34 N.J.C.L. 145.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra, “Law, Politics and Constitutional Hegemony” in Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav and Mehta, Pratap Bhanu (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick, Silent Covenants: Brown v. Board of Education and the Unfulfilled Hopes for Racial Reform (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Bell, Derick A. Jr., “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation” (1976) 85 Yale L. J. 470.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, P. N., “Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation” (1985) 23 Colum. J. Transntn’l. L. 561.Google Scholar
Bhwanania, Anuj, Courting the People Public Interest Litigation in Post-Emergency India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Bray, Samuel, “The Myth of the Mild Declaratory Judgment” (2014) 63 Duke L.J. 1091.Google Scholar
Budlender, Steven, Marcus, Gilbert and Ferreira, Nick, Public Interest Litigation and Social Change in South Africa: Strategies, Tactics and Lessons (The Atlantic Philanthropies, 2014).Google Scholar
Buyse, Antoine, “The Pilot Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: Possibilities and Challenges” (2009) 57 Nomiko Vima 1890.Google Scholar
Carter, Robert L., “The Warren Court and Desegregation” (1968) 67(2) Mich. L. Rev. 236.Google Scholar
Chandrachud, Chintan, “Structural Injunctions and Public Interest Litigation in India” in Yap, Po Jen (ed.), Constitutional Remedies in Asia, 1st ed. (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, “Public Law Litigation and the Burger Court” (1982) 96 Harv. L. Rev. 4.Google Scholar
Chen, Jim, “With All Deliberate Speed: Brown II and Desegregation’s Children” (2006) 24 L. Ineq. 1.Google Scholar
Chiang, Emily, “Reviving the Declaratory Judgment: A New Path to Structural Reform” (2015) 63(3) Buff. L. Rev. 549.Google Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav and Bhanu Mehta, Pratap, “Locating Indian Constitutionalism” in Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav and Mehta, Pratap Bhanu (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Conklin, William and Morrison, Jodi, “Public Law Issues in a Private Law World: The Appointment of a Receiver as a Case Study” (1986) 26 Osgoode Hall L. J. 45.Google Scholar
Donald, Alice and Speck, Anne-Katrin, “The European Court of Human Rights’ Remedial Practice and Its Impact on the Execution of Judgments” (2019) 19(1) Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 83.Google Scholar
Dunn, Joshua, Complex Justice: The Story of Missouri v. Jenkins (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore and Yeazell, Stephen, “The Ordinary and Extraordinary in Institutional Litigation” (1980) 93 Harv. L. Rev. 465.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm and Rubin, Edward, Judicial Policy-Making and the Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen, “Dombrowski” (1977) 86 Yale L. J. 1103.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen, The Civil Rights Injunction (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon, “Mediation – Its Forms and Functions” (1971) 44 S. Cal. L. Rev. 305.Google Scholar
Gerards, Janneke H. and Glas, Lize R., “Access to Justice in the European Convention on Human Rights System” (2017) 35 Netherlands Q. Hum. Rts. 11.Google Scholar
Gilles, Myriam, “Reinventing Structural Reform: Deputizing Private Citizens in the Enforcement of Civil Rights” (2000) 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1384.Google Scholar
Guetzkow, Joshua and Schoon, Eric, “If You Build It, They Will Fill It: The Consequences of Prison Overcrowding Litigation” (2015) 49(2) L. Soc’y. Rev. 401.Google Scholar
Hirschhorn, James M., “Where the Money Is: Remedies to Finance Compliance with Structural Injunctions” (1984) 82(8) Mich. L. Rev. 1815.Google Scholar
Hoffer, Peter, The Law’s Conscience Equitable Constitutionalism in America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald, The Courts and Social Policy (Washington: Brookings, 1977).Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra, “Reforming the State from Afar: Structural Reform Litigation at the Human Rights Courts” (2015) 40 Yale L. J. 1.Google Scholar
Jackson, Michael, Prisoners of Isolation (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Jansen, Rudolph and Tendayi Achiume, Emily, “Prison Conditions in South Africa and the Role of Public Interest Litigation since 1994” (2011) 27(1) S.A. J. Hum. Rts. 183.Google Scholar
Kindt, Eline, “Giving up on Individual Justice?” (2018) 36 Netherlands Q. Hum. Rts. 173.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael, From Jim Crow to Civil Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael, Brown v. Board of Education and the Civil Rights Movement (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Kluger, Richard, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality (New York: Knopf, 1975).Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Gordon, “Heading Off Bilodeau: Attempting Constitutional Amendment” (1986) 15 Man. L. J. 271.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla (ed.), Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa and Colombia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McLachlin, Beverley, “The Charter: A New Role for the Judiciary” (1991) 29 Atla. L. Rev. 540.Google Scholar
Minor, Janet and Wilson, James, “Reflections of a Supervisory Order Sceptic” in Sharpe, Robert J. and Roach, Kent, Taking Remedies Seriously (Ottawa: Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 2010).Google Scholar
Mowbry, Alistair, “An Examination of the European Court of Human Rights Indication of General Measures” (2017) 17 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 451.Google Scholar
Noonan, Kathleen, Lipson, Jonathan and Simon, William, “Reforming Institutions: The Judicial Function in Bankruptcy and Public Law Litigation” (2019) 94 Indiana L. J. 491.Google Scholar
Ogletree, Charles J. Jr. and Eaton, Susan, “From Little Rock to Seattle and Louisville: Is All Deliberate Speed Stuck in Reverse” (2008) 30(2) U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 279.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy, “The Supreme Court and Public Law Remedies: A Tale of Two Kansas Cities” (1999) 50 Hastings L. J. 475.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jason, “Aging Injunctions and the Legacy of Institutional Reform Litigation” (2017) 70 Vanderbilt L. Rev. 167.Google Scholar
Parrillo, Nicholas, “The Endgame of Administrative Law: Governmental Disobedience and the Judicial Contempt Power” (2018) 131 Harv. L. Rev. 685.Google Scholar
Pillay, Anashri, “Process and Substance in Economic and Social Rights Adjudication” in Elliott, Mark, Varuhas, Jason and Stark, Shona Wilson (eds.), The Unity of Public Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Limits of Corrective Justice and the Potential of Equity in Constititional Remedies” (1991) 33 Ariz. L. Rev. 859.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics: The Afghan Detainee and Omar Khadr Cases” (2010) 28 N.J.C.L. 115.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Charter Remedies” in Oliver, Peter, Macklem, Patrick and Des Rosiers, Nathalie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent and Budlender, Geoff, “Mandatory Relief and Supervisory Jurisdiction: When Is It Appropriate, Just and Equitable” (2005) 122 S.A. L. J. 325.Google Scholar
Rouleau, Paul and Sherman, Linsey, “Doucet-Boudreau, Dialogue and Judicial Activism” (2010) 41(2) Ottawa L. Rev. 171.Google Scholar
Rushin, Stephen, “Structural Reform Litigation in American Police Departments” (2015) 99 Minn. L. Rev. 1343.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Simon, William H., “Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds” (2004) 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1016.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo, “Beyond the Hero Judge: Institutional Reform Litigation as Litigation” (1999) 97 Mich. L. Rev. 6.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo, “Plata v. Brown and Realignment: Jails, Prisons, Courts and Politics” (2013) 48 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 145.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo, “Trends in Prison Litigation, as the PLRA Enters Adulthood” (2015) 5 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 153.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan, Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarkable Court Decision and the Future of American Prisons (New York: New Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Taylor, Helen, “Forcing the Court’s Remedial Hand: Non-Compliance as a Catalyst for Remedial Innovation” (2019) 9 Constitutional Ct. Rev. 247.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, “Public Law Litigation and the Ambiguities of Brown” (1992) 61 Fordham L. Rev. 23.Google Scholar
Viljoen, Sue-Mari and Makama, Saul Porsche, “Structural Relief – A Context-Sensitive Approach” (2018) 34 S.A J. Hum. Rts. 209.Google Scholar
Yackle, Larry, Reform and Regret: The Story of Federal Involvement in the Alabama Prison System (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Yoo, John, “Who Measures the Chancellor’s Foot: The Inherent Remedial Authority of the Federal Courts” (1996) 84 Calif. L. Rev. 1121.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, David, Poverty and Fundamental Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Brown, George D., “Binding Advisory Opinions: A Federal Court’s Perspective on State Court School Finance Decisions” (1994) 35(3) B.C. L. Rev. 543.Google Scholar
Budlender, Geoff, “The Right to Alternative Accommodations in Forced Evictions” in Squires, John et al. (eds.), The Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in the Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido and Bobbit, Philip, Tragic Choices: The Conflicts Society Confronts in the Allocation of Tragically Scarce Resources (New York: Norton, 1978).Google Scholar
Cassels, Jamie, “Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation in India: Attempting the Impossible?” (1989) 37(3) Am. J. Comp. L. 495.Google Scholar
Černič, Jernej Letnar, “The European Court of Human Rights, Rule of Law and Socio-Economic Rights in Times of Crises” (2016) 8 Hague J. Rule Law 227.Google Scholar
Chenwi, Lilian, “A New Approach to Remedies in Socio-economic Rights Adjudication: Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road and Others v. City of Johannesburg and Others” (2009) 2 Constitutional Crt. Rev. 371.Google Scholar
Chitalkar, Poorvi and Gauri, Varun, “India: Compliance with Orders on the Right to Food” in Langford, Mal, Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar and Rossi, Julieta, Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Cullet, Philippe, “The Right to Water in Rural India” in Langford, Malcom The Human Right to Water: Theory, Practice and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind, “Creating Dialogue about Socio-Economic Rights” (2007) 5 I. Con. 391.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Octavio, “Brazil: Are Collective Suits Harder to Enforce?” in Mal Langford, Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito and Rossi, Julieta, Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Ferraz, Octavio Luiz Motta, “Social Rights, Judicial Remedies and the Poor” (2019) 18(3) Wash. U. Global Studies L. Rev. 569.Google Scholar
Flood, Colleen, “Chaoulli’s Legacy for the Future of Canadian Health Care Policy” (2006) 44 Osgoode Hall L. J. 273.Google Scholar
Flood, Colleen M., Roach, Kent and Sossin, Lorne (eds.), Access to Care, Access to Justice: The Legal Debate Over Private Health Insurance in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gomez-Ceballos, Diego and Craverier, Isabel, “Judicialization of the Right to Health” (2019) 34 Int’l. J. Health Plan. Mgmt. 1277.Google Scholar
Hunter, Molly, “All Eyes Forward: Public Engagement and Educational Reform in Kentucky” (1999) 28 J. L. Edu. 485.Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki C. and Tushnet, Mark (eds.), Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Kapczynski, Amy and Berger, Jonathan M., “Story of the TAC Case: The Potential and Limits of Socio-Economic Rights Litigation in South Africa” in Hurwitz, Deena and Slaitterwaite, Margaret, Human Rights Advocacy Stories (New York: Foundation Press, 2009).Google Scholar
King, Jeff, Judging Social Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Lamprea, Everaldo, “Colombia’s Right-to-Health Litigation in a Context of Health Care Reform” in Flood, Colleen and Gross, Aeyal (eds.), The Right to Health at the Public/Private Divide: A Global Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Lamprea, Everaldo and Garcia, Johnathan, “Closing the Gap between Formal and Material Health Care Coverage in Colombia” (2016) 18(2) Health Hum. Rts. 49.Google Scholar
Landau, David, “The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement” (2012) 53 Harv. J. Int’l. L. 189.Google Scholar
Landau, David and Dixon, Rosalind, “Constitutional Non-Transformation?” in Young, Katharine (ed.), The Future of Economic and Social Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Langford, Mal, Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar and Rossi, Julieta, Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Liebenberg, Sandra, Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution (Claremont, South Africa: Juta, 2010).Google Scholar
Liebenberg, Sandra, “Participatory Approaches to Socio-Economic Rights: Tentative Lessons from South Africa’s Evictions Law” (2014) 32(4) Nordic J. Hum. Rts. 312.Google Scholar
Mbazira, Christopher, “Appropriate, Just and Equitable Relief in Socio-Economic Rights Litigation: The Tension between Corrective and Distributive Forms of Justice” (2008) 125(1) S.A. L. J. 71.Google Scholar
Mbazira, Christopher, “Non-Implementation of Court Orders in Socio-Economic Rights Litigation in South Africa: Is the Cancer Here to Stay?” (2008) 9(4) ESR Rev.: Econ. Soc. Rts. S.A. 2.Google Scholar
Mbazira, Christopher, Litigating Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: A Choice between Corrective and Distributive Justice (Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2009).Google Scholar
McLean, Kirsty, “Meaningful Engagement: One Step Forward or Two Back: Some Thoughts on Joe Slovo” (2010) 3 Con. Ct. Rev. 223.Google Scholar
Melish, Tara, “Rethinking the ‘Less as More’ Thesis: Supranational Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Americas” (2006) 39 N.Y.U. J. Int’l. L. Pol’y. 171.Google Scholar
Naznin, Atia and Alam, Shawkat, “Judicial Remedies for Forced Slum Evictions in Bangladesh” (2019) 6(1) Asian J. L. Soc’y 99.Google Scholar
Pieterse, Marius, “Coming to Terms with Judicial Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights” (2004) 20 S.A. J. Hum. Rts. 383.Google Scholar
Pillay, Anashri, “Towards Effective Social Economic Rights Adjudication: The Role of Meaningful Engagement” (2012) 10(3) I. Con. 732.Google Scholar
Pillay, Anashri, “Revisiting the Indian Experience of Economic and Social Rights Adjudication: The Need for a Principled Approach to Judicial Activism and Restraint” (2014) I.C.L.Q. 385.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Constitutional, Remedial and International Dialogues about Rights: The Canadian Experience” (2005) 40 Texas Int’l. L. J. 537.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Courts and Medicare: Too Much or Too Little Judicial Activism?” in Flood, Colleen M., Roach, Kent and Sossin, Lorne (eds.), Access to Care, Access to Justice: The Legal Debate Over Private Health Insurance in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “The Challenge of Crafting Remedies for Violations of Socio-Economic Rights” in Langford, Mal (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar, “Beyond Enforcement: Assessing and Enhancing Judicial Impact” in Langford, Mal, Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar and Rossi, Julieta, Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Rebell, Michael, Courts and Kids: Pursuing Educational Equity through the State Courts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Rebell, Michael A. and Hughes, Robert, “Schools, Communities, and the Courts: A Dialogical Approach to Educational Reform” (1996) 14 Yale L. Pol’y. Rev. 99.Google Scholar
Rebell, Michael A., and Hughes, Robert, “Efficacy and Engagement: The Remedies Problem Posed by Sheff v. O’Neill and a Proposed Solution” (1997) 29 Conn. L. Rev. 1115.Google Scholar
Rooney, James, “Class Actions and Public Interest Standing in South Africa: Practical and Participatory Perspectives” (2017) 33(3) S.A. J. Hum. Rts. 406.Google Scholar
Sachs, Albie, “The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights: The Grootboom Case” (2003) 56 Current Leg. Prob. 579.Google Scholar
Sachs, Albie, “Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights” (2006) 22 Am. U. Int’l. L. Rev. 673.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H., “Public Law Litigation and Social Reform” (1993) 102 Yale L. J. 1763.Google Scholar
Sengupta, Arghya et al., “Legislating Human Rights” in Young, Katharine (ed.), The Future of Economic and Social Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Sharpe, Robert J., “Injunctions and the Charter” (1984) 22(3) Osgoode Hall L. J. 474.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan, “A Normative Theory of Public Law Remedies” (1991) 79 Geo. L. J. 1355.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa” (2001) 11(4) Constitutional Forum 123.Google Scholar
Young, Katharine, Constituting Economic and Social Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Young, Katharine, “Proportionality, Reasonableness and Economic and Social Rights” in Jackson, Vicki C. and Tushnet, Mark (eds.) Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Young, Katharine (ed.), The Future of Economic and Social Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Young, Katherine G., “Holism and Separatism in Economic and Social Rights Adjudication” (2019) 69 Supp. 1 U.T.L.J. 124.Google Scholar
Young, Katharine G. and Lemaitre, Julieta, “The Comparative Fortunes of the Right to Health: Two Tales of Justiciability in Colombia and South Africa” (2013) 26 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 179, 193.Google Scholar
Akhtar, Zia, “Mapuche Land Claims: Environmental Protest, Legal Discrimination and Customary Rights” (2013) 20(4) Int’l. J. Minority Group Rts. 551.Google Scholar
Alvardo, Leonardo J., “Prospects and Challenges in the Implementation of Indigenous Peoples’ Human Rights in International Law: Lessons from the Case of Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua” (2007) 24(3) Ariz. J. Int’l. Comp. L. 609.Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James, “The Native Hawaiian People and International Human Rights Law: Towards a Remedy for Past and Continuing Wrongs” (1994) 28 Geo. L. Rev. 309.Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James, Indigenous Peoples in International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James, “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Situation of Maori People in New Zealand” (2015) 32 Ariz. J. Int’l. Comp. L. 1.Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James and Grossman, Claudio, “The Case of Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua: A Step in the International Law of Indigenous Peoples” (2002) 19 Ariz. J. Int’l. Comp. L. 1.Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James and Puig, Sergio, “Mitigating State Sovereignty: The Duty to Consult with Indigenous Peoples” (2017) 67 U.T.L.J. 435.Google Scholar
Antkowiak, Thomas M., “Rights, Resources, and Rhetoric: Indigenous Peoples and the Inter-American Court” (2013) 35 U. Pa. J. Int’l. L. 113.Google Scholar
Antkowiak, Thomas M., “A Dark Side of Virtue: The Inter-American Court and Reparations for Indigenous Peoples” (2014) 25 Duke J. Comp. Int’l. L. 1.Google Scholar
Ariss, Rachel, and Cutfeet, John, Keeping the Land: Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug, Reconciliation and Canadian Law (Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette and Sibanda, Sanele, “From Reparations to Dignity Restoration: The Story of the Popela Community” (2018) 18 African Hum. Rts. L. J. 654.Google Scholar
Barelli, Mauro, “Free, Prior and Informed Consent in the Aftermath of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Developments and Challenges Ahead” (2012) 16 Int’l. J. Hum. Rts. 10.Google Scholar
Beaton, Ryan, “Articles 27 and 46(2): UNDRIP Signposts Pointing towards the Justified Infringement Section 35 Morass” in Centre for International Governance Innovation and Wiyasiwewin Mikiwahp Native Law Centre, UNDRIP Implementation: More Reflections on the Braiding of International, Domestic and Indigenous Laws (Saskatchewan: Center for International Governance Innovation, 2018).Google Scholar
Blumm, Michael, “Indian Treaty Fishing Rights and the Environment: Affirming the Right to Habitat Protection and Restoration” (2016) 92 Wash. L. Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Boast, Richard P., “Foreshore and Seabed, Again” (2011) 9 N.Z. J. Pub. Int’l. L. 271.Google Scholar
Borrows, John, Freedom and Indigenous Constitutionalism (Toronto: University of Toronto, 2016).Google Scholar
Borrows, John, Law’s Indigenous Ethics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Borrows, John, Wise Practices: Exploring Indigenous Economic Justice and Self-Determination (Toronto: University of Toronto, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Borrows, John and Coyle, Michael (eds.), The Right Relationship: Reimagining the Implementation of Historical Treaties (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Borrows, John, et al. (eds.), Braiding Legal Orders: Implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Waterloo: Centre for International Governance, 2019).Google Scholar
Carlson, Hans, “A Watershed of Words: Litigating and Negotiating Nature in Eastern James Bay, 1971–75” (2004) 85(1) Can. Historical Rev. 63.Google Scholar
Chingmak, Phutoli Shikhu, “International Law and Reparations for Indigenous People in Asia” in Lenzerini, Federico (ed.), Reparations for Indigenous Peoples (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ciaccia, John, James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (Montreal: Quebec National Library, 1976).Google Scholar
Cohen, Fay, Treaties on Trial (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Correia, Joel E., “Adjudication and Its After Effects in Three Inter-American Court Cases Brought against Paraguay: Indigenous Land Rights” (2018) 11(1) Erasmus L. Rev. 43.Google Scholar
Dawson, John, “The Remedies Report” in Hayward, Janine and Wheel, Nicola R. (eds.), The Waitangi Tribunal: Te Roopu Whakamana i te Titri o Waitangi (Wellington: Williams, 2004).Google Scholar
Drake, Karen, “The Trials and Tribulations of Ontario’s Mining Act: The Duty to Consult and Anishinaabek Law” (2015) 11(2) J.S.D.L.P. 183.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix and Greene, Nathan, The Labor Injunction (New York: MacMillan, 1930).Google Scholar
Gunn, Brenda, “Remedies for Violations of Indigenous Peoples’ Human Rights” (2019) 69 Supp. 1 U.T.L.J. 150.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Robert and Nichols, Joshua, “The Tin Ear of the Court” (2019) 56(3) Alta. L. Rev. 729.Google Scholar
Herrera, Juan, “Judicial Dialogue and Transformative Constitutionalism: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-Descendants” (2019) 43 Revista Derecho del Estado 191, 212–213.Google Scholar
Imai, Shin, “Sound Science, Careful Policy Analysis, and Ongoing Relationships: Integrating Litigation and Negotiation in Aboriginal Lands and Resources Disputes” (2003) 41(4) Osgoode Hall L. J. 587.Google Scholar
Koorndjik, Jeanice, “Judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Rights in Suriname” (2019) 23(10) Int’l. J. Hum. Rts. 1615.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Phil, The Structural Injunction as a Remedy for Violations of Aboriginal Constitutional Rights (Ottawa: Canada Bar Association, 1991).Google Scholar
Lawrence, Sonia and Macklem, Patrick, “From Consultation to Reconciliation: Aboriginal Rights and the Crown’s Duty to Consult” (2000) 79 Can. Bar Rev. 252.Google Scholar
Lenzerini, Federico (ed.), Reparations for Indigenous Peoples (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Lenzerini, Frederico, “Reparations, Restitution and Redress” in Hohmann, Jessie and Weiler, Marc (eds.), The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Magallanes Iorns, Catherine J., “Improving the Global Environmental Rule of Law by Upholding Indigenous Rights: Examples from Aotearoa New Zealand” (2018) 7 Global J. Comp. L. 61.Google Scholar
Mainville, Robert, An Overview of Aboriginal and Treaty Rights and Compensation for their Breach (Saskatoon: Purich, 2001).Google Scholar
Milward, David, “Restless Spirit in the Land: Finding a Place in Canadian Law for Aboriginal Disobedience” (2009) 15 Int’l. J. Minority Group Rts. 1.Google Scholar
Morales, Sarah, “Braiding the Incommensurables” in Borrows, John et al. (eds.), Braiding Legal Orders: Implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Waterloo: Centre for International Governance, 2019).Google Scholar
Newman, Dwight, “Negotiated Rights Enforcement” (2006) 69 Sask. L. Rev. 119.Google Scholar
Newman, Dwight, Revisiting the Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples (Saskatoon: Purich Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
Newman, Dwight, The Rule and Role of Law: Duty to Consult, Aboriginal Communities and the Canadian Natural Resource Sector (Ottawa: MacDonald Laurier Institute, 2014).Google Scholar
Palmer, MSR, The Treaty of Waitangi in New Zealand’s Law and Constitution (Wellington, Victoria University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Patzer, Jeremy, “Indigenous Rights and the Legal Politics of Canadian Coloniality: What Is Happening to Free and Informed Consent in Canada?” (2019) Int’l. J. Hum. Rts. 214.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, “Remedies for Violation of Aboriginal Rights” (1992) 21 Man. L. J. 498.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter H., Recognizing Aboriginal Title (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Stacey, Richard, “Honour in Sovereignty: Can Crown Consultation with Indigenous People Erase Canada’s Sovereignty Deficit?” (2018) 68 U.T.L.J. 405.Google Scholar
van Genugten, Willem and Lenzerini, Frederico, “Legal Implementation and International Co-operation and Assistance” in Hohmann, Jessie and Weiler, Marc (eds.), The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Ventura Robles, Manuel, “Impact of the Reparations Ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights” in Haeck, Yves, Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo, and Burbano-Herrera, Clara (eds.) The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice, Present and Future (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2015).Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D., “Rights and Remedies within Common Law and Indigenous Legal Traditions: Can the Covenant Chain Be Judicially Enforced Today?” in Borrows, John and Coyle, Michael (eds.), The Right Relationship: Reimagining the Implementation of Historical Treaties (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Charles, Messages From Frank’s Landing: A Story of Salmon, Treaties, and the Indian Way (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Williams, Rick et al., “The New Normal? Natural Resource Development, Civil Disobedience and Injunctive Relief” (2017) 55 Alta. L. Rev. 285.Google Scholar
Wilson Raybould, Jody, From Where I Stand: Rebuilding Indigenous Nations for a Stronger Canada (Vancouver: Purich Books, 2019).Google Scholar
Young, Stephen, “The Deification of Process in the Duty to Consult” (2019) 52 U.B.C. L. Rev. 1065.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Kent Roach, University of Toronto
  • Book: Remedies for Human Rights Violations
  • Online publication: 29 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108283618.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Kent Roach, University of Toronto
  • Book: Remedies for Human Rights Violations
  • Online publication: 29 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108283618.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Kent Roach, University of Toronto
  • Book: Remedies for Human Rights Violations
  • Online publication: 29 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108283618.012
Available formats
×