Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:20:17.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Use of Spatial Order in Çatalhöyük Material Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
Anke Kamerman
Edited by
Ian Hodder
Ian Hodder
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

From the first moment I laid eyes on the representations of the “leopard” reliefs from Çatalhöyük they attracted me by what seems a contradiction. On the one hand, there is the rigidity of their formal position: By pose, proportions, and the mirroring of the painted figures on their bodies, the “leopards” show strong reflection symmetry. On the other hand, the figures differ in kind and in pattern from layer to plastered layer and by stratigraphic level (Hodder 2006: 10; Mellaart 1967: 119). When the “leopards” are compared to other paintings in the same stratigraphic levels, the contradiction becomes even stronger: In the “vulture” paintings, for example, the central figure is asymmetric and figures are positioned much more freely. Why are these reliefs so rigid by their positioning and pose, while the skin patterns differ by layer and level and other paintings are asymmetrical and much more freely positioned? My curiosity was aroused and I wanted to analyze them in more detail.

Returning, in the course of this essay, to the themes of the position of the observer, the changing of the pattern on the skin, the focus on the navel, and the continuities between “leopard” and “bear” reliefs, and related seals used in later phases of the settlement, I will try to show how spatial patterns of formal and more free positioning function with these two kinds of artifacts and can be analyzed as means of identification and communication.

Type
Chapter
Information
Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society
Vital Matters
 , pp. 304 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnheim, Rudolf. 1974 [1954]. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency, An Anthropological Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerbrands, Adriaan. 1967. Wow-Ipits. Eight Asmat Woodcarvers of New –Guinea. The Hague ans Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst. 1996 [1959]. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst 2006 [1979]. The Sense of Order, a Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian. 2006. The Leopard’s Tale. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert. 2009 [1972]. Nonverbal Communication. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James. 1967. Catal Huyuk, a Neolithic Town in Anatolia. Londen: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Morphy, Frances, and Morphy, Howard. 2006. Tasting the Waters: Discriminating Identities in the Waters of Blue Mud Bay. Journal of Material Culture 1(1/2):67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morphy, Howard. 1980. What Circles Look Like. Canberra Anthropology (1):17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Klaus. 2008. Sie bauten die ersten Tempel. Das ratselhafte Heiligtum der Steinzeitjager. München: DTV Deutcher Taschenbuch.Google Scholar
Stevens, Martin and Merilaita, Sami. 2008. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspective. (accessed January 5, 2012).
Top, Jaap. 2008. Symmetrie (lectures). (accessed January 1, 2010).
Türkcan, Ali Umut. 1997. Stamp seals. In Catalhöyük 1997 archive report. .
Türkcan, Ali Umut 2003. Stamp seals and clay figures in Catalhöyük 2003 Archive Report (accessed May 2012).
Türkcan, Ali Umut 2005. Clay stamps seals. In Catalhöyük 2005 Archive Report, cultural and environmental materials reports. (accessed May 2012).
Wright, Craig. 2004 [2001]. The Maze and the Warrior, Symbols in Architecture, Theology, and Music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×