Book contents
- Relationship Maintenance
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Relationship Maintenance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Theories of Relationship Maintenance
- Part III Processes of Relationship Maintenance
- Part IV The Social Context of Relationship Maintenance
- Part V Conclusion
- 19 Relationship Maintenance Reprise and Reflections: Past, Present, and Future
- Index
- References
19 - Relationship Maintenance Reprise and Reflections: Past, Present, and Future
from Part V - Conclusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2019
Book contents
- Relationship Maintenance
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Relationship Maintenance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Theories of Relationship Maintenance
- Part III Processes of Relationship Maintenance
- Part IV The Social Context of Relationship Maintenance
- Part V Conclusion
- 19 Relationship Maintenance Reprise and Reflections: Past, Present, and Future
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter serves as the conclusion of a volume on the maintenance of relationships, especially romantic relationships. As its author, I sought to reflect on the other chapters in the book, doing some synthesizing, placing the volume’s contents in context, and adding my own views. The chapter unfolds by first discussing what maintenance is and then examining the past, the present, and the future of scholarship on maintenance. The discussion of the past mapped the growth of work on maintenance and reflects on a few comparisons between early and current contributions. The segment on the present identifies a citation count–based who’s who in the area, compares five theoretical perspectives on maintenance, and offers a broad-stroke synthesis of antecedents and consequences of maintenance. The chapter’s final section looks to the future, highlighting what authors in the volume recommend plus identifying four additional directions maintenance researchers might pursue. Overall, the chapter documents that from maintenance scholarship’s modest beginnings nearly 50 years ago, the volume of research, the sophistication of theoretical analyses, and the variety of research paradigms have all substantially advanced. Maintenance has gone from obscurity to being an important topic in good standing as we approach 2020.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Relationship MaintenanceTheory, Process, and Context, pp. 369 - 398Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Agnew, C. R., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., & Aron, E. N. (2001). Shared self-expanding activities as a means of maintaining and enhancing close romantic relationships. In Harvey, J. M. & Wenzel, A. E. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 47–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 62–67.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, T. J. (1999). Friends’ influence on students’ adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1995). Help wanted: A grand theorist of interpersonal relationships, sociologist or anthropologist preferred. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckles, K. S., & Munnich, E. L. (2012). Birth spacing and sibling outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 47, 613–642.Google Scholar
Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1994). A social skills analysis of relationship maintenance: How individual differences in communication skills affect the achievement of relationship functions. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 61–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Canary, D. J., & Dainton, M. (Eds.). (2003). Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Canary, D. J., & Dainton, M. (2006). Maintaining relationships. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 727–743). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canary, D., & Stafford, L. (Eds.). (1994). Communication and relational maintenance. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. (2018). What is good and what is missing in relationship theory and research. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 28–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dainton, M. (2003). Framing the maintenance of relationships through communication: An epilogue. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 299–321). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong Gierveld, J., & Perlman, D. (2006). Long-standing nonkin relationships of older adults in the Netherlands and the U.S.A. Research on Aging, 28, 730–748.Google Scholar
Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (287–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dindia, K. (2003). Relationship maintenance communication. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (Eds.). (1993). Special issue on relational maintenance [Special issue]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2).Google Scholar
Duck, S. (1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 45–60). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., & Hall, A. N. (2018). The I3 Model: A metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 125–130.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411.Google Scholar
Harre, R. (1977). Friendship as an accomplishment: An ethnogenic approach to social relationships. In Duck, S. (Ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 339–354). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. H., & Wenzel, A. (Eds.). (2001). Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, J. H., & Wenzel, A. (Eds.). (2002). A clinician’s guide to maintaining and enhancing close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kashy, D. A., Ackerman, R. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2018). Analyzing cross-sectional and longitudinal data in close relationships (pp. 49–64). In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, K. D., Murphy, S. L., Xu, J. Q., & Arias, E. (2017). Mortality in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 293. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
Kreider, R. M., & Ellis, R. (2011). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2009. Current Population Reports, p70–125, Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Lydon, J., & Quinn, S. (2013). Relationship maintenance processes. In Simpson, J. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 573–588). New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Assessing the accuracy of predictions about dating relationships: How and why do lovers’ predictions differ from those made by observers? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1417–1429.Google Scholar
Margulis, S. T. (1977). Conceptions of privacy: Current status and next steps. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 5–21.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. (2016). Highlighting the contextual nature of interpersonal relationships. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 247–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Menard, H. W. (1971). Science: Growth and change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Peake, P. K. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 687–696.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of relationship maintenance in intimate relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(2-A), 746.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., & Gray, C. R. (2016). Conflict, negative emotion, and reports of partners’ relationship maintenance in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(2), 171–180.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., & Monk, J. K. (2018). Maintaining relationships. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 523–537). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 9, 275–306.Google Scholar
Perlman, D. (2001). Maintaining and enhancing relationships: Concluding commentary. In Harvey, J. M. & Wenzel, A. E. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 357–377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perlman, D., Duck, S., & Hengstebeck, N. D. (2018). The seven seas of the study of personal relationships research: Historical and recent currents. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 9–27). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulin, F., & Chan, A. (2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review, 30, 257–272.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simon, E. P., & Baxter, L. A. (1993). Attachment‐style differences in relationship maintenance strategies. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 419–430.Google Scholar
Stafford, L. (1994). Tracing the threads of spider webs. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 297–306). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stafford, L. (Ed.). (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.Google Scholar
Stueve, C. A., & Gerson, K. (1977). Personal relations across the life-cycle. In Fischer, C. S., Jackson, R. M., Stueve, C. A., Gerson, K., McCallister Jones, L., & Baldassare, M. (Eds.), Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting (pp. 79–98). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.Google Scholar
Wu, H., & Brown., S. L. (2016). Long-term marriage among older adults. Family Profiles, FP-16–08. Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research. Retrieved from www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/wu-brown-longterm-marriage-older-adults-fp-16-08.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wu, K. D. (2001). Evolution and evolutionary psychology: Their application to close relationships. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 215–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar