Re-imagining International Relations World Orders in the Thought and Practice of Indian, Chinese, and Islamic Civilizations
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Re-imagining International RelationsWorld Orders in the Thought and Practice of Indian, Chinese, and Islamic Civilizations, pp. 161 - 175Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aboul-Enein, H. Yousuf, and Zuhur, Sherifa (2004) Islamic Rulings on Warfare, Darby, PA: Diane Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2003–4) ‘Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future?’, International Security, 28:3, 149–64.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2004) ‘How Ideas Spread, Whose Norms Matter: Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, International Organization, 58:2, 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2011) ‘Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories beyond the West’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39:3, 619–37.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2012) Civilizations in Embrace: The Spread of Ideas and the Transformation of Power, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2014) ‘Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly, 58:4, 647–59.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2019) ‘From Heaven to Earth: “Cultural Idealism” and “Moral Realism” As Chinese Contributions to Global International Relations’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12:4, 467–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, and Buzan, Barry (2007) ‘Conclusion: On the Possibility of a Non-Western IR Theory in Asia’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7:3, 427–38.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, and Buzan, Barry (2019) The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adiong, Nassef M., Mauriello, Raffaele, and Abdelkader, Deina (eds) (2019) Islam in International Relations: Politics and Paradigms, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alejandro, Audrey (2018) Western Dominance in International Relations: The Internationalization of IR in Brazil and India, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles H. (1967) An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alteker, A. S. (2001) State and Government in Ancient India, New Delhi: Motilalal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Aydin, Cemil (2018) ‘What Is the Muslim World’, Aeon, 1 August, https://aeon.co/amp/essays/the-idea-of-a-muslim-world-is-both-modern-and-misleading?__twitter_impression=true.Google Scholar
‘Backgrounder: Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence’ (2015) China Daily, 22 April, www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2015xivisitpse/2015-04/22/content_20509374.htm.Google Scholar
Baderin, Mashood A. (2000) ‘The Evolution of Islamic Law of Nations and the Modern International Order: Universal Peace through Mutuality and Cooperation’, American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 17: 2, 57–80.Google Scholar
Bain, William (2020) Political Theology of International Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bala, Arun (2006) The Dialogue of Civilizations and the Birth of Modern Science, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens (2018) War in International Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bayly, Martin J. (2017) ‘Imagining New Worlds: Forging “Non-Western” International Relations in Late Colonial India’, British Academy Review, 30, 50–3.Google Scholar
Behera, Navnita C. (2007) ‘Re-imagining IR in India’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7:3, 341–68.Google Scholar
Belting, Hans (2011) Florence and Baghdad: Renaissance Art and Arab Science, trans. Deborah Lucas Schneider, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bennison, Amira K. (2009) ‘The Ottoman Empire and Its Precedents from the Perspective of English School Theory’, in Buzan, Barry and Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana (eds), International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 45–69.Google Scholar
Bernal, Martin (1991) Black Athena: The Afro-Asiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger (2003) ‘Kautilya’s “Arthasastra” on War and Diplomacy in Ancient India’, Journal of Military History, 67:1, 19–20, www.defencejournal.com/2003/mar/kautilya.htm.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand (1994 [1987]) A History of Civilizations, trans. Richard Mayne, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand (2001) The Mediterranean in the Ancient World, trans. Sian Reynolds, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Buckley, Chris (2014) ‘Leader Taps into Chinese Classics in Seeking to Cement Power, New York Times, 11 October, www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/world/leader-taps-into-chinese-classics-in-seeking-to-cement-power.html?auth=login-google.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1966) ‘International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach’, World Politics, 18:3, 361–77.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1984) ‘The Revolt against the West’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds), The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–28.Google Scholar
Burbank, Jane, and Cooper, Frederick (2010) Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2010) ‘China in International Society: Is “Peaceful Rise” Possible?’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3:1, 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2011) ‘A World Order without Superpowers: Decentred Globalism’, International Relations, 25:1, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2014a) An Introduction to the English School of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2014b) ‘The “Standard of Civilisation” As an English School Concept’, Millennium, 42:3, 576–94.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (forthcoming) Global Society: An English School Structural History of Humankind since the Ice Age.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Falkner, Robert (forthcoming) ‘The Market in Global International Society: A Dialectic of Contestation and Resilience’, in Trine Flockhart and Zach Paikin (eds), Rebooting Global International Society: Change, Contestation, and Resilience, ch. 11.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Goh, Evelyn (2020) Rethinking Sino-Japanese Alienation: History Problems and Historical Opportunities, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George (2014) ‘Capitalism and the Emergent World Order’, International Affairs, 90:1, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George (2015) The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George (2016) ‘The Impact of the “Global Transformation” on Uneven and Combined Development’, in Anievas, Alexander and Matin, Kamran (eds), Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 171–84.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George (2020) ‘China through the Lens of Modernity’, Chinese Journal of International Politics (online).Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George (forthcoming) Modes of Power: A Theory of International History.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard (2000) International Systems in World History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Schouenborg, Laust (2018) Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. (2009) ‘Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony?’, International Studies Review, 10:4, 749–61.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, K. N. (1985) Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Yudan (2015) ‘Chinese Notions of Sovereignty’, in Gaskarth, Jamie (ed.), China, India and the Future of International Society, London: Rowman and Littlefield, 38–52.Google Scholar
Chong, Ja Ian (2014) ‘Popular Narratives vs. China’s History: Implications for Understanding an Emergent China’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:4, 939–64.Google Scholar
Christian, David (2004) Maps of Time, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ian (2009) ‘Towards an English School Theory of Hegemony’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:2, 203–28.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 204–54.Google Scholar
Cui, Shunji, and Buzan, Barry (2016) ‘Great Power Management in International Society’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9:2, 181–210.Google Scholar
Curtin, Philip D. (1984) Cross-cultural Trade in World History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalacoura, Katerina (2021) ‘Global IR, Global Modernity and Civilization in Turkish Islamist Thought: A Critique of Culturalism in International Relations’, International Politics, 58, 131–47.Google Scholar
Lama, Dalai (2005) The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality, New York: Morgan Road Books.Google Scholar
Dale, Stephen F. (2010) The Muslim Empires of the Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, John (2020) Unlocking the World: Port Cities and Globalisation in the Age of Steam 1830–1930, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Datta-Ray, Deep K. (2015) The Making of Indian Diplomacy: A Critique of Eurocentrism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (2007) Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dhammika, Ven. S. (1993) ‘The Edicts of King Ashoka’, Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society, www.cs.colostate.edu/~malaiya/ashoka.html.Google Scholar
Draper, Gerald (1995) ‘The Contribution of the Emperor Asoka Maurya to the Development of the Humanitarian Ideal in Warfare’, International Review of the Red Cross, 305, 30 April, www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/article/other/57jmf2.htm.Google Scholar
Dreyer, June Teufel (2016) Middle Kingdom and Empire of the Rising Sun: Sino-Japanese Relations Past and Present, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwardes, Michael (1971) East–West Passage: The Travel of Ideas, Arts, and Inventions between Asia and the Western World, New York: Taplinger.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John King (1968) The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garver, John W. (2016) China’s Quest: The History of the Foreign Relations of the People’s Republic of China, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goh, Evelyn (2013) The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Jack (2002) Rebellions and Revolutions: China from the 1800s to 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter Hays (2004) China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ho, David Yau-fai (1976) ‘On the Concept of Face’, American Journal of Sociology, 81:4, 867–84.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. (2004) The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Marshall G. S. (1993) Rethinking World History: Essays on Europe, Islam and World History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Tom (2012) In the Shadow of the Sword: The Battle for Global Empire and the End of the Ancient World, London: Little, Brown Book Group.Google Scholar
Hourani, Albert (1991) Islam in European Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hu, H. C. (1944) ‘The Chinese Concept of “Face”’, American Anthropologist, 46:1, 45–64.Google Scholar
Hui, Victoria Tin-bor (2005) War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-kuo (2011) The Foundations of Chinese Psychology: Confucian Social Relations, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2010) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel H. (2019) ‘Reclaiming the Social: Relationalism in Anglophone International Studies’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32: 3, 582–600.Google Scholar
Jacq-Hergoualc’h, Michel (2002) The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk Road, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2003) ‘Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks’, International Security, 27:4, 57–85.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2003–4) ‘Hierarchy, Balancing and Empirical Puzzles in Asian International Relations’, International Security, 28:3, 165–80.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2005) ‘Why China’s Rise Will Be Peaceful: Hierarchy and Stability in the East Asian Region’, Perspectives on Politics, 3: 3, 551–4.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2010) ‘Civilization and State Formation in the Shadow of China’, in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, London: Routledge, 91–113.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A. (1966) ‘The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations’, World Politics, 19:1, 1–20.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2006) ‘Multiple Modernities As Limits to Secular Europeanization?’, in Byrnes, Timothy A. and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds), Religion in an Expanding Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–33.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2010) ‘A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions and Practices’, in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, London: Routledge, 1–40.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1988) ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, 32:4, 379–96.Google Scholar
Khadduri, Majid (1966) The Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybānī’s Siyar, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Khaldun, Ibn (1969 [1370]) Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, trans. Franz Rosenthal, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press/Ballinger.Google Scholar
King, Amy (2014) ‘Where Does Japan Fit in China’s “New Type of Great Power Relations”?’, The ASAN Forum: Special Forum, 2:2, 21 March, www.theasanforum.org/where-does-japan-fit-in-chinas-new-type-of-great-power-relations/?dat=March%20–%20April,%202014.Google Scholar
Kosambi, D. D. (1975) An Introduction to the Study of Indian History, Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
Koyama, Hitomi, and Buzan, Barry (2019) ‘Rethinking Japan in Mainstream International Relations’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19:2, 185–212.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kulke, Hermann, and Rothermund, Dietmar (1986) A History of India, New York: Dorset Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Gerald J. (1998) Classical Sāṃkhya: An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning, New Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Bruce B. (2010) ‘Islam in Afro-Eurasia: A Bridge Civilization’, in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, London: Routledge, 157–75.Google Scholar
Lawson, Fred H. (2006) Constructing International Relations in the Arab World, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liebig, Michael, and Mishra, Saurabh (2017) ‘Introduction’ in Liebig, Michael and Mishra, Saurabh (eds), Arthasastra in a Transcultural Perspective: Comparing Kautilya with Sun-Zi, Nizam al-Mult, Barani and Machiavelli, New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis, Pentagon Press, 1–30.Google Scholar
Little, Richard (2006) ‘The Balance of Power and Great Power Management’, in Little, Richard and Williams, John (eds), The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 97–120.Google Scholar
Little, Richard (2007) The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian S. (1997) ‘The Absence of Middle Eastern Great Powers: Political “Backwardness” in Historical Perspective’, International Organization, 5:4, 653–83.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. (2012) The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Jonathan (2010) The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Mallavarapu, Siddharth (2009) ‘Development of International Relations Theory in India: Traditions, Contemporary Perspectives and Trajectories’, International Studies, 46:1–2, 165–83.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1986) The Sources of Social Power, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, William H. (1965) The Rise of the West: A History of Human Community, New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
Menon, Sunil, and Mishra, Siddhartha (2013) ‘We Are All Harappans’, Outlook (India), 13 August, 28–35.Google Scholar
Mitra, Sbrata K. (2017) ‘Kautilya Redux?’ in Liebig, Michael and Mishra, Saurabh (eds), Arthasastra in a Transcultural Perspective: Comparing Kautilya with Sun-Zi, Nizam al-Mult, Barani and Machiavelli, New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis, Pentagon Press, 31–62.Google Scholar
Moore, Gregory J. (2014) ‘“In Your Face”: Domestic Politics, Nationalism and “Face” in the Sino-Japanese Islands Dispute’, Asian Perspective, 38, 219–40.Google Scholar
Mulk, Nizam al (2002) The Book of Government, or Rules for Kings, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. Taggart (2014) Japan and the Shackles of the Past, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagao, Gajin M. (1991) Mādhyamika, and Yogācāra, A Study of Mahāyāna Philosophies: Collected Papers, trans. Leslie S. Kawamura, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita, and Narlikar, Aruna (2014) Bargaining with a Rising India: Lessons from the Mahabharata, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B., and Wigen, Einar (2018) The Steppe Tradition in International Relations: Russians, Turks ad European State Building 4000 BCE–2017 CE, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newbigin, Eleanor (2019) ‘Do We Need to Decolonise History? And If So, How?’, History Extra (BBC), 25 March, www.historyextra.com/period/modern/decolonise-history-curriculum-education-how-meghan-markle-black-study.Google Scholar
Odgaard, Liselotte (2012) China and Coexistence: Beijing’s National Security Strategy for the Twenty-First Century, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh (2011) Institutions and European Trade: Merchant Guilds 1000–1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Onuma, Yasuaki (2000) ‘When Was the Law of International Society Born? An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective’, Journal of the History of International Law, 2, 1–66.Google Scholar
Paine, Lincoln (2014) The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World, London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Paine, S. C. M. (2003) The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew, and Sharman, J. C. (2015) International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelham, Nicholas (2016) ‘The People Who Shaped Islamic Civilisation,’ The Economist 1843, 5 December, www.1843magazine.com/culture/the-daily/the-people-who-shaped-islamic-civilisation.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri (2012) The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri (2018) ‘Legalism in Chinese Philosophy’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/chinese-legalism.Google Scholar
Piscatori, James (1986) Islam in a World of Nation-States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piscatori, James, and Saikal, Amin (2019) Islam beyond Borders: The Umma in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2007) ‘Why Is There No Chinese International Relations Theory?’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7:3, 313–40.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2011) ‘Relationality and Processual Construction: Bringing Chinese Ideas into International Relations Theory’; ‘Rule, Rules, and Relations: Towards a Synthetic Approach to Governance’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 4:2, 117–45.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2016) ‘Relational Theory of World Politics’, International Studies Review, 18:1, 33–47.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2018) A Relational Theory of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, S. (1940) Eastern Religions and Western Thought, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony (1988) ‘Female Roles in Pre-colonial Southeast Asia’, Modern Asian Studies, 22: 3, 629–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, Xiao (2016) ‘Idea Change Matters: China’s Practices and the East Asian Peace’, Asian Perspectives, 40, 329–56.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik (2019) History of International Relations: A Non-European Perspective, Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, www.openbookpublishers.com/reader/228#page/150/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Risso, Patricia (1995) Merchants and Faith: Muslim Commerce and Culture in the Indian Ocean, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin (2010) ‘Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development Part II: Unevenness and Multiplicity.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23:1, 165–89.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin (2013) ‘Kenneth Waltz and Leon Trotsky: Anarchy in the Mirror of Uneven and Combined Development’, International Politics, 50:2, 183–230.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin (2016) ‘International Relations in the Prison of Political Science’, International Relations, 30:2, 127–53.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber (2010) ‘Four Variants of Indian Civilization’, in Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, London: Routledge, 137–56.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (2004) ‘American Exceptionalism and Global Governance: A Tale of Two Worlds?’, Working Paper No. 5, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Harvard University, April 2004.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Benoy Kumar (1919) ‘Hindu Theory of International Relations’, American Political Science Review, 13:3, 400–14.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Benoy Kumar (1921) ‘The Hindu Theory of the State’, Political Science Quarterly, 36:1, 79–90.Google Scholar
Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta (1967) Nandas and Maurysa, 2nd ed., New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (2017) Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shahi, Deepshikha (2014) ‘Arthashastra beyond Realpolitik: The “Eclectic” Face of Kautilya’, Economic & Political Weekly, 49:41, 11 October, 68–74.Google Scholar
Shahi, Deepshikha (2018) Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shahi, Deepshikha (2020a) Book Review: The History of the Arthaśāstra: Sovereignty and Sacred Law in Ancient India, by Mark McClish, Global Intellectual History, DOI: 10.1080/23801883.2020.1771247.Google Scholar
Shahi, Deepshikha, ed. (2020b) Sufism: A Theoretical Intervention in Global International Relations, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Shahi, Deepshikha, and Ascione, Gennaro (2016) ‘Rethinking the Absence of Post-Western International Relations Theory in India: “Advaitic Monism” As an Alternative Epistemological Resource’, European Journal of International Relations, 22:2, 313–34.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, David (2013) China Goes Global: The Partial Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kindle ed.Google Scholar
Sharan, Paramata (1992–3) Ancient India Political Thought and Institutions, Meerut, India: Meenakshi Prakashan.Google Scholar
Sharma, Ram Sharan (1996) Aspects of Political Ideas and Institutions in Ancient India, 4th ed., New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Sheikh, Faiz (2016) Islam and International Relations: Exploring Community and the Limits of Universalism, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Shi, Yinhong (2007) ‘The Need for a Composite Strategy in China-Japan Relations’, in Shin, Gi-Wook and Sneider, Daniel C. (eds), Cross Currents: Regionalism and Nationalism in Northeast Asia, Stanford CA: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Centre Books, 213–25.Google Scholar
Shilliam, Robbie (2009) ‘The Enigmatic Figure of the Non-Western Thinker in International Relations’, AntePodium: Online Journal of World Affairs, https://nanopdf.com/download/robbie-shilliam-victoria-university-of-wellington_pdf.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter (2010) Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry (2004) Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrick (2020) The World Imagined: Collective Beliefs and Political Order in the Sinocentric, Islamic and Southeast Asian International Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo (2009) Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swope, Kenneth M. (2009) A Dragon’s Head and a Serpent’s Tail: Ming China and the First Great East Asian War, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou (2010) ‘International Relations Theory and the Islamic Worldview’, in Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (eds), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, London: Routledge, 174–96.Google Scholar
Thapar, Romila (2012) Ashoka and the Decline of the Mauryas, 3rd ed., New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arlene, Tickner, and Wæver, Ole (eds) (2009) International Relations Scholarship around the World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1990) Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1992, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann (2009) ‘The Status of Women As a Standard of “Civilization”’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:4, 681–706.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. (2010) Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, John (2009) ‘Islam as a Theory of International Relations?’ E-International Relations Students, 3 August, www.e-ir.info/2009/08/03/islam-as-a-theory-of-international-relations.Google Scholar
Wade, Geoff (2004) ‘The Zheng He Voyages: A Reassessment’, Working Paper Series No. 31, October, Asia Research Centre, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations As Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wang, Jisi (2011) ‘China’s Search for a Grand Strategy’, Foreign Affairs, 90:2, 68–79.Google Scholar
Warner, Caroline M. (2001) ‘The Rise of the State System in Africa’, in Cox, Michael, Dunne, Tim, and Booth, Ken (eds), Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformations in International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–89.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam (1997) The Limits of Independence: Relations between States in the Modern World, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam (2001) ‘Foreword’ to ‘Forum on the English School’, Review of International Studies, 27:3, 467–70.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46:2, 391–425.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1966) ‘Why Is There No International Theory?’, in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London: Allen and Unwin, 17–34.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1977) Systems of States, edited by Bull, Hedley, Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions, edited by Porter, Brian and Wight, Gabriele, Leicester: Leicester University Press/Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, David (2008) ‘Hêgemonía: Hegemony, Classical and Modern’, Journal of World-Systems Research, 14:2, 119–41.Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong (2011) Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong (2019) Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurdusev, Nuri (2004) Ottoman Diplomacy: Conventional or Unconventional?, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yurdusev, Nuri (2009) ‘The Middle East Encounter with the Expansion of European International Society’, in Buzan, Barry and Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana (eds), International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 70–91.Google Scholar
Zha, Jianying (2020) ‘Prince Han Fei & Chairman Xi Jinping’, http://chinaheritage.net/journal/chinas-heart-of-darkness-part-iii.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng (2009) ‘Rethinking the “Tribute System”: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2:4, 545–74.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng (2014) ‘International Societies in Pre-modern East Asia: A Preliminary Framework’, in Buzan, Barry and Zhang, Yongjin (eds), Contesting International Society in East Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–50.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng (2015a) ‘Confucian Foreign Policy Traditions in Chinese History’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8:2, 197–218.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng (2015b) Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East Asian History, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin (2001) ‘System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations’, in Cox, Michael, Dunne, Tim, and Booth, Ken (eds), Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformations in International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 43–63.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin, and Buzan, Barry (2012) ‘The Tributary System As International Society in Theory and Practice’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5:1, 3–36.Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng (2017) ‘Reconstruction of Chinese History for a Peaceful Rise’, YaleGlobal, 13 June, http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/reconstruction-chinese-history-peaceful-rise.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2006) ‘Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept “All-under-heaven” Tian-xia’, Social Identities, 12:1, 29–41.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2009) ‘A Political World Philosophy in Terms of All-Under-Heaven (Tian-Xia)’, Diogenes, 221, 5–18.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2014) ‘The “China Dream” in Question’, Economic and Political Studies, 2:1, 127–42.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2015) ‘Yi tianxia chongxin dingyi zhengzhi gainian: wenti, tiaojian he fangfa’ [‘Redefining the Concept of Politics via “Tianxia”: The Problems, Conditions and Methodology’, translated by Lu Guobin, edited by Sun Lan], World Economics and Politics (Beijing), 6, 4–22.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2018) ‘A Neglected Project for Tianxia System’, paper presented to the international conference on Global IR and Non-Western IR Theory, China Foreign Affairs University, 24 April.Google Scholar