Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:04:10.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Regulatory compliance: organizational capacities and regulatory strategies for environmental protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Hannah Quirk
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Toby Seddon
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Graham Smith
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we argue that forms of regulation vary in their capacity to influence behaviour. This is because the receptive capacity to particular forms of regulation varies between different actors. As a consequence, the successful application of regulatory approaches will only be secured if they are correctly aligned to these receptive capacities. This is a critical issue, particularly as the focus within the literature on regulatory compliance has tended to be on the relative effectiveness of different regulatory strategies and tools, without considering in any depth this question of differential capacity to respond. In a sense, our argument constitutes an extension and elaboration of the idea of responsive regulation (Ayres and Braithwaite 1992; Grabosky, Chapter 4, this book): we argue, in effect, that regulators should be responsive not only to the conduct of those they seek to regulate but also to their capacities to comply and internalize different approaches. This has some important implications for regulatory strategies.

To develop this argument and substantiate our claims, we focus on one specific substantive area, namely, environmental regulation directed at private sector businesses. This is, of course, an important area in its own right but we suggest that our argument has wider implications, including for the criminal justice arena, and we return to consider these in our conclusion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Regulation and Criminal Justice
Innovations in Policy and Research
, pp. 134 - 161
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arora, S. and Cason, T. (1996) ‘Why Do Firms Volunteer to Exceed Environmental Regulations? Understanding Participation in EPA's 3/50 Program’, Land Economics, 72(4), 413–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. and Black, J. (2008) ‘Really Responsive Regulation’, Modern Law Review, 71(1), 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P. and Roth, K. (2000) ‘Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–36.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991) ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, R., Connell, L. and Flynn, A. (1998) ‘Company Size, Environmental Regulation and Ecological Modernization: Further Analysis at the Level of the Firm’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(5), 285–96.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (2008) ‘Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes’, Regulation and Governance, 2, 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, F. (2002) ‘Does Size Matter? Organizational Slack and Visibility as Alternative Explanations for Environmental Responsiveness’, Business and Society, 41(1), 118–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di, Maggio P. and Powell, W. (1991) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality’, in Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975) ‘Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior’, Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Earthworks and Oxfam America (2004) Dirty Metals: Mining, Communities and the Environment.
,ENDS Report (2009) ‘BP to Pay $179m to settle Texas Pollution Case’. Report 410, March, pp. 67–8.
,Environment Agency (2007) ‘Spotlight on Business: Environmental Performance in 2006’ (at: http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GEHO0707BMMX-e-e.pdf).
Fiorino, D. (2006) The New Environmental Regulation. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA:Pitman.Google Scholar
Gerstenfeld, A. and Roberts, H. (2000) ‘Size Matters: Barriers and Prospects for Environmental Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’, in Hillary, R. (ed.), Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and the Environment: Business Imperatives. Sheffield:Greenleaf Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Graafland, J. and Smid, H. (2004) ‘Reputation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Market Regulation’, Tijdchrift voor Economie en Management, 49(2), 271–308.Google Scholar
Greening, D. and Gray, B. (1994) ‘Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues’, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467–98.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. (2009) ‘Environment Law, Regulation and Governance: Shifting Architectures’, Journal of Environmental Law, 21(2), 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. (1998) Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. and Thornton, D. (2004) ‘Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance’, Law and Social Inquiry, 29(4), 307–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Rees, J. (1997) ‘Industry Self-regulation: An Institutional Perspective’, Law and Policy, 19, 363–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Sinclair, D. (2002) Leaders and Laggards: Next Generation Environmental Regulation. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. McCarthy, T.. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. McCarthy, T.. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge:Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford:Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hitchens, D., Clausen, J., Trainor, M. and Thankappan, S. (2004) ‘Competitiveness, Environmental Performance and Management of SMEs’, Greener Management International, 44, 45–57.Google Scholar
Hitchens, D., Thankappan, S., Trainor, M., Clausen, J. and Marchi, B. (2005) ‘Environmental Performance, Competitiveness and Management of Small Businesses in Europe’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), 541–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, A. and Chaston, I. (1994) ‘Environmental Management in Devon and Cornwall's Small and Medium Sized Enterprise Sector’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 3(1), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, B. and Jones, C. (2007) ‘From Government to Governance: External Influences on Business Risk Management’, Regulation and Governance, 1, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jänicke, M. (2008) ‘Ecological Modernisation: New Perspective’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. (1988) ‘Re-thinking Incrementalism’, Strategic Management Journal 9, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, W. and Douglas, T. (1998) ‘Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment’, Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. and Scholz, J. (1984) ‘The “Criminology of the Corporation” and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies’, in Hawkins, K. and Thomas, J. (eds.), Enforcing Regulation. Boston, MA:Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D. and Minton, J. (1999) Negotiation. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1982). The Differentiation of Society. New York, NY:Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1989) Ecological Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1993) Risk – A Sociological Theory. New York, NY:De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch-Wood, G. and Williamson, D. (2007) ‘The Social Licence as a Form of Regulation for Small and Medium Enterprises’, Journal of Law and Society, 34(3), 321–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, R., Cordano, M. and Silverman, M. (2005) ‘Exploring Individual and Institutional Drivers of Proactive Environmentalism in the US Wine Industry’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Marshall Report (1998) ‘Economic Instruments and the Business Use of Energy’. Report to Chancellor of the Exchequer. London:HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Maurer, J. (1971) Readings in Organization Theory: Open-System Approaches. New York, NY:Random House.Google Scholar
Michaelas, M., Chittenden, F. and Poutziouris, P. (1999) ‘Financial Policy and Capital Structure Choice in UK SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Company Panel Data’, Small Business Economics, 12(2), 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. (1985) ‘Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, A. (1997) ‘Ecological Modernisation: Industrial Transformations and Environmental Reform’, in Redclift, M. and Woodgate, G. (eds.), The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 138–49.Google Scholar
NetRegs, (2006) SME-nvironment 2006. Bristol:Environment Agency.Google Scholar
Nonet, P. and Selznick, P. (1978) Towards Responsive Law: Law and Society in Transition, repr. 2001. New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. (1994) ‘Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theories and Evidence’, Small Business Economics, 6(5), 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orts, E. (1995) ‘Reflexive Environmental Law’, Northwestern University Law Review, 89(4), 1227.Google Scholar
Owens, A. (2002) ‘Inheritance and the Life-Cycle of Family Firms in the Early Industrial Revolution’, Business History, 44(1), 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peteraf, M. (1993) ‘The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View’, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. and Rajan, R. (1994) ‘The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data’, Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, A. (1992) ‘Fundamental Themes in Strategy Process Research’, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petts, J., Herd, A., Gerrard, S. and Horne, C. (1999) ‘The Climate and Culture of Environmental Compliance within SMEs’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 8, 14–30.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. and Linde, C. (1995) ‘Green and Competitive’, Harvard Business Review, September–October, 120–34.
Revell, A. and Blackburn, R. (2004) ‘SMEs and Their Response to Environmental Issues in the UK’. Kingston University, London: Small Business Research Centre.
Rowe, J. and Enticott, R. (1998) ‘Evaluating the Links between Locality and Environmental Performance of SMEs: Some Observations from Survey and Partnership Programmes in the Greater Bristol Area’, Eco-Management and Auditing, 5(3), 112–25.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, M and Fouts, P. (1997) ‘A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 40(3), 534–59.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. and Ross, D. (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Smith, M. and Kemp, R. (1998) Small Firms and the Environment 1998: A Groundwork Report. Birmingham:Groundwork.Google Scholar
Spence, L., Jeurissen, R. and Rutherfoord, R. (2000) ‘Small Business and the Environment in the UK and the Netherlands: Towards Stakeholder Co-operation’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(4), 945–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M. (1995) ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law and Society Review 17, 253–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D. (2005) The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (1992) The New Politics of the Environment. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, B. and Marshall, B. (2004) A Problem-Oriented Approach to Fly-Tipping. London: Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London.Google Scholar
Weber, J. and Wasieleski, D. (2003) ‘Managing Corporate Stakeholders: Subjecting Miles's 1987 Data-Collection Framework to Tests of Validation’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9(1), 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, D. and Lynch-Wood, G. (2001) ‘A New Paradigm for SME Environmental Practice’, International Journal of Total Quality Management, 13(6), 424–32.Google Scholar
Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G. and Ramsay, J. (2006) ‘Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR’, Journal of Business Ethics 67, 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. (1991) ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, I. and Patton, D. (2003) ‘Researching the Drivers of SME Environmental Behaviour: A Study of the UK Screen-printing Sector’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 352–62.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. and Patton, D. (2005) ‘Strategic Intent in the Management of the Green Environment within SMEs: An Analysis of the UK Screen-printing Sector’, Long Range Planning, 38, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×