Bibliography

Miriam Cohen

doi:10.1017/9781108574846.010

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2020

Miriam Cohen

Show author details

Miriam Cohen: Affiliation:
Université de Montréal

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Realizing Reparative Justice for International Crimes
From Theory to Practice
, pp. 218 - 248

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108574846.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Abel, Charles F., and Marsh, Frank H., Punishment and Restitution: A Restitutionary Approach to Crime and the Criminal, Greenwood Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ambos, Kai, and Othmann, Mohamed, New Approaches in International Criminal Justice: Kosovo, East Timor, Sierra Leoneand Cambodia, Max Planck Institute for International Law, 2003.Google Scholar

Bailleux, Antoine, La compétence universelle au carrefour de la pyramide et du réseau, Bruylant, 2005.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, and Wise, Edward M., “Aut dedere aut judicare”: The Duty to Extradite or Prosecute in International Law, Nijhoff, 1995.Google Scholar

Beloof, Douglas E., Victims in Criminal Procedure, Carolina Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Beristain, Carlos M., Diálogos sobre la Reparación: Experiencias en el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, Universidad Santo Tomas, 2008.Google Scholar

Bigger, Nigel, Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After Civil Conflict, Georgetown University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Boister, Neil, and Currie, Robert J., Routledge Handbook of Transnational Criminal Law, Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Bonacker, Thorsten, and Safferling, Christoph, Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse, Intersentia, 2013.Google Scholar

Bonafè, Beatrice I., The Relationship Between State and Individual Responsibility for International Crimes, Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad of the Law of International Claims, Banks Law Publishing, 1919.Google Scholar

Bottigliero, Ilaria, Redress for Victims of Crimes under International Law, Nijhoff, 2004.Google Scholar

Bourdon, William, Duverger, Emmanuelle, and Badinter, Robert, La Cour Pénale Internationale: Le Statut de Rome (Commentary on the Rome Statute), Olivier Duhamel, 2000.Google Scholar

Brienen, Marion E., and Hoegen, Ernestine H., Victims of Crime in 22 European Criminal Justice Systems, Wolf Legal Productions, 2000.Google Scholar

Buyse, Antoine, Post Conflict Housing Restitution: The European Human Rights Perspective with a Case Study on Bosnia and Herzegovina, Intersentia, 2008.Google Scholar

Cesare, Beccaria, Dei Delliti e Delle Pene, 1974, translation available at www.constitution.org/cb/crim_pun.htm.Google Scholar

Chandler, David, A History of Cambodia, Westview Press, 4th ed., 2008.Google Scholar

Chappell, Louise, The Politics of Gender at the International Criminal Court: Legacies and Legitimacy, Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cryer, Robert, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime, Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Cryer, Robert, Friman, Håkan, Robinson, Darryl, and Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRef Google Scholar

d’Argent, Pierre, Les Réparations de Guerre en Droit International Public, LGDJ, 2002.Google Scholar

de Brouwer, Anne-Marie, Supranational Criminal Prosecution of Sexual Violence: The ICC and the Practice of the ICTY and the ICTR, Intersentia, 2005.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, and Spencer, John, European Criminal Proceedings, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Dominicé, Christian, Observations sur les droits de l’Etat victime d’un fait internationalement illicite, in Droit international 2, edited by Dominicé, C et al., Pedone, 1982.Google Scholar

Driscoll, William, Zompetti, Joseph P., and Zompetti, Suzette, The International Criminal Court: Global Politics and the Quest for Justice, International Debate Education Association, 2004.Google Scholar

Droege, Cordula, Guía para profesionales N°2: El derecho a interponer recursos y a obtener reparación por violaciones graves de los derechos humanos, International Commission of Jurists, 2007.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark A., Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Dwertmann, Eva, The Reparation System of the International Criminal Court: Its Implementation, Possibilities and Limitations, Nijhoff, 2010.Google Scholar

Elias, Robert, The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology and Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Eyh, Brianne McGonigle, Procedural Justice? Victims Participation in International Criminal Proceedings, Intersentia, 2011.Google Scholar

Fauchille, Paul, Traité de Droit international public, vol. I, Part I, Libr. A. Rousseau Éd., 1922.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, Goetz, Mariana, and Stephens, Alan, Reparations for Victims of Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, Nijhoff, 2009.Google Scholar

Funk, Markus, Victims’ Rights and Advocacy at the International Criminal Court, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

García-Amador, Francisco V., Principios de derecho internacional que rigen la responsabilidad: análisis crítico de la concepción tradicional, Escuela de funcionarios internacionales, 1963.Google Scholar

García-Amador, Francisco V., The Changing Law of International Claims, Oceana, 1984.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Law of War and Peace, translation by Francis W. Kelsey, Clarendon Press, 1925.Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert L. A., Punishment and Responsibility, Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume 1: Rules, Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Holtzmann, Howard, and Kristjánsdóttir, Edda, International Mass Claims Processes: Legal and Practical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Inazumi, Mitsue, Universal Jurisdiction in Modern International Law: Expansion of National Jurisdiction for Prosecuting Serious Crimes Under International Law, adapted version of dissertation defended at Utrecht University on 27 October 2004, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert, The Case Against the Nazi War Criminals, Alfred A. Knopf, 1946.Google Scholar

Janis, Mark Weston, An Introduction to International Law, Aspen Publishers, 4th ed., 2003.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Gerry, Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates, Willan, 2002.Google Scholar

International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, Redressing Injustices Through Mass Claims Processes: Innovative Responses to Unique Challenges, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

International Council on Human Rights Policy, Hard Cases: Bringing Human Rights Violators to Justice Abroad - A Guide to Universal Jurisdiction, International Council on Human Rights Policy, 1999.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, translation by Mary Gregor, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kiza, Ernesto, Rathgeber, Corene, and Rohne, Holger, Victims of War: War-Victimization and Victims’ Attitudes towards Addressing Atrocities, Hamburger Edition, 2006.Google Scholar

Kuosmanen, Taru, Bringing Justice Closer: Hybrid Courts in Post-Conflict Societies, Erik Castrén Institute of International Law and Human Rights, 2007.Google Scholar

Lebigre, Arlette, Quelques Aspects de la Responsabilité Pénale en Droit Romain Classique, Presses Universitaires de France, 1967.Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul H., Authoritarian Regimes in Latin America: Dictators, Despots, and Tyrants, Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard, Weston, Burns, and Bederman, David, International Claims: Their Settlement by Lump-Sum Agreement, University Press of Virginia, vol. 1, 1975.Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen, Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Maison, Rafaëlle, La responsabilité individuelle pour crime d’État en Droit international public, Bruylant/Éds. de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2004.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Conor, Reparations and Victim Support in the International Criminal Court, Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Minow, Martha, Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence, Beacon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, Justice for Victims before the International Criminal Court, Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Morris, Virginia, and Scharf, Michael P., An Insider’s Guide to the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia, Transnational Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar

Musila, Godfrey, Rethinking International Criminal Law: Restorative Justice and the Rights of Victims in the International Criminal Court, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar

Nettlefield, Lara J., Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina, The Hague Tribunal’s Impact in a Postwar State, Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise, Longmans, Green, 2nd ed., 1912.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa, Jennings, Robert Y., and Watts, Arthur D., Oppenheim’s International Law: Peace, Longman, 9th ed., 1992.Google Scholar

Patton, George Whitecross, A Textbook of Jurisprudence, Clarendon Press, 4th ed., 1972.Google Scholar

Personnaz, Jean, La réparation du préjudice en Droit international public, Libr. Rec. Sirey, 1939.Google Scholar

Pross, Christian, Paying for the Past: The Struggle over Reparations for Surviving Victims of the Nazi Terror, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, Albrecht, and Tomuschat, Christian, State Responsibility and the Individual: Reparation in Instances of Grave Violations of Human Rights, Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar

Raphael, David D., Concepts of Justice, Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ratner, Steven R., Abrams, Jason, and Bischoff, James, Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law, Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reichel, Philip, and Albanese, Jay S., Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice, Sage Publications, 2nd ed., 2014.Google Scholar

Reitzer, Ladislas, La réparation comme conséquence de l’acte illicite en Droit international, Libr. Rec. Sirey, 1938.Google Scholar

Reydams, Luc, Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives, Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare P. R., Nollkaemper, André, and Kleffner, Jann K., Internationalized Criminal Courts – Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia, Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Rombouts, Heidy, Victim Organizations and the Politics of Reparation: A Case-Study on Rwanda, Intersentia, 2004.Google Scholar

Rubin, Alfred P., The Law of Piracy, Transnational Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar

Ryngaert, Cedric, Jurisdiction in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2015.Google Scholar

Schabas, William A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2004.Google Scholar

Schabas, William A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge University Press, 4th ed., 2011.Google Scholar

Schabas, William A., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2015.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N., The Faces of Injustice, Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Sriram, Chandra Lekha, Globalizing Justice for Mass Atrocities, Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Stahn, Carsten, and El Zeidy, Mohamed M., The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H., Assessing the Legacy of the ICTY, Nijhoff, 2011.Google Scholar

Strang, Heather, and Braithwaite, John, Restorative Justice and Civil Society, Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Trindade, Antônio Augusto Cançado, International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium, Nijhoff, 2010. Harvard Research in International Law.Google Scholar

van Ness, Daniel W., and Strong, Karen Heetderks, Restoring Justice, Routledge, 2nd ed., 2002.Google Scholar

von Mehren, Arthur T., and Murray, Peter L., Law in the United States, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2007.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wemmers, Jo-Anne M., Reparation and the International Criminal Court: Meeting the Needs of Victims, International Centre for Comparative Criminology, University of Montreal, 2006.Google Scholar

Westlake, John, The Collected Papers of John Westlake on Public International Law, ed. Oppenheim, Lassa, Cambridge University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Eric K., Interracial Justice: Conflict and Reconciliation in Post-Civil Rights America, New York University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Accioly, Hidelbrando, “Principes généraux de la responsabilité internationale d’après la doctrine et la jurisprudence,” Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye 96 (1953), pp. 349–441.Google Scholar

Akhavan, Payam, “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” American Journal of International Law 95 (2001), pp. 7–31.Google Scholar

Amezcua-Noriega, Octavio, “Reparation Principles under International Law and their Possible Application by the International Criminal Court: Some Reflections,” Reparations Unit, Briefing Paper No.1, Dr. Clara Sandoval, University of Essex, 2011, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Antkowiak, Thomas, “An Emerging Mandate for International Courts: Victim-Centered Remedies and Restorative Justice,” Stanford Journal of International Law 47 (2011), pp. 279–332.Google Scholar

Antkowiak, Thomas M., “Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Beyond,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 46 (2008), pp. 351–419.Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, “La responsabilité internationale des États a raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers,” Revue générale de droit international public 13 (1906), pp. 5–29.Google Scholar

Aptel, Cécile, “Some Innovations in the Statute of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), pp. 1107–1124.Google Scholar

Arajärvi, Noora, “Looking Back from Nowhere: Is There a Future for Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes?,” Tilburg Law Review 16 (2011), pp. 5–29.Google Scholar

Arsanjani, Mahnoush H., “The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” American Journal of International Law 93 (1999), pp. 22–43.Google Scholar

Askin, Kelly D., “Sexual Violence in Decisions and Indictments of the Yugoslav and Rwandan Tribunals: Current Status,” American Journal of International Law 93 (1999), pp. 97–123.Google Scholar

Bachrach, Michael, “The Protection of Rights and Victims Under International Criminal Law,” International Law 34 (2000), pp. 7–20.Google Scholar

Bair, James P., “From the Numbers Who Died to Those Who Survived: Victim Participation in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia,” University of Hawaii Law Review 31 (2008), pp. 507–552.Google Scholar

Beckett, W. Eric, “Criminal Jurisdiction Over Foreigners,” British Yearbook of International Law 8 (1927), pp. 108–128.Google Scholar

Bílková, Veronika, “Victims of War and Their Right to Reparation for Violations of International Humanitarian Law,” Mickolc Journal of International Law 4 (2007), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Bittner, Egon, and Platt, Anthony, “The Meaning of Punishment,” Issues in Criminology 2 (1966), pp. 79–99.Google Scholar

Boracic, Selma, “Bosnia War Victims’ Compensation Struggle,” International War and Peace Reporting (IWPR), 3 August 2011, available at https://iwpr.net/global-voices/bosnia-war-victims-compensation-struggle.Google Scholar

Boyle, David, “The Rights of Victims Participation, Representation, Protection, Reparation,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (2006), pp. 307–313.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John, “A Future Where Punishment Is Marginalized: Realistic or Utopian?,” UCLA Law Review 46 (1999), pp. 1727–1750.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John, “Restorative Justice and De-Professionalization,” The Good Society 13 (2004), pp. 28–31.Google Scholar

Butler, Hays, “The Doctrine of Universal Jurisdiction: A Review of the Literature,” Criminal Law Forum 11 (2000), pp. 353–373.Google Scholar

Capeloto, Tessa V., “Reconciliation in the Wake of Tragedy: Cambodia’s Extraordinary Chambers Undermines the Cambodian Constitution,” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association 17 (2008), pp. 103–132.Google Scholar

Carranza, Ruben, “Imagining the Possibilities for Reparations in Cambodia,” International Centre for Transitional Justice, Briefing Paper (2005), pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

Casey, Lee A., “The Case Against the International Criminal Court,” Fordham International Law Journal 25 (2002), pp. 840–872.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, “Is the Bell Tolling for Universality? A Plea for a Sensible Notion of Universal Jurisdiction,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1 (2003), pp. 589–595.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, “On the Current Trends Towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law,” European Journal of International Law 9 (1998), pp. 2–17.Google Scholar

Chaitidou, Eleni, “Recent Developments in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court,” Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 8 (2013), pp. 130–160.Google Scholar

Chung, Christine H., “Victim’s Participation at the International Criminal Court: Are Concessions of the Court Clouding the Promise?” Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 6 (2007), pp. 459–545.Google Scholar

Colangelo, Anthony J., “The New Universal Jurisdiction: In Absentia Signaling over Clearly Defined Crimes,” Georgetown Journal of International Law 36 (2004–2005), pp. 537–603.Google Scholar

Conforti, Benedetto, “The Judgment of the International Court of Justice on the Immunity of Foreign States: A Missed Opportunity,” Italian Yearbook of International Law 21 (2011), pp. 135–142.Google Scholar

Cornell, Timothy, and Salisbury, Lance, “The Importance of Civil Law in the Transition to Peace: Lessons from the Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina,” Cornell International Law Journal 35 (2000–2001), pp. 389–426.Google Scholar

Couillard, Valérie, “The Nairobi Declaration: Redefining Reparations for Women Victims of Sexual Violence,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (2007), pp. 444–453.Google Scholar

Cowles, Willard, “Universality of Jurisdiction over War Crimes,” California Law Review 33 (1945), pp. 177–218.Google Scholar

d’Argent, Pierre, “Le Fonds et la Commission de Compensation des Nations Unies,” Revue Belge de Droit International 25 (1992), pp. 485–518.Google Scholar

Danieli, Yael, “Reappraising the Nuremberg Trials and Their Legacy: The Role of Victims in International Law,” Cardozo Law Review 27 (2006), pp. 1633–1650.Google Scholar

Dannenbaum, Tom, “The International Criminal Court, Article 79, and Transitional Justice: The Case for an Independent Trust Fund for Victims,” Wisconsin International Law Journal 28 (2010), pp. 235–298.Google Scholar

David, Eric, “Le Tribunal International Pénal pour l’Ex-Yougoslavie,” Revue Belge de Droit International 25 (1992), pp. 565–598.Google Scholar

De Bertodano, Sylvia, “Problems Arising from the Mixed Composition and Structure of the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (2006), pp. 285–293.Google Scholar

De Brouwer, Anne-Marie, “Reparation to Victims of Sexual Violence: Possibilities at the International Criminal Court and at the Trust Fund for Victims and Their Families,” Leiden Journal of International Law 20 (2007), pp. 207–237.Google Scholar

De Hemptinne, Jérôme, “Challenges Raised by Victims’ Participation in the Proceedings of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (2010), pp. 165–179.Google Scholar

De Hemptinne, Jérôme, “The Creation of Investigating Chambers at the International Criminal Court,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), pp. 402–418.Google Scholar

Diab, Nader Iskandar, “Challenges in the Implementation of the Reparation Award Against Hissein Habré: Can the Spell of Unenforceable Awards Across the Globe be Broken?” Journal of International Criminal Justice 16 (2018), pp. 141–163.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Edwin D., “Is the Crime of Piracy Obsolete?” Harvard Law Review 38 (1925), pp. 334–360.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Laura A., “The Promise of Hybrid Courts,” American Journal of International Law 97 (2003), pp. 295–310.Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, “The Settlement of War-Related Claims: Does International Law Recognize a Victim’s Private Right of Action? Lessons After 1945,” Berkeley Journal of International Law 20 (2002), pp. 296–341.Google Scholar

Donadio, Colette, “Gender Based Violence: Justice and Reparation in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5 (2014), pp. 692–702.Google Scholar

Donovan, Donald Francis, “Universal Jurisdiction – The Next Frontier?,” American Society of International Law Proceedings 99 (2005), pp. 117–128.Google Scholar

Donovan, Donald Francis, and Roberts, Anthea, “The Emerging Recognition of Universal Civil Jurisdiction,” American Journal of International Law 100 (2006), pp. 142–163.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark A., “Sclerosis: Retributive Justice and the Rwandan Genocide,” Punishment & Society 2 (2000), pp. 287–307.Google Scholar

Dubinsky, Paul R., “Justice for the Collective: The Limits of the Human Rights Class Action,” Michigan Law Review 102 (2004), pp. 1152–1190.Google Scholar

Durbach, Andrea, and Chappell, Louise, “Leaving Behind the Age of Impunity: Victims of Gender Violence and the Promise of Reparations,” International Feminist Journal of Politics 8 (2014), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Espósito, Carlos, “Jus Cogens and Jurisdictional Immunities of States at the International Court of Justice: A Conflict Does Exist,” Italian Yearbook of International Law 21 (2011), pp. 161–174.Google Scholar

Evans, Christine, “Reparations for Victims in International Criminal Law,” Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, online, 2012.Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B., “International Criminal Courts: The Legacy of Nuremberg,” Pace International Law Review 10 (1998), pp. 203–235.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, “The Reparation Regime of the International Criminal Court: Practical Considerations,” Leiden Journal of International Law 15 (2002), pp. 667–686.Google Scholar

Fischer, Peter G., “The Victims’ Trust Fund of the International Criminal Court: Formation of a Functional Reparations Scheme,” Emory International Law Review 17 (2003), pp. 187–240.Google Scholar

Frisso, Giovanna M., “The Winding Down of the ICTY: The Impact of the Completion Strategy and the Residual Mechanism on Victims,” Goettingen Journal of International Law 3 (2011), pp. 1092–1121.Google Scholar

Garcia-Mora, Manuel R., “Criminal Jurisdiction over Foreigners for Treason and Offences Against the Safety of the State Committed Upon Foreign Territory,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 19 (1958), pp. 567–590.Google Scholar

Garkawe, Sam, “Victims and the International Criminal Court: Three Major Issues,” International Criminal Law Review 3 (2003), pp. 345–367.Google Scholar

Gavouneli, Maria, “War Reparation Claims and State Immunity,” Revue Hellénique de droit international 50 (1997), pp. 595–608.Google Scholar

Geraghty, Anne H., “Universal Jurisdiction and Drug Trafficking: A Tool for Fighting one of the World’s Most Pervasive Problems,” Florida Journal of International Law 16 (2004), pp. 371–403.Google Scholar

Gillard, Emanuela-Chiarra, “Reparation for Violations of International Humanitarian Law,” International Review of the Red Cross 85 (2003), pp. 529–553.Google Scholar

Ginn, Courtney, “Ensuring the Effective Prosecution of Sexually Violent Crimes in the Bosnian War Crimes Chamber: Applying Lessons from the ICTY,” Emory International Law Review 27 (2013), pp. 565–601.Google Scholar

Glaspy, Padraic J., “Justice Delayed? Recent Developments at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia,” Harvard Human Rights Journal 21 (2008), pp. 143–154.Google Scholar

Goldstone, Richard J., and Hamilton, Rebecca J., “Bosnia v. Serbia: Lessons from the Encounter of the International Court of Justice with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia,” Leiden Journal of International Law 21 (2008), pp. 95–112.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Joshua Michael, “Universal Jurisdiction and the Pirate: Time for an Old Couple to Part,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 39 (2006), pp. 973–1011.Google Scholar

Greco, Gioia, “Victims’ Rights Overview under the ICC Legal Framework: A Jurisprudential Analysis,” International Criminal Law Review 7 (2007), pp. 531–547.Google Scholar

Grovestins, Aida, “Victims’ Lawyers Start Battle to Seize Habré’s Millions,” Justice Hub, 4 August 2016, available at https://justicehub.org/article/victims-lawyers-start-battle-to-seize-habres-millions/.Google Scholar

Hall, Jerome, “Interrelations of Criminal Law and Torts,” Columbia Law Review 43 (1943), pp. 753–779.Google Scholar

Harvard Research in International Law, “Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime,” American Journal of International Law 29 (1935), pp. 439–442.Google Scholar

Hassan, Farooq, “The Theoretical Basis of Punishment in International Criminal Law,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 15 (1983), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar

Henzelin, Marc, Heiskanen, Veijo, and Mettraux, Guénaël, “Reparations to Victims Before the International Criminal Court: Lessons From International Mass Claims Processes,” Criminal Law Forum 17 (2006), pp. 281–344.Google Scholar

Herman, Johanna, “Reaching for Justice: The Participation of Victims at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia,” CHRC Policy Paper No. 5, (2010), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Ingadottir, Thordis, “The International Criminal Court: The Trust Fund for Victims (Article 79 of the Rome Statute), A Discussion Paper,” ICC Discussion Paper No. 3, PICT, February 2001.Google Scholar

“International Military Tribunal Nuremberg, Judgment and Sentences,” American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), pp. 172–333.Google Scholar

Jordan, Jon B., “Universal Jurisdiction in a Dangerous World: A Weapon for All Nations Against International Crimes,” Michigan State University-DCL Journal of International Law 9 (2000), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Jouet, Mugambi, “Reconciling the Conflicting Rights of Victims and Defendants at the International Criminal Court,” St. Louis University Public Law Review 26 (2007), pp. 249–308.Google Scholar

Jurdi, Nidal Nabil, “The Subject-Matter Jurisdiction of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), pp. 1125–1138.Google Scholar

Kalshoven, Frits, “State Responsibility for Warlike Acts of the Armed Forces,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 40 (1991), pp. 827–858.Google Scholar

Kamminga, Menno T., “Lessons Learned from the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction in Respect of Gross Human Rights Offenses,” Human Rights Quarterly 23 (2001), pp. 940–974.Google Scholar

Kamminga, Menno T., “Universal Civil Jurisdiction: Is it Legal? Is it Desirable?” American Society of International Law Proceedings 99 (2005) pp. 123–125.Google Scholar

Karnavas, Michael G., “The ICTY Legacy: A Defense Counsel’s Perspective,” Goettingen Journal of International Law 3 (2011), pp. 1052–1092.Google Scholar

Kartenstein, Suzanne, “Hybrid Tribunals: Searching for Justice in East Timor,” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16 (2003), pp. 245–278.Google Scholar

Keller, Linda M., “Seeking Justice at the International Criminal Court: Victims’ Reparations,” Thomas Jefferson Law Review 29 (2007), pp. 189–217.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Collective and Individual Responsibility in International Law with Particular Regard to the Punishment of War Criminals,” California Law Review 31 (1943), pp. 530–571.Google Scholar

Kendall, Sara, and Nouwen, Sarah, “Representational Practices at the International Criminal Court: The Gap Between Juridified and Abstract Victimhood,” Law and Contemporary Problems 75 (2013), pp. 235–262.Google Scholar

Kleffner, Jann K., and Zegveld, Liesbeth, “Establishing an Individual Complaints Procedure for Violations of International Humanitarian Law,” Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 3 (2000), pp. 384–401.Google Scholar

Klein, Katheryn M., “Bringing the Khmer Rouge to Justice: The Challenges and Risks Facing the Joint Tribunal in Cambodia,” New Jersey International Human Rights 4 (2006), pp. 549–566.Google Scholar

Kleinhaus, Brian, “Serving Two Masters: Evaluating the Criminal or Civil Nature of VWPA and MVRA Through the Lens of the Ex Post Facto Clause, the Abatement Doctrine and the Sixth Amendment,” Fordham Law Review 73 (2005), pp. 2711–2768.Google Scholar

Kontorovich, Eugene, “Implementing Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain: What Piracy Reveals About the Limits of the Alien Tort Statute,” Notre Dame Law Review 80 (2004), pp. 111–162.Google Scholar

Kontorovich, Eugene, “International Legal Responses to Piracy,” American Society of International Law 13 (2009), available at https://asil.org/insights/volume/13/issue/2/international-legal-responses-piracy-coast-somalia.Google Scholar

Kontorovich, Eugene, “The Piracy Analogy: Modern Universal Jurisdiction’s Hollow Foundation,” Harvard International Law Journal 45 (2004), pp. 183–238.Google Scholar

Langer, Máximo, and Doherty, Joseph W., “Managerial Judging Goes International, but Its Promise Remains Unfulfilled: An Empirical Assessment of the ICTY Reforms,” Yale Journal of International Law 36 (2011), pp. 241–305.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, “Règles générales du droit de la paix,” Recueil des Cours 62 (1937) (translation), pp. 95–422.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, “The Law of Nations and the Punishment of War Crimes,” British Yearbook of International Law 21 (1944), pp. 58–95.Google Scholar

Lemkin, Raphael, “Genocide as a Crime under International Law,” American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), pp. 145–151.Google Scholar

Levmore, Saul, “Reparations in the Wake of Atrocities: A Plan for Encouraging Participation by Governments,” Human Rights and International Criminal Law Online Forum, available at https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304451_029, pp. 249–251.Google Scholar

Linton, Suzannah, “Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in International Justice,” Criminal Law Forum 12 (2001), pp. 185–246.Google Scholar

Mbadinga, M. Itsouhou, “Le recours à la compétence universelle pour la répression des crimes internationaux: étude de quelques cas,” Revue de Droit International et de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques 81(2003), pp. 285–305.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Conor, “Reparations under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Reparative Justice Theory,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 3 (2009), pp. 250–271.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Conor, “Victim Redress and International Criminal Justice: Competing Paradigms, or Compatible Forms of Justice?” Journal of International Criminal Justice 10 (2012), pp. 325–372.Google Scholar

McGonigle, Brianne N., “Bridging the Divides in International Criminal Proceedings: An Examination into the Victim Participation Endeavor of the International Criminal Court,” Florida Journal of International Law 21 (2009), pp. 93–151.Google Scholar

McGonigle, Brianne N., “Two for the Price of One: Attempts by the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia to Combine Retributive and Restorative Justice Principles,” Leiden Journal of International Law 22 (2009), pp. 127–149.Google Scholar

McGregor, Lorna, “State Immunity and Jus Cogens,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (2006), pp. 437–445.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, “Justifying Compensation by the International Criminal Court’s Victims Trust Fund: Lessons from Domestic Compensation Schemes,” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 36 (2010–2011), pp. 123–204.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, “The Case for Collective Reparations Before the ICC” (November 15, 2012), pp. 1–18, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196911.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, “The International Criminal Court Statute and the Failure to Mention Symbolic Reparation,” International Review of Victimology 16 (2009), pp. 127–147.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, “The Legacy of the ICTY as Seen Through Some of Its Actors and Observers,” Goettingen Journal of International Law 3 (2011), pp. 1011–1052.Google Scholar

Mekjian, Gerard J., and Varughese, Mathew C., “Hearing the Victim’s Voice: Analysis of Victims’ Advocate Participation in the Trial Proceeding of the International Criminal Court,” Pace International Law Review 17 (2005), pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law,” American Journal of International Law 94 (2000), pp. 239–278.Google Scholar

Milanović, Marko, “An Odd Couple: Domestic Crimes and International Responsibility in the Special Tribunal for Lebanon,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), pp. 1139–1152.Google Scholar

Milanović, Marko, “From Compromise to Principles: Clarifying the Concept of State Jurisdiction in Human Rights Treaties,” Human Rights Law Review 8 (2008), pp. 411–448.Google Scholar

Milanović, Marko, “State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-Up,” European Journal of International Law 18 (2007), pp. 669–694.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, “Elaborating Justice for Victims at the International Criminal Court: Beyond Rhetoric and The Hague,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 13 (2015), pp. 281–311.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, “Meaningful and Effective? Considering Victims Interests Through Participation at the International Criminal Court,” Criminal Law Forum 26 (2015), pp. 255–289.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, “Navigating Complex Identities of Victim-Perpetrators in Reparation Mechanisms,” Queen’s University Belfast, School of Law Research Paper No. 2014B13, pp. 1–23, available at https://ecpr.eu/filestore/paperproposal/14d84c59-1767-467b-814c-0d57e7404655.pdf.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, “Realising Justice for Victims Before the International Criminal Court,” International Crimes Database (2014).Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, “Reparations at the ICC: Can It Really Serve as a Model?” Justiceinfo.net, 19 July 2019, available at www.justiceinfo.net/en/justiceinfo-comment-and-debate/opinion/41949-reparations-at-the-icc-can-it-really-serve-as-a-model.html (last accessed 26 July 2019).Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, “Reparations for ‘Guilty Victims’: Navigating Complex Identities of Victim–Perpetrators in Reparation Mechanisms,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 10 (2016), pp. 146–167.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, “Reparative Complementarity: Ensuring an Effective Remedy for Victims in the Reparation Regime of the International Criminal Court,” International Journal of Human Rights 17 (2013), pp. 368–390.Google Scholar

Monachesi, Elio, “Pioneers in Criminology IX: Cesare Beccaria (1738–1794),” Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Political Science 46 (1955), pp. 439–449.Google Scholar

Moyo, Monica, “ICJ Delivers Decision on the Application of the Genocide Convention,” AJIL International Law in Brief, 3 February 2015, available at www.asil.org/blogs/icj-delivers-decision-application-genocide-convention-february-3-2015.Google Scholar

Mugiraneza, Jean Paul, “Rwanda Genocide: Why Compensation Would Help the Healing,” Guardian, 8 March 2014, available at www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014/mar/04/rwanda-genocide-victims-compensation.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, “Concurrence Between Individual Responsibility and State Responsibility in International Law,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52 (2003), pp. 615–640.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, “The Contribution of International Institutions to Domestic Reparation for International Crimes,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 103 (2009), pp. 203–207.Google Scholar

Nsereko, Daniel Ntanda, “The International Criminal Court: Jurisdictional and Related Issues,” Criminal Law Forum 10 (1999), pp. 87–120.Google Scholar

Park, Won Soon, “Japanese Reparations Policies and the ‘Comfort Women’ Question,” positions 5 (1997), pp. 107–134.Google Scholar

Pavoni, Riccardo, “An American Anomaly? On the ICJ’s Selective Reading of United States Practice in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State,” Italian Yearbook of International Law 21 (2011), pp. 143–159.Google Scholar

Pellegrini, Flaviane de Magalhães Barros, “Os direitos das vítimas de crimes no Estado Democrático de Direito – uma análise do Projeto de Lei nº 269/2003 – Senado Federal,” Virtuajus: Revista da Faculdade de Direito da PUC-MG.Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, “Le Tribunal Criminel International pour l’Ex-Yougoslavie,” Revue Générale de Droit International Public 98 (1994), pp. 7–60.Google Scholar

Pham, Phuong, Vinck, Patrick, Balthazard, Mychelle, and Hean, Sokhom, “After the First Trial: A Population-Based Survey on Knowledge and Perceptions of Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia,” available at SSRN 1860963 (2011).Google Scholar

Phan, Hae Duy, “Reparations to Victims of Gross Human Rights Violations: The Case of Cambodia,” East Asia Law Review 4 (2009), pp. 277–298.Google Scholar

Rabinovitch, Ryan, “Universal Jurisdiction in Absentia,” Fordham International Law Journal 28 (2004–2005), pp. 500–530.Google Scholar

Randall, Kenneth C., “Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law,” Texas Law Review 66 (1988), pp. 785–841.Google Scholar

Ratner, Stephen, “Belgium’s War Crimes Statute: A Postmortem,” American Journal of International Law 97 (2003), pp. 888–897.Google Scholar

Reydams, Luc, “Belgium’s First Application of Universal Jurisdiction: The Butare Four Case,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1(2003), pp. 428–436.Google Scholar

Reydams, Luc, “Universal Criminal Jurisdiction: The Belgian State of Affairs,” Criminal Law Forum 11 (2000), pp. 183–216.Google Scholar

Reydams, Luc, “Universal Jurisdiction in Context,” American Society of International Law Proceedings 99 (2005), pp. 118–120.Google Scholar

Riznik, Donald, “Completing the ICTY-Project Without Sacrificing Its Main Goals: Security Council Resolution 1966: A Good Decision,” Goettingen Journal of International Law 3 (2011), pp. 907–922.Google Scholar

Robinson, Darryl, “Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions, and the International Criminal Court,” European Journal of International Law 14 (2003), pp. 481–505.Google Scholar

Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, “Reparations, Decisions, and Dilemmas,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 27 (2004), pp. 157–219.Google Scholar

Rojas Báez, Julio Joe, “La Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en Materia de Reparaciones y los Criterios del Proyeto de Artículos sobre Responsabilidad del Estado por Hechos Internacionalmente Ilícitos,” American University International Law Review 92 (2007–2008), pp. 91–126.Google Scholar

Rosand, Eric, “The Right to Compensation in Bosnia: An Unfulfilled Promise and Challenge to International Law,” Cornell Journal of International Law 33 (2000), pp. 113–158.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Friedrich, “Collective Reparation for Victims of Armed Conflict,” International Review of the Red Cross 92 (2010), pp. 731–746.Google Scholar

Roth, Kenneth, “The Case for Universal Jurisdiction,” Foreign Affairs 80 (2001), pp. 150–154.Google Scholar

Rubio-Marín, Ruth, and de Greiff, Pablo, “Women and Reparations,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (2007), pp. 318–337.Google Scholar

Ryngaert, Cedric, “Universal Tort Jurisdiction over Gross Human Rights Violations,” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 38 (2007), pp. 3–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sader, Choucri, “A Lebanese Perspective on the Special Tribunal for Lebanon:Hopes and Disillusions,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), pp. 1083–1089.Google Scholar

Scharf, Irene, “Kosovo’s War Victims: Civil Compensation or Criminal Justice for Identity Elimination,” Emory International Law Review 14 (2000), pp. 1415–1449.Google Scholar

Scharf, Michael P., “Application of Treaty-Based Universal Jurisdiction on Nationals of Non-Party States,” New England Law Review 35 (2001), pp. 363–382.Google Scholar

Schimmel, Naom, “A UN Trust Fund,” Huffington Post, 25 May 2012, available at www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/noam-785/a-un-trust-fund-for-rwand_b_1542340.html?guccounter=1.Google Scholar

Schocken, Celina, “The Special Court for Sierra Leone: Overview and Recommendations,” Berkeley Journal of International Law 20 (2002), pp. 436–461.Google Scholar

Serra, Gianluca, “Special Tribunal for Lebanon:A Commentary on its Major Legal Aspects,” International Criminal Justice Review 18 (2008), pp. 344–355.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, “Righting Wrongs: Reparations in the Articles on State Responsibility,” American Journal of International Law 96 (2002), pp. 833–856.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah L., and Ingadottir, Thordis, “The International Criminal Court Reparations to Victims of Crimes (Article 75 of the Rome Statute) and the Trust Fund (Article 79): Recommendations for the Court Rules of Procedure and Evidence,” Center on International Cooperation, New York University, Meeting of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court (26 July–13 August 1999), available at www.vrwg.org/downloads/reparations.pdf.Google Scholar

Sluiter, Göran, “Due Process and Criminal Procedure in the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (2006), pp. 314–326.Google Scholar

Sossai, Mirko, “Are Italian Courts Directly Bound to Give Effect to the Jurisdictional Immunities Judgment?” Italian Yearbook of International Law 21 (2011), pp. 175–189.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, “Collective Reparations at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia,” International Criminal Law Review 12 (2012), pp. 457–489.Google Scholar

Spinedi, Marina, “State Responsibility v Individual Responsibility for International Crimes: Tertium Non Datu,” European Journal of International Law 13 (2002), pp. 895–899.Google Scholar

Stahn, Carsten, “Reparative Justice after the Lubanga Appeal Judgment: New Prospects for Expressivism and Participatory Justice or ‘Juridified Victimhood’ by Other Means?” Journal of International Criminal Justice 13 (2015), pp. 801–813.Google Scholar

Stahn, Carsten, “Reparative Justice after the Lubanga Appeals Judgment on Principles and Procedures of Reparation,” Ejil: Talk!, 7 April 2015, available at http://ejiltalk.org/reparative-justice-after-the-lubanga-appeals-judgment-on-principles-and-procedures-of-reparation/#more-13286.Google Scholar

Steiner, Henry, “Three Cheers for Universal Jurisdiction: Or Is it Only Two?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 6 (2004), pp. 199–236.Google Scholar

Stephens, Beth, “Conceptualizing Violence Under International Law: Do Tort Remedies Fit the Crime?” Albany Law Review 60 (1996–1997), pp. 579–606.Google Scholar

Stephens, Beth, “Translating Filartiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations,” Yale Journal of International Law 27 (2002), pp. 1–58.Google Scholar

Steven, Lee A., “Genocide and the Duty to Extradite or Prosecute: Why the United States Is in Breach of Its International Obligations,” Virginia Journal of International Law 39 (1999), pp. 425–466.Google Scholar

Swart, Maria, “Tadic Revisited: Some Critical Comments on the Legacy and the Legitimacy of the ICTY,” Goettingen Journal of International Law 3 (2011), pp. 985–1009.Google Scholar

The Hague Justice Portal, “No signs of victim compensation in Sierra Leone: Chief Prosecutor at the Special Court for Sierra Leone, Brenda Hollis deplores the lack of assistance for victims,” 18 November 2010, available at www.haguejusticeportal.net/index.php?id=12284.Google Scholar

Thynne, Kelisiana, “The International Criminal Court: A Failure of International Justice for Victims,” Alberta Law Review 46 (2009), pp. 957–982.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, “Darfur: Compensation for the Victims,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3 (2005), pp. 579–589.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, “Reparation for Victims of Grave Human Rights Violations,” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 10 (2002), pp. 157–184.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, “Reparation in Cases of Genocide,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), pp. 905–912.Google Scholar

Triffterer, Otto, “Prosecution of States for Crimes of State,” Revue Internationale de Droit Penal 67 (1996), pp. 345–364.Google Scholar

Trumbull, Charles P., “The Victims of Victim Participation in International Criminal Proceedings,” Michigan Journal of International Law 29 (2008), pp. 777–826.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, Beth, “In Defence of Civil Redress: The Domestic Enforcement of Human Rights Norms in the Context of the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention,” Harvard International Law Journal 42 (2001), pp. 141–200.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, Beth, “Justice Without Borders: Universal Civil Jurisdiction,” American Society of International Law Proceedings 99 (2005), pp. 120–122.Google Scholar

Vandermeersch, Damien, “Prosecuting International Crimes in Belgium,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3 (2005), pp. 400–421.Google Scholar

Villa-Vicencio, Charles, “Why Perpetrators Should Not Always Be Prosecuted: Where the International Criminal Court and Truth Commissions Meet,” Emory Law Journal 49 (2000), pp. 205–222.Google Scholar

Walker, Margaret Urban, “Transformative Reparations? A Critical Look at a Current Trend in Thinking about Gender-Just Reparations,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 10 (2016), pp. 108–125.Google Scholar

Walleyn, Luc, “Victimes et Témoins de Crimes Internationaux: du droit à une Protection au Droit à la Parole,” Revue Internationale de la Croix Rouge 84 (2002), pp. 51–78.Google Scholar

Watson, Geoffrey R., “The Passive Personality Principle,” Texas International Law Journal 28 (1993), pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

Weckel, Philippe, “La justice internationale en le soixantième anniversaire de la Déclaration Universelle des Droits de l’Homme,” Revue générale de Droit international public 113 (2009), pp. 5–18.Google Scholar

Wemmers, Jo-Anne M., “Victim Reparation and the International Criminal Court,” International Review of Victimology 16 (2009), pp. 123–126.Google Scholar

Werner, Alain, and Rudy, Daniella, “Civil Party Representation at the ECCC:Sounding the Retreat in International Criminal Law,” Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights 8 (2010), pp. 301–309.Google Scholar

Wetzel, Jan Erik, and Mitri, Yvonne, “The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: A Court Off the Shelf for a Divided Country,” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 7 (2008), pp. 81–114.Google Scholar

White, Brent T., “Say You’re Sorry: Court-Ordered Apologies as a Civil Rights Remedy,” Cornell Law Review 91 (2006), pp. 1261–1312.Google Scholar

Wierda, Marieke, Nassar, Habib, and Maalouf, Lynn, “Early Reflections on Local Perceptions, Legitimacy and Legacy of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007), pp. 1065–1081.Google Scholar

Wiersing, Anja, “Lubanga and its Implications for Victims Seeking Reparations at the International Criminal Court,” Amsterdam Law Forum 4 (2012), pp. 21–39.Google Scholar

Williams, Sarah, “The Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers: A Dangerous Precedent for International Justice,” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 53 (2004), pp. 227–245.Google Scholar

Wippman, David, “Atrocities, Deterrence, and the Limits of International Justice,” Fordham International Law Journal 23 (1999), pp. 473–488.Google Scholar

Wringe, Bill, “Why Punish War Crimes? Victor’s Justice and Expressive Justifications of Punishment,” Law and Philosophy 25 (2006), pp. 159–191.Google Scholar

Wu, Yolanda S., “Genocidal Rape in Bosnia: Redress in United States Courts Under the Alien Tort Claims Act,” UCLA Women’s Law Journal 4 (1993), pp. 101–112.Google Scholar

Yeager, David, “The Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Case Study in Transitional Justice,” International Legal Perspectives 14 (2004), pp. 44–55.Google Scholar

Zacklin, Ralph, “The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2 (2004), pp. 541–545.Google Scholar

Zapallà, Salvatore, “The Rights of Victims v. the Rights of the Accused,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (2010), pp. 137–164.Google Scholar

Zedner, Lucia, “Reparation and Retribution: Are they Reconcilable?” The Modern Law Review 57 (1994), pp. 228–250.Google Scholar

Zegveld, Liesbeth, “Remedies for Victims of Violations of International Humanitarian Law,” International Review of the Red Cross 85 (2003), pp. 497–527.Google Scholar

Zegveld, Liesbeth, “Victims’ Reparations Claims and International Criminal Courts, Incompatible Values?,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (2010), pp. 79–111.Google Scholar

Abazovic, Dino, “Reconciliation, Ethopolitics and Religion in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” in Post-Yugoslavia: New Cultural and Political Perspectives, edited by Abazovic, Dino and Velikonja, Mitja, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges, “The Specificities of Humanitarian Law,” in Studies and Essays of International Humanitarian Law and the Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, edited by Swinarski, Christophe, Nijhoff, 1984, pp. 265–280.Google Scholar

Authers, John, “Making Good Again: German Compensation for Forced and Slave Laborers,” in The Handbook of Reparations, edited by de Greiff, Pablo, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 420–448.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, Cherif, “Assessing Conflict Outcomes: Accountability and Impunity,” in The Pursuit of International Criminal Justice: A World Study on Conflicts, Victimization, and Post-Conflict Justice, edited by Bassiouni, M. Cherif, Intersentia, 2010, pp. 3–39.Google Scholar

Benito, Elizabeth Odio, “Development and Interpretation of Principles of Reparation: The Case Law of the IACHR and its Possible Contributions to the Jurisprudence of the ICC,” in Protecting Humanity: Essays in International Law and Policy in Honour of Navanethem Pillay, edited by Eboe-Osuji, Chile, Nijhoff, 2010, pp. 571–594.Google Scholar

Benito, Elizabeth Odio, “Foreword,” in Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, edited by Ferstman, Carla, Goetz, Mariana, and Stephens, Alan, Nijhoff, 2009, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, Cherif, “The History of Universal Jurisdiction and Its Place in International Law,” in Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law, edited by Macedo, Stephen, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004, pp. 39–63.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, Cherif, “The Sources and Content of International Criminal Law: A Theoretical Framework,” in International Criminal Law, edited by Bassiouni, Cherif (2nd rev. ed., vol. 1), Transnational Publishers, 1999, pp. 3–127.Google Scholar

Bitti, Gilbert, “Article 21 of the International Criminal Law Statute and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC,” in The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, edited by Stahn, Carsten and Sluiter, Göran, Nijhoff, 2008, pp. 285–304.Google Scholar

Bitti, Gilbert, and Rivas, Gabriela Gonzalez, “The Reparations Provisions for Victims under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” in Redressing Injustices through Mass Claims Processes, Innovative Responses to Unique Challenges, The International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 299–322.Google Scholar

Buti, Antonio, “The Notion of Reparations as a Restorative Justice Measure,” in One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders – Perspectives of Evolution: Essays on Macau’s Autonomy after the Resumption of Sovereignty by China, edited by Oliveira, Jorge Costa and Cardinal, Paulo, Springer, 2009, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar

Chifflet, Pascale, “The Roles and Status of the Victims,” in International Criminal Law and Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY, edited by Boas, Gideon and Schabas, William A., Nijhoff, 2003, pp. 75–111.Google Scholar

Colonomos, Ariel, and Armstrong, Andrea, “German Reparations to the Jews after World War II: A Turning Point in the History of Reparations,” in Handbook of Reparations, edited by Greiff, Pablo de, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 390–419.Google Scholar

D’Amato, Anthony, “National Prosecution for International Crimes,” in International Criminal Law, edited by Bassiouni, M. Cherif, Nijhoff, 2008. 3rd edn, Vol. III, 1987, pp. 285–295.Google Scholar

de Greiff, Pablo, and Wierda, Marieke, “The Trust Fund for Victims of the International Criminal Court: Between Possibilities and Constraints,” in Out of the Ashes: Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Violations of Human Rights, edited by de Feyter, Koen et al., Intersentia, 2005, pp. 225–243.Google Scholar

de Vlaming, Frederiek, and Clark, Kate, “War Reparations in Bosnia and Herzegovina:Individual Stories and Collective Interests,” in Narratives of Justice In and Out of the Courtroom, edited by Dubravka, Zarkov and Marlies, Glasius, Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 163–185.Google Scholar

del Ponte, Carla, “Compensating Victims with Guilty Money,” interview with Carla del Ponte, Chief Prosecutor of the ad hoc international criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, in Judicial Diplomacy: Chronicles and Reports on International Criminal Justice, The Hague, 9 June 2000.Google Scholar

Dixon, Peter J., “Reparations and the Politics of Recognition,” in Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, edited by Stahn, Carsten et al., Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 326–351.Google Scholar

Dolinko, David, “Punishment,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law, edited by Deigh, John and Dolinko, David, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 403–440.Google Scholar

Donat-Cattin, David, “Article 75 – Reparations to Victims,” in Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, edited by Triffterer, Otto, Baden-Baden, 1999, pp. 1399–1412.Google Scholar

Duff, Anthony, “Authority and Responsibility in International Criminal Law,” in The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 589–604.Google Scholar

Duggan, Colleen, and Abusharaf, Adila, “Reparation of Sexual Violence in Democratic Transitions: The Search for Gender Justice,” in The Handbook of Reparations, edited by, Greiff, pablo de, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 623–649.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “International Criminal Responsibility of the Individual and International Responsibility of the State,” in The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, edited by Cassese, Antonio et al., Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1085–1099.Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm, “International Wrongs and National Jurisdiction,” in Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma, edited by Evans, Malcolm, Hart Publishing, 1998, pp. 173–190.Google Scholar

Fattah, Ezzat A., “From a Guilt Orientation to a Consequence Orientation: A Proposed New Paradigm for the Criminal Law in the 21st Century,” in Beitraege zur Rechtswissenschaft, edited by Küper, Wilfried and Welp, Jürgen, C. F. Mueller Juristischer Verlag, 1993, pp. 771–792.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, and Goetz, Mariana, “Reparations Before the International Criminal Court: The Early Jurisprudence on Victim Participation and its Impact on Future Reparations Proceedings,” in Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, edited by Ferstman, Carla et al., Nijhoff, 2009, pp. 313–350.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, and Rosenberg, Sheri P., “Reparations in Dayton’s Bosnia and Herzegovina,” in Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, edited by Ferstman, Carla et al., Nijhoff, 2009, pp. 483–513.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Laurel, “Refracted Justice: The Imagined Victim and the International Criminal Court,” in Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, edited by Stahn, Carsten et al., Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 302–325.Google Scholar

Fox, Hazel, “The International Court of Justice’s Treatment of Acts of the State and in Particular the Attribution of Acts of Individuals to States,” in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, edited by Ando, Nisuke et al., Kluwer Law International, 2002, pp. 147–163.Google Scholar

Garkawe, Sam, “The Role and Rights of Victims at the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal,” in The Nuremberg Trials: International Criminal Law since 1945, edited by Reginbogin, Herbert R., Safferling, Christoph J., and Hippel, Walter R., Kluwer, 2006, pp. 86–94.Google Scholar

Goetz, Mariana, “Reparative Justice at the International Criminal Court: Best Practice or Tokenism?,” in Reparation for Victims of Crimes against Humanity: The Healing Role of Reparation, edited by Webbers, Jo-Anne M, Routledge, 2014, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, “International Humanitarian Law (Laws of War),” in The Centennial of the First International Peace Conference, edited by Kalshoven, Frits, Kluwer Law International, 2000, pp. 161–260.Google Scholar

Groenhuijsen, Marc, “Victims’ Rights and Restorative Justice: Piecemeal Reform of the Criminal Justice System or a Change of Paradigm?,” in Crime, Victims and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice, edited by Kaptein, Hendrik and Malsch, Marijke, Ashgate Publishing, 2004, pp. 63–79.Google Scholar

Hall, Christopher Keith, “Universal Jurisdiction: New Uses for an Old Tool,” in Justice for Crimes Against Humanity, edited by Lattimer, Mark and Sands, Philipe, Hart, 2007, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar

Haslam, Emily, “Victim Participation at the International Criminal Court: A Triumph of Hope Over Experience,” in The Permanent International Criminal Court, edited by McGoldrick, D, Hart, 2004, pp. 315–334.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Rainer, “Victims of Violations of International Humanitarian Law: Do They Have an Individual Right to Reparation Against States Under International Law?” in Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat, edited by Dupuy, Pierre-Marie et al., Kehl Engel, 2006, pp. 341–359.Google Scholar

Holness, Toni, and Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, “Participation as Reparations: The ECCC and Healing in Cambodia,” in Cambodia’s Hidden Scars: Trauma Psychology in the Wake of the Khmer Rouge, Documentation Center of Cambodia, 2012, pp. 172–188.Google Scholar

Ingadottir, Thordis, “The Trust Fund of the ICC,” in International Crimes, Peace, and Human Rights: The Role of the International Criminal Court, edited by Shelton, Dinah, Transnational, 2000, pp. 149–174.Google Scholar

Ingadottir, Thordis, “The Trust Fund for Victims (Article 79 of the Rome Statute),” in The International Criminal Court: Recommendations on Policy and Practice – Financing, Victims, Judges, and Immunities, edited by Ingadottir, Thordis, Ardsley, 2003, pp. 111–144.Google Scholar

Jorda, Claude, and de Hamptinne, Jerome, “The Status and Role of the Victims,” in The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, edited by Cassese, Antonio et al., Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1387–1419.Google Scholar

Kristjánsdóttir, Edda, “International Mass Claims Processes and the ICC Trust Fund for Victims,” in Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, edited by Ferstman, Carla et al., Nijhoff, 2009, pp. 167–195.Google Scholar

Malmström, Susanne, “Restitution of Property and Compensation to Victims,” in Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald, edited by May, Richard et al., Kluwer Law International, 2001, pp. 373–384.Google Scholar

Malone, Linda, “Enforcing International Criminal Law Violations with Civil Remedies: The U.S. Alien Tort Claims Act,” in International Criminal Law, edited by Bassiouni, Cherif, Brill, 2008, pp. 421–455.Google Scholar

Mazzeschi, Riccardo Pisillo, “International Obligations to Provide for Reparation Claims,” in State Responsibility and the Individual – Reparations in Instances of Grave Violations of Human Rights, edited by Randelzhofer, Albrecht and Tomuschat, Christian, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 149–172.Google Scholar

Menon, Jaykumar A., “The Low Road: Promoting Civil Redress for International Wrongs,” in Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law, edited by Cassese, Antonio, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 626–642.Google Scholar

Muttukumaru, Christopher, “Reparations to Victims,” in The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute, Issues, Negotiations, Results, edited by Lee, Roy S. K., Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 262–293.Google Scholar

Nowak, Manfred, “Reparation by the Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina,” in Out of the Ashes: Reparations for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations, edited by Feyter, Koen de et al., Intersentia, 2005, pp. 245–288.Google Scholar

Peschke, Katharina, “The Role and Mandates of the ICC Trust Fund for Victims,” in Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse, edited by Bonacker, Thorsten and Safferling, Christoph, Springer, 2013, pp. 317–327.Google Scholar

Plato, , “Protagoras,” in Works of Plato, edited by Edman, Irwin, The Modern Library, 1956, pp. 71–116.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A., “A Minimalist Reparations Regime for the International Criminal Court,” in Human Rights and International Criminal Law Online Forum, February 1, 2012, pp. 264–270, available at https://brill.com/view/title/32363.Google Scholar

Ramírez, Sergio Garcia, “Las reparaciones en el sistema interamericano de protección de los derechos humanos,” in El sistema interamericano de protección de los derechos humanos en el umbral del siglo XXI: tomo I, Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, 2001, pp. 129–158.Google Scholar

Rao, Pemmaraju Sreenivasa, “International Crimes and State Responsibility,” in International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter, edited by Ragazzi, Maurizio, Nijhoff, 2005, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar

Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, and Orlovsky, Katharine, “A Complementary Relationship: Reparations and Development,” in Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections, edited by Greiff, Pablo de and Duthie, Roger, Social Science Research Council, 2009, pp. 170–213.Google Scholar

Rombouts, Heidy et al., “The Right to Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations,” in Out of the Ashes: Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Violations of Human Rights, edited by Feyter, Koen de et al., Intersentia, 2005, pp. 345–503.Google Scholar

Scomparin, Laura, “La Victime du Crime et la Juridiction Pénale Internationale,” in La Justice Pénale Internationale entre Passé et Avenir, edited by Chiavario, M, Giuffrè, 2003, pp. 335–352.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, “Global Justice: Beyond International Equity,” in Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, edited by Kaul, I, UNDP, 1999, pp. 116–125.Google Scholar

Stern, Brigitte, “Vers une limitation de ‘l’irresponsabilité souveraine’ des Etats et chefs d’Etat en cas de crime de droit international?,” in Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch, edited by Kohen, Marcelo, Nijhoff, 2007, pp. 511–548.Google Scholar

Studzinsky, Silke, “Participation Rights of Victims as Civil Parties and the Challenges of Their Implementation Before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia,” in Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse, edited by Bonacker, Thorsten and Safferling, Christoph, TMC Asser Press, 2013, pp. 175–188.Google Scholar

Timm, Birte, “The Legal Position of Victims in the Rule of Procedure and Evidence,” in International and National Prosecution of Crimes under International Law, edited by Fischer, Horst, Kress, Claus, and Lüder, Sascha Rolf, Berlin Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, “Reparation in Favour of Individual Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law,” in Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law, edited by Kohen, Marcelo G., Nijhoff, 2007, pp. 569–590.Google Scholar

Trindade, Antônio Augusto Cançado, “Complementarity Between State Responsibility and Individual Responsibility for Grave Violations of Human Rights: The Crime of State Revisited,” in International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter, edited by Ragazzi, Maurizio, Nijhoff, 2005, pp. 253–269.Google Scholar

Trindade, Antônio Augusto Cançado, “State Responsibility in Cases of Massacres: Contemporary Advances in International Justice,” Inaugural Address as Honorary Professor to the Chair in International and Regional Human Rights Courts, 10 November 2011 at Utrecht University.Google Scholar

Trindade, Antônio Augusto Cançado, “The Inter-American System of Protection of Human Rights (1948–2009): Evolution, Present State and Perspectives,” in Dossier Documentaires/Documentary File- XL Session d’Enseignement, Vol. 2, IIDH, 2009.Google Scholar

van Boven, Theo, “The Perspective of the Victim,” in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Fifty Years and Beyond, edited by Danieli, Yael and Stamatopoulou, Elsa, Baywood, 1999, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar

van Boven, Theo, “The Position of the Victim in the Statute of the International Criminal Court,” in Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adrian Bos, edited by von Hebel, Herman A. M., Lammers, Johan G., and Schukking, Jolien, Asser Press, 1999, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar

Vasiliev, Sergey, “Article 68(3) and Personal Interests of Victims in the Emerging Practice of the ICC,” in The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, edited by Stahn, Carsten and Sluiter, Göran, Brill, 2008, pp. 635–690.Google Scholar

Vasiliev, Sergey, “Victim Participation Revisited: What the ICC Is Learning About Itself,” in The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court, edited by Stahn, Carsten, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 1133–1202.Google Scholar

Vasiliev, Sergey, “Trial Process at the ECCC: The Rise and Fall of the Inquisitorial Paradigm in International Criminal Law” in The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Assessing their Contribution to International Criminal Law, edited by Meisenberg, Simon and Stegmiller, Ignaz, Asser Press, 2016, pp. 389–433.Google Scholar

Watson, David, Boucherat, J., and Davis, G., “Reparation for Retributivists,” in Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders and Community, edited by Wright, Martin and Galaway, Burt, Sage, 1989, pp. 212–228.Google Scholar

Zedner, Lucia, “England,” in Reparation in Criminal Law: International Perspectives, edited by Eser, Albin and Walther, Susanne (vol. 1), Iuscrim, Max-Planck Institute Für Ausländisches und International Strafrecht, 1996.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive