Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- 1 Ontology for Relativistic Collapse Theories
- 2 The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation: Measurement, Invariance, and Ontology
- 3 Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
- 4 Quantum Physics Grounded on Bohmian Mechanics
- 5 Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
- 6 Generalized Contexts for Quantum Histories
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
6 - Generalized Contexts for Quantum Histories
from Part I - Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2019
Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- 1 Ontology for Relativistic Collapse Theories
- 2 The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation: Measurement, Invariance, and Ontology
- 3 Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
- 4 Quantum Physics Grounded on Bohmian Mechanics
- 5 Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
- 6 Generalized Contexts for Quantum Histories
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum WorldsPerspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 107 - 118Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Castagnino, M., Id Betan, R., Laura, R., Liotta, R. (2002). “Quantum decay processes and Gamov states,” Journal of Physics A, 35: 6055–6074.Google Scholar
Dowker, F. and Kent, A. (1996). “On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 82: 1575–1646.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J. B. (1990). “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology,” pp. 425–458 in Zurek, W. (ed.), Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. (1984). “Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 36: 219–272.Google Scholar
Laloë, F. (2001). “Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes, and theorems,” American Journal of Physics, 69: 655–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laura, R. and Castagnino, M. (1998). “Functional approach for quantum systems with continuous spectrum,” Physical Review E, 57: 3948–3961.Google Scholar
Laura, R. and Vanni, L. (2009). “Time translation of quantum properties,” Foundations of Physics, 39: 160–173.Google Scholar
Losada, M. and Laura, R. (2013). “The formalism of generalized contexts and decay processes,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 52: 1289–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losada, M. and Laura, L. (2014a). “Generalized contexts and consistent histories in quantum mechanics,” Annals of Physics, 344: 263–274.Google Scholar
Losada, M. and Laura, R. (2014b). “Quantum histories without contrary inferences,” Annals of Physics, 351: 418–425.Google Scholar
Losada, M. and Lombardi, O. (2018). “Histories in quantum mechanics: distinguishing between formalism and interpretation,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8: 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losada, M., Vanni, L., and Laura, R. (2013). “Probabilities for time-dependent properties in classical and quantum mechanics,” Physical Review A, 87: 052128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losada, M., Vanni, L., and Laura, R. (2016). “The measurement process in the generalized contexts formalism for quantum histories,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 55: 817–824.Google Scholar
Okon, E. and Sudarsky, D. (2014). “On the consistency of the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics,” Foundations of Physics, 44: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omnès, R. (1988). “Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. I. Foundations,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 53: 893–932.Google Scholar
Vanni, L. and Laura, R. (2010). “Deducción del principio de complementariedad en la teoría cuántica,” Epistemología e Historia de la Ciencia. Selección de trabajos de las XX Jornadas, 16: 647–656.Google Scholar
Vanni, L. and Laura, R. (2013). “The logic of quantum measurements,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 52: 2386–2394.Google Scholar