Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:30:22.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2021

Ioana-Elena Oana ,
Carsten Q. Schneider  and
Eva Thomann
Ioana-Elena Oana
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Carsten Q. Schneider
Affiliation:
Central European University, Budapest
Eva Thomann
Affiliation:
Universität Konstanz, Germany
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R
A Beginner's Guide
 , pp. 224 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. Measurement validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.Google Scholar
Arel-Bundock, Vincent. 2019. The double bind of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, DOI: 10.1177/0049124119882460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bara, Corinne. 2014. Incentives and opportunities: a complexity-oriented explanation of violent ethnic conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 51(6), 696–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrenechea, Rodrigo, and Castillo, Isabel. 2019. The many roads to Rome: family resemblance concepts in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 53(1), 107–130.Google Scholar
Basurto, Xavier, and Speer, Johanna. 2012. Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Field Methods, 24(2), 155–174.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Michael. 2008. Uncovering deterministic causal structures: a Boolean approach. Synthese, 170(1), 71–96.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Michael. 2009. Inferring causal complexity. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(1), 71–101.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Michael. 2013. Detecting causal chains in small-N data. Field Methods, 25(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Michael. 2015. Parsimony and causality. Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 839–856.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Michael, and Thiem, Alrik. 2015. Identifying complex causal dependencies in configurational data with coincidence analysis. The R Journal, 7(1), 176–184.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Michael, and Thiem, Alrik. 2017. Model ambiguities in configurational comparative research. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(4), 954–987.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Michael, and Thiem, Alrik. 2020. Often trusted but never (properly) tested: evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 279–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2018. Integrating cross-case analyses and process tracing in set-theoretic research: strategies and parameters of debate. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 3–36.Google Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, and De Meur, Gisele. 2009. Comparative research design: case and variable selection. Pages 19–32 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.Google Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, De Meur, Gisele, Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an approach. Pages 1–18 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2017. Aggregation bias and the analysis of necessary and sufficient conditions in fsQCA. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(2), 242–251.Google Scholar
Caren, Neal, and Panofsky, Aaron. 2005. TQCA: a technique for adding temporality to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), 147–172.Google Scholar
Cooper, Barry, and Glaesser, Judith. 2016a. Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: an illustration from the sociology of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), 445–459.Google Scholar
Cooper, Barry, and Glaesser, Judith. 2016b. Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how do results vary as case weights change? Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 327–346.Google Scholar
Cronqvist, Lasse. 2019. Tosmana [Version 1.61].Google Scholar
Cronqvist, Lasse, and Berg-Schlosser, Dirk. 2009. Multi-value QCA (mvQCA). Pages 69–86 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Block, Debora, and Vis, Barbara. 2019. Addressing the challenges related to transforming qualitative into quantitative data in qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 503–535.Google Scholar
Dusa, Adrian. 2018. QCA with R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ege, Jörn, Thomann, Eva, and Paustyan, Ekatarina. 2019. Approaches to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and standards of good practice: a systematic review. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Wroclaw, November 4–7, 2019.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick. 2012. How good are your counterfactuals? Assessing quantitative macro-comparative welfare state research. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 365–380.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick, Kvist, Jon, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2013. Making the most of Configurational Comparative Analysis: an assessment of QCA applications in comparative welfare-state research. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 185–190.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick, Schraff, Dominik, and Walter, André. 2014. QCA, the truth table analysis and large-N survey data: the benefits of calibration and the importance of robustness tests. COMPASSS Working Paper 2014-79.Google Scholar
Fischer, Manuel. 2011. Social network analysis and Qualitative Comparative Analysis: their mutual benefit for the explanation of policy network structures. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(2), 27–51.Google Scholar
Fischer, Manuel, and Maggetti, Martino. 2017. Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the study of policy processes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 345–361.Google Scholar
Fiss, Peer C. 2011. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.Google Scholar
Fiss, Peer, Sharapov, Dmitry, and Cronqvist, Lasse. 2013. Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 191–197.Google Scholar
Freyburg, Tina, and Garbe, Lisa. 2018. Blocking the bottleneck: internet shutdowns and ownership at election times in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Communication, 12 (2018), 3896–3916.Google Scholar
García-Castro, Roberto, and Arino, Miguel A. 2016. A general approach to panel data set-theoretic research. Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 2, 63–76.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2008. Case selection for case-study analysis: qualitative and quantitative techniques. Pages 645–684 of: Box-Steffensmeier, J., Brady, Henry. E., and Collier, David (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2011. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2012. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2005. Two-level theories and fuzzy-set analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4), 497–538.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2009. Scope in case study research. Pages 307–318 of: Byrne, David, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Case-Based Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Starr, Harvey. 2003. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham/Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Greckhamer, Thomas, Furnari, Santi, Fiss, Peer C., and Aguilera, Ruth V. 2018. Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 482–495.Google Scholar
Greckhamer, Thomas, Misangyi, Vilmos F., and Fiss, Peer C. 2013. The two QCAs: from a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach. Pages 49–75 of: Fiss, P. C., Cambre, B., and Marx, A. (eds.), Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research. Somerville: Emerald Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haesebrouck, Tim. 2016. The added value of multi-value Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum Qualitative Social Research], 17(1).Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2013. Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference. Political Analysis, 21(2), 252–265.Google Scholar
Jopke, Nikolaus, and Gerrits, Lasse. 2019. Constructing cases and conditions in QCA-lessons from grounded theory. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 599–610.Google Scholar
Kahwati, Leila C., and Kane, Heather L. 2018. Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Mixed Methods Research and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koivu, Kendra, Schneider, Carsten Q., and Vis, Barbara. 2020. Set-analytic approaches, especially Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) Final Report of QTD Working Group III.4, in Jacobs, Alan M. et al. (eds), Transparency in qualitative research: an overview of key findings and implications of the deliberations. Perspectives on Politics 19(1): 171–208.Google Scholar
Krogslund, Chris, Choi, Donghyun Danny, and Poertner, Mathias. 2014. Fuzzy sets on shaky ground: parametric and specification sensitivity in fsQCA. Political Analysis, 23(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1937. Some remarks on typological procedures in social research. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 6(1), 119–139.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix, and Barton, Allen H. 1957. Qualitative Measurement in the Social Siences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2010. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Legewie, Nicolas. 2017. Anchored calibration: from qualitative data to fuzzy sets. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(3), 24.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, David. 2006. A question of size? A heuristics for stepwise comparative research design. Pages 43–66 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Grimm, Heike (eds.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2010. After KKV: the new methodology of qualitative research. World Politics, 62(1), 120–147.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2004. The possibility principle and case selection: choosing negative cases in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2006. A tale of two cultures: contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, Kimball, Erin, and Koivu, Kendra L. 2009. The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 114–146.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Vanderpoel, Rachel Sweet. 2015. Set diagrams and qualitative research. Comparative Political Studies, 48(1), 65–100.Google Scholar
Marx, Axel, and Dusa, Adrian. 2011. Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(2), 103–148.Google Scholar
Mello, Patrick A. 2021. Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Research Design and Application. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Meuer, Johannes, and Rupietta, Christian. 2017. Integrating QCA and HLM for multi-level research on organizational configurations. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 324–342.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, Kim Sass. 2017. Negative case selection: justifications and consequences for set-theoretic MMR. Sociological Methods and Research, 46(4), 739–771.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1872. A System of Logic. 8 ed., vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, Reader.Google Scholar
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., and Aguilera, R. 2017. Embracing causal complexity: the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282.Google Scholar
Møller, Jørgen, and Skaaning, Svend Erik. 2019. Set-theoretic methods in democratization research: an evaluation of their uses and contributions. Democratization, 26(1), 78–96.Google Scholar
Oana, Ioana-Elena, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2018. SetMethods: an add-on R package for advanced QCA. The R Journal, 10(1): 507–533.Google Scholar
Oana, Ioana Elena, and Schneider, Carsten Q. n.d. A Robustness Test Protocol for Applied QCA: Theory and R Software Application. Under review.Google Scholar
Paykani, Toktam, Rafiey, Hassan, and Sajjadi, Homeira. 2018. A fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 131 countries: which configuration of the structural conditions can explain health better? International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 10.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. 8 ed., vol. 2. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2019. What did I leave out? Omitted variables in regression and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. European Political Science, 18(2), 275–290.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1994. Constructing Social Research. The Unity and Diversity of Method. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2008a. Measurement versus calibration: A set-theoretic approach. Pages 174–198 of Steffensmeier, J., Brady, Henry. E., and Collier, David (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2008b. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2008c. Qualitative Comparative Analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Pages 87–122 pf Rihoux, B., and Ragin, C. C. (eds), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, vol. 51. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C., and Becker, Howard Saul. 1992. What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C., and Davey, Sean. 2016. Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 3.0. Irvine: Department of Sociology, University of California. Available at: www.socsci.uci.edu/$\oldsim$cragin/fsQCA/software.shtml.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C., and Fiss, Peer C. 2016. Intersectional Inequality. Race, Class, Test Scores, and Poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C., and Strand, Sarah. 2008. Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to study causal order. Comment on Caren and Panofsky (2005). Sociological Methods and Research, 36(4), 431–441.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C., Shulman, David, Weinberg, Adam, and Gran, Brian. 2003. Complexity, generality, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Field Methods, 15(4), 323–340.Google Scholar
Rihoux, Benoit, Alamos, Priscilla, Bol, Damien, Marx, Axel, and Rezsohazy, Ilona. 2013. From niche to mainstream method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA applications in journal articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 175–184.Google Scholar
Rihoux, Benoît, and Ragin, Charles C. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfing, Ingo. 2015. Mind the gap: a review of simulation designs for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–4.Google Scholar
Rohlfing, Ingo. 2016. Why simulations are appropriate for evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Quality & Quantity, 50(5), 2073–208.Google Scholar
Rohlfing, Ingo, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2013. Improving research on necessary conditions: formalized case selection for process tracing after QCA. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 220–235.Google Scholar
Rohlfing, Ingo, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2018. A unifying framework for causal analysis in set-theoretic multimethod research. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 37–63.Google Scholar
Roig-Tierno, Norat, Gonzalez-Cruz, Tomas F., and Llopis-Martinez, Jordi. 2017. An overview of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23.Google Scholar
RStudio Team. 2019. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston: RStudio, Inc.Google Scholar
Rubinson, Claude. 2019. Presenting Qualitative Comparative Analysis: notation, tabular layout, and visualization. Methodological Innovations, 12(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
Rubinson, Claude, Gerrits, Lasse, Rutten, Roel, and Greckhamer, Thomas. 2019. Avoiding common errors in QCA: a short guide for new practitioners. COMPASSS Working Paper, available at https://compasss.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Common_Errors_in_QCA.pdf .Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q. 2016. Real differences and overlooked similarities. Set-methods in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 49(6), 781–792.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q. 2018. Realists and idealists in QCA. Political Analysis, 26(2), 246–254.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q. 2019. Two-step QCA revisited: the necessity of context conditions. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q. 2022. Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research: A Guide to Combining QCA and Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Under contract.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Maerz, Seraphine. 2017. Legitimation, cooptation, and repression and the survival of electoral autocracies. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 11(2), 213–235.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2013. Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(4), 559–597.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2016. Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency: formalizing case selection and causal inference. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 526–568.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2019. Set-theoretic multimethod research: the role of test corridors and conjunctions for case selection. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(3), 253–275.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2006. Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 751–786.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2010. Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2011. Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 391–408.Google Scholar
Thiem, Alrik. 2014a. Membership function sensitivity of descriptive statistics in fuzzyset relations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(6), 625–642.Google Scholar
Thiem, Alrik. 2014b. Mill’s methods, induction, and case sensitivity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis: a comment on Hug (2013). Qualitative & Multi-Method Research Newsletter, 12(2), 19–24.Google Scholar
Thiem, Alrik. 2014c. Unifying configurational comparative methods: generalized-set qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2), 313–337.Google Scholar
Thiem, Alrik, and Dusa, Adrian. 2013. QCA: a package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. R Journal, 5(1), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiem, Alrik, Spöhel, Reto, and Duşa, Adrian. 2016. Enhancing sensitivity diagnostics for Qualitative Comparative Analysis: a combinatorial approach. Political Analysis, 24(1), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomann, Eva. 2015. Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1368–1387.Google Scholar
Thomann, Eva. 2019. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as a tool for street-level bureaucracy research. Pages 370–391 of: Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Ground Floor of Government in Context. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Thomann, Eva, and Maggetti, Martino. 2020. Designing research with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 356–386.Google Scholar
Thomann, Eva, van Engen, Nadine, and Tummers, Lars. 2018. The necessity of discretion: a behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583–601.Google Scholar
Toth, Zsofia, Henneberg, Stephan C., and Naude, Peter. 2017. Addressing the ‘qualitative’ in fuzzy set qualitative Comparative analysis: the generic membership evaluation template. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 192–204.Google Scholar
Verweij, Stefan, and Trell, E.-M. 2019. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in spatial planning research and related disciplines: a systematic literature review of applications. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(3), 300–317.Google Scholar
Wagemann, Claudius, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2015. Transparency standards in qualitative comparative analysis. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 13(1), 38–42.Google Scholar
Wagemann, Claudius, Buche, Jonas, and Siewert, Markus B. 2016. QCA and business research: work in progress or a consolidated agenda? Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2531–2540.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Ioana-Elena Oana, European University Institute, Florence, Carsten Q. Schneider, Central European University, Budapest, Eva Thomann, Universität Konstanz, Germany
  • Book: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R
  • Online publication: 07 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009006781.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Ioana-Elena Oana, European University Institute, Florence, Carsten Q. Schneider, Central European University, Budapest, Eva Thomann, Universität Konstanz, Germany
  • Book: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R
  • Online publication: 07 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009006781.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Ioana-Elena Oana, European University Institute, Florence, Carsten Q. Schneider, Central European University, Budapest, Eva Thomann, Universität Konstanz, Germany
  • Book: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R
  • Online publication: 07 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009006781.015
Available formats
×