Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:05:23.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Thomas Hoffmann
Thomas Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Universität Osnabrück
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Preposition Placement in English
A Usage-based Approach
 , pp. 280 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, Bas. 2000. Corpus linguistics, Chomsky and Fuzzy Tree Fragments. In: Mair, Christian and Hundt, Marianne, eds. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, 5–13.Google Scholar
Aarts, Bas, Denison, David, Keizer, Evelien and Popova, Gergana, eds. 2004. Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aarts, Jan. 1991. Intuition-based and observation-based grammars. In: Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt, eds. English Corpus Linguistics. London/New York: Longman, 44–62.Google Scholar
Abdulaziz, Mohamed H. 1991. East Africa (Tanzania and Kenya). In: Cheshire, , ed. 1991: 391–401.CrossRef
Aitchison, Jean. 1991. Language Change: Progress or Decay? 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1980. Movement and deletion in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 261–323.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul D. 2008. Convergence failures in logistic regression. In: SAS Institute Inc. 2008. Proceedings of the SAS® Global Forum 2008 Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2008/360–2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Alston, R. C. 1965. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol. I. Leeds: Arnold and Son.Google Scholar
Appleby, Lee L. 1961. A First Luyia Grammar. Nairobi: The East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Ash, John. 1760. Grammatical Institutes: Or, An Easy Introduction to Dr. Lowth's English Grammar, Designed For The Use Of Schools. Worcester. 4th edn. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1967): English Linguistics 9. Leeds: The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Variation: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1986. Where English cannot put a preposition before a relative or interrogative pronoun. In: Leitner, Gerhard, ed. The English Reference Grammar: Language and Linguistics, Writers and Readers. (Linguistische Arbeiten 172.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 156–77.Google Scholar
Ball, Catherine N. 1996. A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change 8: 227–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Robertson, Dan and Sorace, Antonella. 1996. Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language 72: 32–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 1987. Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning 37: 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds. 2000. Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Barrett-Keach, Camillia. 1985. The Syntax and Interpretation of the Relative Clause Construction in Swahili. New York/London: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Bates, Elisabeth and MacWhinney, Brian. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In: Bates, Elisabeth and MacWhinney, Brian, eds. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–73.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert and Preston, Dennis R., eds. 1996. Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRef
Bengtsson, Per. 1996. Prepositional relatives in English: A diachronic case study of three authors. Unpublished paper. Department of English, Göteborg University.
Bentley, Muriel and Sherwood, Adrian. 1964. English for Modern Africa. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Bergh, Gunnar and Seppänen, Aimo. 2000. Preposition stranding with Wh-relatives: A historical survey. English Language and Linguistics 4: 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variations across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bock, J. Kathryn. 1987. Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In: Ellis, Andrew, ed. Progress in the Psychology of Language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 337–90.Google Scholar
Bock, J. Kathryn. 1990. Structure in language: Creating form in talk. American Psychologist 45: 1221–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borsley, Robert D. 2004. An approach to English comparative correlatives. In: Müller, Stefan, ed. Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference. Stanford, CA CSLI Publications. csli-publications.stanford.edu.Google Scholar
Bortz, Jürgen. 2005. Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. 6th edn. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bortz, Jürgen, Lienert, Gustav and Boehnke, Klaus. 1990. Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauner, Siegmund and Bantu, Joseph K.. 1967. Lehrbuch des Swahili. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig.Google Scholar
Broccias, Christiano. 2006. Cognitive approaches to grammar. In: Kristiansen, Gitte, Achard, Michel, Dirven, René and Ibáñez, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza, eds. Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 80–115.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim. 1991. Syntax: A Linguistic Introduction to Sentence Structure. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina and Njeng´ere, David. 2004. Head Start Secondary English: Form 3. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina and Njeng´ere, David. 2005. Head Start Secondary English: Form 4. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina, Njeng´ere, David and Mutei, Virginia. 2003a. Head Start Secondary English: Form 1. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina, Njeng´ere, David and Njue, Jane. 2003b. Head Start Secondary English: Form 2. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W. 1996. The New Fowler's Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bury, Dirk. 2003. Phrase structure and derived heads. Ph.D. thesis, University College London. www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dirk/PS derivedheads.pdf.
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow, and Kemmer, , eds. 2000: 65–85.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82: 711–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul, eds. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRef
Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. Constructions SV1–7. www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/683/Cappelle_ Particle_Placement.pdf.
Casenhiser, Devin and Goldberg, Adele E.. 2005. Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8: 500–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalker, Sylvia and Weiner, Edmund. 1994. The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, ed. 1991. English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1961. Some methodological remarks on generative grammar. Word 17: 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. (Studies in Generative Grammar 9.) Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publication.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan, eds. 2000. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In: Kenstowicz, Michael, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. Comprehensive Topical English. 2006. KCPE Revision Book with Reminder Notes and Reasoned Answers. 1990–2005. Standard 5–8. Nairobi: High Flyer Services.
Cook, Vivian and Newson, Mark. 1996. Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Crawley, Michael J. 2005. Statistics: An Introduction UsingR. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William and Alan Cruse, D.. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, William D. and Dubinsky, Stanley. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, Paul D. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1990. Preposition stranding and relative complementizer deletion: Implicational tendencies in English and other Germanic languages. In: Adamson, Sylvia, Low, Vivian, Vincent, Nigel and Wright, Susan. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 87–109.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Sprouse, Rex A. and Anderson, Bruce. 1998. Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: Binding construals, null prepositions and Universal Grammar. Second Language Research 14: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 1985. Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 3: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
,Department of Education and Science. 1989. English for Ages 5 to 16. (‘The Cox Report’.) London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Komplexe Konstruktionen im Erstspracherwerb. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 39–54.
Diessel, Holger and Tomasello, Michael. 2000. The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 131–51.Google Scholar
Donohew, Grace. 1962. A First Course in Luyia Grammar. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Downing, Bruce T. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure. In: Greenberg, Joseph H., ed. Universals of Human Language. Vol. IV: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 375–418.Google Scholar
Eckman, Fred. R. 2004. Universals, innateness and explanation in second language acquisition. Studies in Language 28: 682–793.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2003. Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In: Doughty, Catherine J. and Long, Michael H., eds. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1995. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. 10th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1998. Second Language Acquisition. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Featherston, Sam. 2004. Bridge verbs and V2 verbs – the same thing in spades?Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 23: 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherston, Sam. 2005. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Some wh-constraints in German. Lingua 115: 1525–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Andy. 2003. Repeated Measures ANOVA. www.statisticshell.com/repeatedmeasures.pdf.
Field, Andy. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. The case for case reopened. In: Cole, Peter and Sadock, Jerrold M., eds. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. VIII: Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press, 59–81.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1999. Inversion and constructional inheritance. In: Webelhuth, König and Kathol, , eds. 1999: 113–28.
Fillmore, Charles J and Kay, Paul. 1996. Construction Grammar. Unpublished Ms. University of California at Berkeley Department of Linguistics.
Filppula, Markku. 2004. Irish English: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 73–101.
Fischer, Kerstin and Stefanowitsch, Anatol, eds. 2006. Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In: Blake, Norman, ed. 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. II: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207–408.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem and Wurff, Wim. 2000. The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Ann. 1750. A New Grammar: Being the Most Easy Guide to Speaking and Writing the English Language Properly and Correctly. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1968): English Linguistics 130. Menston:The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg. 2002. Preposition stranding in German dialects. In: Sief, Barbiers, Cornips, Leonie and Kleij, Susanne, eds. Syntactic Microvariation. www.meertens.knaw.nl/books/synmic/pdf/fleischer.Google Scholar
Fowler, Henry W. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Daniel H., Jr. 1987. Applied Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2003. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 1. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar
Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2004a. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 2. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar
Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2004b. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 3. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar
Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2005. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 4. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle and Gries, Stefan Th.. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan and Sag, Ivan A.. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7: 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalisation in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1994. Einführung ins Frühneuenglische. 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 1998. The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In: Granger, Sylviane, ed. Learner English on Computer. London: Longman, 3–18.Google Scholar
Gravetter, Frederick J. and Wallnau, Larry B.. 1992. Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences: A First Course for Students of Psychology and Education. 3rd edn. New York et al: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grewendorf, Günther. 2002. Minimalistische Syntax. Tübingen/Basle: A. Franke Verlag.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2002. Preposition stranding in English: Predicting speakers' behaviour. In: Samiian, Vida, ed. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics. Vol. XII. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University, 230–41.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2004a. Coll.analysis 3. A Program for R for Windows 2.x. people.freenet.de/Stefan_Th_Gries.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2004b. HCFA 3.2 – A Program for Hierarchical Configural Frequency Analysis for R for Windows. people.freenet.de/Stefan_Th_Gries.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2008. Statistik für Sprachwissenschaftler. (Studienbuch zur Linguistik 13.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., Hampe, Beate and Schönefeld, Doris. 2005. Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16: 635–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. and Bayley, Robert. 1995. On the choice of relative pronouns in English. American Speech 70: 148–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberzettl, Stefanie. 2006. Konstruktionen im Zweitspracherwerb. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 55–77.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1988. On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In: Benson, James, Cummings, Michael J. and Greaves, William S., eds. Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 27–51.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Robert. 1994. Sum: Null-prep and piping. Posting on the Linguist List, 28.06.1994. www.umich.edu/~archive/linguistics/linguist.list/volume.5/no.751–800.
Hancock, Ian F. and Angogo, Rachel. 1982. English in East Africa. In: Bailey, Richard W. and Görlach, Manfred. English as a World Language. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 298: 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75: 245–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Roger. 2001. Second Language Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer B. and Baayen, R. H.. 2005. Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 342–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernd, Heine. 1982. Boni Dialects. (Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya 10.) Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Möhlig, William J. G.. 1980. Geographical and Historical Introduction: Language and Society. (Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya 1.) Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich. 1995. Preposition stranding and resumptivity in West Germanic. In: Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten, eds. Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 95–118.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2003. Preposition stranding vs pied-piping in British English relative clauses: A corpus-based study. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Regensburg.
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2005. Variable vs categorical effects: Preposition pied piping and stranding in British English relative clauses. Journal of English Linguistics 33: 257–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2006. Corpora and introspection as corroborating evidence: The case of preposition placement in English relative clauses. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2: 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2007a. ‘Good is good and bad is bad’: But how do we know which one we had?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3: 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2007b. ‘I need data which I can rely on’: Corroborating empirical evidence on preposition placement in English relative clauses. In: Featherston, Sam and Sternefeld, Wolfgang, eds. Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 161–83.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2008. English relative clauses and Construction Grammar: A topic which preposition placement can shed light on? In: Trousdale, Graeme and Gisborne, Nicolas, eds. Constructional Explanations in English Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–112.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert and Weinberg, Amy. 1981. Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 55–91.Google Scholar
Hosmer, David W. and Lemeshow, Stanley. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002a. The clause: Complements. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 213–321.
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002b. Clause type and illocutionary force. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 851–946.CrossRef
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002c. Non-finite and verbless clauses. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 1171–272.CrossRef
Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., eds. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Peterson, Peter. 2002. Relative constructions and unbound dependencies. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 1031–96.
Hudson, Richard A. 1996. Sociolinguistics. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson-Ettle, , Diana, M. and Schmied, Josef. 1999. Manual to accompany the East African Component of the International Corpus of English. Unpublished Ms. Chemnitz University of Technology.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Christine and Geisler, Christer. 1998. Pied piping in spoken English. In: Renouf, Antoinette, ed. Explorations in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 67–82.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E. 2009a. Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E. 2009b. RBRUL MANUAL. www.ling.upenn.edu/~johnson4/Rbrul_manual.html.
Johnson, Keith. 2008. Quantitative Methods in Linguistics. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kanyoro, Musimbi R. A. 1991. The politics of the English language in Kenya and Tanzania. In: Cheshire, , ed. 1991: 402–17.CrossRef
Kao, Rong-Rong. 2001. Where have the prepositions gone? A study of English prepositional verbs and input enhancement in instructed SLA. IRAL 39: 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul and Fillmore, Charles J.. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalisations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language 75: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Frank, Corley, Martin, Corley, Steffan, Konienczny, Lars and Todirascu, Amalia. 1998. WebExp: A Java toolbox for web-based psychological experiments. Technical Report HCRC/TR-99, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.
Keller, Frank and Alexopoulou, Theodora. 2005. A crosslinguistic, experimental study of resumptive pronouns and that-trace effects. In: Bara, Bruno G., Barsalou, Lawrence and Bucciarelli, Monica, eds. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1120–5. www.cogsci.rpi.edu/CSJarchive/Proceedings/2005/docs/p1120.pdf.Google Scholar
Keller, Frank. 2000. Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Kempen, Gerard and Harbusch, Karin. 2005. The relationship between grammaticality ratings and corpus frequencies: A case study into word order variability in the midfield of German clauses. In: Kepser, and Reis, , eds. 2005. 327–47.CrossRef
Kepser, Stephan and Reis, Marga, eds. 2005. Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kioko, Angelina Nduku and Muthwii, Margaret Jepkirui. 2004. English variety for the public domain in Kenya: Speaker's attitudes and views. In: Muthwii, Margaret Jepkirui and Kioko, Angelina Nduku, eds. New Language Bearings in Africa: A Fresh Quest. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd., 34–58.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 1988. ‘What a night on which to die’: On symmetry in English relative clauses. English Studies 6: 559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Elaine C. 2001. (Mis)constructing null prepositions in L2 intergrammars: A commentary and a proposal. Second Language Research 17: 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, Paul. 1993. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kluender, Robert. 1990. A neurophysiological investigation of Wh-Islands. In: Hall, Kiraet al., eds. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 187–204.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard and Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. On the reanalysis of verbs as prepositions. In: Rauh, Gisa, ed. Approaches to Prepositions. (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 358.) Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 109–25.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, Schneider, Edgar W. and Upton, Clive, eds. 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. II: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Swahili. In: Jacobs, Joachim, Stechow, Arnim, Strenefeld, Wolfgang and Vennemann, Theo, eds. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Vol. II. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1397–418.Google Scholar
Kubota, Yusuke. 2003. Yet another HPSG-analysis for free relative clauses in German. In: Kim, Jong-Bok and Wechsler, Stephan, eds. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 147–67.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New YorkCity. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meaning. In: Bailey, Charles-James and Shuy, Roger W., eds. New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 340–73.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1975. Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In: Austerlitz, Robert P., ed. The Scope of American Linguistics: Papers of the first Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America, Held at the University of Massachussets, Amherst on July 24 and 25, 1974. Lisse: Peter de Ridder, 77–133.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2005. Construction Grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In: Ibánez, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza and Cervel, M. Sandra Pena, eds. Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 101–59.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1988. Implicit arguments in situation semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaky, Louis S. B. 1959. First Lessons in Kikuyu. Dar es Salaam: Eagle Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1992. Corpus and theories of linguistic performance. In: Svartvik, Jan, ed. Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 105–22.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1996. An A-Z of English Grammar and Usage. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1998. Preface. In: Granger, Sylviane, ed. Learner English on Computer. London: Longman, xiv–xx.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2007. New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In: Hundt, Marianne, Nesselhauf, Nadja and Biewer, Carolin, eds. Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 133–49.Google Scholar
Leisi, Ernst. 1985. Das heutige Englisch: Wesenszüge und Probleme. 7th edn. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Lieven, Elena, Behrens, Heike, Speares, Jennifer and Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Early syntactic creativity: A usage based approach. Journal of Child Language 30: 333–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemnitzer, Lothar and Zinsmeister, Heike. 2006. Korpuslinguistik: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. 2nd edn. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1967): English Linguistics 18. Menston: The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar
Lu, Bingfu. 2002. How does language encode performance limitation into its structure. www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~whu/China/chunk.doc.
Mackey, Alison. 2006. Second language acquisition. In: Ralph W. Fasold and Jeff Connor-Linton, eds. An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433–63.Google Scholar
Maindonald, John and Braun, John. 2003. Data Analysis and Graphics Using R: An Example-based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazurkewich, Irene. 1985. Syntactic Markedness and language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbaabu, Ireri. 1996. Language Policy in East Africa: A Dependency Theory Perspective. Nairobi: Educational Research Publications.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Dana and Cowart, Wayne. 1999. Experimental evidence for a Minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition 70: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDaniel, Dana, McKee, Cecile and Bernstein, Judy B.. 1998. How children's relatives solve a problem for Minimalism. Language 74: 308–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Wilson, Andrew. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McKercher, David A. 1996. On the syntax and semantics of English adverbials. M.A. thesis, University of Victoria. individual.utoronto.ca/McKercher-MA-thesis.pdf.
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2004. Black South African English: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 962–73.
Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M.. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2004. Scottish English: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 47–72.
Milroy, Lesley and Gordon, Matthew. 2003. Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 1971. Effective English: Teacher's Book 2. London: Evans Brothers.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2004. Gullah: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 356–73.
Müller, Stefan. 1999. An HPSG-Analysis for free relative clauses in German. Grammars 2: 53–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Stefan. 2006. Resultativkonstruktionen, Partikelverben und syntaktische vs lexikonbasierte Konstruktionen. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 176–202.
Murray, Lindley. 1795. English Grammar: Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1968): English Linguistics 106. Menston. The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar
Musau, Paul M. 2004. Linguistic human rights in Africa: Challenges and prospects for indigenous languages in Kenya. In: Muthwii, Margaret Jepkirui and Kioko, Angelina Nduku, eds. New Language Bearings in Africa: A Fresh Quest. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd., 59–68.Google Scholar
Mwangi, Serah. 2004. Preposition vanishing in Kenya: A case of syntactic simplification in a variety of East African English. English Today 77: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean and Aarts, Bas. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, Arne. 1981. Relative Junctions in Written American English. Göteborg: ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Omondi, Lucia Ndong'a. 1982. The Major Syntactic Structures of Dholuo. (Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya Supplement 1.) Berlin: Dietrich Riemer Verlag.Google Scholar
Palmer, Harold E. 1974. The Teaching of Oral English. 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Paolillo, John C. 2002. Analyzing Linguistic Variation: Statistical Models and Methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Tom, Philips, Matt and Gourlay, Will. 2006. Lonely Planet: Kenya. 6th edn. London: Lonely Planet Publication Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L. 2004. Jamaican Creole: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 407–38.
Payne, John and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 323–524.CrossRef
Penke, Martina and Rosenbach, Anette. 2004. What counts as evidence in linguistics? An introduction. Studies in Language 28: 480–526.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1998. Some Optimality principles of sentence production. In: Barbosa, Pilaret al., eds. Is the best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 337–83.Google Scholar
Philp, A. M. 2001. English grammar in British schools. In: Mesthrie, Rajend, ed. Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 723–35.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In: Bybee, and Hopper, , eds. 2001: 137–57.CrossRef
Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan A.. 1987. Information-based Syntax and Semantics. Vol. I: Fundamentals. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Variationist perspectives on second language acquisition. In: Bayley, and Preston, , eds. 1996: 1–45.CrossRef
Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Scholz, Barbara C.. 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Prepositions and prepositional phrases. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 597–661.
Quirk, Randolph. 1957. Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies 38: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Team, R Development Core. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational Syntax: A Student's Guide to Chomsky's Extended Standard Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, Eric. 1969. Constructing Sentences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.Google Scholar
Rezai, Mohammad Javad. 2006. Preposition stranding and pied piping in second language acquisition. Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics 8. www.sx.ac.uk/linguistics/pgr/egspll/volume8/PDFs/M.%20Javad%20Rezai.pdf.Google Scholar
Robinson, John S., Lawrence, Helen. R. and Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2001. GOLDVARB 2001: A multivariate analysis application for Windows. www.york.ac.uk/depts/lang/webstuff/goldvarb.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, Eleanor and Loyd, Barbara B., eds. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 27–48.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1986. Infinite Syntax!Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E., McClelland, James L. and the PDP research group. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sadighi, F., Parhizgar, M. R. and Saadat, M.. 2004. Preposition pied-piping and preposition stranding constructions in the interlanguage of Iranian EFL learners. Asian EFL Online Journal 6: Article 3. www.asian-efl-journal.com.Google Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R. 2001. The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 44: 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R. 2002. Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 47: 172–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sag, Ivan A. 1997. English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics 33: 431–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sag, Ivan A. 2007. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. An informal synopsis. Unpublished Ms. lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/theo-syno.pdf.
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2001. Empirical Linguistics. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef. 1991a. Relative constructions in British and Indian English. Post-doctoral diss., University of Bayreuth.
Schmied, Josef. 1991b. English in Africa: An Introduction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef. 1996. Second-language corpora. In Greenbaum, , ed. 1996: 182–96.
Schmied, Josef. 2004a. East African English phonology. In: Kortmann, Bernd, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, Schneider, Edgar W. and Upton, Clive, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. I: Phonology. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 918–30.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef. 2004b. East African English (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania): Morphology and Syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 929–47.
Schneider, Edgar W. 1992. Who(m)? Constraints on the loss of case marking of wh-pronouns in the English of Shakespeare and other poets of the Early Modern English period. In: Rissanen, Matti, Ihalainen, Ossi, Nevalainen, Terttu and Taavitsainen, Irma, eds. History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Peter Lang, 437–52.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonical English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert J. 1997. Choosing your relatives: Relative clauses in New Zealand English. Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Sigley, Robert J. 2003. The importance of interaction effects. Language Variation and Change 15: 227–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skandera, Paul. 2003. Drawing a Map of Africa: Idiom in Kenyan English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella and Keller, Frank. 2005. Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115: 1497–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Gries, Stefan Th.. 2005. Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D. and Sciarini, Natalia V.. 2006. An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sundby, Bertil, Bjørge, Anne Kari and Haugland, Kari E.. 1991. A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Review of Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie eds. 2003. Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2: 79–94.Google Scholar
Taylor, John. 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2006. Eighteenth-century Prescriptivism and the Norms of Correctness. In: Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou, eds. The Handbook of the History of English. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 539–57.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2006. Konstruktionsgrammatik und Erstspracherwerb. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 19–37.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1992. Syntax. In: Hogg, Richard M., ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–289.Google Scholar
Trotta, Joe. 2000. Wh-clauses in English: Aspects of Theory and Description. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1995. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tseng, Jesse. 2006. English prepositional passives in HPSG. In: Winter, Shuly, ed. Proceedings of the FG-2006 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 171–183. csli-publications.stanford.edu.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich, Meier, Gerhard E. H., Schäfer, Klaus and Lechler, Shirley B.. 1996. A Grammar of Present-Day English. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan. 1985. Relative that – a centennial dispute. Journal of Linguistics 21: 149–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eynden, Nadine. 1996. Aspects of prepositional placement in English. In: Klemola, Juhani, Kytö, Merja and Rissanen, Matti, eds. Speech Past and Present: Studies in English Dialectology in Memory of Ossi Ihalainen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 426–46.Google Scholar
Eynde, F. 2004. Pied Piping is a local dependency. In: Müller, Stefan, ed. Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. csli-publications.stanford.edu.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk. 2000. Free relatives. Syncom: Case 44. faculty.washington.edu/bcitko/LING580/van Riemsdijk_syncom.pdf.
Visser, F. Th. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Vol I: Syntactical Units with one Verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vitale, Anthony J. 1981. Swahili Syntax. Dordrecht/NL, Cinnaminson/USA: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, Birner, Betty and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Information packaging. In: Huddleston and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 1363–448.CrossRef
Webelhuth, Gert, König, Jean-Pierre and Kathol, Andreas, eds. 1999. Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Weiner, Edmund S. C. 1983. The Oxford Guide to English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weiß, Helmut. 2001. On two types of natural languages: Some consequences for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 27: 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitely, Wilfred H. and Muli, M. G.. 1962. Practical Introduction to Kamba. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcock, Graham. 1999. Lexicalization of context. In: Webelhuth, König and Kathol, , eds. 1999: 373–87.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Gertrude, E. M.Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woods, Anthony, Fletcher, Paul and Hughes, Arthur. 1986. Statistics in Language Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2004. Preposition stranding in Early Modern English: A corpus-based approach. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL), University of Vienna, Austria. 23–27 August.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2006. Prescriptivism and preposition stranding in eighteenth-century prose. Historical-Socio-Linguistics/Socio-Historical-Linguistics 6. www.let.leidenuni.nl/hsl_shl/preposition%20stranding.htm.
Young, Richard and Bayley, Robert. 1996. VABRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In: Bayley, and Preston, , eds. 1996: 253–306.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Thomas Hoffmann, Universität Osnabrück
  • Book: Preposition Placement in English
  • Online publication: 04 February 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933868.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Thomas Hoffmann, Universität Osnabrück
  • Book: Preposition Placement in English
  • Online publication: 04 February 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933868.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Thomas Hoffmann, Universität Osnabrück
  • Book: Preposition Placement in English
  • Online publication: 04 February 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933868.009
Available formats
×