Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:47:50.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - The Normative Influence of Ratings and Rankings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2020

Judith G. Kelley
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Beth A. Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Barder, Owen. 2016. Aid Transparency: Are We Nearly There? Center for Global Development, April 13, 2016. Available at www.cgdev.org/blog/aid-transparency-are-we-nearly-there.Google Scholar
Bent, Rodney. 2015. A Sad State of Affairs: Is Transparency a Solution? Publish What You Fund blog, September 23. Available at http://www.publishwhatyoufund.org/updates/by-country/us/state-transparency-solution/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Bisbee, James H., Hollyer, James R, Peter Rosendorff, B, and Raymond Vreeland, James. this volume. The Millennium Development Goals and Education: Accountability and Substitution in Global Indicators. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhushan, Aniket, and Bond, Rebekka. 2013. Open Data, Transparency and International Development. Summary Report for the North-South Institute, November. Available at http://www.nsi-ins.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/2013-Open-Data-Summary-Report.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Buntaine, Mark T. 2016. Giving Aid Effectively. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, and Brechenmacher, Saskia. 2014. Accountability, Transparency, Participation and Inclusion: A New Development Consensus? Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at http://carnegieendowment.org/files/new_development_consensus.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Clare, Ali, Verhulst, Stefaan, and Young, Andrew. 2016. OpenAid in Sweden: Enhanced Transparency and Accountability in Development Cooperation. Report for the GovLab, in collaboration with the Omidyar Network. Available at http://odimpact.org/case-openaid-in-sweden.html. Accessed February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Collin, Matt, Zubairi, Asma, Nielson, Daniel and Barder, Owen. 2009. The Costs and Benefits of Aid Transparency: A Draft Analytical Framework. Avalable at https://iatistandard.org/documents/482/1140-100407-Framework-for-Costs-and-Benefits-of-transparency-with-Annexes.pdf.Google Scholar
Darby, Sefton. 2010. Natural Resource Governance: New Frontiers in Transparency and Accountability. London, UK: Transparency and Accountability Initiative, Open Society Foundation. Available at http://www.transparency-initiative.org/uncategorized/613/natural-resource-governance-new-frontiers-in-transparency-and-accountability/.Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Doshi, Rush, Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Best A.. 2019. The Power of Ranking: The Ease of Doing Business Indicator as a form of Social Pressure. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Susan. 2014. The Not-So-Great Aid Debate. Third World Quarterly 35 (8):1374–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Sauder, Michael. 2007. Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113 (1):1–40.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 2007. The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Friends of Publish What You Fund. 2016. How Can Data Revolutionize Development? Putting Data at the Center of US Global Development: An Assessment of US Foreign Aid Transparency. Available at http://media.wix.com/ugd/9a0ffd_2ce18150803b48989905acabf9bb91d6.pdf.Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Gaventa, John, and McGee, Rosemary. 2013. The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives. Development Policy Review 31 (S1):S3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Hannah. 2012. Raising the Bar on Transparency, Accountability and Openness. World Bank’s Inside the Web. (Blog.) February 16. Available at http://blogs.worldbank.org/insidetheweb/raising-the-bar-on-transparency-accountability-and-openness. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2002. Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (6):873–93.Google Scholar
Gulrajani, Nilima. 2011. Transcending the Great Foreign Aid Debate: Managerialism, Radicalism and the Search for Aid Effectiveness. Third World Quarterly 32 (2):199–216.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Joni. 2015. USAID’s Strategic Approach to Improving IATI Compliance. August 13. Available at http://www.aidtransparency.net/news/usaids-strategic-approach-to-improving-iati-compliance. Accessed February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Xu, Yiqing. 2019. How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice. Political Analysis (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hanlon, Joseph, Barrientos, Armando, and Hulme, David. 2010. Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Heather, and Marschner, Catherine. Millennium Challenge Corporation: Principles into Practice. Washington, DC: Millennium Challenge Corporation. Available at https://assets.mcc.gov/content/uploads/2017/05/paper-2015001163301-principles-transparency.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., eds. 2006. Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations and Principal-Agent Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrling, Sheila. 2015. The Business Proposition of Open Aid Data: Why Every US Agency Should Default to Transparency. Publish What You Fund (blog). Available at http://www.publishwhatyoufund.org/updates/by-country/us/business-proposition-open-aid-data-why-every-u-s-agency-should-default-transparency/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2011. Democracy and Transparency. Journal of Politics 73 (4):1191–205.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2014. Measuring Transparency. Political Analysis 22 (4):413–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2015. Transparency, Protest, and Autocratic Instability. American Political Science Review 109 (4):764–84.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2018a. Information, Democracy, and Autocracy: Economic Transparency and Political (In)Stability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2018b. Transparency, Protest and Democratic Stability. British Journal of Political Science 1–27.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan. 2018. Navigation by Judgment: Why and When Top-Down Control of Foreign Aid Doesn’t Work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan. 2019. When Reporting Undermines Performance: The Costs of Politically Constrained Autonomy in Foreign Aid Implementation. International Organization 73 (1):171–201.Google Scholar
Ingram, George. 2015. Making Aid Transparency a Reality. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2015/02/11/making-aid-transparency-a-reality/. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2014. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):55–70.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2019. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2017. Scorecard Diplomacy: Grading States to Influence Their Reputation and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie and Lipscy, Phillip. 2019. The Politics of International Testing. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koeberle, Stefan. 2016. The World Bank Is Again in the Top Ten of the Aid Transparency Index. The World Bank Data Blog. March 3. Available at https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/world-bank-again-top0-aid-transparency-index.Google Scholar
Koliev, Faradj, Sommerer, Thomas, and Tallberg, Jonas. 2019. Reporting Matters: Performance Assessment and Compliance in the ILO. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Sung. 2016. The Data Revolution That’s Reshaping American Foreign Assistance. US Global Leadership Coalition. (Blog). May 11. Available at http://www.usglc.org/blog/the-data-revolution-thats-reshaping-american-foreign-assistance/.Google Scholar
Marks, Joseph. 2012. USAID Plans to Map All Its Spending Data in Some Countries. January 19. Available at http://www.nextgov.com/technology-news/2012/01/usaid-plans-to-map-all-its-spending-data-in-some-countries/50481/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia. 2019. Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing. International Organization 73 (3).Google Scholar
Mulley, Sarah. 2010. Donor Aid: New Frontiers in Transparency and Accountability. Transparency and Accountability Initiative. Available at http://www.transparency-initiative.org/archive/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/donor_aid_final1.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Nelson, Paul J. 2001. Transparency Mechanisms at the Multilateral Development Banks. World Development 29 (11):1835–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2009. Transparency and Open Government. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2009/m09-12.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Orszag, Peter. 2009. Open Government Directive. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at https://www.treasury.gov/open/Documents/m10-06.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. 2009. Briefing Paper 1: Why Aid Transparency Matters, and the Global Movement for Aid Transparency.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. (2011–2016). Aid Transparency Indices: 2011–2016. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. 2015a. 2015 EU Aid Transparency Review. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. 2015b. 2015 US Aid Transparency Review. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. Annual Reports of the Aid Transparency Index, 2011–2017. London: Publish What You Fund. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. Publish What You Fund Annual Report 2017. London: Publish What You Fund. Available at https://www.publishwhatyoufund.org/download/11964/. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jordan and Tellez, Juan. 2019. Freedom House’s Scarlet Letter: Assessment Power Through Transnational Pressure. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saunder, Michael, and Espeland, Wendy Nelson. 2009. The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review 74 (1):63–82.Google Scholar
Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 2013. Full Committee Hearing: Nomination. November 19. Available at https://www.foreign.senate.gov/hearings/2013/11/19/nomination. Accessed February 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Skagerlind, Helena Hede. 2019. Power in Global Development Policy: The Millennium Development Goals. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thier, Alex, and Crumbly, Angelique. 2015. It’s Clear: Transparency Works. USAID Blogs, July 2. Available at https://blog.usaid.gov/2015/07/its-clear-transparency-works/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
United Kingdom Department for International Development. 2015. Key Topics in Transparency. Memo of the International Development Sector Transparency Panel, 5 March. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/attachment_data/file/441699/Key_topics_in_transparency_-_Paper_5_March_2015.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2018.Google Scholar
United States Agency for International Development. 2015. International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) Cost Management Plan. Washington, DC: USAID. Available at https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1870/IATI%20Cost%20Management%20Plan_u_14July2015.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Weaver, Catherine, and Peratsakis, Christian. 2014. Engineering Policy Norm Implementation: The World Bank’s Transparency Transformation. In Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice, edited by Betts, Alexander and Orchard, Phil, eds., 179–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Abdul-Hamid, Husein, Abu-Lebdeh, Khattab M., and Patrinos, Harry A.. 2011. Assessment Testing Can Be Used to Inform Policy Decisions: The Case of Jordan. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 5890, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Addey, Camilla. 2015. Participating in International Literacy Assessments in Lao PDR and Mongolia: A Global Ritual of Belonging. In Literacy as Numbers: Researching the Politics and Practices of International Literacy Assessment, edited by Hamilton, Mary, Maddox, Bryan and Addey, Camilla, 147–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Angrist, Noam, Patrinos, Harry A., and Schlotter, Martin. 2013. An Expansion of a Global Data Set on Educational Quality: A Focus on Achievement in Developing Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (6536).Google Scholar
Benhassine, Najy, Devoto, Florencia, Duflo, Esther, Dupas, Pascaline, and Pouliquen, Victor. 2013. Turning a Shove into a Nudge? A “Labeled Cash Transfer” for Education. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Luis. 1999. The Politics of Student Testing: A Comparative Analysis of National Assessment Systems in Southern Cone Countries. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bisbee, James H., Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2017. The Millennium Development Goals and Education: Accountability and Substitution in Global Assessment.Google Scholar
Boulding, Carew. 2014. NGOs, Political Protest, and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braga, Michela, Checchi, Daniele, and Meschi, Elena. 2013. Educational Policies in a Long-Run Perspective. Economic Policy 28 (73):45–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breakspear, Simon. 2012. The Policy Impact of PISA. OECD Education Working Papers. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/5k9fdfqffr28-en. Accessed April 14, 2017.Google Scholar
Carnoy, Martin. 2014. Globalization, Educational Change, and the National State. In Globalization and Education: Integration and Contestation Across Cultures, edited by Stromquist, Nelly P. and Monkman, Karen, 21–38, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2014.Google Scholar
Chabbott, Colette. 2003. Constructing Educational Development: International Development Organizations and the World Conference on Education for All. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duflo, Esther, Hanna, Rema, and Ryan, Stephen P.. 2012. Incentives Work: Getting Teachers to Come to School. The American Economic Review 102 (4):1241–78.Google Scholar
Greaney, Vincent, and Kellaghan, Thomas. 2008. Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education. Vol. 1. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Grek, Sotiria. 2009. Governing by Numbers: The PISA “Effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy 24 (1):23–37.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Kimko, Dennis D.. 2000. Schooling, Labor-Force Quality, and the Growth of Nations. American Economic Review 90 (5):1184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Woessmann, Ludger. 2008. The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature 46 (3):607–68.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Woessmann, Ludger. 2012. Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Causation. Journal of Economic Growth 17 (4):267–321.Google Scholar
Henry, Miriam, Lingard, Bob, Rizvi, Fazal, and Taylor, Sandra. 2001. The OECD, Globalisation and Education Policy. Published for IAU Press, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan. 2016. Seeing is Believing: The Normative Drivers of Agency Response to the Aid Transparency Index. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Husén, Torsten. 1979. An International Research Venture in Retrospect: The IEA Surveys. Comparative Education Review 23 (3):371–85.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jennifer L., and Bearak, Jonathan Marc. 2014. “Teaching to the Test” in the NCLB Era How Test Predictability Affects Our Understanding of Student Performance. Educational Researcher:0013189X14554449.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, Phillips, Brian, and Alley, Joshua. 2016. One Man’s Terrorist: When Does Blacklisting Reduce Terrorism? Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kamens, David H., and McNeely, Connie L.. 2010. Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review 54 (1):5–25.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Vol. 35. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Beth, A. Simmons. this volume. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. Chapter 1 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., Simmons, Beth A, and Doshi, Rush. 2016. The Power of Ranking: The East of Doing Business Indicator as a Form of Social Pressure. This Volume.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie. 2010. Why Participate? Cross-National Assessments and Foreign Aid to Education. In The Impact of International Achievement Studies on National Education Policymaking, 13: Vol. 13. International Perspectives on Education and Society Series. Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie. 2013. The Politics of Cross-National Assessments: Global Trends and National Interests. Stanford University, Ph. D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie, and Leer, Jane. 2016. Legitimacy, State-building, and Contestation in Education Policy Development: Chile’s Involvement in Cross-national Assessments. In The Global Testing Culture: Shaping Education Policy, Perceptions, and Practice, edited by Smith, William, 43–62. Oxford: Symposium Book.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie, and Lipscy, Phillip. 2018. The Politics of International Testing. Stanford University, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Koliev, Faradj, Sommerer, Thomas, and Tallberg, Jonas. 2019. Reporting Matters: Performance Assessment and Compliance in the ILO.The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koretz, Daniel M. 2009. Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael, Brannen, Conner, and Glennerster, Rachel. 2013. The Challenge of Education and Learning in the Developing World. Science 340 (6130):297–300.Google Scholar
Ladd, Helen F. 2002. School Vouchers: A Critical View. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4):3–24.Google Scholar
Le, Anh, and Malesky, Edmund. 2016. Do Subnational Governance Indices Lead to Improved Governance? Evidence from Field Experiment in Vietnam. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lee, Melissa M., and Matanock, Aila M.. this volume. Third Party Policymakers and the Limits of the Influence of Indicators. Chapter 11 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Lockheed, Marlaine. 2012. Policies, Performance and Panaceas: The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments in Developing Countries. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 42 (3):512–18.Google Scholar
Loveless, Tom. 2012. Misinterpreting International Test Scores: In 2012 Brown Center Report on American Education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Martens, Kerstin, and Niemann, Dennis. 2013. When Do Numbers Count? The Differential Impact of the PISA Rating and Ranking on Education Policy in Germany and the US. German Politics 22 (3):314–32.Google Scholar
Meyer, Heinz-Dieter, and Benavot, Aaron. 2013. PISA, Power, and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance. Oxford: Symposium Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, Bromley, Patricia, and Ramirez, Francisco. 2010. Human Rights in Social Science Textbooks Cross-national Analyses, 1970–2008. Sociology of Education 83 (2):111–34.Google Scholar
Meyer, Heinz-Dieter and Zahedi, Katie. 2014. An Open Letter: To Andreas Schleicher, OECD, Paris. GDM-Mitteilungen 97: 31–36.Google Scholar
Miguel, Edward, and Kremer, Michael. 2004. Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities. Econometrica 72 (1):159–217.Google Scholar
Molutsi, Patrick P., and Holm, John D.. 1990. Developing Democracy When Civil Society Is Weak: The Case of Botswana. African Affairs 89 (356):323–40.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia. 2016. Pathways to Policy Change: Blacklists and Market Enforcement in the Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing. In Assessment Power in World Politics Conference. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Mullis, Ina, and Martin, Michael. 2007. TIMSS in Perspective: Lessons Learned from IEA’s Four Decade of International Mathematics Assessments. In Lessons Learned: What International Assessments Tell Us about Math Achievement. International Perspectives on Education and Society Series. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Mundy, Karen. 1999. Educational multilateralism and world (dis) order. Comparative Education Review 42 (4):448–78.Google Scholar
Mundy, Karen, and Manion, Caroline. 2014. Globalization and Global Governance in Education. In Globalization and Education, edited by Stromquist, Nelly P. and Monkman, Karen, 39–54, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
Mundy, Karen, and Murphy, Lynn. 2001. Transnational Advocacy, Global Civil Society? Emerging Evidence from the Field of Education. Comparative education review 45 (1):85–126.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O., Meyer, John W, and Lerch, Julia. 2015. World Society and the Globalization of Educational Policy. In The Handbook of Global Policies and Policy-Making in Education, edited by Mundy, Karen, Green, Andy, Lingard, Bob, and Verger, Antoni, 43–63. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell Publisher.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O., Suárez, David, and Meyer, John W.. 2007. The Worldwide Rise of Human Rights Education. In School Knowledge in Comparative and International Perspectives, edited by Benavot, Aaron and Braslavsky, Cecilia, 35–52. the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1995. Getting Interventions Right: How South Korea and Taiwan Grew Rich. Economic Policy 10 (20):53–107.Google Scholar
Smith, William. 2016. Introduction. In The Global Testing Culture: Shaping Education Policy, Perceptions, and Practice, Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, edited by Smith, William, 43–62. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
Steiner-Khamsi, Gita. 2003. The Politics of League Tables. Journal of Social Science Education 2 (1). Available from http://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/470. Accessed April 14, 2017.Google Scholar
Suárez, David F., Ramirez, Francisco O., and Koo, Jeong-Woo. 2009. UNESCO and the Associated Schools Project: Symbolic Affirmation of World Community, International Understanding, and Human Rights. Sociology of Education 82 (3):197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Rosemary E. 2004. Teaching under High-Stakes Testing Dilemmas and Decisions of a Teacher Educator. Journal of Teacher Education 55 (5):463–75.Google Scholar
Takayama, Keita. 2008. The Politics of International League Tables: PISA in Japan’s Achievement Crisis Debate. Comparative Education 44 (4):387–407.Google Scholar
Takayama, Keita. 2010. Politics of Externalization in Reflexive Times: Reinventing Japanese Education Reform Discourses through “Finnish PISA Success.” Comparative Education Review 54 (1):51–75.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, and Wotipka, Christine Min. 2004. Global Civil Society and the International Human Rights Movement: Citizen Participation in Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations. Social Forces 83 (2):587–620.Google Scholar
Volante, Louis. 2004. Teaching to the Test: What Every Educator and Policy-Maker Should Know. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 35.Google Scholar
Weaver, Catherine. 2016. The Power and Politics of Aid Transparency Rankings and Ratings. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
World Bank Group. 2011. Learning for All: Investing in People’s Knowledge and Skills to Promote Development. The World Bank. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/ESSU/Education_Strategy_4_12_2011.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2013.Google Scholar

References

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society. International Organization 68 (1):143–76.Google Scholar
Bearce, David, and Bondanella, Stacy. 2007. Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence. International Organization 61 (4):703–33.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, Hofmann, Tobias, Panke, Diana, and Sprungk, Carina. 2010. Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States Do Not Comply with European Law. Comparative Political Studies 43 (11):1363–90.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel. 2013. Reputation in International Relations and International Law Theory. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations, edited by Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Pollack, Mark A, 524–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, David, and Signorino, Curtis. 2010. Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data. Political Analysis 18 (3):271–92.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.Google Scholar
Cingranelli, David, and Richards, David. 2014. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project Coding Manual Version 5.20.14. Available at http://www.humanrightsdata.com/p/data-documentation.html.Google Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie. 2013. The Normative Context of Human Rights Criticism: Treaty Ratification and UN Mechanisms. In The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, edited by Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C, and Sikkink, Kathryn, 125–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Snyder, Jack, eds. 2015. Ranking the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooney, Sean. 1999. Testing Times for the ILO: Institutional Reform for the New International Political Economy. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 20 (3):365–400.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, eds. 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donnatella, and Tarrow, Sidney, eds. 2005. Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
DeMeritt, Jacqueline H.R. 2015. Delegating Death: Military Intervention and Government Killing. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (3):428–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, William A., Ferguson, John-Paul, and Klett, Erin. 2004. An Effective Confluence of Forces in Support of Workers’ Rights: ILO Standards, US Trade Laws, Unions, and NGOs. Human Rights Quarterly 26 (2):273–99.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M, and Barsoom, Peter N. 1996. Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379–406.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kimberly Ann, and Freeman, Richard B. 2003. Can Labor Standards Improve under Globalization? Washington, DC: Peterson Institute Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, James C. 2008. Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly 52 (1):187–211.Google Scholar
Friman, H. Richard, ed. 2015a. The Politics of Leverage in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Friman, H. Richard. 2015b. Behind the Curtain: Naming and Shaming in International Drug Control. In The Politics of Leverage in International Relations, edited by Friman, H. Richard, 143–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. 2005 The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem. International Organization 62 (4):689–716.Google Scholar
Hafner–Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology 110 (5):1373–411.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2008. Monitoring Compliance with Unratified Treaties: The ILO Experience. Law and Contemporary Problems 71 (1):193–217.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Cullen S., and Wong, Wendy H. 2013. When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses. British Journal of Political Science 43 (3):651–72.Google Scholar
Hill, Daniel W., Moore, Will H, and Mukherjee, Bumba. 2013. Information Politics versus Organizational Incentives: When Are Amnesty International’s “Naming and Shaming” Reports Biased? International Studies Quarterly 57 (2):219–32.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2014. Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO. 1977. Report of the CEACR. 63rd Session 1977. Report III. part 4A, p. 10–11. International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ILO. 1993a. Observation (CEACR) – adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:2112822. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1993b. Observation (CEACR) – adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:2127318. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1994a. Observation (CEACR) – adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:2127304. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1994b. Observation (CEACR) – adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:2127318. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1994c. Report of the CEACR. International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/P/09661/09661%281994-81-1-2-3%29.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1996. Report of the CEACR. International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID, P11110_COUNTRY_ID, P11110_COUNTRY_NAME, P11110_COMMENT_YEAR:2147837,102658,Greece,1995. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1997. Direct Request (CEACR) – Adopted 1996, Published 85th ILC Session (1997). Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) – Slovakia. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:2154742. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1998. Report of the CEACR. International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/P/09661/09661%281998-86%29.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 1999. Observation (CEACR) – Adopted 1998, Published 87th ILC Session (1999). Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) – Morocco. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:2173009. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 2002. Observation (CEACR) – Adopted 2011, Published 90th ILC Session (2002). Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) – Morocco. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:2202143. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
ILO. 2012. Handbook of Procedures relating to International Labour Conventions and Recommendations. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
ILO. 2016b. NORMLEX: Information System on International Labour Standards. Available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:1:0::NO:::. Accessed April 11, 2017.Google Scholar
ILO. 2016c. Information and Reports on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations. Available at http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/P/09661/. Accessed April 11, 2017.Google Scholar
ILO. 2016d. Reports of the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards. Available at http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/information-resources-and-publications/publications/WCMS_190528/lang--en/index.htm. Accessed April 11, 2017.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Harold, and Weiss, Edith Brown, eds. 1998. Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, Philipps, Brian, and Alley, Joshua. 2017. One Man’s Terrorist: When Does Blacklisting Reduce Terrorism? This volume.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair I. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487–516.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair I. 2008. Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A. 2015. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):55–70.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2019. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. This volume.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Moonhawk. 2012. Ex Ante Due Diligence: Formation of PTAs and Protection of Labor Rights. International Studies Quarterly 56 (4):704–19.Google Scholar
Kim, Wonik. 2010. The Ratification of ILO Conventions and the Provision of Unemployment Benefits: An Empirical Analysis. International Social Security Review 63 (1):37–55.Google Scholar
Krain, Matthew. 2012. J’accuse! Does Naming and Shaming Perpetrators Reduce the Severity of Genocides or Politicides? International Studies Quarterly 56 (3):574–89.Google Scholar
Kuchera, David, and Sari, Dora. 2016. New “Labour Rights Indicators”: Method and Results. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Lebovic, James H., and Voeten, Erik. 2006. The Politics of Shame: The Condemnation of Country Human Rights Practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly 50 (4):861–88.Google Scholar
Lebovic, James H. 2009. The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators. Journal of Peace Research 46 (1):79–97.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V, and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2000. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International trade. American Political Science Review 94 (2):305–21.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted, and Jaggers, Keith. 2014. Polity IV Project. Center for Systemic Peace. Available at www.systemicpeace.org.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2011. Collective Labor Rights Dataset Codebook. Available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/file.xhtml?fileId=2288282&version=1.0.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna, and Uno, Saika. 2007. Racing to the Bottom or Climbing to the Top? Economic Globalization and Collective Labor Rights. Comparative Political Studies 40 (8):923–48.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda. 2014. Help or Harm? The Human Security Effects of International NGOs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda M., and Davis, David R. 2012. Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1):1–16.Google Scholar
Peksen, Dursun, and Blanton, Robert. 2016. The Impact of ILO Conventions on Worker Rights: Are Empty Promises Worse than No Promises? Review of International Organization, Online First.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon, and Russett, Bruce. 2006. Democratic International Governmental Organizations Promote Peace. International Organization 60 (4):969–1000.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, edited by Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C, and Sikkink, Kathryn, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas and Ropp, Stephen C. 2013. Introduction and Overview. In The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, edited by Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C, and Sikkink, Kathryn, 3–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 2013. From Commitment to Compliance. The Persistent Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1996. Labor Standards in International Trade: Do they Matter and What Do We Do about Them? In Emerging Agenda for Global Trade: High Stakes for Developing Countries, edited by Lawrence, Robert, Rodrik, Dani, and Whalley, John. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):47–80.Google Scholar
Sharman, Jason C. 2009. The Bark is the Bite: International Organization and Blacklisting. Review of International Political Economy 16 (4):573–96.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2012. International Law. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed., edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Danner, Allison. 2010. Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court. International Organization 64 (2):225–56.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2002. Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. International Organization 56 (3):609–43.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, and Squatrito, Theresa. 2016. Democratic Memberships in International Organizations: Sources of Institutional Design. Review of International Organizations 11 (1):59–87.Google Scholar
Thomann, Lars. 2011. Steps to Compliance with International Labour Standards: The International Labour Organization and the Abolition of Forced Labour. Wiesbaden: vs Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Thompson, Alexander. 2013. Coercive Enforcement of International Law. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations, edited by Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Pollack, Mark A, 502–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007. Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt across Three Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
US State Department. 1996. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. Guatemala. Available at http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/democracy/1995_hrp_report/95hrp_report_ara/Guatemala.html. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
US State Department. 1998. Slovak Republic Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1997. Available at http://www.state.gov/www/global/human_rights/1997_hrp_report/slovakre.html. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
US State Department. 2000. 1999 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Slovak Republic. Available at http://www.state.gov/www/global/human_rights/1999_hrp_report/slovakre.html. Accessed April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
Weisband, Edward. 2000. Discursive Multilateralism: Global Benchmarks, Shame and Learning in the ILO Labor Standards Monitoring Regime. International Studies Quarterly 44 (4):643–66.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2016. World Bank Development Indicators. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed April 11, 2017.Google Scholar

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (2):239–75.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David A. 2011. Stability and Change in the Freedom House Political Rights and Civil Liberties Measures. Journal of Peace Research 48(5):653–62.Google Scholar
Bandura, Romina. 2008. A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2008 Update. Office of Development Studies. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Beger, Andreas, Dorff, Cassy L, and Ward, Michael D. 2014. Ensemble Forecasting of Irregular Leadership Change. Research & Politics 1(3):2053168014557511.Google Scholar
Björkdahl, Annika. 2002. Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15(1):9–23.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Paxton, Pamela. 2000. Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy. Comparative Political Studies 33 (1):58–86.Google Scholar
Boschee, Elizabeth, Lautenschlager, Jennifer, OBrien, Sean, Shellman, Steve, Starz, James, and Ward, Michael. 2015. ICEWS Coded Event Data. Harvard Dataverse Network [Distributor], 1.Google Scholar
Boschee, Elizabeth, Natarajan, Premkumar, and Weischedel, Ralph. 2013. Automatic Extraction of Events from Open Source Text for Predictive Forecasting. In Subrahmanian, V. S., editor, Handbook of Computational Approaches to Counterterrorism, 51–67. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Bradley, Christopher. 2015. International Organizations and the Production of Indicators: The Case of Freedom House. In Merry, Sally Engle, Davis, Kevin E., and Kingsbury, Benedict, editors, The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2017. The Politics of Rating Freedom: Ideological Affinity, Private Authority, and the Freedom in the World Ratings. Perspectives on Politics 15 (3):711–31.Google Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2003. Gender Equality and State Aggression: The Impact of Domestic Gender Equality on State First Use of Force. International Interactions 29 (3):195–214.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle. 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle. 2012. Introduction: Global Governance by Indicators. In Davis, Kevin E, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, editors, Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings, 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Towards Democratic Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Lindsay R. 2017. Labeling Laggards and Leaders: International Organizations and the Politics of Defining Development. Available at www.peio.me/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PEIO11_paper_16.pdfGoogle Scholar
Donno, Daniela. 2010. Who Is Punished? Regional Intergovernmental Organizations and the Enforcement of Democratic Norms. International Organization 64 (4):593–625.Google Scholar
D’Orazio, Vito, Yonamine, James E, and Schrodt, Philip A. 2011. Predicting Intra-State Conflict Onset: An Event Data Approach Using Euclidean and Levenshtein Distance Measures. In 69th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Duval, Robert D., and Thompson, William R. 1980. Reconsidering the Aggregate Relationship between Size, Economic Development, and Some Types of Foreign Policy Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 511–25.Google Scholar
Franklin, James C. 2008. Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly 52 (1):187–211.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2015. Freedom in the World 2015: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2016. Our history.Google Scholar
Gastil, Raymond Duncan. 1985. The Past, Present and Future of Democracy. Journal of International Affairs 38 (2):161–79.Google Scholar
Gastil, Raymond Duncan. 1990. The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Experiences and Suggestions. Studies in Comparative International Development 25 (1):25–50.Google Scholar
Gerner, Deborah J., Schrodt, Philip A, and Omur, Yilmaz. 2009. Conflict and Mediation Event Observations (CAMEO): An Event Data Framework for a Post-Cold War World. In International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings, edited by Bercovitcch, Jacob and Sigmund Gartner, Scott, 287–304. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giannone, Diego. 2010. Political and Ideological Aspects in the Measurement of Democracy: The Freedom House Case. Democratization 17 (1):68–97.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2005. Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression. International Organization 59 (3):593–629.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem. International Organization 62 (4):689–716.Google Scholar
Hahn, Jinyong, Todd, Petra, and Van der Klaauw, Wilbert. 2001. Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design. Econometrica 69 (1):201–09.Google Scholar
Hansen, Hans Krause and Mühlen-Schulte, Arthur. 2012. The Power of Numbers in Global Governance. Journal of International Relations and Development 15 (4):455–65.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. 1850. The Scarlet Letter. Boston, MA: Ticknor, Reed & Fields.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A. 2007. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15 (3):199–236.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan and Weaver, Catherine. this volume. A Race to the Top?: The Aid Transparency Index and the Normative Power of Global Performance Assessments. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Høyland, Bjørn, Moene, Karl, and Willumsen, Fredrik. 2012. The Tyranny of International Index Rankings. Journal of Development Economics 97 (1):1–14.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido W., and Lemieux, Thomas. 2008. Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics 142 (2):615–35.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, volume 6. Ithaca, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):55–70.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. this volume. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. Chapter 1 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., Simmons, Beth A, and Doshi, Rush. this volume. The Power of Ranking: The Ease of Doing Business and Global Regulatory Behavior. Chapter 2 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie and Lipscy, Phillip Y. this volume. International Assessments and Education Policy: Evidence from an Elite Survey. Chapter 6 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Le, Ahn, and Malesky, Edmund. this volume. Do Subnational Performance Assessments (SPAs) Lead to Improved Governance?: Evidence from Field Experiment in Vietnam. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Lee, Melissa M., and Matanock, Aila M. this volume. Third Party Policymakers and the Limits of the Influence of Indicators. Chapter 11 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Linden, Ariel and Adams, John L. 2012. Combining the Regression Discontinuity Design and Propensity Score-Based Weighting to Improve Causal Inference in Program Evaluation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (2):317–25.Google Scholar
Lozovsky, Ilya. 2016. Freedom by the numbers. Foreign Policy. Available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/29/freedom-by-the-numbers-freedom-house-in-the-world/.Google Scholar
Masaki, Takaaki, Sethi, Tanya, and Custer, Samantha. 2016. In the Eye of the Beholder: When is governance data good enough? AidData at the College of William & Mary and the Governance Data Alliance.Google Scholar
Meernik, James, Aloisi, Rosa, Sowell, Marsha, and Nichols, Angela. 2012. The Impact of Human Rights Organizations on Naming and Shaming Campaigns. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (2):233–56.Google Scholar
Metternich, Nils W., Dorff, Cassy, Gallop, Max, Weschle, Simon, and Ward, Michael D. 2013. Antigovernment Networks in Civil Conflicts: How Network Structures Affect Conflictual Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 57 (4):892–911.Google Scholar
Metternich, Nils W., Minhas, Shahryar, and Ward, Michael D. 2015. Firewall? or Wall on Fire? a Unified Framework of Conflict Contagion and the Role of Ethnic Exclusion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 0022002715603452.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C. 2016. Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sean P. 2010. Crisis Early Warning and Decision Support: Contemporary Approaches and Thoughts on Future Research. International Studies Review 12 (1):87–104.Google Scholar
Parks, Bradley G., and Masaki, Takaaki. 2016. Do Performance Assessment Influence Policy Behavior? Micro-Evidence from the 2014 Reform Efforts Survey. Paper presented at the 112th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Peterson, Timothy M., and Graham, Leah. 2011. Shared Human Rights Norms and Military Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (2):248–73.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002. Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization 56 (3):515–49.Google Scholar
Ramos, Howard, Ron, James, and Thoms, Oskar N.T.. 2007. Shaping the Northern Media’s Human Rights Coverage, 1986–2000. Journal of Peace Research 44 (4):385–406.Google Scholar
Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, volume 66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1994. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A. 2012. CAMEO: Conflict and Mediation Event Observations Event and Actor Codebook. Event Data Project, Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Sobek, David, Abouharb, M. Rodwan, and Ingram, Christopher G. 2006. The Human Rights Peace: How the Respect for Human Rights at Home Leads to Peace Abroad. Journal of Politics 68 (3):519–29.Google Scholar
Thistlethwaite, Donald L., and Campbell, Donald T. 1960. Regression-Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex Post Facto Experiment. Journal of Educational psychology 51 (6):309.Google Scholar
Weisiger, Alex and Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2015. Revisiting Reputation: How Past Actions Matter in International Politics. International Organization 69 (2):473–95.Google Scholar
Weschle, Simon. The Impact of Economic Crises on Political Representation in Public Communication: Evidence from the Eurozone. British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×