Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:45:40.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Power tactics preference in organizations: Individual and situational factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

By
Meni Koslowsky  and
Joseph Schwarzwald
Edited by
Dean Tjosvold  and
Barbara Wisse
Dean Tjosvold
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Barbara Wisse
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The concepts of power and influence have been of interest to social thinkers even before psychologists began to study the phenomena (Bruins 1999; Carson et al. 1993; Ng 1980). Dahl (1957: 201) believes that from the days of Plato to the more modern thinkers such as Weber, the concept of power has been “as ubiquitous as any that social science can boast.” Russell (1938) sees the centrality of power in social sciences as parallel to the concept of energy in the physical sciences. Similar to energy which can manifest itself in different forms, power may be observed in the military, civilian, and judicial domains. Lewin (1951) in his field theory established the foundation for the psychological formulation of social power and influence. He defined the relationship between an influencing agent and a target person acting in a field where opposing forces are said to exist. Lewin's approach had a major impact on French and Raven's taxonomy of social-power tactics (1959) and even more so on Raven's Interpersonal Power Interaction Model (IPIM) (1992).

The chapter integrates previous findings using the IPIM and presents an overall perspective for explaining social-power choice in conflict situations. In terms of our presentation, compliance can be said to occur when the influencing agent's power exceeds the target's resistance. The IPIM's applicability for organizational settings is delineated here by identifying individual and situational factors involved in choosing power tactics to gain compliance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Power and Interdependence in Organizations , pp. 244 - 261
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, N., Lievens, F., Dam, K. V, and Born, M. (2006) Construct-driven investigation of gender differences in a leadership-role assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 55–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bass, B. M. and Avolio, B. J. (1994) Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. and Kramer, R. (1985) The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruins, J. (1999) Social power and influence tactics: A theoretical interdiction. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, K. T., Raven, B. H., and Schwarzwald, J. (1994) Influence strategies in dating relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction, gender, and perspective. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 429–442.Google Scholar
Carson, P. P., Carson, C. K., and Roe, C. W. (1993) Social power bases: A meta-analytic examination of interrelationships and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1150–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, S. M. and Wagner, J. A. (1994) Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1957) The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., and Haga, W. J. (1975) A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBrin, A. J. (1991) Sex and gender differences in tactics of influence. Psychological Reports, 68, 635–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Johnson, B. T. (1990) Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. and Karau, S. J. (1991) Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Steffen, V. J. (1984) Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erchul, W. P., Raven, B. H., and Ray, A. G. (2001) School psychologists' perceptions of social power bases in teacher consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1964) Modern organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1971) Comparative analysis of complex organizations, New York, N.Y.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. W. (1997) Moderating and mediating processes in environment-behavior research. In Moore, G. T. and Marans, R. (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design: Towards the integration of theory, methods, research, and utilization (Vol. IV, pp. 255–285), New York, N.Y.: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falbo, T. and Peplau, L. A. (1980) Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. H. (1959) The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167), Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Fung, S. (1991) The effects of power, relationship, and purpose in gaining compliance. Contemporary Social Psychology, 15, 44–57.Google Scholar
Graen, G. and Cashman, J. F. (1975) A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In Hunt, J. G. and Larson, L. L. (Eds.), Leadership frontiers, Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, K. J. and White, J. W. (1986) Gender differences in the perceptions of self's and other's use of power strategies. Sex Roles, 15, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (2001) Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.Google Scholar
Keshet, S., Kark, R., Pomerantz-Zorin, L., Koslowsky, M., and Schwarzwald, J. (2006) Gender, status, and the use of power strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipnis, D. and Schmidt, S. M. (1985) The language of persuasion. Psychology Today, 19, 40–46.Google Scholar
Koslowsky, M., Aminov, H., and Schwarzwald, J. (2007) Social distance and managerial style: Predictors of influence tactics usage. Presented at the Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.
Koslowsky, M. and Schwarzwald, J. (1993) The use of power tactics to gain compliance: Testing aspects of Raven's (1988) theory in conflictual situations. Social Behavior and Personality, 21, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslowsky, M., and Schwarzwald, J. (2001) Power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and practice. In Lee-Chai, A. and Bargh, J. (Eds.), Use and abuse of power (pp. 195–214), Philadelphia, Pa.: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Koslowsky, M., Schwarzwald, J., and Ashuri, S. (2001) On the relationship between subordinates' compliance to power sources and organizational attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 436–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951) Field theory in social science, New York, N.Y.: Harper.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power in and around organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mullen, B., Brown, R., and Smith, C. (1992) Intergroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. H. (1980) The social psychology of power, New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Offerman, L. R. and Kearney, C. T. (1988) Supervisor sex and subordinate influence strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 286–300.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M. and Schriesheim, C. A. (1985) Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahim, M. A., Antonioni, D., and Psenicka, C. (2001) A structural equations model of leader power, subordinates' styles of handling conflict, and job performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, B. H. (1965) Social influence and power. In Steiner, D. and Fishbein, M. (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371–382), New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Raven, B. H. (1992) A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217–244.Google Scholar
Raven, B. H. (1993) The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, B. H. (2001) Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: Experimental investigations and case studies. In Lee-Chai, A. and Bargh, J. (Eds.), Use and abuse of power (pp. 217–240), Philadelphia, Pa.: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., and Koslowsky, M. (1998) Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1938) Power: A new social analysis, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Schriesheim, C. A., Hinkin, T. R., and Podsakoff, P. M. (1991) Can ipsative and single-item measures produce erroneous results in field studies of French and Raven's (1959) five bases of power? An empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, J. and Goldenberg, J. (1979) Compliance and assistance to an authority figure in perceived equitable or nonequitable situations. Human Relations, 32, 877–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, J. and Koslowsky, M. (1999) Gender, self-esteem, and focus of interest in the use of power strategies by adolescents in conflict situations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, J., and Koslowsky, M. (2006) The Interpersonal Power Interaction Model: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological reflections. In Chadee, D. and Young, J. (Eds.), Current themes in social psychology, St. Augustine, Trinidad: SOCS, The University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., and Allouf, M. (2005) Group membership, status, and social power preference. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 644–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., and Ochana-Levin, T. (2004) Usage of and compliance with power tactics in routine versus nonroutine work settings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., and Agassi, V. (2001) Captain's leadership type and police officers' compliance to power bases. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., and Brody-Shamir, S. (2006) Factors related to perceived power usage in schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 445–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajfel, H. (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchell, S. and Austin, W. C. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, 2nd edn, Chicago, Ill.: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Teven, J. J. and Herring, J. E. (2005) Teacher influence in the classroom: A preliminary investigation of perceived instructor power, credibility, and student satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 22, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L. (1982) Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study, Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. and Falbe, C. M. (1991) Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×