Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T05:01:04.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Power and social exchange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

By
Linda D. Molm
Edited by
Dean Tjosvold  and
Barbara Wisse
Dean Tjosvold
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Barbara Wisse
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

The concept of power has been central to social exchange theory since its early development. Peter Blau (1964) included “power” in the title of his classic theory of exchange; Richard Emerson's (1972a, 1972b) exchange formulation was built upon his earlier analysis of power-dependence relations; and theories and research on power have dominated the contemporary development of the sociological exchange tradition for the past thirty years (see Molm 2000 for a review).

Although social exchange theories are typically formulated at an abstract level designed to apply to different settings and different levels of analysis, several features make them particularly well suited for application to organizations. The participants in social exchange, called actors, can be either individual persons or collective actors such as teams or organizations, and either specific entities or interchangeable occupants of structural positions (e.g., the CEO of a firm). Actors are connected to one another in dyadic relations, and those relations are typically embedded in larger exchange networks of variable size and complexity, making social exchange theories appropriate for analysis of both intra- and inter-organizational power relations. Finally, the very concept of exchange is central to most organizational analyses.

Social exchange theory is most appropriately viewed as a framework or theoretical orientation that includes numerous specific theories. All social exchange theories share certain concepts and assumptions, but they also differ in various respects.

Type
Chapter
Information
Power and Interdependence in Organizations , pp. 153 - 168
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bienenstock, E. J. and Bonacich, P. (1993) Game theory models for social exchange networks: Experimental results. Sociological Perspectives, 36, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964) Exchange and power in social life, New York, N.Y.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cook, K. S. (1977) Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations. Sociological Quarterly, 18, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, K. S. and Emerson, R. M. (1978) Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, K. S, and Emerson, R. M. (1984) Exchange networks and the analysis of complex organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R., and Tamagishi, T. (1983) The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 275–305).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, K. S. and Gillmore, M. R. (1984) Power, dependence, and coalitions. In Lawler, E. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. I, pp. 27–48), Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M. (1972a) Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. II, pp. 38–57), Boston, Mass.: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M.(1972b) Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and networks. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. II, pp. 58–87), Boston, Mass.: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M.(1987) Toward a theory of value in social exchange. In Cook, K. S. (Ed.), Social exchange theory (pp. 11–58), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. E. (1992) An expected value model of social power: Predictions for selected exchange networks. Social Networks, 14, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, M. (1992) Should values be written out of the social scientist's lexicon?Sociological Theory, 10, 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, G. C. (1961) Social behavior: Its elementary forms, New York, N. Y.: Harcourt Brace & World.Google Scholar
Kollock, P. (1994) The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A. (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. J. (1992) Power processes in bargaining. Sociological Quarterly, 33, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. J. (2001) An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovsky, B., Willer, D., and Patton, T. (1988) Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53, 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D. (1997) Coercive power in social exchange, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D. (2000) Theories of social exchange and exchange networks. In Ritzer, G. and Smart, B. (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Theory (pp. 260–272), New York, N.Y.: Sage Press.Google Scholar
Molm, L. D. (2003) Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., and Schaefer, D. R. (2006) Conflict and fairness in social exchange. Social Forces, 84, 2325–2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., and Schaefer, D. R. (2007a) Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., and Takahashi, N. (1999) Power use in negotiated and reciprocal exchange. American Sociological Review, 64, 876–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., and Takahashi, N. (2001) The value of exchange. Social Forces, 80, 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D., Schaefer, D. R., and Collett, J. L. (2007b) The value of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., and Peterson, G. (2000) Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1396–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., and Peterson, G. (2003) In the eye of the beholder: Procedural justice in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 68, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offer, A. (1997) Between the gift and the market: The economy of regard. Economic History Review, 3, 450–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Salanack, G. R. (1978) The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York, N.Y.: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Thye, S. R. (2000) A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Gillmore, M. R., and Cook, K. S. (1988) Network connections and the distribution of power in exchange networks. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 833–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×