Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T23:04:17.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2018

Andreas Goldthau
Andreas Goldthau
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Shale Gas in Eastern Europe
Energy Security, Contested Technologies and the Social Licence to Frack
 , pp. 159 - 194
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalto, Pami. 2007. The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue. Europe's Future Energy Security. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Abdelal, Rawi. 2013. The profits of power: commerce and realpolitik in Eurasia. Review of International Political Economy 20 (3):421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AFP. 2013. Poland anchors energy strategy in coal, shale gas: PM. 10 September.Google Scholar
AFP. 2015. Bulgaria drops $4bn Westinghouse nuclear deal. 1 April.Google Scholar
Alcorn, Jessica, Rupp, John and Graham, John D.. 2017. Attitudes toward ‘fracking’: perceived and actual geographic proximity. Review of Policy Research 34:504–536.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Ramón A., Pacala, Stephen W., Winebrake, James J., Chameides, William L. and Hamburg, Steven P.. 2012. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:6435–6440.Google Scholar
Andersen, Svein, Goldthau, Andreas and Sitter, Nick, eds. 2017. Energy Union: Europe's New Liberal Mercantilism? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. and Tverdova, Yuliya V.. 2003. Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47 (1):91–109.Google Scholar
Andrews-Speed, Philip. 2014. The governance of unconventional gas development outside the United States of America. Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence 12 (3).Google Scholar
Arnold, Gwen and Holahan, Robert. 2014. The federalism of fracking: how the locus of policy-making authority affects civic engagement. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 44 (2):344–368.Google Scholar
Astrov, Alexander. 2011. The Great Power (Mis)Management: The Russian-Georgian War and its Implications for Global Political Order. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Michael M. and Coleman, William D.. 1989. Strong states and weak states: sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. British Journal of Political Science 19:47–67.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Michael M. and Coleman, William D.. 1992. Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance 5 (2):154–180.Google Scholar
Avocatnet.ro. 2012. Citeste AICI textul integral al motiunii de cenzura care a dat jos Guvernul Ungureanu. Available from www.avocatnet.ro/content/articles/id_28591/Citeste-AICI-textul-integral-al-motiunii-de-cenzura-care-a-dat-jos-Guvernul-Ungureanu.html [accessed 30 October 2017].Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009. Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baev, Pavel K. 2008. Russian Energy Policy and Military Power: Putin's Quest for Greatness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bahgat, Gawdat. 2003. Pipeline diplomacy: the geopolitics of the Caspian Sea region. International Studies Perspectives 3 (3):310–327.Google Scholar
Balmaceda, Margarita M. 2008. Energy Dependency, Politics and Corruption in the Former Soviet Union. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bamberger, Michelle and Oswald, Robert. 2015. The Real Cost of Fracking: How America's Shale Gas Boom Is Threatening Our Families, Pets, and Food. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 1991. Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics 53 (4):1044–1074.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 2002. Positive and negative feedback in politics. In Policy Dynamics, edited by Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Beleva, Iskra and Kotzeva, Mariana. 2001. Bulgaria: country study on international skilled migration. Available from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/47564/ [accessed 30 October 2017].Google Scholar
Belyi, Andrei and Goldthau, Andreas. 2015. Between a rock and a hard place: international market dynamics, domestic politics and Gazprom's strategy. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/22.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe. 1997. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bilgin, Mert. 2009. Geopolitics of European natural gas demand: Supplies from Russia, Caspian and the Middle East. Energy Policy 37 (11):4482–4492.Google Scholar
Blackwill, Robert D. and Harris, Jennifer M.. 2016. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blackwill, Robert D. and O'Sullivan, Meghan. 2014. America's energy edge. The geopolitical consequences of the shale revolution. Foreign Affairs (March/April).Google Scholar
Bleich, Erik. 2002. Integrating ideas into policy-making analysis: frames and race policies in Britain and France. Comparative Political Studies 35 (9):1054–1076.Google Scholar
Bloomberg. 2012. Polish veto won't prevent EU CO2 measures, Hedegaard says. 10 March.Google Scholar
Bloomberg. 2014. San Leon nears first commercial European shale gas in Poland. 23 January.Google Scholar
BMI Research. 2015. Poland's shale progress put in danger as Chevron exits. 9 February. Available from www.bmiresearch.com/articles/polands-shale-progress-put-in-danger-as-chevron-exits [accessed 30 October 2017].Google Scholar
Boersma, Tim. 2015. Energy Security and Natural Gas Markets in Europe – Lessons from the EU and the United States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boersma, Tim. 2016. Natural gas in the United States in 2016. Problem child and poster child. Brookings. Policy Brief 16-02.Google Scholar
Boersma, Tim and Goldthau, Andreas. 2014. The 2014 Ukraine-Russia crisis: implications for energy markets and scholarship. Energy Research and Social Science 1 (3):13–15.Google Scholar
Boersma, Tim and Goldthau, Andreas. 2017. Whither the EU's market making project in energy: from liberalization to securitization? In Energy Union. Europe's New Liberal Mercantilism?, edited by Andersen, S., Goldthau, A. and Sitter, N.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
Boersma, Tim and Johnson, Corey. 2012. The shale gas revolution: US and EU policy and research agendas. Review of Policy Research 29 (4):570–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Tim and Khodabakhsh, Cameron. 2014. EU engagement with shale gas. Oil, Gas and Energy Law 3:1–11.Google Scholar
Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2015. Shale we drill? Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19:1–17.Google Scholar
Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2017. Fracking and framing in transatlantic perspective: a comparison of shale politics in the US and European Union. Journal of Transatlantic Studies 15 (2):101–120.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D. and Schwartz, Anna. 1997. Monetary policy regimes and economic performance: the historical record. NBER Working Paper 6201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudet, Hilary Schaffer, Clarke, Christopher, Bugden, Dylan, Maibach, Edward, Roser-Renouf, Connie and Leiserowitz, Anthony. 2014. ‘Fracking’ controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65 (0):57–67.Google Scholar
Boutilier, Robert G. and Zdziarski, Michal. 2017. Managing stakeholder networks for a social license to build. Construction Management and Economics 35:1–16.Google Scholar
Bouzarovski, Stefan. 2013. Energy poverty in the European Union: landscapes of vulnerability. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 3 (3):276–289.Google Scholar
BP. 2015. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2015. London.Google Scholar
BP. 2016. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. London.Google Scholar
BP. 2017. BP Energy Outlook. London.Google Scholar
Brandt, A.R., Heath, G. A., Kort, E. A., et al. 2014. Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems. Science 343 (6172):733–735.Google Scholar
Bros, Thierry. 2012. After the US Shale Gas Revolution. Paris: Editions Technip.Google Scholar
Brown, Erica, Borick, Christopher, Rabe, Barry G. and Ivacko, Thomas. 2013. Public opinion on fracking: perspectives from Michigan and Pennsylvania. Issues in Energy and Environmental Policy 3 (May).Google Scholar
Burger, Michael. 2013. Response, fracking and federalism choice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 161 (431):150–163.Google Scholar
Burr, Michael T. 2005. The geopolitical risks of LNG. Public Utilities Fortnightly.Google Scholar
Business Magazin. 2013. Chevron incepe cautarea gazului de sist romanesc. 28 March.Google Scholar
Butler, Eamonn. 2011. The geopolitics of merger and acquisition in the Central European energy market. Geopolitics 16 (3):626–654.Google Scholar
Buzogány, Aron. 2009. Romania: environmental governance – form without substance. In Coping with Accession to the European Union: New Modes of Environmental Governance, edited by Börzel, T. A.. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, Giliberto, Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M.. 2015. Bringing governments back in: governance and governing in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17 (4):311–321.Google Scholar
Carmine, Joanne, Darnall, Nicole and Mil-Homens, Joao. 2003. Stakeholder involvement in the design of US voluntary environmental programs: does sponsorship matter? Policy Studies Journal 31 (4):527–543.Google Scholar
Castle, Ben. 2012. The Global Movement Against Fracking. Lessons from Bulgaria, the UK and New York State. San Francisco, CA: The Democracy Center.Google Scholar
Christensen, Tom and Lægreid, Per. 2007. The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review 67 (6):1059–1066.Google Scholar
Christie, Edward. 2009. Energy vulnerability and EU-Russia energy relations. Journal of Contemporary European Research 5 (2):274–292.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ariel. 2009. Russia: the flawed energy superpower. In Energy Security Challenges for the 21st Century, edited by Luft, G. and Korin, A.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff. 2013. Petro-Aggression: When Oil Causes War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Bill and Kothari, Uma. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Correlje, Aad and van der Linde, Coby. 2006. Energy supply security and geopolitics: a European perspective. Energy Policy 34 (5):532–543.Google Scholar
Cotton, Matthew, Rattle, Imogen and Alstine, James Van. 2014. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: an argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy 73:427–438.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert Henry and Béland, Daniel. 2012. Valence, policy ideas, and the rise of sustainability. Governance 26 (2):307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, Michael P. 2010. Rethinking systems: configurations of politics and policy in contemporary governance. Administration and Society 42:504–525.Google Scholar
Czyzewski, Adam B., Bodnari, Eduard and Kozieja, Grzegorz. 2012. Gas (R)Evolution in Poland: Which Way to Success? Warsaw: PKN Orlen.Google Scholar
Dąborowski, Tomasz and Groszkowski, Jakub. 2012. Shale Gas in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Romania: Political Context – Legal Status – Outlook. OSW Report. Available from http://aei.pitt.edu/58010/1/shale_gas_in_bulgaria_the_czech_republic_and_romania_net_0.pdf [accessed 22 November 2017].Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Jonathan S. 2002. Urban regime theory: a normative-empirical critique. Journal of Urban Affairs 24 (1):1–17.Google Scholar
Davies, Jonathan S. 2009. The limits of joined-up government: toward a political analysis. Public Administration 87 (1):80–96.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles. 2012. The politics of ‘fracking’: regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research 29 (2):177–191.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles. 2014. Substate federalism and fracking policies: does state regulatory authority trump local land use autonomy? Environmental Science & Technology 48 (15):8397–8403.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles and Hoffer, Katherine. 2012. Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking. Policy Sciences 45:221–241.Google Scholar
de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada, Hays, Jake and Finkel, Madelon L.. 2014. The role of ethics in shale gas policies. Science of the Total Environment 470:1114–1119.Google Scholar
Departmentul Pentru Energie. 2014. Strategia Energetica a Romaniei. Draft Supus Dezbaterii Publice. Bucharest.Google Scholar
Dollar, David and Levin, Victoria. 2005. Sowing and Reaping: Institutional Quality and Project Outcomes in Developing Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3524.Google Scholar
Dowding, Keith. 2001. Explaining urban regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (1):7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dudău, Radu. 2014. Romania's Energy Strategy Options: Current Trends in Eastern Europe's Natural Gas Markets. Bucharest: Energy Policy Group.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2011. Fracking heaven: other europeans fear fracking. Poland is steaming ahead. 23 June.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2013a. Bulgaria's electricity prices. Protesting about power prices. 15 February.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2013b. Shale gas in Poland. Mad and messy regulation. 10 July.Google Scholar
EFET. 2016. Consultation on Gas Market Development/Ankieta dotycząca oceny rynku gazu. EFET comments – 29 February 2016. Amsterdam: European Federation of Energy Traders.Google Scholar
EIA. 2008. Annual Energy Outlook. Washington, DC: Energy Information Agency, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
EIA. 2011a. Most electric generating capacity additions in the last decade were natural gas-fired. Today in Energy. 5 July.Google Scholar
EIA. 2011b. World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Outside the United States. Washington DC: Energy Information Agency, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
EIA. 2015a. Shale gas development in China aided by government investment and decreasing well cost. Today in Energy. 30 September.Google Scholar
EIA. 2015b. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: Other Eastern Europe, Washington, DC: Energy Information Agency, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
EIA. 2016a. Energy-related CO2 emissions for first six months of 2016 are lowest since 1991. Today in Energy.12 October.Google Scholar
EIA. 2016b. US Shale Production. US Department of Energy. Available from https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/res_epg0_r5302_nus_bcfa.htm [accessed 5 May 2017].Google Scholar
EIA. 2017a. Annual Energy Outlook 2017. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.Google Scholar
EIA. 2017b. Argentina seeking increased natural gas production from shale resources to reduce imports. Today in Energy. 17 February.Google Scholar
EIA. 2017c. Electricity Monthly Update. Washington, DC: Energy Information Agency, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
EIA. 2017d. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production. Available from https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_a_EPG0_FPD_mmcf_a.htm [accessed 18 July 2017].Google Scholar
EIA. 2017e. Short Term Energy Outlook (STEO). Washington, DC: Energy Information Agency, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
EIA. 2017f. US Dry Natural Gas Production. Available from https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9070us2m.htm [accessed 22 May 2017].Google Scholar
EIA/ARI. 2013. EIA/ARI World Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States. Washington, DC: Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Eisner, Marc Allen. 1994. Discovering patterns in regulatory history: continuity, change and regulatory regimes. Journal of Policy History 6 (2):157–187.Google Scholar
Eisner, Marc Allen. 2000. Regulatory Politics in Transition, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen L. 1987. City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elmore, Richard F. 1978. Organizational models of social program implementation. Public Policy 26 (2):185–226.Google Scholar
EMIS. 2014. Energy Sector Poland. London/New York/Mumbai.Google Scholar
Energy Charter Secretariat. 2007. Putting a Price on Energy. International Pricing Mechanisms for Oil and Gas. Brussels.Google Scholar
Energy and Water Regulatory Commission. 2010. 2009 National Report to the European Commission. Sofia.Google Scholar
Energyworldmag. 2016. Romania: ExxonMobil, OMV Petrom Complete Black Sea Drilling. 10.02.Google Scholar
Engeli, Isabelle and Allison, Christine Rothmayr, eds. 2014. Comparative Policy Studies: Conceptual And Methodological Challenges. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
ENTSO-G. 2015. Ten Year Network Development Plan 2015. Brussels.Google Scholar
EPG. 2014. The Need to Update the Romanian Oil and Gas Legislation for Exploration and Production, Bucharest: Energy Policy Group.Google Scholar
Ernst & Young. 2013. Analysis of Central Europe's Energy Sector. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Esping-Anderson, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
EUObserver. 2012. EU ditches plan to regulate on shale gas. 22 January.Google Scholar
Euractiv. 2012a. Hungary to step up nationalisations. 5 September.Google Scholar
Euractiv. 2012b. Poland defies Europe over 2050 low-carbon roadmap. 8 March.Google Scholar
Euractiv. 2012c. US tells Bulgaria shale gas is safe. 7 February.Google Scholar
Euractiv. 2013. In historic vote, Bulgarian voters back new nuclear plant. 28 January.Google Scholar
Euractiv. 2014. Poland says it ‘won’ at the EU summit. 24 October.Google Scholar
Euractiv. 2015. Bulgaria lacks political will to build interconnectors, says Commission. 6 March.Google Scholar
Eurocoal. 2017. Country profiles. Available from https://euracoal.eu/info/country-profiles/poland/ [accessed 17 June 2017].Google Scholar
Eurogas. 2013. Long-Term Outlook for Gas to 2035. Brussels.Google Scholar
Eurogas. 2014. Statistical Report 2014. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2003. Commission Reaches Breakthrough with Gazprom and ENI on Territorial Restriction Clauses (IP/03/1345). Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Communities L 140 (5 June):16–61.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2010. Energy 2020. A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy. Brussels: COM(2010) 639 COM(2010) 639.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011a. Energy Roadmap 2050. Brussels: COM(2011) 885 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011b. EU Gas Market: Commission Refers Bulgaria and Romania to Court to Ensure European Law is Properly Implemented IP/11/1437. 24 November.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012a. Press Release. Antitrust: Commission Opens Proceedings Against Gazprom. 4 September.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012b. Quarterly Report: Energy on European Gas Markets. Fourth Quarter 2012. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013a. Antitrust: Commission Opens Proceedings Against Bulgarian Energy Holding and its Subsidiaries Bulgargaz and Bulgartransgaz. 5 July.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013b. Enforcing EU Energy Law Gas & Electricity. Infringement Proceedings. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infringements/proceedings/electricity_gas_en.htm [accessed 30 May 2013].Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013c. Flash Eurobarometer 360: Attittudes of Europeans Towards Air Quality. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013d. Internal Energy Market: Commission Refers Bulgaria, Estonia and the United Kingdom to Court for Failing to Fully Transpose EU Rules IP/13/42. 24 January.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013e. Report to the Bulgarian Government on ‘Findings and Recommendations Related to Bulgarian Energy Policy’. Sofia.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014a. Commission Recommendation of 22 January 2014 on minimum principles for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high-volume hydraulic fracturing. Official Journal L 39 (8 February):72–78.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014b. Commission Recommendation of 22 January 2014 on minimum principles for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high-volume hydraulic fracturing 2014/70/EU. Official Journal L 39:72–78.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014c. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Exploration and Production of Hydrocarbons (such as Shale Gas) Using High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in the EU. Brussels: COM (2014) 23.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014d. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Short Term Resilience of the European Gas System. Preparedness for a Possible Disruption of Supplies from the East during the Fall and Winter of 2014/2015. Brussels: COM(2014) 654 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014e. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. Brussels: COM/2014/015 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014f. Country Report: Poland. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014g. Country Report: Bulgaria. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014h. Country Report: Romania. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014i. EU Energy, Transport and GHG Emissions Trends to 2050. Brussels: DG Energy.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014j. Macroeconomic Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction in the EU. Brussels: DG ENV.ENV.F.1/SER/2012/0046r.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014k. Quarterly report on European gas markets. Market Observatory for Energy 9(7).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015a. Agriculture and Rural Development. Member States Factsheets: Bulgaria. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015b. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Assessment of the Progress Made by Member States Towards the National Energy Efficiency Targets for 2020 and Towards the Implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/EU as Required by Article 24 (3) of Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/EU. Brussels: COM(2015) 574 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016a. Antitrust: Commission Confirms Unannounced Inspections in the Natural Gas Sector. Brussels: Statement/16/2133. 7 June.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the COuncil, the European Economic and Social Comittee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank. Clean Energy for All Europeans. Brussels: COM(2016) 860 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016c. Country Report Romania 2016 Including an In-Depth Review on the Prevention and Correction of Macroeconomic Imbalances. Brussels: Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2016) 91 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016d. Projects of Common Interest. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/infrastructure/projects-common-interest [accessed 12 April 2016].Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016e. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union, Amending Directive 94/22/EC, Directive 98/70/EC, Directive 2009/31/EC, Regulation (EC) No 663/2009, Regulation (EC) No 715/2009, Directive 2009/73/EC, Council Directive 2009/119/EC, Directive 2010/31/EU, Directive 2012/27/EU, Directive 2013/30/EU and Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 (Text with EEA Relevance). Brussels: COM(2016) 759 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016f. Quarterly Report. Energy on European Gas Markets. Fourth Quarter of 2015 and First Quarter of 2016. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2017. New Governance to Deliver on Objectives of the Energy Union. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/new-governance-deliver-objectives-energy-union [accessed 17 June 2017].Google Scholar
European Communities. 2007. The Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty Establishing the European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community Including the Protocols and Annexes, and Final Act with Declarations. Brussels: C 306 (01).Google Scholar
European Council. 1992a. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal L 206:7–50.Google Scholar
European Council. 1992b. Council Directive 92/91/EEC of 3 November 1992 concerning the minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers in the mineral- extracting industries through drilling (eleventh individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Official Journal L 348:9–24.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice. 2013. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 June 2013. European Commission v. Republic of Poland. Failure of a Member State to Fulfil Obligations – Directive 94/22/EC – Conditions for Granting and Using Authorisations for the Prospection, Exploration and Extraction of Hydrocarbons – Non-Discriminatory Access. Luxembourg: Case C-569/10.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 1994. Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons. Official Journal L 164:3–8.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 1998. Directive 98/30/EC Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Natural Gas. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 22 June.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal L 327:1–73.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Official Journal L 197:30–37.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2003. Directive 2003/55/EC Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Natural Gas and Repealing Directive 98/30/EC. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 26 June.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2004. Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. Official Journal L 143:56–75.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2006a. Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the management of waste from the extractive industries. Official Journal L 102:1–29.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2006b. Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration. Official Journal L 372:19–31.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2006c. Directive 2006/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances in order to adapt it to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Official Journal L 396:850–856.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2006d. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal L 49:396.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2009a. Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020. Official Journal L 140:136–148.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2009b. Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community. Official Journal L 140:63–87.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2009c. Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal L 140:114–134.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2009d. Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Natural Gas and Repealing Directive 2003/55/EC. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2010a. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds. Official Journal L 20:7–25.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2010b. Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control). Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal L 334:17–119.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2010c. Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 concerning measures to safeguard security of gas supply and repealing Council Directive 2004/67/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union L 295:1–22.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2012a. Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification). Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal L 26:1–21.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2012b. Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directive 96/82/EC. Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal L 197:1–37.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2013. Directive 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on safety of offshore oil and gas operations and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal L 178:66–106.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council. 2014. Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament and the Council 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal L 124:1–18.Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2014. Renewable Energy Statistics. Brussels.Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2015. GDP Per Capita at Current Market Prices, 2005 and 2015. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/File:GDP_per_capita_at_current_market_prices,_2005_and_2015_(EU-28_%3D_100;_based_on_PPS_per_inhabitant)_YB16.png [accessed 11 November 2016].Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2016. Energy Production and Imports. July. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Energy_production_and_imports [accessed 2 May 2017].Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2017. EU Imports of Energy Products – Recent Developments. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/EU_imports_of_energy_products_-_recent_developments [accessed 1 June 2017].Google Scholar
Evensen, Darrick. 2016. Ethics and ‘fracking’: a review of (the limited) moral thought on shale gas development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 3 (4):575–586.Google Scholar
Evensen, Darrick T., Clarke, Christopher E. and Stedman, Richard C.. 2014. A New York or Pennsylvania state of mind: social representations of gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4:65–77.Google Scholar
Fagan, Adam and Carmin, JoAnn, eds. 2011. Green Activism in Post-Socialist Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2010. Europe the new frontier in shale gas rush. 7 March.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2014a. Bulgarians see Russian hand in anti-shale protests. 30 November.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2014b. Nato claims Moscow funding anti-fracking groups. 19 June.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2014c. ENI joins shale gas exodus from Poland. 15 January.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2015a. Eastern European shale exploration on ice as boom turns to bust. 28 October.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2015b. The US shale revolution. 24 April.Google Scholar
Finon, Dominique and Locatelli, Catherine. 2008. Russian and European gas interdependence. Can market forces balance out geopolitics? Energy Policy 36 (1):423–442.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. Leiper and Stevens, Judith Parris. 1987. A theoretical and conceptual reexamination of subsystem politics. Public Policy and Administration 2 (9):9–24.Google Scholar
Gabor, Hunya. 2007. Privatization Disputes in Romania – the Petrom Case, Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. wiiw Research Report Nr. 337.Google Scholar
Garpiel, Rafał. 2014. Attitudes towards shale gas in Poland and the Czech Republic. In The Development of the Shale Gas Sector in Poland and its Prospects in the Czech Republic – Analysis and Recommendations, edited by Albrycht, I., Bigaj, W., Dvořáková, V., et al. Krakow: The Kosciuszko Institute.Google Scholar
Gazprom Export. 2016. Gas Supplies to Europe. Available from www.gazpromexport.ru/en/statistics/ [accessed 19 May 2016].Google Scholar
Geels, Frank W. 2005. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 72:681–696.Google Scholar
Geels, Frank W. and Kemp, René. 2007. Dynamics in socio-technical systems: typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology and Society 29 (4):441–455.Google Scholar
Gény, Florence. 2010. Can Unconventional Gas be a Game Changer in European Gas Markets? Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. NG 46.Google Scholar
Georgiev, Atanas. 2011. Shale gas battle in Bulgaria – high stalkes for Europe. European Energy Review. 1 September.Google Scholar
Georgiev, Atanas. 2016. Shale and Eastern Europe – Bulgaria, Romania, and Ukraine. In The Global Impact of Unconventional Shale Gas Development, edited by Wang, Y. and Hefley, W. E.. New York, NY: Springer, 75–96.Google Scholar
Georgieva, Patricia. 2004. Bulgaria: the double edge of economy and demography. Higher Education in Europe 29 (3):363–372.Google Scholar
Giurco, Damien, Mclellan, Benjamin, Franks, Daniel M., Nansai, Keisuke and Prior, Timothy. 2014. Responsible mineral and energy futures: views at the nexus. Journal of Cleaner Production 84:322–338.Google Scholar
Godzimirski, Jakub M. and Kasianiuk, Krzysztof, eds. 2014. Polish and Norwegian Governance: Closing the Gaps. Warsaw: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych (PISM).Google Scholar
Gold, David A., Lo, Clarence Y. H. and Wright, Erik Olin. 1975. Recent developments in Marxist theories of the capitalist state. Monthly Review 27 (5):29–43.Google Scholar
Gold, Russell. 2014. The Boom: How Fracking Ignited the American Energy Revolution and Changed the World. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2008. Resurgent Russia? Rethinking Energy Inc. Five myths about the ‘energy superpower’. Policy Review 147 (February/March):53–63.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2011a. Challenges in global oil governance. In Oil Politics Handbook, edited by Looney, R.. London: Routledge, pp. 348–360.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2011b. A public policy perspective on global energy security. International Studies Perspectives 13 (December):64–83.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2012a. Emerging governance challenges for Eurasian gas markets after the shale gas revolution. In Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia, edited by Kuzemko, C., Belyi, A., Goldthau, A. and Keating, M.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2012b. From the state to the market and back. Policy implications of changing energy paradigms. Global Policy 2 (S2):198–210.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2013. The politics of natural gas development in the European Union. Cambridge, MA/Houston, TX: Harvard Belfer Center/Rice University's Baker Institute.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2016a. Assessing Nord Stream 2: Regulation, Geopolitics & Energy Security in the EU, Central Eastern Europe & the UK. London: King's College London, Russia Institute & EUCERS. EUCERS Strategy Paper 10.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2016b. Conceptualizing the above ground factors in shale gas. Toward a research agenda on regulatory governance. Energy Research and Social Science 20:73–81.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2016c. Energy technology, politics, and interpretative frames: the case of shale gas fracking in Eastern Europe. Global Environmental Politics 16 (4):50–69.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas. 2017. The G20 must govern the shift to low-carbon energy. Nature 546:203–205.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas and LaBelle, Michael. 2016. The power of policy regimes. Explaining shale gas policy divergence in Bulgaria and Poland. Review of Policy Research 33 (6):603–622.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas and Sitter, Nick. 2014. A liberal actor in a realist world? The Commission and the external dimension of the single market for energy. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (10):1452–1472Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas and Sitter, Nick. 2015a. A Liberal Actor in a Realist World. The European Union Regulatory State and the Global Political Economy of Energy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas and Sitter, Nick. 2015b. Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security. Review of International Political Economy 22 (5):941–965.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas and Sovacool, Benjamin. 2016. Energy technology, politics, and interpretative frames: The case of shale gas fracking in Eastern Europe. Global Environmental Politics 16 (4):50–69.Google Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas and Witte, Jan Martin. 2009. Back to the future or forward to the past? Strengthening markets and rules for effective global energy governance. International Affairs 85 (2):373–390.Google Scholar
Grafton, R. Quentin, Cronshaw, Ian G. and Moore, Michal C., eds. 2017. Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambride University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, John D., Rupp, John A. and Schenk, Olga. 2015. Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues. Risk Analysis 35 (10):1770–1788.Google Scholar
Graves, John H. 2012. Fracking: America's Alternative Energy Revolution. Asheville: Safe Harbor.Google Scholar
Groen, Lisanne, Niemann, Arne and Oberthür, Sebastian. 2012. The EU as a global leader? The Copenhagen and Cancun UN climate change negotiations. Journal of Contemporary European Research 8 (2):173–191.Google Scholar
Grubler, Arnulf and Wilson, Charlie, eds. 2013. Energy Technology Innovation: Learning from Historical Successes and Failures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2010. Ukraine extends lease for Russia's Black Sea fleet. 21 April.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2012. Bulgaria becomes second state to impose ban on shale-gas exploration. 14 February.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2013a. Chevron suspends shale gas exploration plan in Romanian village after protest. 21 October.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2013b. Police remove protesters from Chevron's fracking site in Romania. 5 December.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2013c. Romania expected to reject gold mine following week of protest. 10 September.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2015. Poland's shale gas revolution evaporates in face of environmental protests. 12 January.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2016a. Leaked TTIP energy proposal could ‘sabotage’ EU climate policy. 11 July.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2016b. Romanian village blocks Canadian firm from mining for gold. 14 January.Google Scholar
Gullion, Jessica Smartt. 2015. Fracking the Neighborhood. Reluctant Activists and Natural Gas Drilling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Kagan, Robert A and Thornton, Dorothy. 2004. Social licence and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 29:307–341.Google Scholar
Gupta, Kuhika. 2012. Comparative public policy: using the comparative method to advance our understanding of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal 40:11–26.Google Scholar
Gusilov, Eugenia. 2012. Romania's Shale Gas Strategy. Bucharest: Romania Energy Center. Policy Brief 1.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Thane. 1998. Crisis Amid Plenty: The Politics of Soviet Energy under Brezhnev and Gorbachev. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (December):936–957.Google Scholar
Hardt, John and Gold, Donna L.. 1982. Soviet Gas Pipeline: US Options. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. IB82020.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard A. and Milkis, Sidney M.. 1996. The Politics of Regulatory Change: A Tale of Two Agencies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haug, Marianne. 2012. Shale gas and renewables: divergence or win-win for transatlantic energy cooperation? Journal of Transatlantic Studies 10 (4):358–373.Google Scholar
Hausman, Catherine and Kellogg, Ryan. 2015. Welfare and Distributional Implications of Shale Gas. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Head, Brian W. 2008. Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3 (2):101–118.Google Scholar
Hickey, Samuel and Mohan, Giles, eds. 2004. Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hiteva, Ralitsa Petrova and Maltby, Tomas. 2014. Standing in the way by standing in the middle: the case of state-owned natural gas intermediaries in Bulgaria. Geoforum 54:120–131.Google Scholar
Högselius, Per. 2012. Red Gas. Russia and the Origins of European Energy Dependence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher, Rothstein, Henry and Baldwin, Robert. 2001. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horsford, Sonya Douglass, ed. 2010. New Perspectives in Educational Leadership. Exploring Social, Political, and Community Contexts and Meaning. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
House, Evan J. 2013. Fractured fairytales: the failed social license for unconventional oil and gas development. Wyoming Law Review 13 (1):6–67.Google Scholar
House of Lords. 2013. The Economic Impact on UK Energy Policy of Shale Gas and Oil. Oral and Written Evidence. London. Available from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldeconaf/172/172.pdf [accessed 22 November 2017].Google Scholar
Howarth, Robert W. 2015. Methane emissions and climatic warming risk from hydraulic fracturing and shale gas development: implications for policy. Energy and Emission Control Technologies 3:45–54.Google Scholar
Howarth, Robert W., Santoro, Renee and Ingraffea, Anthony. 2011. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change 106 (4):679–690.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2001. Canadian Forest Policy: Adapting to Change. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2004. Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy and Society 23 (2):1–17.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2009. Governance modes, policy regimes, and operational plans: a multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice an policy design. Policy Sciences 42 (1):73–89.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Mukherjee, Ishani. 2014. Policy design and non-design: towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance 2 (2):57–71.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M.. 2002. The policy effects of internationalization: a subsystem adjustment analysis of policy change Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 4 (1):31–50.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Rayner, Jeremy. 2006. Convergence and divergence in ‘new governance’ arrangements: evidence from european integrated natural resource strategies. Journal of Public Policy 26 (2):167–189.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael, Ramesh, M. and Perl, Anthony. 2009. Studying Public Policy. Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoy, Kyle A., Kelsey, Timothy W. and Shields, Martin. 2017. An economic impact report of shale gas extraction in Pennsylvania with stricter assumptions. Ecological Economics 138:178–185.Google Scholar
Hulbert, Matthew and Goldthau, Andreas. 2013. Natural gas going global? Potential and pitfalls. In Handbook of Global Energy Policy, edited by Goldthau, A.. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 98–112.Google Scholar
Hultman, Nathan, Rebois, Dylan, Scholten, Michael and Ramig, Christopher. 2011. The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation. Environmental Research Letters 6:044008.Google Scholar
Hunter, Janet R and Smith, Zachary A. 2006. Protecting Our Environment: Lessons from the European Union. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
ICIS. 2011. Bulgaria planning to cut Russian natural gas imports by 75%. 7 July. Available from www.icis.com/heren/articles/2011/07/07/9475963/bulgaria+planning+to+cut+russian+natural+gas+imports+by.html [accessed 18 December 2013].Google Scholar
IEA. 2012a. Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas. World Energy Outlook Special Report on Unconventional Gas. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. 2012b. Natural Gas Information. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. 2014a. Energy Supply Security: The Emergency Response of IEA Countries – 2014 Edition. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. 2014b. Medium-Term Gas Market Report. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. 2015. World Energy Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. 2016. World Energy Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
IGU. 2016. Wholesale Gas Price Survey 2016 Edition. Fornebu.Google Scholar
IHS Energy. 2016. Shale Gas Reloaded: The Evolving View of North American Natural Gas Resources and Costs. London.Google Scholar
Imbroscio, David L. 1998. Reformulating urban regime theory: the division of labor between state and market reconsidered. Journal of Urban Affairs 20 (3):233–248.Google Scholar
IMF. 2014. 25 Years of Transition. Post-Communist Europe and the IMF. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Inmam, Mason. 2016. Can fracking power Europe? Nature 532 (7592):22–24.Google Scholar
International Business Times. 2010. Poland: the next fracking frontier? 20 October.Google Scholar
International Herald Tribune. 2008. Russia, Iran and Qatar move toward forming gas cartel. 22 October.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert B., Vengosh, Avner, Carey, J. William, et al. 2014. The environmental costs and benefits of fracking. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39 (7):1–7.Google Scholar
Jacquet, Jeffrey B. 2014. Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. Environmental Science & Technology 48 (15):8321–8333.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Amy Myers. 2010. Shale gas will rock the world. Wall Street Journal. 10 May.Google Scholar
Jahn, Detlef. 1998. Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD-countries. Policy Sciences 31:107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jans, Jan H. and Vedder, Hans H.. 2011. European Environmental Law: After Lisbon Vol. 4. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Jaspal, Rusi and Nerlich, Brigitte. 2014. Fracking in the UK press: threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding of Science 23 (3):348–363.Google Scholar
Jaspal, Rusi, Nerlich, Brigitte and Lemańcyzk, Szczepan. 2014. Fracking in the Polish press: geopolitics and national identity. Energy Policy 74:253–261.Google Scholar
Jaspal, Rusi, Turner, Andrew and Nerlich, Brigitte. 2014. Fracking on YouTube: exploring risks, benefits and human values. Environmental Values 23 (5):501.Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., St Clair, Gilbert and Woods, Brian. 1991. Explaining change in policy subsystems: analysis of coalition stability and defection over time. American Journal of Political Science 35 (4):851–881.Google Scholar
Jochim, Ashley E. and May, Peter J.. 2010. Beyond subsystems: policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal 38 (2):303–327.Google Scholar
Johnson, Corey and Derrick, Matthew. 2012. A splintered heartland: russia, europe, and the geopolitics of networked energy infrastructure. Geopolitics 17 (3):482–501.Google Scholar
Jong, Sijbren de, Auping, Willem and Govers, Joris. 2014. The Geopolitics of Shale Gas. The Implications of the US Shale Gas Revolution on Intrastate Stability within Traditional Oil- and Natural Gas Exporting Countries in the EU Neighborhood. The Hague: The Hague Center for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Jordan, Andy and Matt, Elah. 2014. Designing policies that intentionally stick: policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences 47 (3):227–247.Google Scholar
Jordan, Grant. 1990. Sub-governments, policy communities and networks: refilling the old bottles? Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3):319–338.Google Scholar
Jordana, Jacint, Levi-Faur, David and Puig, Imma. 2006. The limits of Europeanization: Regulatory reforms in the Spanish and Portuguese telecommunications and electricity sectors. Governance 19 (3):437–464.Google Scholar
Judge, Andrew and Maltby, Tomas. 2017. European Energy Union? Caught between securitisation and ‘riskification’. European Journal of International Security 2 (2):179–202.Google Scholar
Kalicki, Jan H. and Goldwyn, David L., eds. 2005. Energy and Security. Toward a New Foreign Policy Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert D. 2012. The geopolitics of shale. Stratfor Worldview. Available from https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/geopolitics-shale [accessed 22 November 2017].Google Scholar
Kavanagh, D. and Richards, D.. 2001. Departmentalism and joined-up government. Parliamentary Affairs 54 (1):1–18.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Yuri, ed. 2004. Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangement and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
KC2. 2014. Natural Gas from Shale. Socioeconomic Impacts for Bulgaria. Sofia: Institute for Market Economics.Google Scholar
Kemp, René, Rotmans, Jan and Loorbach, Derk. 2007. Assessing the Dutch energy transition policy: how does it deal with dilemmas of managing transitions? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9 (3–4):315–331.Google Scholar
Kenarov, Dimiter. 2011. Where your gold comes from: the story of an exploited town in Bulgaria. The Atlantic. 7 November.Google Scholar
Kenarov, Dimiter. 2012. Poland's shale gas dream. Foreign Policy. 26 December.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 2000. The transformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review 60 (6):488–497.Google Scholar
Kim, Younkyoo and Blank, Stephen. 2014. US shale revolution and Russia: shifting geopolitics of energy in Europe and Asia. Asia Europe Journal 13 (1):95–112.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Klare, Michael. 2001. Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Klare, Michael T. 2009. Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Klein, Hans E. and Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 2002. The social construction of technology: structural considerations. Science, Technology, and Human Values 27 (1):28–52.Google Scholar
Knill, Christoph. 1998. European policies: the impact of national administrative traditions. Journal of Public Policy 18 (1):1–28.Google Scholar
Knill, Christoph and Lehmkuhl, Dirk. 2002. The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research 41 (2):255–280.Google Scholar
Kohl, Wilfrid. 2010. The International Energy Agency and the Global Energy Order. In Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game, edited by Goldthau, A. and Witte, J. M.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kohler-Koch, Beate and Rittberger, Berthold. 2006. The ‘governance turn’ in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies 44:27–49.Google Scholar
Konoplyanik, Andrey A. 2010. Evolution of gas pricing in Continental Europe: a view from Russia – modernization of indexation formulas versus gas-to-gas competition. Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence. June.Google Scholar
Kovacevic, Aleksandar. 2009. The Impact of the Russia–Ukraine Gas Crisis in South Eastern Europe. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. NG 29.Google Scholar
KPMG. 2012. Central and Eastern European Shale Gas Outlook. KPMG Global Energy Institute.Google Scholar
KPMG. 2014. New Shale Gas Tax Law in Poland. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. In International Regimes, edited by Krasner, S. D.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krastanova, Radosveta. 2012. The Green Movement and the Green Parties in Bulgaria: Between System Integration and System Change. Sofia: Friedrich Ebert FoundationGoogle Scholar
Krastev, Ivan. 2014. Russian revisionism. Putin's plan for overturning the European order. Foreign Affairs. 3 March. Available from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-03-03/russian-revisionism [accessed 12 June 2017].Google Scholar
Kriesky, Jill, Goldstein, Bernard D., Zell, Katrina and Beach, Scott. 2013. Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity. Energy Policy 58:228–236.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Maximilian and Umbach, Frank. 2011. Unconventional gas resources: a transatlantic shale alliance? In Transatlantic Energy Futures. Strategic Perspectives on Energy Security, Climate Change and New Technologies in Europe and the United States, edited by Koranyi, D.. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, John Hopkins University Press, pp. 207–228.Google Scholar
Kuzemko, Caroline, Belyi, Andrei, Goldthau, Andreas and Keating, Michael, eds. 2012. Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
LaBelle, Michael. 2017. A state of fracking: building Poland's national innovation capacity for shale gas. Energy Research & Social Science 23:26–35.Google Scholar
LaBelle, Michael C. 2016. Failure to frack: pitfalls of governance and risk in Polish shale gas. In Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas. A Global Perspective, edited by Grafton, R. Q., Cronshaw, I. G. and Moore, M. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–285.Google Scholar
LaBelle, Michael and Goldthau, Andreas. 2014a. Escaping the valley of death? Comparing shale gas technology policy prospects to nuclear and solar in Europe. Journal of World Energy, Law & Business 7 (2):93–111.Google Scholar
LaBelle, Michael and Goldthau, Andreas. 2014b. The governance of shale gas in Bulgaria. From exploration to bust. Oil, Gas and Energy Law Journal 12 (3): Special Edition on The Governance of Unconventional Gas Development Outside the United States.Google Scholar
Lachapelle, Erick, Montpetit, Éric and Gauvin, Jean-Philippe. 2014. Public perceptions of expert credibility on policy issues: the role of expert framing and political worldviews. Policy Studies Journal 42 (4):674–697.Google Scholar
Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie. 2013. Erdöl und Erdgas in der Bundesrepublic Deutschland. Hannover.Google Scholar
Landry, David. 2013. Fracking for Hungary? Minister describes Hungary's ‘neutral’ position. Budapest Business Journal. 19 July.Google Scholar
Larsson, Robert L. 2006. Russia's Energy Policy: Security Dimensions and Russia's Reliability as an Energy Supplier. Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency.Google Scholar
Lauria, Mickey. 1996. Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory. In Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, edited by Lauria, M.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1–10.Google Scholar
Law, John. 1991. Theory and narrative in the history of technology: response. Technology and Culture 32 (2):379–380.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, David. 1999. The Governance of Competition: the interplay of technology, economics, and politics in European Union electricity and telecom regimes. Journal of Public Policy 19 (2):175–207.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 2002. Ideas, institutions, and political order: explaining political change. American Political Science Review 96 (4):697–712.Google Scholar
Lin, Albert C. 2014. Fracking and federalism: a comparative approach to reconciling national and subnational interests in the United States and Spain Environmental Law 44 (4):1039–1078Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lis, Aleksandra and Stankiewicz, Piotr. 2016. Framing shale gas for policy-making in Poland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (1):53–71.Google Scholar
Lis, Aleksandra, Braendle, Claudia, Fleischer, Torsten, et al. 2015. Existing European Data on Public Perceptions of Shale Gas. M4ShaleGas Consortium. Project Report.Google Scholar
Lodge, Martin. 2002. Varieties of Europeanisation and the national regulatory state. Public Policy and Administration 17 (2):43–67.Google Scholar
Lodge, Martin. 2008. Regulation, the regulatory state and European politics. West European Politics 31 (1/2):280–301.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16:677–715.Google Scholar
Lund, Susan, Manyika, James, Nyquist, Scott, Mendonca, Lenny and Ramaswamy, Sreenivas. 2013. Game Changers: Five Opportunities for US Growth and Renewal, Seoul/San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 1994. The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics 17 (3):77–101.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 1997. From the positive to the regulatory state: causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy 17 (2):139–167.Google Scholar
Manley, David, Cust, James and Cecchinato, Giorgia. 2017. Stranded Nations? The Climate Policy Implications for Fossil Fuel-Rich Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies. OxCarre Policy Paper 34.Google Scholar
Mason, Charles F., Muehlenbachs, Lucija A. and Olmstead, Sheila M.. 2015. The Economics of Shale Gas Development. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
May, Peter J. and Jochim, Ashley E.. 2013. Policy regime perspectives: policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3):426–452.Google Scholar
May, Peter J., Jochim, Ashley E. and Sapotichne, Joshua. 2011. Constructing homeland security: an anemic policy regime. Policy Studies Journal 39 (2):285–307.Google Scholar
Mazmanian, Daniel A. and Sabatier, Paul A.. 1989. Implementation and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
McCool, Daniel. 1998. The subsystem family of concepts: a critique and a proposal. Political Research Quarterly 51 (2):551–570.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., Noll, Roger G. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 3 (2):243–277.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., Noll, Roger G. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. Structure and process, politics and policy: administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review 75 (2):431–482.Google Scholar
McGowan, Francis. 2014. Regulating innovation: European responses to shale gas development. Environmental Politics 23 (1):41–58.Google Scholar
McGowan, Francis and Wallace, Helen. 1996. Towards a European regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy 3 (4):560–576.Google Scholar
McGuinn, Patrick. 2006. Swing issues and policy regimes: federal education policy and the politics of policy change. Journal of Policy History 18 (2):205–240.Google Scholar
Medarov, Georgi. 2013. Land concentration, land grabbing and land conflicts in Europe: the case of Boynitsa in Bulgaria. In Land Concentration, Land Grabbing and People's Struggles in Europe, edited by Franco, J. and Borras, S. M. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute (TNI)/European Coordination Via Campesina (ECVC)/Hands off the Land Alliance, pp. 154–179.Google Scholar
Medlock, Kenneth B. 2009. Shale Gas: A Game-Changer with Global Implications. Houston, TX: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University.Google Scholar
Medlock, Kenneth B., Jaffe, Amy Myers and Hartley, Peter R.. 2011. Shale Gas and US National Security. Houston, TX: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. and Smith, Kevin B.. 1994. Say it ain't so, Moe: institutional design, policy effectiveness, and drug policy. Journal of Public Administration and Theory 4 (5):429–442.Google Scholar
Metze, Tamara. 2017. Fracking the debate: frame shifts and boundary work in Dutch decision making on shale gas. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (1):35–52.Google Scholar
Mihalache, Anca Elena. 2015. No shale gas, after all – implications of Chevron's exit from Romania. Natural Gas Europe. 30 March.Google Scholar
Milward, H. Brinton and Provan, Keith G.. 2000. Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2):359–380.Google Scholar
Ministerstwo Gospodarki/Ministerstwo Srodowiska. 2014. Strategia Bezpieczeństwo Energetyczne i Środowisko perspektywa do 2020 r. Warszawa.Google Scholar
Ministerul Energiei. 2016. Strategia Energetică a României 2016–2030, cu perspectiva anului 2050. BukarestGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Economics, Energy and Tourism. 2011. Energy Strategy of Republic of Bulgaria till 2020. For Reliable, Effective and Cleaner Energy. SofiaGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Economy and Energy. 2014. Energy Security and the Environment Strategy – 2020 Perspective (Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne i środowisko – perspektywa do roku 2020). Warsaw.Google Scholar
Mossberger, Karen and Stoker, Gerry. 2001. The evolution of urban regime theory: the challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review 36 (6):810–835.Google Scholar
Murphy, Joseph, ed. 2007. Governing Technology for Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Natural Gas Europe. 2012. Park Place Energy Not Seeking to Explore for Shale in Bulgaria. 5 April.Google Scholar
Natural Gas Europe. 2013a. Bureaucratic Delays Impact Poland's Shale Promise. 1 February.Google Scholar
Natural Gas Europe. 2013b. Poland Proposes Restrictions to Shale Gas Opposition. 1 April.Google Scholar
Naturalgasworld. 2012. President: Romania Needs Decision on Shale Gas Development. 13 August.Google Scholar
Naturalgasworld. 2013. Romania Needs Shale Gas to Achieve Energy Independence. 6 October.Google Scholar
Nelsen, Jacqueline L. 2006. Social license to operate. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment 20 (3):161–162.Google Scholar
Neslen, Arthur. 2014. EC serves notice to Poland over shale gas defiance. The Guardian. 30 July.Google Scholar
Neville, Kate J. and Weinthal, Erika. 2016. Scaling up site disputes: strategies to redefine ‘local’ in the fight against fracking. Environmental Politics 25 (4):569–592.Google Scholar
Neville, Kate J., Baka, Jennifer, Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti, et al. 2017. Debating unconventional energy: social, political, and economic implications. Annual Review of Environment & Resources 42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016–061102 [accessed 22 November 2017].Google Scholar
Newman, Joshua and Howlett, Michael. 2014. Regulation and time: temporal patterns in regulatory development. International Review of Administrative Sciences 80 (3):493–511.Google Scholar
Newsweek. 2015. Romania's Prime Minister appears in court days after shock resignation. 11 June.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1981. Soviet natural gas for West curtailed. 10 January.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2010. Eastern Europe, seeking energy security, turns to shale gas. 11 May.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2012a. Romanian Prime Minister resigns amid protests. 6 February.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2012b. Seeking disclosure on fracking. 30 May.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2013. The lives they lived: George Mitchell. 21 December.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2014a. Boom in energy spurs industry in the Rust Belt. 8 September.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2014b. Lithuania offers example of how to break Russia's grip on energy. 27 October.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2017. Anger and mistrust fuel unabated protests in Romania. 12 February.Google Scholar
Nikolenyi, Csaba. 2014. Institutional Design and Party Government in Post-Communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. Warner, Stern, Paul C., Webler, Thomas and Field, Patrick. 2014. Public and stakeholder participation for managing and reducing the risks of shale gas development. Environmental Science & Technology 48 (15):8388–8396.Google Scholar
Nosko, Andrej and Mišík, Matúš. 2017. No united front: the political economy of energy in Central and Eastern Europe. In Energy Union. Europe's New Liberal Mercantilism?, edited by Andersen, S., Goldthau, A. and Sitter, N.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 201–222.Google Scholar
Novinite. 2011a. Bulgarian minister: energy is key to national security. 29 May.Google Scholar
Novinite. 2011b. Dundee: Bulgaria's gold mine project has 3.3 year payback. 6 December.Google Scholar
Novinite. 2012. Bulgaria quits belene nuclear power plant project. 28 March.Google Scholar
Novinite. 2015. Bulgaria's energy sector is in state of financial collapse – minister. 22 February.Google Scholar
Nülle, Grant Mark. 2015. Prospects for shale development outside the USA: evaluating nations’ regulatory and fiscal regimes for unconventional hydrocarbons. Journal of World Energy Law & Business 8 (3):232–268.Google Scholar
Nygren, Bertil. 2008. Putin's use of natural gas to reintegrate the CIS region. Problems of Post-Communism 55 (4):3–15.Google Scholar
Oberthür, Sebastian and Stokke, Olav Schram, eds. 2011. Managing Institutional Complexity. Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Orban, Anita. 2008. Power, Energy, and the New Russian Imperialism. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen. 1998. Regimes and regime building in American government: a review of literature on the 1940s. Political Science Quarterly 113 (4):689–702.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, Meghan. 2013. The entanglement of energy, grand strategy, and international security. In Wiley Handbook of Global Energy Policy, edited by Goldthau, A.. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Owen, John R. and Kemp, Deanna. 2013. Social licence and mining: a critical perspective. Resources Policy 38 (1):29–35.Google Scholar
Pachiu, Laurentiu, Mustaciosu, Raluca and Dudau, Radu. 2014. Oil and Gas Regulation in Romania: An Overview. Energy and Natural Resources Multi-Jurisdictional Guide.Google Scholar
Pachiu, Laurentiu, Vasiliu, Delia and Dudău, Radu. 2016. Romania. In Energy 2017, 5th edn, edited by Picton-Turbervill, G. and Derrick, J.. London: Global Legal Group Ltd, pp. 180–186.Google Scholar
Parsons, Richard and Moffat, Kieren. 2014. Constructing the meaning of social licence. Social Epistemology 28 (3–4):340–363.Google Scholar
Pearson, Ivan, Zeniewski, Peter, Gracceva, Francesco, et al. 2012. Unconventional Gas: Potential Energy Market Impacts in the European Union. Luxembourg: European Commission Joint Research Centre.Google Scholar
Pencea, Roxana, Brădăţan, Tudor and Simion, Ştefania. 2013. Transylvania. Undermined-Territory. Bukarest: Mining Watch România.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. 1998. Managing horizontal government: the politics of co-ordination. Public Administration 76 (2):295–311.Google Scholar
Peters, Guy. 2010. Bureaucracy and democracy. Public Organization Review 10:209–222.Google Scholar
PGI-NRI. 2012. Assessment of Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resources of the Lower Paleozoic Baltic-Podlasie-Lublin Basin in Poland, Warsaw. Polish Geological Institute – National Research Institute. Available from https://www.pgi.gov.pl/docman-tree/aktualnosci-2012/zasoby-gazu/769-raport-en/file.html [accessed 22 November 2017].Google Scholar
Pickles, John and Smith, Adrian, eds. 1998. Theorizing Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinch, Trevor J. and Bijker, Wiebe. 1984. The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14 (3):399–418.Google Scholar
PKEE. 2016. Polish Power Sector. Getting the Facts Straight. Warsaw: Polish Electricity Association.Google Scholar
Platts. 2017. Analysis: Global Gas Suppliers Up The Ante in Market Share Battle. 24 February.Google Scholar
Polish Geological Survey. 2014. Public Opinion Poll on Shale Gas. Available from http://infolupki.pgi.gov.pl/en/society/public-opinion-poll-shale-gas [accessed 14 July 2016].Google Scholar
Polish Geological Survey. 2015a. Shale Gas Exploration Status in Poland as of April 2015. Available from http://infolupki.pgi.gov.pl/en/exploration-status/news/shale-gas-exploration-status-poland-april-2015 [accessed 1 July 2015].Google Scholar
Polish Geological Survey. 2015b. Taxation of Hydrocarbons – Not Really High – Will Have No Adverse Effects on the Level of Investment. Available from http://infolupki.pgi.gov.pl/en/economy/law-concessions/taxation-hydrocarbons-not-really-high-will-have-no-adverse-effects-level [accessed 22 November 2017].Google Scholar
Polish Ministry of the Environment. 2015. Shale Gas Development in Poland – Progress Report.Google Scholar
Politico. 2013. Shale gas could be ‘game changer’. 24 April.Google Scholar
Politico. 2016. Shrugging off concerns, Europe waves through Hungary's controversial nuke deal. 27 December.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2003. Joined-up government: a survey. Political Studies Review 1 (1):34–49.Google Scholar
Pöyry. 2013. Macroeconomic Effects of European Shale Gas Production. A Report to the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP). Oxford.Google Scholar
PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2011. Shale Gas: A Renaissance in US Manufacturing. New York.Google Scholar
The PRS Group. 2015. Regional Political Risk Index (as of April 2015). Available from https://www.prsgroup.com/category/risk-index [accessed 7 October 2016].Google Scholar
Prno, Jason and Slocombe, D. Scott. 2012. Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy 37:346–357.Google Scholar
Pye, Steve, Dobbins, Audrey, Baffert, Claire, et al. 2015. Energy Poverty and Vulnerable Consumers in the Energy Sector across the EU: Analysis of Policies and Measures. Brussels: INSIGHT_E.Policy Report 2.Google Scholar
Rabe, Barry G. and Borick, Christopher. 2013. Conventional politics for unconventional drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania's early move into fracking policy development. Review of Policy Research 30 (3):321–340.Google Scholar
Rahm, Dianne. 2011. Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: the case of Texas. Energy Policy 39 (5):2974–2981.Google Scholar
Rayner, Jeremy and Howlett, Michael. 2009. Introduction: understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society 28 (2):99–109.Google Scholar
Rein, Martin. 1983. From Policy to Practice. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Reins, Leonie. 2017. Regulating Shale Gas. The Challenge of Coherent Environmental and Energy Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2010. Chevron seeks to explore for shale gas in Bulgaria. 15 July.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2011. Bulgaria seeks to ease fears on shale gas drilling. 19 July.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2012a. Bulgaria eases oil and gas fracking ban. 14 June.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2012b. Czechs eye moratorium on shale gas exploration. 7 May.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2013a. Exit by two foreign firms leaves Polish shale gas under cloud. 8 May.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2013b. Romanian farmers choose subsistence over shale gas. 19 October.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2013c. Work together better, shale gas investors tell Polish companies. 27 March.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2014a. Chevron leaves Lithuania as shale gas prospects remain uncertain. 8 July.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2014b. Romania does not have shale gas, PM Ponta says. 10 November.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2014c. US considers fracking fluid disclosure rules. 9 May.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2015a. Bulgaria scraps incentives for new renewable energy installations. 26 February.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2015b. Conoco the last global oil firm to quit Polish shale gas. 5 June.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2015c. Insight – Creeping ‘Orbanisation’ in Poland sparking unease in EU. 17 December.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2015d. Update 1 – Romania to send oil and gas royalty tax law to parliament in September. 25 May.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2016a. Dutch lower Groningen gas production cap to 24 bcm. 24 June.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2016b. Poland aims to end long-term gas supplies from Russia after 2022. 31 May.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A.W. 1997. Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Rittel, Horst W. J. and Webber, Melvin M.. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155–169.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, Subramanian, Arvind and Trebbi, Francesco. 2004. Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9 (2):131–165.Google Scholar
Romanian Energy Regulatory Authority. 2015a. First Quarter 2015 Newsletter. Bucharest: ANRE.Google Scholar
Romanian Energy Regulatory Authority. 2015b. National Report 2014. Bucharest: ANRE.Google Scholar
Romanian National Committee of World Energy Council. 2013. Natural Gas Resource from Unconventional Fields – Potential and Recovery. Bucharest.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo and Teorell, Jan. 2008. What is quality of Government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21 (2):165–190.Google Scholar
Rutland, Peter. 2008. Russia as an energy superpower. New Political Economy 13 (2): 203–210.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21:129.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. 1986. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy 6 (1):21–48.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Sabatier, P. A.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan, eds. 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2012. Experimentalist governance. In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by Levi-Faur, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169–183.Google Scholar
Sakmar, , , Susan L. 2011. The global shale gas initiative: will the United States be the role model for the development of shale gas around the world? Houston Journal of International Law 33 (2):369–416.Google Scholar
Schafft, Kai A., Borlu, Yetkin and Glenna, Leland. 2013. The relationship between marcellus shale gas development in Pennsylvania and local perceptions of risk and opportunity the relationship between Marcellus Shale gas development in Pennsylvania and local perceptions of risk and opportunity. Rural Sociology 78 (2):143–166.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1935. Politics, Pressure, and the Tariff. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies 61 (1):2–22.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Sophie. 2013. Comparative approaches to the study of public policy-making. In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Araral, E. J., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. and Wu, X.. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 29–43.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne L. and Ingram, Helen M.. 2009. What is next for policy design and social construction theory? Policy Studies Journal 37 (1):103–119.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Brenda. 2009. Energy Politics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Silve, Florent and Noël, Pierre. 2010. Cost curves for Gas Supply Security: the Case of Bulgaria. Cambridge Electricity Research Group Working Paper 1031.Google Scholar
Simina, Anca. 2013. Ponta susţine nu doar explorarea, ci şi exploatarea gazelor de şist: ‘Acum nu mai am dubii’. Gandul. 13 June.Google Scholar
Skalamera, Morena and Goldthau, Andreas. 2016. Russia Playing Hardball or Bidding Farewell to Europe? Debunking the Myths of Eurasia's New Geopolitics of Gas. Harvard White Paper.Google Scholar
Smeenk, Tom. 2010. Russian Gas for Europe: Creating Access and Choice. Underpinning Russia's Gas Export Strategy with Gazprom's Infrastructure Investments. The Hague: Clingendael International Energy Programme.Google Scholar
Smil, Vaclav. 2010. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Smith, Don C. and Richards, Jessica M.. 2015. Social license to operate: hydraulic fracturing-related challenges facing the oil & gas industry. Oil and Gas, Natural Resources & Energy Journal 1 (2):81–163.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael F. and Ferguson, Denise P.. 2013. ‘Fracking democracy’: issue management and locus of policy decision-making in the Marcellus Shale gas drilling debate. Public Relations Review 39 (4):377–386.Google Scholar
The Sofia Echo. 2012. ‘75% of Bulgarians favour shale gas exploration if environmental safety certain’ – poll. 17 January.Google Scholar
Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2014a. Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 37 (September):249–264.Google Scholar
Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2014b. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science 1:1–29.Google Scholar
Spence, David B. 2013. Federalism, regulatory lags, and the political economy of energy production. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 161 (431):431–508.Google Scholar
Standard News. 2014. US shale gas giant Chevron is leaving Bulgaria. 28 May.Google Scholar
Stark, David and Bruszt, Laszlo. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
State Agency for National Security. 2011. National Security Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia.Google Scholar
Stefanov, Ruslan, Nikolova, Valentina, Hristov, Dobromir, et al. 2011. Energy and Good Governance in Bulgaria. Trends and Policy Options. Sofia: Center for the Study of DemocracyGoogle Scholar
Stefanov, Ruslan, Galev, Todor, Tsanov, Martin, Vladimirov, Martin and Gantcheva, Nadejda. 2014. Energy Sector Governance and Energy (In)security in Bulgaria. Sofia: Center for the Study of Democracy.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M. and Bickers, Kenneth N.. 1995. Perpetuating The Pork Barrel: Policy Subsystems and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stent, Angela. 1981. From Embargo to Ostpolitik: The Political Economy of West German-Soviet Relations, 1955–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Michael H. 2016. Shale gas in North America and Europe. Energy Science and Engineering 4 (1):4–13.Google Scholar
Stern, Jonathan. 2006. The Russian–Ukrainian Gas Crisis of 2006. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
Stern, Jonathan, Pirani, Simon and Yafimava, Katja. 2009. The Russo-Ukrainian Gas Dispute of January 2009: A Comprehensive Assessment. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
Stevens, Paul. 2009. Transit Troubles. Pipelines as a Source of Conflict. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 1989a. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946–1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. 1989b. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly 104 (2):281–300.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 2002. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stulberg, Adam N. 2005. Moving beyond the great game: the geoeconomics of Russia's influence in the Caspian energy bonanza. Geopolitics 10 (1):1–25.Google Scholar
Stulberg, Adam N. 2008. Well-Oiled Diplomacy: Strategic Manipulation and Russia's Energy Statecraft in Eurasia. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Stulberg, Adam N. 2012. Strategic bargaining and pipeline politics: confronting the credible commitment problem in Eurasian energy transit. Review of International Political Economy 19 (5):808–836.Google Scholar
Supreme Audit Office of Poland. 2014. NIK on Shale Gas Search – Supreme Audit Office. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Szulecki, Kacper, Fischer, Severin, Gullberg, Anne Therese and Sartor, Oliver. 2016. Shaping the ‘Energy Union’: between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Climate Policy 16 (5):548–567.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ian and Boutilier, Robert. 2011. The social licence to operate. In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, edited by Darling, P.. Englewood, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, pp. 1779–1796.Google Scholar
Trammel, Setephan. 2015. The Unconventional is Becoming the New Conventional. Available from http://blog.ihs.com/the-unconventional-is-becoming-the-new-conventional [accessed 22 May 2017].Google Scholar
Transgaz. 2016. Structure of Gas Mixture. Available from www.transgaz.ro/en/informatii-clienti-0 [accessed 22 July 2016].Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2014. Corruption Perception Index 2014: Results. Berlin.Google Scholar
Tusk, Donald. 2014. A united Europe can end Russia's energy stranglehold. Financial Times. 21 April.Google Scholar
Ulli-Beer, Silvia. 2013. Dynamic Governance of Energy Technology Change: Socio-technical Transitions towards Sustainability. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Umbach, Frank. 2013. The unconventional gas revolution and the prospects for Europe and Asia. Asia Europe Journal 11 (3):305.Google Scholar
Upham, Paul, Lis, Aleksandra, Riesch, Hauke and Stankiewicz, Piotr. 2015. Addressing social representations in socio-technical transitions with the case of shale gas. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16:120–141.Google Scholar
UPI. 2013. Romgaz lands option for Black Sea field. 18 February.Google Scholar
Urban, Julie A. 2008. US access to the global LNG market. OPEC Energy Review 32 (3):215–231.Google Scholar
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014. The Marcellus Shale Gas Boom in Pennsylvania: Employment and Wage Trends. Monthly Labor Review. Available from https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2014.7 [accessed 6 June 2017].Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, Thijs, Haesebrouck, Tim and Debaere, Peter. 2017. Fractured politics? The comparative regulation of shale gas in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy:1–18.Google Scholar
Verweij, Marco, Douglas, Mary, Ellis, Richard, et al. 2006. Clumsy solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Administration 84 (4):817–843.Google Scholar
Vesalon, Lucian and Cretan, Remus. 2015. ‘We are not the Wild West’: anti-fracking protests in Romania. Environmental Politics 24 (2):288–307.Google Scholar
Visan, George. 2013. Public Perception of shale gas in Romania. Bucarest: Romania Energy Center. Policy Brief 3.Google Scholar
VOA. 2015. Bulgaria key battleground in US–Russia energy war. 23 February.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen, Pollack, Mark A. and Young, Alasdair R., eds. 2014. Policy-Making in the European Union, 7th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal. 2012. Polish state-controlled firms team up to explore for shale gas. 4 July.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal. 2014. Poland proposes tax breaks for shale gas industry. 11 March.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2007. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. Philadelphia, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Zhongmin and Krupnick, Alan. 2013. A Retrospective Review of Shale Gas Development in the United States. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Warner, Barbara and Shapiro, Jennifer. 2013. Fractured, fragmented federalism: a study in fracking regulatory policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43 (3):474–496.Google Scholar
Watson, Nigel, Deeming, Hugh and Treffny, Raphael. 2009. Beyond bureaucracy? Assessing institutional change in the governance of water in England. Water Alternatives 2 (3):448–460.Google Scholar
Weaver, Kent. 2010. Paths and forks or chutes and ladders? Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy 30 (2):137–162.Google Scholar
Weible, Christopher M., Heikkila, Tanya, Ingold, Karin and Fischer, Manuel, eds. 2016. Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing. Comparing Coalition Politics in North America and Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Collective identity formation and the international state. American Political Science Review 88:384–96.Google Scholar
Wilber, Tom. 2012. Under the Surface: Fracking, Fortunes, and the Fate of the Marcellus Shale. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Laurence, Macnaghten, Phil, Davies, Richard and Curtis, Sarah. 2015. Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science 26(1):89–104.Google Scholar
Williams, Russell A. 2009. Exogenous shocks in subsystem adjustment and policy change: the credit crunch and Canadian banking regulation. Journal of Public Policy 29 (1):29–53.Google Scholar
Wilson, Carter. 2000. Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy 20 (3):247–274.Google Scholar
Wolsink, Maarten. 2000. Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy 21 (1):49–64.Google Scholar
Wolske, Kim, Hoffman, Andrew and Strickland, Lukas. 2013. Public Perceptions of High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing & Deep Shale Gas Development. Graham Sustainability Institute Integrated Assessment Report Series. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, pp. 8.Google Scholar
Worsham, Jeff and Stores, Chaun. 2012. Pet sounds: subsystems, regimes, policy punctuations, and the neglect of African American farmers, 1935–2006. Policy Studies Journal 40 (1):169–189.Google Scholar
Youngs, Richard. 2009. Energy security: Europe's New Foreign Policy Challenge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zafonte, Matthew and Sabatier, Paul A.. 1998. Share beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 (4):473–505.Google Scholar
Zborowski, Matt. 2015. Poland's energy challenge. Oil & Gas Journal. 28 September.Google Scholar
Zielinski, Michal. 2012. Pomorze: seeds of polish shale gas counter revolution. Natural Gas Europe. 26 November.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Gregory. 2013. The Frackers: The Outrageous Inside Story of the New Billionaire Wildcatters. New York, NY: Portfolio/Penguin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Andreas Goldthau, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Book: The Politics of Shale Gas in Eastern Europe
  • Online publication: 21 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875018.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Andreas Goldthau, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Book: The Politics of Shale Gas in Eastern Europe
  • Online publication: 21 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875018.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Andreas Goldthau, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Book: The Politics of Shale Gas in Eastern Europe
  • Online publication: 21 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875018.010
Available formats
×