Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:09:47.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Toward a theory of phonological and phonetic timing: evidence from Bantu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Kathleen Hubbard
Affiliation:
University of California
Bruce Connell
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Amalia Arvaniti
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Duration is at the same time one of the easiest and one of the most difficult aspects of speech to analyze: while it is relatively simple to measure duration (as compared to pitch or formant structure, for instance), sorting out what part of duration is linguistically determined – rather than mechanically driven, or put to affective use - is a much more complicated matter (Lehiste, 1970). But much has been said about linguistic timing in the phonological literature, with respect to quantity of vowels and consonants, compensatory lengthening, and the like, so it is appropriate to try to examine phonetic timing in the light of these phonological claims. The goal of this paper is to explore the relation between phonological structure and phonetic output, and the mapping between the two, focusing on the mora as a unit of timing in non-stress languages.

The mora

The importance of phonological timing came to the fore with the development of the autosegmental CV or X tier, which assigns one timing unit to each segment and represents the fact that either the segmental melody or the timing tier may be separately affected by phonological rules (Clements and Keyser, 1983; Levin, 1985). The evolution of this notion into mora or weight-tier theory reflects the insight that phonological timing revolves around weight-bearing elements – syllable nuclei, and sometimes consonants in the rhyme, but never onset consonants; thus on the timing tier, timing units are assigned only to weight-bearers, not to every segment (Hyman, 1984, 1985; Hayes, 1989).

Type
Chapter
Information
Phonology and Phonetic Evidence
Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV
, pp. 168 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×