The Rhetoric of This Economics

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819025.028

22 - The Rhetoric of This Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Daniel M. Hausman

Deirdre N. McCloskey

Show author details

Daniel M. Hausman: Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Deirdre N. McCloskey (1942–) was educated at Harvard University, taught for many years at the University of Chicago and the University of Iowa, and is currently a UIC Distinguished Professor of Economics, History, English, and Communication at the University of Illinois at Chicago. McCloskey was Donald until 1995. She describes her transition in Crossing: A Memoir. In addition to her long-standing research interests in economic history, in the 1980s McCloskey became interested in the ways in which economists persuade one another, and her work on the rhetoric of economics poses a serious challenge to traditional views of economic methodology. The author of twenty books and three hundred articles, McCloskey has been an extremely influential figure.

In the opening scene of the movie The Graduate a Mr. McGuire puts an avuncular arm around the Dustin Hoffman character and says, “I just want to say one word to you. Just one word.” Yes, sir? “Are you listening?” Yes, I am. “Plastics.” [Pause] Exactly how do you mean it? “There's a great future in plastics. Think about it. Will you think about it?” Yes, I will. “Enough said: that's a deal.”

So nowadays the avuncular word to the wise is “rhetoric.” There's a great future in rhetoric. Furthermore, unlike plastics, rhetoric has also had a great past, the twenty centuries during which it was the educator of the young and the theory of speech in the West – as the classicist Werner Jaeger called it, “the first humanism,” the “rhetorical paideia.”

Type: Chapter
Information: The Philosophy of Economics
An Anthology
, pp. 415 - 430

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.028 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aristotle, . 1991. Rhetoric. Trans. George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. 1965. Political Argument. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. National Bureau for Economic Research. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Berger, John. 1985. The Sense of Sight: Writings by John Berger. Ed. Spencer, L.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Bicchieri, Cristina. 1988. “Should a Scientist Abstain from Metaphor?” pp. 100–114 in Klamer, Solow, and McCloskey, eds., Consequences.

Blundell, William E. 1988. The Art and Craft of Feature Writing. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar

Cairncross, Alec. 1992. “From Theory to Policy-Making: Economics as a Profession.” Banco Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 180 (March): 3–20.Google Scholar

Feiwel, George R. 1987. Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gergen, Kenneth J. 1986. “Correspondence versus Autonomy in the Language of Understanding Human Action.” pp. 136–162 in Fiske and Shweder, eds., Metatheory in Social Science.

Gordon, David. 1991. “Review of McCloskey's, ‘If You're So Smart.’” Review of Austrian Economics 5 (2): 123–127.Google Scholar

Kirby, John T. 1990. “The ‘Great Triangle’ in Early Greek Rhetoric and Poetics.” Rhetorica 8: 213–228.CrossRef Google Scholar

Klamer, Arjo. 1983. Conversations with Economists: New Classical Economists and Opponents Speak out on the Current Controversy in Macroeconomics, Totawa, N. J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar

Klamer, Arjo. 1984. “Levels of Discourse in New Classical Economics.” History of Political Economy 16 (Summer): 263–290.CrossRef Google Scholar

Klamer, Arjo and Thomas C. Leonard. 1993. “So What's a Metaphor?” In Mirowski, Philip, ed., Natural Images in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klamer, Arjo, Solow, Robert M., and McCloskey, D. N., eds., 1988. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lanham, Richard A. 1974. Style: An Anti-Textbook. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lanham, Richard A. 1992. “The Extraordinary Convergence: Democracy, Technology, Theory, and the University Curriculum.” pp. 33–56 in Gless, Darryl J. and Smith, Barbara Herrnstein, eds., The Politics of Liberal Education. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Lanham, Richard A.. 1993. The Electronic World: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Levi, Primo, and Regge, Tullio. 1992. Conversations. Trans. R. Rosenthal. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1990. “The Dark Side of Reason [Review of Feyerabend's Farewell to Reason.]” Critical Review 4 (3, Summer): 377–385.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. N. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

McGrath, Francis C. 1985. “How Metaphor Works: What Boyle's Law and Shakespeare's 73rd Sonnet Have in Common.” Department of English, University of Southern Maine, Portland, Maine.

Marcus, Solomon. 1974. “Fifty-two Oppositions between Scientific and Poetic Communication.” pp. 83–96 in Cherry, C., ed., Pragmatic Aspects of Human Communication. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, Ruth. 1966 (1985). Niels Bohr: The Man, His Science, and the World They Changed. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, John. 1983. “Models, Statistics, and Other Tropes of Politics: Or, Whatever Happend to Argument in Political Science?” In Zarefsky, D., Sillars, M. O., and Rhodes, J., eds., Argument in Transition: Proceedings of the Third Summer Conference on Argumentation. Annandale, Va.: Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. 1959 (1991). “The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind.” pp. 488–541 in Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar

Petrey, Sandy. 1990. Speech Acts and Literary Theory. New York and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Plato, . 1925. Georgias. Trans. W. R. M. Lamb. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Plato, . 1914. Phaedrus. Trans, H. N. Fowler. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. 1987. Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, Louise M. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Thucydides, . 1972. History of the Peloponnesian War. Trans. R. Warner. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Thurow, Lester. 1985. The Zero-Sum Solution: Building a World-Class American Economy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1945 (1958). Philosophical Investigations: The English Text of the Third Edition. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar