Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-02T02:03:47.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Philosophical Foundations of Mainstream Normative Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Daniel M. Hausman
By
Daniel M. Hausman  and
Michael S. McPherson
Daniel M. Hausman
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

Michael S. McPherson (1947–) received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago and taught for many years at Williams College before becoming President of Macalester College and then of the Spencer Foundation. His academic work concerns the economics of higher education and issues at the boundaries of economics and ethics. He and Daniel Hausman founded the journal Economics and Philosophy in 1985 and edited it for its first ten years. They also coauthored Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy, from which this essay derives.

Let us begin with an old joke. Brezhnev and other members of the Soviet Central Committee are reviewing a May Day parade in Moscow. Thousands of infantry march by, followed by armored cars, the latest tanks, long range artillery, and progressively larger, sleeker, and more impressive missiles. At the end, a battered flatbed truck rumbles by carrying a half-dozen unathletic and bespectacled middle-aged men and women in dirty raincoats sitting around a card table. The crowd is restless and members of the Central Committee are scandalized. One is bold enough to ask Brezhnev what these nondescript civilians are doing in the midst such a magnificent military parade. Brezhnev replies, “Ah, those are our economists. You'd be amazed at the damage they can do.”

Like most economist jokes, this one is unkind, but its unkindness should not be exaggerated. It refers to the damage economists can do, not to any inevitable harm that they cause. And there is no suggestion that their intentions are evil.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Philosophy of Economics
An Anthology
 , pp. 226 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ayogu, Melvin and Don, Ross. 2005. Development Dilemmas: The Methods and Political Ethics of Growth Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baker, C. 1975. “The Ideology of the Economic Analysis of Law.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 3–48.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 1991. “Utility.” Economics and Philosophy 7: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harberger, Arnold. 1978. “On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 86: s87–s120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. 1995. “The Impossibility of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons.” Mind 104: 473–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel and Michael, McPherson. 1996. Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel and Michael, McPherson. 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks, John. 1939. “The Foundations of Welfare Economics.” Economic Journal 49: 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2000. “Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach.” pp. 673–692 of Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (Eds.) Choices, Values and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Alan, Krueger. 2006. “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1939. “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Economic Journal 49: 549–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, Richard. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lipsey, Richard and Kelvin, Lancaster. 1956. “The General Theory of the Second Best.” Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Ian. 1957. A Critique of Welfare Economics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. (1859). Ed.: Currin, V. Shields. New York: Macmillan, 1985.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism (1863). Rpt. in Marshall, Cohen, ed. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. New York: Modern Library, 1961, pp. 321–98.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul. 1950. “Evaluation of Real National Income.” Oxford Economic Papers New Series 2: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×