Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:34:13.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Pediatric Ethics Committees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Geoffrey Miller
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Ethics committees have become nearly ubiquitous in American hospitals in the past quarter-century, and their use has been widely endorsed. The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights recommends the use of independent, pluralistic, multidisciplinary ethics committees to provide advice on ethical problems in clinical settings and to establish educational forums for the discussion of issues in bioethics. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has mandated that every health care organization in the United States have a mechanism in place to address ethical confl icts, and for the majority of hospitals this requirement has been met by the creation of an ethics committee. The American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) have endorsed hospital ethics committees and have provided specific guidelines for their use. The early proliferation of these committees occurred partially in response to landmark cases involving neurologically incapacitated adults, notably Karen Quinlan in 1976. In 1983, the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research endorsed the creation and use of hospital ethics committees to promote effective decision making for incapacitated individuals. At that time fewer than 1% of all U.S. hospitals had such a committee. In the years since then, ethics committees have become commonplace in U.S. hospitals, and more recently their use in European hospitals has grown as well.

As the use of hospital ethics committees increased, it became apparent that many of the difficult issues confronted by these committees involved infants and children.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pediatric Bioethics , pp. 87 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×