Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:12:39.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The Transcendence of Holiness

Divine Goodness and Human Freedom in Henry More’s Critique of Baruch de Spinoza

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2024

Douglas Hedley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Daniel J. Tolan
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Henry More, the most speculatively gifted of the Cambridge Platonists, engaged critically with all the major thinkers of the early modern age. He provided an in-depth refutation of the materialist and determinist system of Thomas Hobbes, exposing its shortcomings with great argumentative vigor in his principal philosophical prose work of 1659 entitled The Immortality of the Soul. His critique of René Descartes, first outlined in his celebrated correspondence with the French rationalist in the late 1640s and culminating in his Enchiridium Metaphysicum of 1671, won him European fame and the sobriquet of the “Hammer of the Cartesians.”1 It was in the late 1670s, however, that he combated the most formidable of the early modern foes of his ancient theology of a supremely benign Deity watching over an animate cosmos inhabited by accountable rational agents: Baruch de Spinoza.2

Type
Chapter
Information
Participation in the Divine
A Philosophical History, From Antiquity to the Modern Era
, pp. 303 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becco, Anna, “La substance unique face aux substances simples: D’H. Morus à G.W. Leibniz,” in Olivetti, Marco M. (ed.), Lo Spinozismo Ieri e Oggi. Padua: Cedam, 1978, 103119.Google Scholar
Boylan, Michael, “Henry More’s Space and the Spirit of Nature,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (1980), 395405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L., Light and Enlightenment. A Study of the Cambridge Platonists and the Dutch Arminians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L.Spinoza in England, 1665–1730,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107 (1964), 183219.Google Scholar
Dolson, Grace N., “The Ethical System of Henry More,” The Philosophical Review 6 (1897), 593607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, Douglas, “Gods and Giants: Cudworth’s Platonic Metaphysics and his Ancient Theology,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (2017), 932953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, Douglas and Leech, David (eds.), Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, Rudolf B., “Das fehlende Bindeglied: Die Rolle der facultas boniformis in der Gewissenskonzeption von Henry More,” in Hengstermann, Christian (ed.), That Miracle of the Christian World”: Origenism and Christian Platonism in Henry More. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 2020, 141167.Google Scholar
Hengstermann, Christian (ed.), That Miracle of the Christian World”: Origenism and Christian Platonism in Henry More. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 2020.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah, “Reason and Revelation in the Cambridge Platonists, and Their Reception of Spinoza,” in: Gründer, Karlfried and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm (eds.), Spinoza in der Frühzeit seiner religiösen Wirkung. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider, 1984, 181200.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexander, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Radford: A & D Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
Leech, David, The Hammer of the Cartesians: Henry More’s Philosophy of Spirit and the Origins of Modern Atheism. Leuven: Peeters, 2013.Google Scholar
Leech, DavidDoes Henry More’s Conception of a ‘Divine Life’ Bear Traces of Origen’s Influence?,” in Hengstermann, Christian (ed.), That Miracle of the Christian World”: Origenism and Christian Platonism in Henry More. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 2020, 125139.Google Scholar
Leech, David “An Early Critique of Spinoza: More’s Confutatio (1679)” (forthcoming).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Second Lash of Alazonomastix. Cambridge: Printers to the University of Cambridge, 1651.Google Scholar
More, Henry Opera omnia, 3 vols., London, 1679 (Reprint Hildesheim: Olms, 1966).Google Scholar
More, Henry An Account of Virtue or Dr Henry More’s Abridgement of Morals, ed. and trans. Southwell, Robert. London: Printed for Benj. Tooke, 1690.Google Scholar
More, Henry The Complete Poems of Dr Henry More, collected and ed. Grosart, Alexander B.. Printed for private circulation, 1878.Google Scholar
More, Henry Henry More’s Refutation of Spinoza, ed. Jacob, Alexander. Hildesheim: Olms, 1991.Google Scholar
More, Henry Henry More’s Manual of Metaphysics: A Translation of the Enchiridium Metaphysicum (1679), ed. Jacob, Alexander, with an introduction and notes, 2 vols. Hildesheim: Olms, 1995.Google Scholar
Reid, Jasper, The Metaphysics of Henry More, Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, JasperHenry More and Nicolas Malebranche’s Critiques of Spinoza,” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (2013), 764792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütt, Hans-Peter, “Zu Henry Mores Widerlegung des Spinozismus,” in Cramer, Konrad Jacobs, Wilhelm G., and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm (eds.), Spinozas Ethik und ihre frühe Wirkung. Wolfenbüttel: Herzog August Bibliothek, 1981, 1950.Google Scholar
Ward, Richard, The Life of Henry More: Parts I and II, ed. Hutton, Sarah, Courtney, Cecil, Courtney, Michelle, Crocker, Robert, and Hall, A. Rupert. Dordrecht: Springer, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×