Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-mgq6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-05T08:14:14.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - The paradoxical brain – so what?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

By
Narinder Kapur ,
Tom Manly ,
Jonathan Cole  and
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Edited by
Narinder Kapur
With
Alvaro Pascual-Leone ,
Vilayanur Ramachandran ,
Jonathan Cole ,
Sergio Della Sala ,
Tom Manly  and
Andrew Mayes
Foreword by
Oliver Sacks
Narinder Kapur
Affiliation:
University College London
Tom Manly
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
Jonathan Cole
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Narinder Kapur
Affiliation:
University College London
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Vilayanur Ramachandran
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Jonathan Cole
Affiliation:
University of Bournemouth
Sergio Della Sala
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Tom Manly
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Andrew Mayes
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Oliver Sacks
Affiliation:
Columbia University Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Summary

Paradoxical findings relating to the human brain have implications for our understanding of the workings of the normal brain, and for how normal functioning may be enhanced. Paradoxical findings may also have implications for how we can prevent and detect brain disease, and how we may best repair and rehabilitate the damaged brain. The brain may best be modelled as a nonlinear device, which relies on dynamic synchrony and balance between neural systems. Damage to the brain may upset this dynamic state, and repair may often entail interventions that restore a degree of synchrony and balance. In this final chapter, we propose 10 principles of brain function that can help accommodate paradoxical phenomena, and we also speculate on paradoxical therapeutic interventions that may be beneficial to human brain functioning.

Introduction

If we can be forgiven a degree of owner's pride, the human brain is quite extraordinary. A three-pound mass of jelly-like material is the only entity in the universe (that we know of) which can form and test theories about that universe. It can also speculate about structures much smaller or larger than it can possibly see. It might be thought that, when it comes to studying itself, the brain would have a number of inherent advantages, being on home turf, as it were. It is certainly true that we are very familiar with what the brain can achieve.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Paradoxical Brain , pp. 418 - 434
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barabasi, A-L. (2007). Network medicine – from obesity to the ‘diseasome’. New England Journal of Medicine, 357: 404–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabasi, A-L. (2009). Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. Science, 325: 412–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, M., & Kemper, T. (2005). Neuroanatomic observations of the brain in autism: a review and future directions. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23: 183–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, D., & Kastner, S. (2009). Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain. Vision Research, 49: 1154–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beddington, J., Cooper, C., Field, J., et al. (2008). The mental wealth of nations. Nature, 455: 1057–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, M. M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12: 201–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggman, K. L., & Kristan, W. B. (2008). Multifunctional pattern-generating circuits. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31: 271–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullmore, E., Barnes, A., Bassett, D. S., et al. (2009). Generic aspects of complexity in brain imaging data and other biological systems. NeuroImage, 47: 1125–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, R. (2008). On Being Certain. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Casanova, M. F., Switala, A. E., Trippe, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2007). Comparative minicolumnar morphometry of three distinguished scientists. Autism, 11: 557–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, B. S., Ly, J., Appignani, B., et al. (2005). Reading impairment in the neuronal migration disorder of periventricular nodular heterotopia. Neurology, 64: 799–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, C., Kilner, J., Friston, K., Kiebel, S., Jolly, R., & Ward, N. (2010). Nonlinear coupling in the human motor system. Journal of Neuroscience, 30: 8393–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009). Are bigger brains better?Current Biology, 19: R995–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, J. (2004). Still Lives. London and Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conacher, G. N. (1990). Childhood autism as a disturbance of neuronal migration. Psychiatric Bulletin, 14: 744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, E., Nachev, P., & Husain, M. (2008). Control over conflict during movement preparation: role of posterior parietal cortex. Neuron, 58: 144–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauwels, J., Eskandar, E., & Cash, S. (2009). Localisation of seizure onset area from intracranial non-seizure EEG by exploiting locally enhanced synchrony. Conference Proceedings IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2180–3.Google Scholar
Davis, G. W., & Bezprozvanny, I. (2001). Maintaining the stability of neural function: a homeostatic hypothesis. Annual Review of Physiology, 63: 847–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arcangelis, L., Perrone-Capano, C., & Herrmann, H. (2006). Self-organized criticality model for brain plasticity. Physics Review Letters, 96: 1–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93: 13,494–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donovan, E. (2009). Propranolol use in the prevention and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans: forgetting therapy revisited. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 53: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, G. (2006). Second Nature. Brain Science and Human Knowledge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, G., & Gally, J. (2001). Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98: 13,763–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falk, D. (2009). New information about Albert Einstein's brain. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 1: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finger, S. (2009). Recovery of function. Redundancy and vicariation theories. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 95: 833–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flegal, K., & Anderson, M. (2008). Overthinking skilled motor performance: or why those who teach can't do. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15: 927–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerde, K., Knowlton, B., & Poldrack, R. (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103: 11,778–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. (2008). Hierarchical models in the brain. PLoS Computational Biology, 4: e1000211, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K., Kilner, J., & Harrison, L. (2006). A free energy principle for the brain. Journal of Physiology Paris, 100: 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallate, J., Chi, R., Ellwood, S., & Snyder, A. (2009). Reducing false memories by magnetic pulse stimulation. Neuroscience Letters, 449: 151–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawande, A. (2010). The Checklist Manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Profile Books.Google Scholar
George, D., & Hawkins, J. (2009). Towards a mathematical theory of cortical micro-circuits. PLOS Computational Biology, 5: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N. (1982). Why Orton was right. Annals of Dyslexia, 32: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golan, M. H., Mane, R., Molczadzki, G., et al. (2009). Impaired migration signalling in the hippocampus following prenatal hypoxia. Neuropharmacology, 57: 511–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1935). The Organism. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press. [Republished in 1995.]Google Scholar
Green, D., Crinion, J., & Price, C. (2006). Convergence, degeneracy and control. Language and Learning, 56: 99–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregoriou, G. G., Gotts, S. J., Zhou, H., & Desimone, R. (2009). High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science, 324: 1207–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, R. L. (1980). Perceptions as hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 290: 181–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrini, R., & Parrini, E. (2010). Neuronal migration disorders. Neurobiological Disorders, 38: 154–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Haan, W., Pijnenburg, Y. A., Strijers, R. L., et al. (2009). Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory. BMC Neuroscience, 10: 101 (pp. 1–12).Google ScholarPubMed
Halligan, P., & Marshall, J. (1994). Focal and global attention modulate the expression of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia, 32: 13–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helmholtz, H., (1866). Concerning the perceptions in general. In: Treatise on Physiological Optics, volume III, 3rd edition (translated by Southall, J. P. C., 1925, Opt. Soc. Am. Section 26, reprinted New York, NY: Dover, 1962).Google Scholar
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2009). The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilgetag, C., Kötter, R., & Young, M. (1999). Inter-hemispheric competition of sub-cortical structures is a crucial mechanism in paradoxical lesion effects and spatial neglect. Progress in Brain Research, 121: 121–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Z. (2009). Molecular regulation of neuronal migration during neocortical development. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, 42: 11–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Im, S., Yu, J., Park, E., et al. (2010). Induction of striatal neurogenesis enhances functional recovery in an adult animal model of neonatal hypoxic–ischemic brain injury. Neuroscience, 169: 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isel, F., Baumgaertner, A., Thrän, J., Miesel, J., & Büchel, C. (2010). Neural circuitry of the bilingual mental lexicon: effect of age of second language acquisition. Brain and Cognition, 72: 169–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, S. (2009). A review of the ipsilateral motor pathway as a recovery mechanism in patients with stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 24: 315–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Jobst, B., Darcey, T., Thadani, V., & Roberts, D. (2010). Brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsia, 51: 88–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, M. V. (2009). Plasticity in the developing brain: implications for rehabilitation. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15: 94–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 30: 135–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, M., Martin, R., Andras, P., & Young, M. P. (2007). Simulation of robustness against lesions of cortical networks. European Journal of Neuroscience, 25: 3185–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirmess, M., & Maher, L. (2010). Constraint induced language therapy in early aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology, 24: 725–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krubitzer, L. (2007). The magnificent compromise: cortical field evolution in mammals. Neuron, 56: 201–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, K. H., Choi, Y. Y., Gray, J. R., et al. (2006). Neural correlates of superior intelligence: stronger recruitment of posterior parietal cortex. Neuroimage, 29: 578–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemere, C., & Masliah, E. (2010). Can Alzheimer disease be prevented by amyloid-β immunotherapy?Nature Reviews Neurology, 6: 109–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S., & O'Donohue, W. (2007). What are the great ideas of clinical science and why do we need them? In: Lilienfeld, S., & O'Donohue, W. (Eds.). The Great Ideas of Clinical Science. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Rios, C., Zhang, N., Yang, L., Chen, W., & He, B. (2010). Linear and nonlinear relationships between visual stimuli, EEG and BOLD fMRI signals. Neuroimage, 50: 1054–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lulé, D., Zickler, C., Häcker, S., et al. (2009). Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. Progress in Brain Research, 177: 339–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, S., Li, S., & Bäckman, L. (2009). Neural underpinnings of within-person variability in cognitive functioning. Psychology and Aging, 24: 792–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffei, A., & Fontanini, A. (2009). Network homeostasis: a matter of coordination. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19: 168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marder, E., & Goaillard, J. M. (2006). Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7: 563–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martel, G., Blanchard, J., Mons, N., Gastambide, F., Micheau, J., & Guillou, J. L. (2007). Dynamic interplays between memory systems depend on practice: the hippocampus is not always the first to provide solution. Neuroscience, 50: 743–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, M., & Abbott, D. (2009). What is stochastic resonance. Definitions, misconceptions, debates, and its relevance to biology. PLoS Computational Biology, 5: epub May 29, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGhee, L., Maani, C., Garza, T., Desocio, P., Gaylord, K., & Black, I. (2009). The effect of propanalol on post-traumatic stress disorder in burned service members. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 30: 92–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercado, E. (2008). Neural and cognitive plasticity: from maps to minds. Psychological Bulletin, 134: 109–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Métin, C., Vallee, R. B., Rakic, P., & Bhide, P. G. (2008). Modes and mishaps of neuronal migration in the mammalian brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28: 11,746–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mowszowski, L., Batchelor, J., & Naismith, S. (2010). Early intervention for cognitive decline: can cognitive training be used as a selective prevention technique?International Psychogeriatrics, 22: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumford, D. (1992). On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biological Cybernetics, 66: 241–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myslobodsky, M. (2009). The paradox of caffeine–zolpidem interaction: a network analysis. Current Drug Targets, 10: 1009–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noppeney, U., Friston, K., & Price, C. (2004). Degenerate neuronal systems sustaining cognitive functions. Journal of Anatomy, 205: 433–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ojima, S., Nakamura, N., Matsuba-Kurita, H., Hoshino, T., & Hagiwara, H. (2011). Neural correlates of foreign-language learning in childhood: a 3-year longitudinal ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23: 183–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poldrack, R. A., & Packard, M. G. (2003). Competition amongst multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia, 41: 245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribram, K. (1971). Languages of the Brain: Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Radak, Z., Hart, N., Sarga, L., et al. (2010). Exercise plays a preventive role against Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Feb 24 (Epub ahead of print).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reder, L. M., Oates, J. M., Dickison, D., et al. (2007). Retrograde facilitation under midazolam: the role of general and specific interference. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14: 261–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolls, E., & Deco, G. (2010). The Noisy Brain. Stochastic Dynamics as a Principle of Brain Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahakian, B., & Morein-Zamir, S. (2011). Neuroethical issues in cognitive enhancement. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 25: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, A. (2009). Explaining and inducing savant skills: privileged access to lower-level, less processed information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 364: 1399–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, I. (1997). Does God Play Dice? The New Mathematics of Chaos. Second Edition. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. (2010). Advances in environmental epidemiology. Movement Disorders, 25: S58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, M., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10: 502–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlhaas, P., Pipa, G., Lima, B., et al. (2009). Neuronal synchrony in cortical networks: history, concept and current status. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 3: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, V., Losonczy, A., Zemelman, B. V., et al. (2009). Fast synaptic subcortical control of hippocampal circuits. Science, 326: 449–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieregge, A., Sieberer, M., Jacobs, H., Hagenah, J., & Vieregge, P. (2001). Transdermal nicotine in PD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology, 57: 1032–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wandell, B., & Smirnakis, S. (2009). Plasticity and stability of visual field maps in adult primary visual cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10: 873–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegiel, J., Kuchna, I., Nowicki, K., et al. (2010). The neuropathology of autism: defects of neurogenesis and neuronal migration, and dysplastic changes. Acta Neuropathologica [epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R., Barnes, L., Aggarwal, N., et al. (2010). Cognitive activity and the cognitive morbidity of Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 75: 990–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witelson, S. F., Kigar, D. L., & Harvey, T. (1999). The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein. Lancet, 353: 2149–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiong, Y., Mahmood, A., & Chopp, M. (2009). Emerging treatments for traumatic brain injury. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs, 14: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiong, Y., Mahmood, A., & Chopp, M. (2010). Angiogenesis, neurogenesis and brain recovery of function following injury. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs, 11: 298–308.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, M. P., Hilgetag, C., & Scannell, J. (1999). Models of paradoxical lesion effects and rules of inference for inputing function to structure in the brain. Neurocomputing, 26–27: 933–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. P., Hilgetag, C. C., & Scannell, J. W. (2000). On imputing function to structure from the behavioural effects of brain lesions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 355: 147–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, D., & Raichle, M. (2010). Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nature Reviews Neurology, 6: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z. X., Guan, L. X., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., & Dai, L. J. (2008). A combined procedure to deliver autologous mesenchymal stromal cells to patients with traumatic brain injury. Cytotherapy, 10: 134–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zufall, F. (2005). Connexins and olfactory synchronicity: toward the olfactory code. Neuron, 46: 693–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×