Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T15:21:09.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Edited by
Timothy Hinton
Timothy Hinton
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Original Position , pp. 266 - 273
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B., “Political Liberalisms,” Journal of Philosophy 91 (1994) 364–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B., Social Justice in the Liberal State (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Ackerman, B., “What Is Neutral about Neutrality?” Ethics 93 (1983) 372–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T., Metaphysics: Concept and Problems (Stanford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Alexander, S., “Social Evaluation through Notional Choice,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 88 (1974) 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alstott, L., No Exit: What Parents Owe Their Children and What Society Owes Parents (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Anderson, E., “Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism,” Hypatia 24 (2009) 130–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H., The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1979).Google Scholar
Arneson, R., “Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ Is Not Good Enough” in Kaufman, A. (ed.) Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (London: Routledge, 2005), pp. 17–43.Google Scholar
Arneson, R., “Justice Is Not Equality” in Feltham, B. (ed.) Justice, Equality and Constructivism: Essays on G. A. Cohen's Rescuing Justice and Equality (Oxford and Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).Google Scholar
Attas, D., “Fragmenting Property,” Law and Philosophy 25 (2006)119–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audard, C., “Cultural Imperialism and ‘Democratic Peace’” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
Aumann, R., “Nash Equilibria Are Not Self-Enforcing” in Aumann, , Collected Papers: Volume I. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), pp. 615–20.Google Scholar
Baehr, A. R., “Liberal Feminism” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/feminism-liberal/.
Baehr, A. R., “Liberal Feminism: Comprehensive and Political” in Abbey, R. (ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Rawls (College Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2013), pp. 150–66.Google Scholar
Barry, B., Theories of Justice (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Beitz, C., Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Bhandary, A., “Dependency in Justice: Can Rawlsian Liberalism Accommodate Kittay's Dependency Critique?” Hypatia 25 (2010) 140–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandary, A., “Liberal Dependency Care,” Journal of Philosophical Research, forthcoming (2016).
Binmore, K., Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K., Natural Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K., Rational Decisions (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Blake, M. and Smith, P. T., “International Distributive Justice” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/international-justice/.
Brake, E., Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. O., “The Separateness of Persons, Distributive Norms, and Moral Theory” in Morris, C. and Frey, R. (eds.) Value, Welfare, and Morality (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 252–389.Google Scholar
Brock, G., Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, G.“Human Rights” in Mandle, J. and Reidy, D. (eds.) A Companion to Rawls (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014), pp. 346–60.Google Scholar
Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, P., “Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough,” Ethics 117 (2007) 296–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, J., The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Clark, B. and Gintis, H., “Rawlsian Justice and Economic Systems,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 7 (1978) 302–25.Google Scholar
Clayton, M., “Liberal Equality: Political not Erinaceous,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, forthcoming 2015.
Clayton, M., “The Resources of Liberal Equality,” Imprints 9 (2000) 63–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, ed. Otsuka, M. (Princeton University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice,” Ethics 99 (1989) 906–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., “Expensive Taste Rides Again” in Burley, J. (ed.) Dworkin and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), pp, 3–29.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., “Incentives, Inequality, and Community,” The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 13 (1992).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., Lectures on the History of Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Wolff, J. (Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., “Robert Nozick and Wilt Chamberlain: How Patterns Preserve Liberty,” Erkenntnis 11 (1977) 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A., “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom” in Cohen, , History, Labour and Freedom: Themes from Marx (Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 255–85.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1997) 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., “Democratic Equality,” Ethics 99 (1989) 727–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, R., “Equality, Priority, and Compassion,” Ethics 113 (2003) 745–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudd, A. E., Analyzing Oppression (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., “The Original Position” in Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 16–52.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., “The Original Position,” The University of Chicago Law Review 40 (1973) 500–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R., “Rawls and the Law” in Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Eaton, A. W., “A Sensible Anti-Porn Feminism,” Ethics 117 (2007) 674–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, D., “Human Nature and the Limits (if any) of Political Philosophy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (2011) 207–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, M. “History and Reason in Rawls’ Moral Theory” in Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 53–80.Google Scholar
Forst, R., “Towards a Critical Theory of Transnational Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001)160–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H., “Equality as a Moral Ideal,” Ethics 98 (1987) 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S., “Introduction: John Rawls – An Overview” in Freeman, S. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
Freeman, S., “The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice,” Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2006) 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S., “The Original Position” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 edition) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/original%20position/.
Freeman, S., Rawls (London and New York: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Freeman, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gauthier, D., Morals by Agreement (Oxford University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A., “Natural Property Rights,” Nous 10 (1976) 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorr, M., “Rawls on Natural Inequality” in Corlett, J. A. (ed.) Equality and Liberty: Analyzing Rawls and Nozick (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991), pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Hampton, J., “Feminist Contractarianism” in Antony, L. and Witt, C. (eds.) A Mind of One's Own (Oxford: Westview, 1993), pp. 227–56.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J., “Bayesian Decision Theory, Subjective and Objective Probabilities, and Acceptance of Empirical Hypotheses,” Synthese 57 (1983) 341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J., “Bayesian Decision Theory and Utilitarian Ethics,” The American Economic Review 68 (1978) 223–8.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J., “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory,” The American Political Science Review 69 (1975) 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J., “Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking,” The Journal of Political Economy (1953) 434–5.
Harsanyi, J., “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” The Journal of Political Economy August (1955) 309–21.
Harsanyi, J., “A General Theory of Rational Behavior in Game Situations,” Econometrica 34 (1966) 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J., “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior” in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J., Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations (Cambridge University Press, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., “Rawls on Liberty and Its Priority,” reprinted in Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974), pp. 230–52.Google Scholar
Hart, H. M. and Sacks, A. M., The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, ed. Eskridge, W. and Frickey, Philip (Westbury, NY: Foundation Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hartley, C. and Watson, L., “Is a Feminist Political Liberalism Possible?” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (2010) 1–21.Google Scholar
Heath, J., “Rawls on Global Distributive Justice: A Defence,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supp. Vol. 31 (2005) 193–226.Google Scholar
Herman, B., The Practice of Moral Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Hill, T., Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Hill, T.Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsch, W., “Global Distributive Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsch, W. and Stepanians, M., “Human Rights as Moral Claims” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 117–33.Google Scholar
Hinton, T., “Equality, Self-Ownership and Individual Sovereignty,” Philosophical Forum 44 (2013) 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, T. “Liberalism, Feminism and Social Tyranny,” inPublic Affairs Quarterly 21 (2007) 235–53.Google Scholar
Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Hurrell, A., “Global Inequality and International Institutions,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A., “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2005) 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason in Kant: Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge University Press, 1996). Abbreviated as KpV, citations to volume and page number in the Berlin Academy edition of Kant's Gesammelte Schriften.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals in Kant: Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge University Press, 1996). Abbreviated as G, citations to volume and page number in the Berlin Academy edition of Kant's Gesammelte Schriften.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. Giovanni, George di, in Kant: Religion and Rational Theology, trans. and ed. Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George di (Cambridge University Press, 1996). Citations are to volume and page number in the Berlin Academy edition of Kant's Gesammelte Schriften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E., Love's Labor (New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L., The Philosophy of Moral Development (New York: Harper and Row, 1981).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C., Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C.The Sources of Nonnativity (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukathas, C. and Pettit, P., Rawls: A Theory of Justice and Its Critics (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Kuper, A., “Rawlsian Global Justice: Beyond the Law of Peoples to a Cosmopolitan Law of Persons,” Political Theory 28 (2000) 640–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, A., “The Past and Present of Marxist Historiography in South Africa: An Interview with Martin Legassick,” Radical History Review 82 (2002) 111–30.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A., “Toward a Liberal Theory of Sexual Equality,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 9 (1998) 203–24.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H., Games and Decisions (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1957).Google Scholar
Mandle, J., “Tolerating Injustice” in Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (eds.) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 219–33.Google Scholar
Martin, R., “Rawls on International Distributive Justice” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 226–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, E. F., Rationality and Dynamic Choice (Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., “Nozick's Critique of Rawls: Distribution, Entitlement and the Assumptive World of A Theory of Justice” in Bader, R. M. and Meadowcroft, J. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 168–96.Google Scholar
Metz, T., “Arbitrariness, Justice, and Respect,” Social Theory and Practice 26 (2000) 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R., “Rawls and Marxism,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 3 (1974) 167–9, reprinted in N. Daniels (ed.) Reading Rawls (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 206–30.Google Scholar
Mills, C., The Racial Contract (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Mills, C. “Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls,” in The Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2009) 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moellendorf, D., Cosmopolitan Justice (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Moehler, M., “Contractarian Ethics and Harsanyi's Two Justifications of Utilitarianism,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 12 (2013) 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. and Nagel, T., The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice (Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T., “Rawls on Justice,” The Philosophical Review 82 (1973) 220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, J., The Libertarian Idea (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Narveson, J. and Sterba, J., “Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?” Special Issue, Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2011) 403–15.Google Scholar
Neufeld, B. and van Schoelandt, C., “Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality,” Law and Philosophy 33 (2014) 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., Sex and Social Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Okin, S., Justice, Gender and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Okin, S., “Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender,” Ethics 105 (1994) 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, M. and Williamson, T. (eds.), Property-Owning Democracy (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014).Google Scholar
O'Neill, O., Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, M., “Self-Ownership and Equality: A Lockean Reconciliation,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (2006) 65–92.Google Scholar
Pateman, C., The Sexual Contract (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Paul, J., (ed.), Reading Nozick: Essays on Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell, 1981).Google Scholar
Plato, , Euthyphro in Plato: Complete Works, ed. Cooper, J. M. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997).Google Scholar
Pogge, T., “Cohen to the Rescue!” Ratio (new series) 21 (2008) 454–75.Google Scholar
Pogge, T., “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1994) 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., “Priorities of Global Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 6–24.Google Scholar
Pogge, T., Realizing Rawls (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Pogge, T., World Poverty and Human Rights (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).Google Scholar
Pogge, T., World Poverty and Human Rights, (Cambridge: Polity, 2008).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, S. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “Distributive Justice” in Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics, and Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967), pp. 58–82, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 130–53.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “Distributive Justice: Some Addenda,” Natural Law Forum 13 (1968), reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 154–75.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997) 765–807, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 573–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., “Justice as Fairness,” Journal of Philosophy 54 (1957) 653–62, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Kelly, Erin (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985) 223–51, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 388–414.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980) 515–72, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 303–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples: With the Idea of Public Reason Revisited (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics,” Philosophical Review 60 (1951), reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism, paperback edition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “Reply to Alexander and Musgrave,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88 (1974) 633–55, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 232–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., “Social Unity and Primary Goods” in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 159–86, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 359–87.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., “Some Reasons for the Maximin Criterion,” American Economic Review 64 (1974) 141–6, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 225–31.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, rev. edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Reath, A., Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, A., “Kant's Conception of Autonomy of the Will” in Sensen, Oliver (ed.) Kant on Moral Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 32–52.Google Scholar
Reidy, D., “Political Authority and Human Rights” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 169–88.Google Scholar
Reidy, D., “Rawls on International Justice: A Defense,” Political Theory 32 (2004) 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidy, D., “Three Human Rights Agendas,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2006) 237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I., “Gender, Care and Property-owning Democracy” in O'Neill, M. and Williamson, T. (eds.) Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), pp. 163–79.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., Basic Political Writings, ed. Cress, D. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987).Google Scholar
Ryan, C. C., “Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty,” Ethics 87 (1977) 126–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J., “The Theory of Statistical Decision,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 46 (1951) 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., “Contractualism and Utilitarianism” in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 103–28.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., “Rawls on Justification” in Freeman, S. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 139–67.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Scheffler, S., “Is the Basic Structure Basic?” in Sypnowich, C. (ed.) The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 102–29.Google Scholar
Sen, A., Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Shields, L., “The Prospects for Sufficientarianism,” Utilitas 24 (2012) 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, C., “How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice,” Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (2007) 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterba, J., “In Defense of Rawls against Arrow and Nozick,” Philosophia 7 (1978) 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, S., “What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?” Philosophy Compass 5 (2010) 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, J., “From Utopia to Kazanistan: John Rawls and the Law of Peoples,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2002) 367–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K. C., Tolerance, Diversity, and Global Justice (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Thompson, J., “What Do Women Want? Rewriting the Social Contract,” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies 8 (1993) 257–72.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. and Ronzoni, M., “On the Meta-Ethical Status of Constructivism: Reflections on G. A. Cohen's ‘Facts and Principles,’” Politics Philosophy Economics 7 (2008) 403–22.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H. (eds.), Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate (London: St. Martins Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Von Mises, L., Socialism (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, (Princeton University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Waldron, J., “How Law Protects Dignity,” Cambridge Law Journal 71 (2012) 200–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J., “John Rawls and the Social Minimum,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (1986) 21–33, reprinted in Waldron, Liberal Rights, pp. 250–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J., Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Waldron, J., “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,” Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1987) 127–50, reprinted in Waldron, Liberal Rights, pp. 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weithman, P., Why Political Liberalism? (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Wenar, L., “Why Rawls Is not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 95–113.Google Scholar
Williams, A., “Equality for the Ambitious,” The Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002) 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R. P., Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of a Theory of Justice (Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Wolpe, H., “Capitalism and Cheap Labour-Power in South Africa: From Segregation to Apartheid,” Economy and Society 1 (1972) 425–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A., Karl Marx, (London and New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Timothy Hinton, North Carolina State University
  • Book: The Original Position
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107375321.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Timothy Hinton, North Carolina State University
  • Book: The Original Position
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107375321.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Timothy Hinton, North Carolina State University
  • Book: The Original Position
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107375321.014
Available formats
×