Genomic Perspectives

doi:10.1017/9781108938891.013

Kerkkamp, H. M. I., Manjunatha Kini, R., Pospelov, A. S., et al., Snake genome sequencing: Results and future prospects. Toxins (Basel), 8 (2016), 360.Google Scholar

Degnan, J. H. and Rosenberg, N. A., Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24 (2009), 332–40.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, C., Rabiee, M., Sayyari, E., and Mirarab, S., ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees. BMC Bioinformatics 19 (2018), 153.Google Scholar

Streicher, J. W. and Wiens, J. J., Phylogenomic analyses reveal novel relationships among snake families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 100 (2016), 160–169.Google Scholar

Burbrink, F. T., Grazziotin, F. G., Pyron, R. A., et al., Interrogating genomic-scale data for Squamata (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) shows no support for key traditional morphological relationships. Systematic Biology, 69 (2020), 502–520.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Huson, D. H., Rupp, R., and Scornavacca, C., Phylogenetic Networks: Concepts, Algorithms and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Brandley, M. C., Warren, D. L., Leaché, A. D., and McGuire, J. A., Homoplasy and clade support. Systematic Biology, 58 (2009), 184–198.Google Scholar

Boore, J. L. and Fuerstenberg, S. I., Beyond linear sequence comparisons: the use of genome-level characters for phylogenetic reconstruction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 363 (2008), 1445–1451.Google Scholar

Boore, J. L.,The use of genome-level characteristics for phylogenetic reconstruction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21 (2006), 439–446.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kellaway, C. H. and Williams, F. E., The serological and blood relationships of some common Australian snakes. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science, 8 (1931), 123–132.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bond, G. C., Serological Studies of the Reptilia: I. Hemagglutinins and hemagglutinogens of snake blood. The Journal of Immunology, 36 (1939), 1–9.Google Scholar

Bond, G. C. and Sherwood, N. P., Serological studies of the Reptilia: II. The hemolytic property of snake serum. The Journal of Immunology, 36 (1939), 11–16.Google Scholar

George, D. W. and Dessauer, H. C., Immunological correspondence of transferrins and the relationships of colubrid snakes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 33 (1970), 617–627.Google Scholar

Cohen, E., Immunological studies of the serum proteins of some reptiles. The Biological Bulletin, 109(1955), 394–403.CrossRef Google Scholar

Crawford, N. G., Faircloth, B. C., McCormack, J. E., et al., More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs. Biology Letters, 8 (2012), 783–6.Google Scholar

Field, D. J., Gauthier, J. A., King, B. L., et al., Toward consilience in reptile phylogeny: miRNAs support an archosaur, not lepidosaur, affinity for turtles. Evolution & Development, 16 (2014), 189–196.Google Scholar

Pearson, D. D., Serological and immuno-electrophoretic comparisons among species of snakes. Bulletin of the Serological Museum 36 (1966), 8.Google Scholar

Dessauer, H. C., Fox, W., and Ramírez, J. R., Preliminary attempt to correlate paper-electrophoretic migration of hemoglobins with phylogeny in Amphibia and Reptilia. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 71 (1957), 11–16.Google Scholar

Dessauer, H. C., Molecular approach to the taxonomy of colubrid snakes. Herpetologica, 23 (1967), 148–155.Google Scholar

Dowling, H. G., Hemipenes and other characters in colubrid classification. Herpetologica, 2(1967), 138–142.Google Scholar

Underwood, G. L., A Contribution to the Classification of Snakes (London: British Museum (Natural History), 1967).Google Scholar

Mao, S. -H. and Dessauer, H. C., Selectively neutral mutations, transferrins and the evolution of natricine snakes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 40 (1971), 669–680.Google Scholar

Mao, S. -H., Chen, B. -Y., and Chang, H. -M., The evolutionary relationships of sea snakes suggested by immunological cross-reactivity of transferrins. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 57 (1977), 403–406.Google Scholar

Lawson, R. and Dessauer, H. C., Electrophoretic evaluation of the colubrid genus Elaphe (Fitzinger). Isozyme Bulletin, 14 (1981), 83.Google Scholar

Dowlings, H. G., Highton, R., Maha, G. C., and Maxson, L. R., Biochemical evaluation of colubrid snake phylogeny. Journal of Zoology, 201 (1983), 309–329.Google Scholar

Cadle, J. E., Dessauer, H. C., Gans, C., and Gartside, D. F., Phylogenetic relationships and molecular evolution in uropeltid snakes (Serpentes: Uropeltidae): allozymes and albumin immunology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 40 (1990), 293–320.Google Scholar

Slowinski, J. B., A phylogenetic analysis of the New World coral snakes (Elapidae: Leptomicrurus, Micruroides, and Micrurus) based on allozymic and morphological characters. Journal of Herpetology, 29 (1995), 325–338.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cadle, J. E. (1988). Phylogenetic relationships among advanced snakes: a molecular perspective. University of California Publications in Zoology, 119 (1988), 1–77.Google Scholar

Feldman, C. R. and Spicer, G. S. (2002). Mitochondrial variation in sharp-tailed snakes (Contia tenuis): Evidence of a cryptic species. Journal of Herpetology, 36 (2002), 648.Google Scholar

Kraus, F. and Brown, W. M., Phylogenetic relationships of colubroid snakes based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 122 (1998), 455–487.CrossRef Google Scholar

Slowinski, J. B. and Keogh, J. S., Phylogenetic relationships of elapid snakes based on cytochrome b mtDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 15 (2000), 157–164.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Burbrink, F. T., Lawson, R., and Slowinski, J. B., Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta): a critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution, 54 (2000), 2107–2118.Google Scholar

Funk, D. J. and Omland, K. E., Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34 (2003), 397–423.Google Scholar

Rubinoff, D. and Holland, B. S., Between two extremes: mitochondrial DNA is neither the panacea nor the nemesis of phylogenetic and taxonomic inference. Systematic Biology, 54 (2005), 952–961.Google Scholar

Lawson, R., Slowinski, J. B., Crother, B. I., and Burbrink, F. T., Phylogeny of the Colubroidea (Serpentes): new evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 37 (2005), 581–601.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wiens, J. J., Kuczynski, C. A., Smith, S. A., et al., Branch lengths, support, and congruence: Testing the phylogenomic approach with 20 nuclear loci in snakes. Systematic Biology, 57 (2008), 420–431.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kubatko, L. S., Gibbs, H. L., and Bloomquist, E. W., Inferring species-level phylogenies and taxonomic distinctiveness using multilocus data in Sistrurus rattlesnakes. Systematic Biology, 60 (2011), 393–409.Google Scholar

Sanders, K. L., Lee, M. S. Y., Mumpuni, T. Bertozzi, and Rasmussen, A. R., Multilocus phylogeny and recent rapid radiation of the viviparous sea snakes (Elapidae: Hydrophiinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66 (2013), 575–591.Google Scholar

Streicher, J. W. and Ruane, S., Phylogenomics of snakes. In eLS . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2018, DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0027476).Google Scholar

Faircloth, B. C., McCormack, J. E., Crawford, N. G., et al., Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Systematic Biology, 61 (2012), 717–726.Google Scholar

Lemmon, A. R., Emme, S. A., and Lemmon, E. M., Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Systematic Biology, 61 (2012), 727–44.Google Scholar

Singhal, S., Grundler, M., Colli, G., and Rabosky, D. L., Squamate conserved loci (SqCL): A unified set of conserved loci for phylogenomics and population genetics of squamate reptiles. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17 (2017), e12–e24.Google Scholar

Karin, B. R., Gamble, T., and Jackman, T. R., Optimizing phylogenomics with rapidly evolving long exons: Comparison with anchored hybrid enrichment and ultraconserved element. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37 (2020), 904–922.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen, X., Lemmon, A. R., Lemmon, E. M., Pyron, R. A., and Burbrink, F. T., Using phylogenomics to understand the link between biogeographic origins and regional diversification in ratsnakes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 111 (2017), 206–218.Google Scholar

Castoe, T. A., Spencer, C. L., and Parkinson, C. L., Phylogeographic structure and historical demography of the western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox): A perspective on North American desert biogeography. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 42 (2007), 193–212.Google Scholar

Schield, D. R., Card, D. C., Hales, N. R., et al., The origins and evolution of chromosomes, dosage compensation, and mechanisms underlying venom regulation in snakes. Genome Research, 29 (2019), 590–601.Google Scholar

Singhal, S., Colston, T. J., Grundler, M. R., et al., Congruence and conflict in the higher-level phylogenetics of squamate reptiles: An expanded phylogenomic perspective. Systematic Biology, 70 (2021), 542–557.Google Scholar

Sims, G. E., Jun, S. -E., Wu, G. A., and Kim, S. -H., Whole-genome phylogeny of mammals: Evolutionary information in genic and nongenic regions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106 (2009), 1777–17082.Google Scholar

Castoe, T. A., de Koning, A. P. J., K. T. Hall, et al., The Burmese python genome reveals the molecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110 (2013), 20645–20650.Google Scholar

Giorgianni, M. W., Dowell, N. L., Griffin, S., et al., The origin and diversification of a novel protein family in venomous snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 117 (2020), 10911–10920.Google Scholar

Pasquesi, G. I. M., Adams, R. H., Card, D. C., et al., Squamate reptiles challenge paradigms of genomic repeat element evolution set by birds and mammals. Nature Communications, 9 (2018), 2774.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gilbert, C., Meik, J. M., Dashevsky, D., et al., Endogenous hepadaviruses, bornaviruses and circoviruses in snakes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 281 (2014), 1122.Google Scholar

Augstenová, B., Johnson Pokorná, M., Altmanová, M., et al., ZW, XY, and yet ZW: Sex chromosome evolution in snakes even more complicated. Evolution, 72 (2018), 1701–1707.Google Scholar

Palvildis, P., Jensen, J. D., Stephan, W., and Stamatakis, A., A critical assessment of storytelling: gene ontology categories and the importance of validating genome scans. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29 (2012), 3237–3248.Google Scholar

Archie, J. W., Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Systematic Zoology, 34 (1985), 326–345.Google Scholar

Thorpe, R. S., Coding morphometric characters for constructing distance Wagner networks. Evolution, 38 (1984), 244–255.Google Scholar

Freudenstein, J. V., Characters, states and homology. Systematic Biology, 54 (2005), 965–973.Google Scholar

Yin, W., Wang, Z-J., Li, Q-Y., et al., Evolutionary trajectories of snake genes and genomes revealed by comparative analyses of five-pacer viper. Nature Communications, 7 (2016), 13107.Google Scholar

Li, J. -T., Gao, Y. -D., Xie, L. , et al., Comparative genomics investigation of high elevation adaptation in ectothermic snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115 (2018), 8406–8411.Google Scholar

Card, D. C., Adams, R. H., Schield, D. R., et al., Genomic basis of convergent island phenotypes in boa constrictors. Genome Biology and Evolution, 11 (2019), 3123–3143.Google Scholar

Organ, C. L., Godínez Moreno, R., and Edwards, S. V., Three tiers of genome evolution in reptiles. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 48 (2008), 494–504.Google Scholar

Kriegs, J. O., Churalov, G., Kiefmann, M., et al., Retrotransposed elements as archives for the evolutionary history of placental mammals. PLoS Biology, 4 (2006), e91.Google Scholar

Vitales, D., Garcia, S., and Dodsworth, S., Reconstructing phylogenetic relationships based on repeat sequence similarities. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 147 (2020), 106766.Google Scholar

Smith, E. N. and Gutberlet, R. L. Jr., Generalized frequency coding: A method of preparing polymorphic multistate characters for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 50 (2001), 156–169.Google Scholar

Wiens, J. J., Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problems and solutions. Systematic Biology, 50 (2001), 689–699.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lawing, A. M., Meik, J. M., and Schargel, W. E., Coding meristic characters for phylogenetic analysis: A comparison of step-matrix gap weighting and generalized frequency coding. Systematic Biology, 57 (2008), 167–173.Google Scholar

Wiens, J. J., Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic systematics. Systematic Biology, 44 (1995), 482–500.Google Scholar

Schliep, K. P., Phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics, 27 (2011), 592–593.Google Scholar

R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).Google Scholar

Jukes, T. H. and Cantor, C. R., Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro, H. N., ed. Mammalian protein metabolism. Volume 3 (New York: Academic Press, 1969), pp. 21–132.CrossRef Google Scholar

Murphy, J. C. and Sanders, K. L., First molecular evidence for the phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic snake genus Brachyorrhos (Serpentes: Caenophidia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61 (2011), 953–957.Google Scholar

Lawson, R., Slowinski, J. B., and Burbrink, F. T., A molecular approach to discerning the phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic snake Xenophidion schaeferi among the Alethinophidia. Journal of Zoology, 263 (2004), 285–294.Google Scholar

Deepak, V., Ruane, S., and Gower, D. J., A new subfamily of fossorial colubroid snakes from the Western Ghats of peninsular India. Journal of Natural History, 52 (2018), 2919–2934.Google Scholar

Heise, P. J., Maxson, L. R., Dowling, H. G., and Hedges, S. B., Higher-level snake phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12 (1995), 259–265.Google Scholar

Dowling, H. G., Hass, C. A., Hedges, S. B., and Highton, R., Snake relationships revealed by slow evolving proteins: a preliminary survey. Journal of Zoology, 240 (1996), 1–28.Google Scholar

Slowinski, J. B. and Lawson, R., Snake phylogeny: evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24 (2002), 194–202.Google Scholar

Pyron, R. A., Burbrink, F. T., Colli, G. R., et al., The phylogeny of advanced snakes (Colubroidea), with discovery of a new subfamily and comparison of support methods for likelihood trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 58 (2011), 329–342.Google Scholar

Pyron, R. A., Kandambi, H. K. D., Hendry, C. R., et al., Genus-level phylogeny of snakes reveals the origins of species richness in Sri Lanka. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66 (2013), 969–978.Google Scholar

Wiens, J. J., Hutter, C. R., Mulcahy, D. G., et al., Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biology Letters, 8 (2012), 1043–1046.Google Scholar

Figueroa, A., McKelvy, A. D., Grismer, L. L., Bell, C. D., and Lailvaux, S. P., A species-level phylogeny of extant snakes with description of a new colubrid subfamily and genus. PloS ONE, 11 (2016), e0161070.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zaher, H., Murphy, R. W., Arredondo, J. C., et al., Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PloS ONE, 14 (2019), e0216148.Google Scholar

Zheng, Y. and Wiens, J. J., Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 94 (2016), 537–547.Google Scholar

Miralles, A., Marin, L., Markus, D., et al., Molecular evidence for the paraphyly of Scolecophidia and its evolutionary implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 31 (2018), 1782–1793.Google Scholar

Pyron, R. A., R. A., Burbrink, F. T., and Wiens, J. J., A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13 (2013), 93.Google Scholar

Rokas, A. and Carroll, S. B., Bushes in the tree of life. PLoS Biology, 4 (2006), e352.Google Scholar

Estes, R. K., de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J., Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. In Estes, R. and Pregill, G., eds., Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families (Stanford: Stanford University Press 1988), pp.119–281.Google Scholar

Saint, K. M., Austin, C. C., Donnellan, S. C., and Hutchinson, M. N., C-mos, a nuclear marker useful for squamate phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 10 (1998), 259–263.Google Scholar

Townsend, T. M., Larson, A., Louis, E., and Macey, J. R., Molecular phylogenetics of Squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree. Systematic Biology, 53 (2004), 735–757.Google Scholar

Vidal, N. and Hedges, S. B., The phylogeny of squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear protein-coding genes. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 328 (2005), 1000–1008.Google Scholar

Streicher, J. W. and Wiens, J. J., Phylogenomic analyses of more than 4000 nuclear loci resolve the origin of snakes among lizard families. Biology Letters, 13 (2017), 20170393.Google Scholar

Siegel, D. S., Miralles, A., and Aldridge, R. D., R. D., Controversial snake relationships supported by reproductive anatomy. Journal of Anatomy, 218 (2011), 342–348.Google Scholar

Schield, D. R., Card, D. C., Adams, R. H., et al., Incipient speciation with biased gene flow between two lineages of the Western Diamondback Rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 83 (2015), 213–223.Google Scholar

Williams, T. A., Szöllosi, G. J., Spang, A., et al., Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114 (2017), E4602–4611.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ruane, S. and Austin, C. C., Phylogenomics using formalin-fixed and 100+ year-old intractable natural history specimens. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17 (2017), 1003–1008.Google Scholar

Ruane, S., New data from old specimens. Copeia (in press).Google Scholar

Feigin, C. Y., Newton, A. H., Doronina, L., et al., Genome of the Tasmanian tiger provides insights into the evolution and demography of an extinct marsupial carnivore. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2 (2018), 182–192.Google Scholar

Shibata, H., Chijiwa, T., Oda-Ueda, N., et al., The habu genome reveals accelerated evolution of venom protein genes. Scientific Reports, 8 (2018), 11300.Google Scholar

Adler, K., Contributions to the History of Herpetology, Volume 3 (Vancouver: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 1012), 564 pp.Google Scholar

Thorpe, R. S., Garth Underwood (1919–2002): A vision of reptile systematics. Herpetological Review, 34 (2003), 6–7.Google Scholar

Liner, E. A. and Cole, C. J., Herbert C. Dessauer. Copeia, 2003 (2003), 195–199.Google Scholar

Bradnam, K. R., Fass, J. N., Alexandrov, A., et al., Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species. GigaScience, 2 (2013), 2047-217x-2-10.Google Scholar

McGlothlin, J. W., Chuckalovcak, J. P., Janes, D. E., et al., Parallel evolution of tetrodotoxin resistance in three voltage-gated sodium channel genes in the garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis . Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31 (2014), 2836–2846.Google Scholar

Ullate-Agote, A., Milinkovitch, M. C., and Tzikia, A. C., The genome sequence of the corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus), a valuable resource for EvoDevo studies in squamates. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 58 (2014), 881–888.Google Scholar

Earl, S. T. H., Birrell, G. W., Wallis, T. P., et al., Post-translational modification accounts for the presence of varied forms of nerve growth factor in Australian elapid snake venoms. Proteomics, 6 (2006), 6554–6665.Google Scholar

Kishida, T., Go, Y., Tatsumoto, S., et al., Loss of olfaction in sea snakes provides new perspectives on the aquatic adaptation of amniotes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286 (2019), 2019.1828.Google Scholar

Peng, C., Ren, J-L., Deng, C., et al., The genome of Shaw’s seasnake (Hydrophis curtus) reveals secondary adaptation to its marine environment. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37 (2020), 1744–1760.Google Scholar

Suryamohan, K., Krishnankutty, S. P., Guillory, J., et al., The Indian cobra reference genome and transcriptome enables comprehensive identification of venom toxins. Nature Genetics, 52 (2020), 106–117.Google Scholar

Vonk, F. J., Casewell, N. R., Henkel, C. V., et al., The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110 (2013), 20651–20656.Google Scholar

Aird, S. D., Arora, J., Barua, A., et al., Population genomic analysis of a pitviper reveals microevolutionary forces underlying venom chemistry. Genome Biology and Evolution, 9 (2018), 2640–2649.Google Scholar

van Hoek, M. L., Prickett, M. D., Settlage, R. E., et al., The Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis) genome and identification of innate immunity genes and clusters. BMC Genomics, 20 (2019), 684.Google Scholar

Georges, A., Li, Q., Lian, J., et al., High-coverage sequencing and annotate assembly of the genome of the Australian dragon lizard Pogona vitticeps . GigaScience, 4 (2015), 45.Google Scholar

Alföldi, J., Di Palma, F., Grabherr, M., et al., The genome of the green anole lizards and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature, 477 (2011), 587–591.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Zhou, Q., Wang, Y., et al., Gekko japonicus genome reveals evolution of adhesive toe pads and tail regeneration. Nature Communications, 6 (2015), 10033.Google Scholar

Castoe, T. A., De Koning, A. P. J., Hall, K. T, et al., The Burmese python genome reveals the molecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110 (2013), 20645–20650.Google Scholar

Vonk, F. J., Casewell, N. R., Henkel, C. V., et al., The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110 (2013), 20651–20656.Google Scholar

Ullate-Agote, A., Milinkovitch, M. C., and Tzikia, A. C., The genome sequence of the corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus), a valuable resource for EvoDevo studies in squamates. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 58 (2014), 881–888.Google Scholar

Emerling, C. A., Genomic regression of claw keratin, taste receptor and light-associated genes provides insights into biology and evolutionary origins of snakes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 115 (2017), 40–49.Google Scholar

Infante, C. R., Mihala, A. G., Park, S., et al., Shared enhancer activity in the limbs and phallus and functional divergence of a limb-genital cis-regulatory element in snakes. Developmental Cell, 35 (2015), 107–119.Google Scholar

Kvon, E. Z., Kamneva, O. K., Melo, U. S., et al., Progressive Loss of function in a limb enhancer during snake evolution. Cell, 167 (2016), 633-642.e11.Google Scholar

Kishida, T., Go, Y., Tatsumoto, S., et al., Loss of olfaction in sea snakes provides new perspectives on the aquatic adaptation of amniotes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286 (2019), 2019.1828.Google Scholar

Zhong, H., Shang, S., Wu, X., et al., Genomic evidence of bitter taste in snakes and phylogenetic analysis of bitter taste receptor genes in reptiles. PeerJ, 5 (2017), e3708.Google Scholar

Perry, B. W., Card, D. C., McGlothlin, J. W., et al., Molecular adaptations for sensing and securing prey and insight into amniote genome diversity from the garter snake genome. Genome Biology and Evolution, 10 (2018), 2110–2129.Google Scholar

Meiri, S., Traits of lizards of the world: Variation around a successful evolutionary design. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27 (2018), 1168–1172.Google Scholar

Grundler, M. C., SquamataBase: A natural history database and R package for comparative biology of snake feeding habits. Biodiversity Data Journal, 8 (2020), e49943.Google Scholar

Rowe, T., DigiMorph. www.DigiMorph.org (2020)Google Scholar

Chenand, Y. H., and Zhao, H., Evolution of digestive enzymes and dietary diversification in birds. PeerJ, 7 (2019), e6840.Google Scholar

German, D. P., Nagle, B. C., Villeda, J. M., et al., Evolution of herbivory in a carnivorous clade of minnows (Teleostei: Cyprinidae): Effects on gut size and digestive physiology. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 83 (2010), 1–18.Google Scholar

Jeuniaux, C., Chitinase: an addition to the list of hydrolases in the digestive tract of vertebrates. Nature, 192 (1961), 135–136.Google Scholar

Emerling, C. A., Delsuc, F., and Nachman, M. W., Chitinase genes (CHIAs) provide genomic footprints of a post-Cretaceous dietary radiation in placental mammals. Science Advances, 4 (2018), eaar6478.Google Scholar

Janiak, M. C., Chaney, M. E., and Tosi, A. J., Evolution of acidic mammalian chitinase genes (CHIA) is related to body mass and insectivory in primates. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35 (2018), 607–622.Google Scholar

Wang, K., Tian, S., Galindo-González, J., et al., Molecular adaptation and convergent evolution of frugivory in Old World and neotropical fruit bats. Molecular Ecology, 29 (2020), 4366–4381.Google Scholar

Boot, R. G., Blommaart, E. F. C., Swart, E., et al., Identification of a novel acidic mammalian chitinase distinct from chitotriosidase. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276 (2001), 6770–6778.Google Scholar

Strobel, S., Roswag, A., Becker, N. I., Trenczek, T. E., and Encarnação, J. A., Insectivorous bats digest chitin in the stomach using acidic mammalian chitinase. PLoS One, 8 (2013), e72770.Google Scholar

Ohno, M., Kimura, M., Miyakazi, H., et al. Acidic mammalian chitinase is a proteases-resistant glycosidase in mouse digestive system. Scientific Reports, 6 (2016), 37756.Google Scholar

Fong, D., Kane, T., and Culver, D., Vestigialization and loss of nonfunctional characters. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26 (1995), 249–268.Google Scholar

Emerling, C. A. and Springer, M. S., Eyes underground: Regression of visual protein networks in subterranean mammals. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 78 (2014), 260–270.Google Scholar

Meredith, R. W., Zhang, G., Gilbert, M. T. P., Jarvis, E. D., and Springer, M. S., Evidence for a single loss of mineralized teeth in the common avian ancestor. Science, 346 (2014), 1254390.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Albalat, R. and Cañestro, C., Evolution by gene loss. Nature Reviews Genetics, 17 (2016), 379–391.Google Scholar

Feng, P., Zheng, J., Rossiter, S. J., Wang, D., and Zhao, H., Massive losses of taste receptor genes in toothed and baleen whales. Genome Biology and Evolution, 6 (2014), 1254–1265.Google Scholar

Marsh, R. S., Moe, C., Lomneth, R. B., Fawcett, J. D., and Place, A., Characterization of gastrointestinal chitinase in the lizard Sceloporus undulatus garmani (Reptilia: Phrynosomatidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 128 (2001), 675–682.Google Scholar

Koludarov, I., Jackson, T. N. W., op den Brouw, B., et al., Enter the dragon: The dynamic and multifunctional evolution of Anguimorpha lizard venoms. Toxins, 9 (2017), 242.Google Scholar

Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D., Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215 (1990), 403–410.Google Scholar

Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., et al., Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28 (2012), 1647–1649.Google Scholar

Burbrink, F. T., Grazziotin, F. G., Pyron, R. A., et al., Interrogating genomic-scale data for Squamata (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) shows no support for key traditional morphological relationships. Systematic Biology, 69 (2020), 502–520.Google Scholar

Edgar, R. C., MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32 (2004), 1792–1797.Google Scholar

Stamatakis, A., RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 30 (2014), 1312–1313.Google Scholar

Olland, A. M., Strand, J., Presman, E., et al., Triad of polar residues implicated in pH specificity of acidic mammalian chitinase. Protein Science, 18 (2009), 569–578.Google Scholar

Tjoelker, L. W., Gosting, L., Frey, S., et al., Structural and functional definition of the human chitinase chitin-binding domain. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275 (2000), 514–520.Google Scholar

Hussain, M. and Wilson, J. B., New paralogues and revised time line in the expansion of the vertebrate GH18 family. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 76 (2013), 240–260.Google Scholar

Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., and Schwartz, T., Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) (2010), 1–8.Google Scholar

Chen, J. M., Cooper, D. N., Chuzhanova, N., Férec, C., and Patrinos, G. P., Gene conversion: Mechanisms, evolution and human disease. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8 (2007), 762–775.Google Scholar

Renkema, G. H., Boot, R. G., Au, F. L., et al., Chitotriosidase a chitinase, and the 39-kDa human cartilage glycoprotein, a chitin-binding lectin, are homologues of family 18 glycosyl hydrolases secreted by human macrophages. European Journal of Biochemistry, 251 (1998), 504–509.Google Scholar

Irisarri, I., Baurain, D., Brinkmann, H., et al., Phylotranscriptomic consolidation of the jawed vertebrate timetree. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1 (2017), 1370–1378.Google Scholar

Zheng, Y. and Wiens, J. J., Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 94 (2016), 537–547.Google Scholar

Lozano-Fernandez, J., Tanner, A. R., Puttick, M. N., et al., A Cambrian–Ordovician terrestrialization of arachnids. Frontiers in Genetics, 11 (2020), 182.Google Scholar

Lins, L. S. F., Ho, S. Y. W., and Lo, N., An evolutionary timescale for terrestrial isopods and a lack of molecular support for the monophyly of Oniscidea (Crustacea: Isopoda). Organisms, Diversity and Evolution, 17 (2017), 813–820.Google Scholar

Misof, B., Liu, S., Meusemann, K., et al., Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346 (2014), 763–767.Google Scholar

Fernández, R., Edgecombe, G. D., and Giribet, G., Phylogenomics illuminates the backbone of the Myriapoda Tree of Life and reconciles morphological and molecular phylogenies. Scientific Reports, 8 (2018), 83 Google Scholar

Modesto, S. P., Scott, D. M., and Reisz, R. R., Arthropod remains in the oral cavities of fossil reptiles support inference of early insectivory. Biology Letters, 5 (2009), 838–840.Google Scholar

Melstrom, K. M., The relationship between diet and tooth complexity in living dentigerous saurians. Journal of Morphology, 278 (2017), 500–522.Google Scholar

Martill, D. M., Tischlinger, H., and Longrich, N. R., A four-legged snake from the Early Cretaceous of Gondwana. Science, 349 (2015), 416–419.Google Scholar

Caldwell, M. W., Nydam, R. L., Palci, A., and Apesteguía, S., The oldest known snakes from the Middle Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous provide insights on snake evolution. Nature Communications, 6 (2015), 5996.Google Scholar

Longrich, N. R., Bhullar, B. A. S., and Gauthier, J. A., A transitional snake from the Late Cretaceous period of North America. Nature, 488 (2012), 205–208.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Caldwell, M. W. and Lee, M. S. Y., A snake with legs from the marine Cretaceous of the Middle East. Nature, 386 (1997), 705–708.Google Scholar

Haas, G., On a new snakelike reptile from the Lower Cenomanian of Ein Jabrud, near Jerusalem. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, 1 (1979), 51–64.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. A., Mohabey, D. M., Peters, S. E., and Head, J. J., Predation upon hatchling dinosaurs by a new snake from the Late Cretaceous of India. PLoS Biology, 8 (2010), e1000322.Google Scholar

Sanders, J. G., Beichman, A. C., Roman, J., et al., Baleen whales host a unique gut microbiome with similarities to both carnivores and herbivores. Nature Communications, 6 (2015), 8285.Google Scholar

Schendel, V., Rash, L. D., Jenner, R. A., and Undheim, E. A. B., The diversity of venom: the importance of behavior and venom system morphology in understanding its ecology and evolution. Toxins (Basel), 11 (2019), 666.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Roelants, K., Champagne, D. E., et al., The toxicogenomic multiverse: convergent recruitment of proteins into animal venoms. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 10 (2009), 483–511.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., From genome to ‘venome’: molecular origin and evolution of the snake venom proteome inferred from phylogenetic analysis of toxin sequences and related body proteins. Genome Research, 15 (2005), 403–420.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Scheib, H., van der Weerd, L., et al., Evolution of an arsenal: structural and functional diversification of the venom system in the advanced snakes (Caenophidia). Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 7 (2008), 215–46.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Vidal, N., van der Weerd, L., Kochva, E., and Renjifo, C., Evolution and diversification of the Toxicofera reptile venom system. Journal of Proteomics, 72 (2009), 127–136.Google Scholar

Vidal, N. and Hedges, S. B.. The phylogeny of squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear protein-coding genes. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 328 (2005), 1000–1008.Google Scholar

Kochva, E., Oral glands of the Reptilia. Biology of the Reptilia. 8 (1978), 43–162.Google Scholar

Pough, F. H., Andrews, R. M., Cadle, J. E., et al., Herpetology 3rd edn. (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2004).Google Scholar

Kardong, K. V., Weinstein, S. A., and Smith, T. L., Reptile venom glands: form, function, and future. In Mackessy, S. P., ed., Handbook of Venoms and Toxins of Reptiles (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009), pp. 65–91.Google Scholar

Burbrink, F. T., Grazziotin, F. G., Pyron, R. A., et al. Interrogating genomic-scale data for Squamata (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) shows no support for key traditional morphological relationships. Systematic Biology, 69 (2020), 502–520.Google Scholar

Daltry, J. C., Wüster, W., and Thorpe, R. S., Diet and snake venom evolution. Nature, 379 (1996), 537–40.Google Scholar

Gibbs, H. L., Sanz, L., Chiucchi, J. E., Farrell, T. M., and Calvete, J. J., Proteomic analysis of ontogenetic and diet-related changes in venom composition of juvenile and adult Dusky Pigmy rattlesnakes (Sistrurus miliarius barbouri). Journal of Proteomics, 74 (2011), 2169–2179.Google Scholar

Zancolli, G., Calvete, J. J., Cardwell, M. D., et al., When one phenotype is not enough: divergent evolutionary trajectories govern venom variation in a widespread rattlesnake species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286 (2019), 20182735.Google Scholar

Casewell, N. R., Jackson, T. N. W., Laustsen, A. H., and Sunagar, K., Causes and Consequences of Snake Venom Variation. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 41 (2020), 570–581.Google Scholar

Jackson, T. N. W., Jouanne, H., and Vidal, N., Snake venom in context: Neglected clades and concepts. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7 (2019), 332.Google Scholar

Modica, M. V., Sunagar, K., Holford, M., and Dutertre, S.,. Diversity and evolution of animal venoms: Neglected targets, ecological iInteractions, future perspectives. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8 (2020), 65.Google Scholar

Cardoso, F. C., Ferraz, C. R., Arrahman, A., et al., Multifunctional toxins in snake venoms and therapeutic implications: from pain to hemorrhage and necrosis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7 (2019), 218.Google Scholar

Casewell, N. R., Harrison, R. A., Wüster, W., and Wagstaff, S. C., Comparative venom gland transcriptome surveys of the saw-scaled vipers (Viperidae: Echis) reveal substantial intra-family gene diversity and novel venom transcripts. BMC Genomics, 10 (2009), 564.Google Scholar

Currier, R. B., Harrison, R. A., Rowley, P. D., Laing, G. D., and Wagstaff, S. C., Intra-specific variation in venom of the African Puff Adder (Bitis arietans): Differential expression and activity of snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs). Toxicon, 55 (2010), 864–873.Google Scholar

Senji Laxme, R. R., Khochare, S., de Souza, H. F., et al., Beyond the ‘big four’: Venom profiling of the medically important yet neglected Indian snakes reveals disturbing antivenom deficiencies. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13 (2019), e0007899.Google Scholar

Sunagar, K., Undheim, E. A., Scheib, H., et al., Intraspecific venom variation in the medically significant Southern Pacific Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus helleri): biodiscovery, clinical and evolutionary implications. Journal of Proteomics, 99 (2014), 68–83.Google Scholar

Jackson, T. N., Koludarov, I., Ali, S. A., et al., Rapid radiations and the race to redundancy: An investigation of the evolution of Australian elapid snake venoms. Toxins (Basel), 8 (2016), 309.Google Scholar

Mackessy, S. P., Williams, K., and Ashton, K. G., Ontogenetic variation in venom composition and diet of Crotalus oreganus concolor: a case of venom paedomorphosis? Copeia, 2003 (2003), 769–782.Google Scholar

Rokyta, D. R., Margres, M. J., Ward, M. J., and Sanchez, E. E., The genetics of venom ontogeny in the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus). PeerJ, 5 (2017), e3249.Google Scholar

Sanz, L., Gibbs, H. L., Mackessy, S. P., and Calvete, J. J., Venom proteomes of closely related Sistrurus rattlesnakes with divergent diets. Journal of Proteome Research. 5 (2006), 2098–2112.Google Scholar

Barlow, A., Pook, C. E., Harrison, R. A., and Wüster, W., Coevolution of diet and prey-specific venom activity supports the role of selection in snake venom evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276 (2009), 2443–2449.Google Scholar

Mackessy, S. P., Sixberry, N. M., Heyborne, W. H., and Fritts, T., Venom of the Brown Treesnake, Boiga irregularis: ontogenetic shifts and taxa-specific toxicity. Toxicon, 47 (2006), 537–548.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Li, M., Fry, B. G., and Kini, R. M., Eggs-only diet: its implications for the toxin profile changes and ecology of the marbled sea snake (Aipysurus eydouxii). Journal of Molecular Evolution, 60 (2005), 81–89.Google Scholar

Durban, J., Perez, A., Sanz, L., et al., Integrated ‘omics’ profiling indicates that miRNAs are modulators of the ontogenetic venom composition shift in the Central American rattlesnake, Crotalus simus simus. BMC Genomics, 14 (2013), 234.Google Scholar

Ujvari, B., Casewell, N. R., Sunagar, K., et al., Widespread convergence in toxin resistance by predictable molecular evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112 (2015), 11911–11916.Google Scholar

Rowe, A. H., Xiao, Y., Rowe, M. P., Cummins, T. R., and Zakon, H. H., Voltage-gated sodium channel in grasshopper mice defends against bark scorpion toxin. Science, 342 (2013), 441–446.Google Scholar

Holding, M. L., Drabeck, D. H., Jansa, S. A., and Gibbs, H. L., Venom resistance as a model for understanding the molecular basis of complex coevolutionary adaptations. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 56 (2016), 1032–1043.Google Scholar

Biardi, J. E., Chien, D. C., and Coss, R. G.. California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi) defenses against rattlesnake venom digestive and hemostatic toxins. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32 (2006), 137–154.Google Scholar

Jansa, S. A. and Voss, R. S., Adaptive evolution of the venom-targeted vWF protein in opossums that eat pitvipers. PLoS One, 6 (2011), e20997.Google Scholar

Holding, M. L., Biardi, J. E., and Gibbs, H. L., Coevolution of venom function and venom resistance in a rattlesnake predator and its squirrel prey. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283 (2016), 20152841.Google Scholar

Barchan, D., Kachalsky, S., Neumann, D., et al., How the mongoose can fight the snake: the binding site of the mongoose acetylcholine receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 89 (1992), 7717–7721.Google Scholar

Drabeck, D. H., Dean, A. M., and Jansa, S. A.. Why the honey badger don’t care: Convergent evolution of venom-targeted nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in mammals that survive venomous snake bites. Toxicon, 99 (2015), 68–72.Google Scholar

Sunagar, K., Casewell, N., Varma, S., et al., Deadly innovations: unraveling the molecular evolution of animal venoms. In Gopalakrishnakone, P. and Calvete, J. J., eds., Venom Genomics and Proteomics (Dordrecht: Springer, 2014), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Sunagar, K. and Moran, Y.. The rise and fall of an evolutionary innovation: Contrasting strategies of venom evolution in ancient and young animals. PLoS Genetics, 11 (2015), e1005596.Google Scholar

Girish, K. S., Jagadeesha, D. K., Rajeev, K. B., and Kemparaju, K.. Snake venom hyaluronidase: an evidence for isoforms and extracellular matrix degradation. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 240 (2002), 105–110.Google Scholar

Tu, A. T. and Hendon, R. R., Characterization of lizard venom hyaluronidase and evidence for its action as a spreading factor. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B, 76 (1983), 377–383.Google Scholar

Katkar, G. D., Sundaram, M. S., NaveenKumar, S. K., et al., NETosis and lack of DNase activity are key factors in Echis carinatus venom-induced tissue destruction. Nature Communications, 7 (2016), 11361.Google Scholar

Lu, Q., Clemetson, J. M., and Clemetson, K. J.. Snake venoms and hemostasis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 3 (2005), 1791–1799.Google Scholar

Xiong, S. and Huang, C.. Synergistic strategies of predominant toxins in snake venoms. Toxicology Letters, 287 (2018), 142–154.Google Scholar

Modahl, C. M. and Mackessy, S. P., Venoms of rear-fanged snakes: New proteins and novel activities. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7 (2019), 279.Google Scholar

Tasoulis, T. and Isbister, G. K., A review and database of snake venom proteomes. Toxins (Basel), 9 (2017), 9.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Undheim, E. A., Ali, S. A, et al., Squeezers and leaf-cutters: differential diversification and degeneration of the venom system in toxicoferan reptiles. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 12 (2013), 1881–1899.Google Scholar

Sunagar, K., Jackson, T. N., Undheim, E. A., et al., Three-fingered RAVERs: Rapid Accumulation of Variations in Exposed Residues of snake venom toxins. Toxins (Basel), 5 (2013), 2172–2208.Google Scholar

Jackson, T. N., Young, B., Underwood, G., et al., Endless forms most beautiful: The evolution of ophidian oral glands, including the venom system, and the use of appropriate terminology for homologous structures. Zoomorphology, 136 (2017), 107–130.Google Scholar

Sanggaard, K. W., Dyrlund, T. F., Thomsen, L. R., et al., Characterization of the gila monster (Heloderma suspectum suspectum) venom proteome. Journal of Proteomics, 117 (2015), 1–11.Google Scholar

Yap, M. K. K. and Misuan, N., Exendin-4 from Heloderma suspectum venom: From discovery to its latest application as type II diabetes combatant. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 124 (2019), 513–527.Google Scholar

Kochva, E.. The origin of snakes and evolution of the venom apparatus. Toxicon, 25 (1987), 65–106.Google Scholar

Auffenberg, W.. The Behavioral Ecology of the Komodo Monitor (Gainsville, FL: University Presses of Florida, 1981).Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Wroe, S., Teeuwisse, W., et al., A central role for venom in predation by Varanus komodoensis (Komodo Dragon) and the extinct giant Varanus (Megalania) priscus . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106 (2009), 8969–8974.Google Scholar

Koludarov, I., Jackson, T. N., op den Brouw, B., et al., Enter the dragon: The dynamic and multifunctional evolution of Anguimorpha lizard venoms. Toxins (Basel), 9 (2017), 242.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Vidal, N., Norman, J. A., et al., Early evolution of the venom system in lizards and snakes. Nature, 439 (2006), 584–588.Google Scholar

Nei, M., Gu, X., and Sitnikova, T., Evolution by the birth-and-death process in multigene families of the vertebrate immune system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94 (1997), 7799–7806.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Wüster, W., Kini, R. M., et al., Molecular evolution and phylogeny of elapid snake venom three-finger toxins. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 57 (2003), 110–129.Google Scholar

Casewell, N. R., Wagstaff, S. C., Harrison, R. A., Renjifo, C., and Wüster, W., Domain loss facilitates accelerated evolution and neofunctionalization of duplicate snake venom metalloproteinase toxin genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28 (2011), 2637–2649.Google Scholar

Suryamohan, K., Krishnankutty, S. P., Guillory, J., et al., The Indian cobra reference genome and transcriptome enables comprehensive identification of venom toxins. Nature Genetics, 52 (2020), 106–117.Google Scholar

Brown, D. D., Wensink, P. C., and Jordan, E., A comparison of the ribosomal DNA’s of Xenopus laevis and Xenopus mulleri: the evolution of tandem genes. Journal of Molecular Biology, 63 (1972), 57–73.Google Scholar

Moran, Y., Weinberger, H., Sullivan, J. C., et al., Concerted evolution of sea anemone neurotoxin genes is revealed through analysis of the Nematostella vectensis genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25 (2008), 737–747.Google Scholar

Brust, A., Sunagar, K., Undheim, E. A. B., et al., Differential evolution and neofunctionalization of snake venom metalloprotease domains. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 12 (2013), 651–663.Google Scholar

Kordis, D. and Gubensek, F., Adaptive evolution of animal toxin multigene families. Gene, 261 (2000), 43–52.Google Scholar

Casewell, N. R., Wüster, W., Vonk, F. J., Harrison, R. A., and Fry, B. G.. Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28 (2013), 219–229.Google Scholar

Hargreaves, A. D., Swain, M. T., Hegarty, M. J., Logan, D. W., and Mulley, J. F., Restriction and recruitment-gene duplication and the origin and evolution of snake venom toxins. Genome Biology and Evolution, 6 (2014), 2088–2095.Google Scholar

Reyes-Velasco, J., Card, D. C., Andrew, A. L., et al., Expression of venom gene homologs in diverse python tissues suggests a new model for the evolution of snake venom. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32 (2015), 173–183.Google Scholar

Lei, Q., Li, C., Zuo, Z., et al., Evolutionary Insights into RNA trans-Splicing in Vertebrates. Genome Biology and Evolution, 8 (2016), 562–577.Google Scholar

Ogawa, T., Oda-Ueda, N., Hisata, K., et al., Alternative mRNA splicing in three venom families underlying a possible production of divergent venom proteins of the Habu Snake, Protobothrops flavoviridis. Toxins (Basel), 11 (2019), 581.Google Scholar

Cousin, X., Bon, S., Massoulie, J., and Bon, C., Identification of a novel type of alternatively spliced exon from the acetylcholinesterase gene of Bungarus fasciatus. Molecular forms of acetylcholinesterase in the snake liver and muscle. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273 (1998), 9812–9820.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Winter, K., Norman, J. A., et al., Functional and structural diversification of the Anguimorpha lizard venom system. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 9 (2010), 2369–2390.Google Scholar

Lynch, V. J., Inventing an arsenal: adaptive evolution and neofunctionalization of snake venom phospholipase A2 genes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7 (2007), 2.Google Scholar

Sunagar, K., Johnson, W. E., O’Brien, S. J., Vasconcelos, V., and Antunes, A., Evolution of CRISPs associated with toxicoferan-reptilian venom and mammalian reproduction. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29 (2012), 1807–1822.Google Scholar

Jackson, K., The evolution of venom-delivery systems in snakes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 137 (2003), 337–354.Google Scholar

Koludarov, I., Jackson, T. N., Pozzi, A., and Mikheyev, A. S., Family saga: reconstructing the evolutionary history of a functionally diverse gene family reveals complexity at the genetic origins of novelty. bioRxiv, (2019), 583344.Google Scholar

Taub, A. M.. Ophidian cephalic glands. Journal of Morphology, 118 (1966), 529–542.Google Scholar

Vonk, F. J., Admiraal, J. F., Jackson, K., et al., Evolutionary origin and development of snake fangs. Nature, 454 (2008), 630–633.Google Scholar

Phisalix, M. and Caius, R.. L’extension de la fonction venimeuse dans l’ordre entière des ophidiens et son existence chez des familles ou elle n’avait pas été soupçonnée jusqu’içi. Journal de Physiologie et de Pathologie Générale, 17 (1918), 923–964.Google Scholar

Fry, B. G., Casewell, N. R., Wüster, W., et al., The structural and functional diversification of the Toxicofera reptile venom system. Toxicon, 60 (2012), 434–448.Google Scholar

Jackson, T. N. and Fry, B. G., A tricky trait: Applying the fruits of the ‘function debate’ in the philosophy of biology to the ‘venom debate’ in the science of toxinology. Toxins, 8 (2016), 263.Google Scholar

Hargreaves, A. D., Swain, M. T., Logan, D. W., and Mulley, J. F., Testing the Toxicofera: comparative transcriptomics casts doubt on the single, early evolution of the reptile venom system. Toxicon, 92 (2014), 140–156.Google Scholar

Townsend, T., Larson, A., Louis, E., and Macey, J. R.. Molecular phylogenetics of squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree. Systematic Biology 53 (2004), 735–757.Google Scholar

Conesa, A., Madrigal, P., Tarazona, S., et al., A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biology, 17 (2016), 13.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Genomic Perspectives

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Part III - Genomic Perspectives

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive