Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T05:21:02.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2024

Wolfgang Weiß  and
Cornelia Furculita
Wolfgang Weiß
Affiliation:
University Speyer
Cornelia Furculita
Affiliation:
University Speyer
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy
Assessing the Turn to Stronger Enforcement and More Robust Interest Representation
 , pp. 466 - 498
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelal, Rawi and Meunier, Sophie, ‘Managed Globalization: Doctrine, Practice and Promise’ (2010) 17(3) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Zaker, WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion: Common Concern of Humankind, Carbon Pricing, and Export Credit Support (Leiden: Brill, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akande, Dapo, Akhavan, Payam, and Bjorge, Eirik, ‘Economic Sanctions, International Law, and Crimes against Humanity: Venezuela’s Referral to the International Criminal Court’ (2021) 115(3) American Journal of International Law, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alden, Chris and Large, Daniel, ‘On Becoming a Norms Maker: Chinese Foreign Policy, Norms Evolution and the Challenges of Security in Africa’ (2015) 221 The China Quarterly, pp. 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allee, Todd, Elsig, Manfred, and Lugg, Andrew, ‘The Ties between WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements’ (2017) 20(2) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 333–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aloupi, Niki, ‘The Right to Non-intervention and Non-interference’ (2015) 4(3) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, pp. 566–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Sulaiti, Ahmed Essa, ‘WTO Members Can Save Their ‘Crown Jewel’: A View from the Arab World’ (2022) 56(1) Journal of World Trade, pp. 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Scott, Friedbacher, Todd, Lau, Christian et al., ‘Using Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU to Ensure the Availability of Appeals’ (2017) 17 Centre for Trade and Economic Integration Working Papers, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Anghel, Suzana, Immenkamp, Beatrix, Lazarou, Elena et al., ‘On the Path to “Strategic Autonomy”: The EU in an Evolving Geopolitical Environment’ (2020) 652(96) European Parliamentary Research Service Study, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Laurens, ‘Opinion 2/15: Adding Some Spice to the Trade & Environment Debate’, European Law Blog, 15 June 2017, https://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/06/15/opinion-215-adding-some-spice-to-the-trade-environment-debate/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apaza Lanyi, Pamela and Steinbach, Armin, ‘Limiting Jurisdictional Fragmentation in International Trade Disputes’ (2014) 5(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, pp. 372–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arko, Annie, ‘A Canadian Border Carbon Adjustment? GATT Compliance and Underexplored Exceptions’ (2021) 16(9) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrowsmith, Sue, Government Procurement in the WTO (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, Sue, ‘Reviewing the GPA: The Role and Development of the Plurilateral Agreement after Doha’ (2002) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 761–790.Google Scholar
Asteriti, Alessandra, ‘Article 21 TEU and the EU’s Common Commercial Policy: A Test of Coherence’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Krajewski, Markus, Tams, Christian et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017 (Cham: Springer, 2017), pp. 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azaria, Danae, ‘Trade Countermeasures for Breaches of International Law Outside the WTO’ (2022) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Azoulai, Loïc, ‘Structural Principles: Internal and External’, in Cremona, Marise (ed.), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018), pp. 35–66.Google Scholar
Åhman, Joachim, ‘Exploring Border Areas between the Law of State Responsibility and WTO Law’ (2020) 54(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen, ‘Geoeconomics in a Changing Global Order’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Bacchus, James, ‘Legal Issues with the European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’ (2021) CATO Briefing Paper No. 125, www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-08/briefing-paper-125.pdf, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Bacchus, James and Lester, Simon, ‘The Rule of Precedent and the Role of the Appellate Body’ (2020) 54(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetens, Freya, ‘Abuse of Process and Abuse of Rights before the ICJ: Ever More Popular, Ever Less Successful?’, EJIL:Talk!, 15 October 2019, www.ejiltalk.org/abuse-of-process-and-abuse-of-rights-before-the-icj-ever-more-popular-ever-less-successful/.Google Scholar
Baetens, Freya and Bronckers, Marco, ‘The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument: A Big Stick for Big Targets’, EJIL: Talk!, 19 January 2022, www.ejiltalk.org/the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-a-big-stick-for-big-targets/.Google Scholar
Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina, Bremberg, Niklas, Michalski, Anna, and Oxelheim, Lars, The European Union in a Changing World Order (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, ‘Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They Are Going’ (2012) No. 9103 CEPR Discussion Paper, pp. 13–59.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert E., ‘The Case for a Multilateral Trade Organization’ in Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin, and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 29–39.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude, Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy. The Future of the World Trade Organization (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Baroncini, Elisa, ‘Preserving the Appellate Stage in the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: The EU and the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement’ (2019) 29 The Italian Yearbook of International Law, pp. 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroncini, Elisa, ‘The EU Approach to Overcome the WTO Dispute Settlement Vacuum: Article 25 DSU Interim Appeal Arbitration as a Bridge between Renovation and Innovation’, in Lewis, Meredith Kolsky, Nakagawa, Junji, Neuwirth, Rostam J et al. (eds.), A Post-WTO International Legal Order. Utopian, Dystopian and Other Scenarios (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade, pp. 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘The Trade and Development Policy of the European Union’ (2007) 18(4) European Journal of International Law, pp. 715–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘The WTO Legality of the EU’s GSP+ Arrangement’ (2007) 10(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 869–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Human Rights and Sustainable Development Obligations in EU Free Trade Agreements’ (2013) 40(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Human Rights, Labour Standards, and Environmental Standards in CETA’, in Griller, Stefan, Obwexer, Walter, and Vranes, Erich (eds.), Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA: New Orientations for EU External Economic Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 202–215.Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the WTO’ (2016) Society of International Economic Law Working Paper No. 2016/18, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Does WTO Law Really Not Regulate ‘Foreign Subsidies’?’, Linklaters, 22 June 2020, www.linklaters.com/en/insights/blogs/tradelinks/2020/june/does-wto-law-really-not-regulate-foreign-subsidies.Google Scholar
Bauermeister, Tabea, ‘A Tool to Investigate M&A Transactions with Regard to Foreign Financial Contributions’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benitah, Marc, WTO Law of Subsidies: A Comprehensive Approach (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2019).Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish and Patrick, Hugh (eds.), Aggressive Unilateralism. America’s 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Bhala, Raj, Modern GATT Law: A Treatise on the Law and Political Economy of the GATT & Other W.T.O Agreements, 2nd ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2013).Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, Peat, Daniel, and Windsor, Matthew (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilal, San and Hoekman, Bernard, ‘Introduction: EU Trade and External Policy in Troubled Waters’, in Bilal, San and Hoekman, Bernard (eds.), Perspectives on the Soft Power of EU Trade Policy (London: CEPR Press, 2019), pp. 9–14.Google Scholar
Bluth, Christian Johannes, Europe’s Trade Strategy for the Age of Geoeconomic Globalization (London: CEPR Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Bogdanova, Iryna, Unilateral Sanctions in International Law and the Enforcement of Human Rights (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohanes, Jan and Salcedo, Karolyn, Overview of WTO Jurisprudence in 2013’, in Herrmann, Christoph, Krajewski, Markus, and Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2015 (Cham: Springer, 2015), pp. 337–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, ‘Remarks: The State of State Responsibility’, (2002) American Society of International Law Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting, pp. 169–172.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, and Lee, Jaemin, ‘The European Union–Korea Free Trade Agreement Sustainable Development Proceeding: Reflections on a Ground-Breaking Dispute’ (2022) 23 The Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Yelter, De Ville, Ferdi, and Orbie, Jan, ‘EU Trade Policy: Persistent Liberalisation, Contentious Protectionism’ (2016) 38(3) Journal of European Integration, pp. 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchert, Ingo, Conconi, Paola, Di Ubaldo, Mattia, and Herghelegiu, Cristina, ‘The Pursuit of Non-Trade Policy Objectives in EU Trade Policy’ (2020) European University Institute Working Papers, RSCAS 2020/26, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Bordin, Fernando Lusa, ‘Reflections of Customary International Law: The Authority of Codification Conventions and ILC Draft Articles in International Law’ (2014) 63(3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 535–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovis, Christopher, ‘The Principles of Public Procurement Regulation’, in Bovis, Christopher (ed.), Research Handbook on EU Public Procurement Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), pp. 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Kolb, Melina, ‘Trump’s Trade War Timeline: An Up-to-Date Guide’, 24 March 2023, www.piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trump-trade-war-china-date-guide.Google Scholar
Bradford, Anu, ‘The Brussels Effect’ (2012) 107(1) Northwestern University Review, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brattberg, Erik and Le Corre, Philippe, ‘The EU and China in 2020: More Competition Ahead’ (2020) Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/1-31-20_Brattberg_Le_Corre_EU_China.pdf.Google Scholar
Breton, Thierry, ‘A European Sovereignty Fund for an industry “Made in Europe”’, Blog of Commissioner Thierry Breton, 15 September 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_22_5543.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: Can we Go Back Again?’ (2019) 113 AJIL Unbound, pp. 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, Stephen, ‘Justifying the Teleological Methodology of the European Court of Justice: A Rebuttal’ (2016) 55 Irish Jurist, pp. 134–165.Google Scholar
Brolin, Matilda J., ‘Procedural Agreements in WTO Disputes: Addressing the Sequencing Problem’ (2016) 85 Nordic Journal of International Law, pp. 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, Marco, ‘Trade Conflicts: Whither the WTO?’ (2020) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 221–244.Google Scholar
Bronckers, Marco and Gruni, Giovanni ‘Taking the Enforcement of Labour Standards in the EU’s Free Trade Agreements Seriously’ (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1591–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, Marco and Gruni, Giovanni ‘Retooling the Sustainability Standards in EU Free Trade Agreements’ (2021) 24 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffard, Isabelle and Zemanek, Karl, ‘The Object and Purpose of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ (1998) 3 Austrian Review of International and European Law, pp. 311–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BusinessEurope, ‘BusinessEurope’s Views on an International Procurement Instrument’, Position Paper, 20 May 2020, www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/position_papers/rex/2020-05-20_views_on_an_international_procurement_instrument.pdf.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A., ‘Sino-Speak: Chinese Exceptionalism and the Politics of History’ (2012) 71(1) The Journal of Asian Studies, pp. 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannizarro, Enzo, ‘The Value of the EU International Values’, in Douma, Wybe, Eckes, Christina, Van Elsuwege, Peter et al. (eds.), The Evolving Nature of EU External Relations Law (Berlin: T.M.C. Asser Press, Springer, 2021), pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranta, Roberto, ‘Article 1. Subject-Matter and Scope’, in Caranta, Roberto and Sanchez-Graells, Albert (eds.), European Public Procurement. Commentary on Directive 2014/24/EU (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2021), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Barry E., ‘Economic Sanctions’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1521?prd=OPIL.Google Scholar
Caspary, Daniel, ‘Opinion: International Procurement Instrument – the end of the waiting game’, Borderlex, 31 March 2022, https://borderlex.net/2022/03/31/opinion-international-procurement-instrument-the-end-of-the-waiting-game/.Google Scholar
Cass, Deborah, Williams, Brett, and Barker, George (eds.), China and the World Trading System: Entering the New Millennium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceretelli, Carlotta, ‘EU – New Zealand FTA: Towards a New approach in the Enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development Obligations’, EJIL:Talk!, 28 September 2022, www.ejiltalk.org/eu-new-zealand-fta-towards-a-new-approach-in-the-enforcement-of-trade-and-sustainable-development-obligations/.Google Scholar
Chaisse, Julien and Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications’ (2018) 52(1) Journal of World Trade, pp. 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra Prasad, Gireesh and Dutta Mishra, Ravi, ‘India Brews Its Own Carbon Levy to Hit Back at EU Imports’, Mint, 19 June 2023, www.livemint.com/economy/india-brews-its-own-carbon-levy-to-hit-back-at-eu-imports-11687113102140.html.Google Scholar
Chandy, Sandeep Thomas and Dasgupta, Anupal, ‘Government Procurement Outside the GPA: A Developing Country View’ (2019) 14(7 & 8) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 383–390.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Grading Trump’s China Trade Strategy’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Krajewski, Markus, Tams, Christian et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2019 (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 217–256.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Grotius Publications Limited, 1987).Google Scholar
Choer Moraes, Henrique, ‘The Turn to Managed Interdependence: A Glimpse into the Future of International Economic Law?’ EJIL:Talk!, 14 August 2018, www.ejiltalk.org/the-turn-to-managed-interdependence-a-glimpse-into-the-future-of-international-economic-law.Google Scholar
Choer Moraes, Henrique and Wigell, Mikael, ‘Balancing Dependence: The Quest for Autonomy and the Rise of Corporate Geoeconomics’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 29–55.Google Scholar
Choi, Won-Mog, ‘Like Products’ in International Trade Law. Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Claussen, Kathleen, ‘Reimagining Trade-Plus Compliance: The Labor Story’ (2020) 23 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli Vignarelli, Mattia, ‘The European Commission Trade Policy Review: The Effectiveness of Sustainable Development Chapters in EU FTAs’ (2021) 6(1) European Papers, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Collins, David, ‘Government Procurement with Strings Attached: The Uneven Control of Offsets by the World Trade Organization and Regional Trade Agreements’ (2018) 8 Asian Journal of International Law, pp. 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conconi, Paola and Voon, Tania, ‘EC – Seal Products: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements’ (2015) EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/70, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Conley, Heather, ‘The Birth of a Global Strategy amid Deep Crisis’ (2016) 51(3) The International Spectator, pp. 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosbey, Aaron and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’ (2014) EUI Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Paper 2014/17, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Couvreur, Sjorre, De Ville, Ferdi, Jacobs, Thomas, and Orbie, Jan, ‘The Good Geopolitical Trade Actor? The European Union’s Discursive Justification of the Anti-Coercion Instrument’ (2022) Special Issue Perspectivas Journal of Political Science, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘State Responsibility’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1093?prd=EPIL.Google Scholar
Cremona, Marise, ‘The European Union and Regional Trade Agreements’, in Herrmann, Christoph and Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2010 (Cham: Springer, 2010), pp. 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, Marise, ‘Values in Foreign Policy’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), Beyond the Established Legal Orders (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 275–317.Google Scholar
Cremona, Marise, State Responsibility. The General Part (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Cremona, Marise, ‘A Quiet Revolution: The Changing Nature of the EU’s Common Commercial Policy’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Krajewski, Markus, Tams, Christian et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017 (Cham: Springer, 2017), pp. 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, Marise, ‘A Quiet Revolution: The Common Commercial Policy Six Years after the Treaty of Lisbon’ (2017) Report No. 2, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
Criddle, Evan J., ‘Humanitarian Financial Intervention’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law, pp. 583–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crochet, Victor, ‘The EU Anti-Coercion Mechanism: Legitimate Trade Instrument or Hidden “Economic” Sanction’, EU Law Live Weekend Edition No. 96, 2 April 2022, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar
Crochet, Victor and Gustafsson, Marcus, ‘Lawful Remedy or Illegal Response? Resolving the Issue of Foreign Subsidization under WTO Law’ (2021) 20(3) World Trade Review, pp. 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crochet, Victor and Hedge, Vineet, ‘China’s “Going Global” Policy: Transnational Production Subsidies under the WTO SCM’ (2020) 23(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 841–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, Louise, Eckhardt, Jappe, and Lee, Jaemin ‘The Trade Policy Response to COVID-19 and Its Implications for International Business’ (2021) 17(2) Critical Perspectives on International Business, pp. 252–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalpé, Vincent, ‘Canada – Feed-In Tariff: Are FITs Desirable, or Even Legal? A Case Comment’ (2014) 27(1) Quebec Journal of International Law, pp. 87–112.Google Scholar
Daunton, Martin, ‘The Inconsistent Quarte: Free Trade Versus Competing Goals’, in Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin, and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson Ladly, Sarah, ‘Border Carbon Adjustments, WTO-Law and the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’ (2012) 12(1) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, pp. 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Arwel, ‘The GATT Article III:8(a) Procurement Derogation and Canada – Renewable Energy’ (2015) 18(3) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawar, Kamala, ‘Government Procurement in the WTO: A Case for Greater Integration’ (2016a) 15(4) World Trade Review, pp. 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawar, Kamala, ‘The 2016 European Union International Procurement Instrument’s Amendments to the 2012 Buy European Proposal: A Retrospective Assessment of Its Prospects’ (2016b) 50(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 845–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Andrade, Mariana, ‘Procedural Innovations in the MPIA: A Way to Strengthen the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism?’ (2020) Questions of International Law, www.qil-qdi.org/procedural-innovations-in-the-mpia-a-way-to-strengthen-the-wto-dispute-settlement-mechanism/.Google Scholar
De Andrade, Mariana, ‘The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument: Balancing Ambiguity’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 13 November 2022, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2022/11/guest-post-the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-balancing-ambiguity.html.Google Scholar
De Bièvre, Dirk, ‘EU Regulatory Trade Agenda and the Quest for WTO Trade Enforcement’ (2006) 13(6) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 851–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Konink, Constant, Ronse, Thierry, and Timmermans, William, European Public Procurement Law: The Public Sector Procurement Directive Explained through 30 Years of Case Law by the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2nd ed. (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2015).Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno, ‘The EU and the International Legal Order: The Case of Human Rights’, in Evans, Malcolm, Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), Beyond the Established Legal Orders: Policy Interconnections Between the EU and the Rest of the World (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 127–148.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno, ‘A Selfish Court? The Court of Justice and the Design of International Dispute Settlement Beyond the EU’, in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds.), The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
Dias, Anna, Seeuws, Stéphanie, and Nosowicz, Agnieszka, ‘EU Border Carbon Adjustment and the WTO: Hand in Hand Towards Tackling Climate Change’ (2020) 15(1) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimopoulos, Angelos, ‘The Effects of the Lisbon Treaty on the Principles and Objectives of the Common Commercial Policy’ (2010) 15(2) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Natalie L. and Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘Provocative Climate Protection: EU ‘Extraterritorial’ Regulation of Maritime Emissions’ (2017) 66 International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 295–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. A Commentary, 2nd ed. (Heidelberg: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
Dreyer, Iana, ‘Ostrich Policy: The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument Risks Becoming a Damp Squib’ (2022) Borderlex, 1 February 2022, https://borderlex.net/2022/02/01/comment-ostrich-policy-the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-risks-becoming-a-damp-squib/.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel, Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham (eds.), The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Duchâtel, Mathieu, ‘Effective Deterrence? The Coming European Anti-Coercion Instrument’, Institut Montaigne, 2 December 2022, www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/effective-deterrence-coming-european-anti-coercion-instrument.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Rupert, ‘Article 3 (5) TEU a Decade On: Revisiting ‘Strict Observance of International Law’ in the Text and Context of Other EU Values’ (2021) 28(4) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, pp. 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta Mishra, Ravi, ‘India Seeks Taiwan, South Africa Backing on Carbon Tax’, Mint, 16 June 2023, www.livemint.com/economy/india-seeks-taiwan-s-africa-backing-on-carbon-border-tax-11686936697768.html.Google Scholar
Dür, Andreas, Eckhardt, Jappe, and Poletti, Arlo, ‘Global Value Chains, the Anti-Globalization Backlash, and EU Trade Policy: A Research Agenda’ (2020) 27 Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 944–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Early, Bryan R. and Cilizoglu, Menevis, ‘Economic Sanctions in Flux: Enduring Challenges, New Policies, and Defining the Future Research Agenda’ (2020) 21(4) International Studies Perspectives, pp. 438–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrecht, Caspar, ‘Foreign Subsidies Regulation and EU International Procurement’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, The European Internal Market and International Trade: A Legal Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, ‘The Integration of Public International Law in EU Law: Analytical and Normative Questions’, in Eeckhout, Piet and López-Escudero, Manuel (eds.), The EU’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, ‘Brexit After the Negotiation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Who Takes Back Control of What?’ (2021) 68 Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, pp. 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliasson, Johan and Garcia-Duran, Patricia, ‘New Is Old? The EU’s Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy’ (2023) 14(Suppl 3) Global Policy, pp. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englisch, Joachim and Falcão, Tatiana, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustments and WTO Law, Part One’ (2021a) 51(10) Environmental Law Reporter, pp. 10857–10882.Google Scholar
Englisch, Joachim and Falcão, Tatiana, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustments and WTO Law, Part Two’ (2021b) 51(11) Environmental Law Reporter, pp. 10935–10946.Google Scholar
Erixon, Frederik, Guinea, Oscar, Lamprecht, Philipp et al., ‘The New Wave of Defensive Trade Policy Measures in the European Union’, European Centre for International Political Economy Occasional Paper No 04/2022.Google Scholar
Espa, Ilaria, ‘Reconciling the Climate/Industrial Interplay of CBAMs: What Role for the WTO?’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 208–212.Google Scholar
Espa, Ilaria, Francois, Joseph, and van Asselt, Harro, ‘The EU Proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): An Analysis under WTO and Climate Change Law’ (2022) World Trade Institute Working Paper No. 06/2022, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon J., ‘Paper Tiger? EU Trade Enforcement as if Binding Pacts Mattered’ (2016) New Direction, The Foundation for European Reform, pp. 8–41.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon J., Sud, Juhi Dion, and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘The European Union’s New Move Against China: Countervailing Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment’ (2020) 15(9) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Meng Mandy, ‘Shades of Green: Mapping the Parameters of the GATT Article III:8(a) Government Procurement Derogation in the Renewable Energy Transition’ (2019) 20 The Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanou, Maria, ‘The CETA ICS and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in Opinion 1/17’ (2020) 22 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, pp. 106–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry and Newman, Abraham, ‘Weaponized Interdependence’ (2019) 44(1) International Security, pp. 42–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felbermayr, Gabriel, ‘A Trumpian Turn in EU Trade Politics and the Silence of Germany’, 2018 EconPol Opinion 6, www.econpol.eu/opinion_6.Google Scholar
Felbermayr, Gabriel and Peterson, Sonja, ‘Economic Assessment of Carbon Leakage and Carbon Border Adjustment’ (2020) EP Briefing Requested by the INTA Committee, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/603501/EXPO_BRI(2020)603501_EN.pdf, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Felbermayr, Gabriel and Steininger, Marina, ‘Trump’s Trade Attack on China – Who Will Have the Last Laugh?’ (2019) 20(1) CesIfo Forum 1/2019, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar
Fernández Pons, Javier, ‘Self-Help and the World Trade Organization’, in Mengozzi, Paolo (ed.), International Trade Law on the 50th Anniversary of the Multilateral Trade System (Milano: Giuffrè, 1999), pp. 55-112.Google Scholar
Fernández Pons, Javier, ‘The European Commission’s Proposed Anti-Coercion Instrument from an International Law Perspective’ (2023) CIDOB, www.cidob.org/en/articulos/monografias/la_estrategia_geoeconomica_de_china/the_european_commission_s_proposed_anti_coercion_instrument_from_an_international_law_perspective, pp. 57–63.Google Scholar
Fiorini, Matteo, Hoekman, Bernard M., Mavroidis, Petros C. et al., ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and the Appellate Body Crisis: Insider Perceptions and Members’ Revealed Preferences’ (2020) 54(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 667–698.Google Scholar
Fisler Damrosch, Lori, ‘The Legitimacy of Economic Sanctions as Countermeasures for Wrongful Acts’ (2019) 37 Berkeley Journal of International Law, pp. 250–264.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘Material Breach of Treaty: Some Legal Issues’ (2001) 6 Austrian Review of International and European Law, pp. 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flett, James, ‘Referring PTA Disputes to the WTO Dispute Settlement System’, in Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred (eds.), Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flett, James, ‘The European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and Its Consistency with World Trade Organization Law’, in European Commission, 70 Years of EU Law: A Union for its Citizens (Brussels: Bietlot, 2022), pp. 268–290.Google Scholar
Frankopan, Peter, The New Silk Roads. The Present and Future of the World (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Furculita, Cornelia, ‘The Time of PTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms Might Have Come’, in Elsig, Manfred, Polanco, Rodrigo, and Van den Bossche, Peter (eds.), International Economic Dispute Settlement: Demise or Transformation? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021a), pp. 442–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furculita, Cornelia, The WTO and the New Generation EU FTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Interacting in a Fragmented and Changing International Trade Law Regime (Cham: Springer, 2021b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Marc, Schulz, Andreas, and Manzini, Alice, ‘Proposal for an International Procurement Instrument: The Undiscovered (Third) Country’ (2020) Public Procurement Law Review, pp. 335–342.Google Scholar
Galiffa, Chiara and Garcia Bercero, Ignacio, ‘How WTO-Consistent Tools Can Ensure the Decarbonization of Emission-Intensive Industrial Sectors’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 196–201.Google Scholar
Gao, Henry, ‘Finding a Rule-Based Solution to the Appellate Body Crisis: Looking Beyond the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement’ (2021) 24 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Henry, ‘Will the European Union’s New Anti-Coercion Instrument Work with China?’ (2022) Research Collection Yong Pung How School of Law, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6036&context=sol_research, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
García, María J., ‘Sanctioning Capacity in Trade and Sustainability Chapters in EU Trade Agreements: The EU–Korea Case’ (2022) 10(1) Politics and Governance, pp. 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Duran Huet, Patricia and Eliasson, Leif Johan, ‘Was the EU’s 2021 Trade Strategy a Critical Juncture?’ (2022) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 563–584.Google Scholar
Garcia-Rubio, Mariano, ‘Unilateral Measures as a Means of Forcible Execution of WTO Recommendations and Decisions’, in Forlati, Laura and Sicilianos, Linos-Alexandre (eds.), Economic Sanctions in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2004), pp. 445–475.Google Scholar
Gargne, Léo, ‘Sustainable Development in Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs)’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021), vol. 11, pp. 468–479.Google Scholar
Gavin, Brigid, The European Union and Globalization: Towards Global Democratic Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, Tobias, ‘EU Open Strategic Autonomy and the Trappings of Geoeconomics’ (2022) European Foreign Affairs Review Special Issue, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Gertz, Geoffrey and Evers, Miles, ‘Geoeconomic Competition: Will State Capitalism Win?’ (2020) 43(2) The Washington Quarterly, pp. 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, Thomas, ‘Article 60. Termination or Suspension of the Operation of a Treaty as a Consequence of Its Breach’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. A Commentary, 2nd ed. (Heidelberg: Springer, 2018), pp. 1095–1125.Google Scholar
Gisselman, Fredrik et al., ‘Border Carbon Adjustments. An analysis of Trade Related Aspects and the Way Forward’ (2020) National Board of Trade Sweden, www.kommerskollegium.se/contentassets/7a09d4cdb83a46feaf0c6ae6e5b02fff/border-carbon-adjustments_final_.pdf, pp. 1–105.Google Scholar
Glöckle, Caroline, ‘Bridging the Gap: The MPIA as a Valuable Short-Term Solution to the Impasse of the WTO’s Appellate Body?’, Völkerrechtsblog, 12 October 2020, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/bridging-the-gap-the-mpia-as-a-valuable-short-term-solution-to-the-impasse-of-the-wtos-appellate-body/.Google Scholar
Glöckle, Caroline, ‘Die Ungewisse Zukunft des WTO Appellate Body’ (2020) 9 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, pp. 356–364.Google Scholar
Glöckle, Caroline and Würdemann, Aike, ‘Die Appellate Body-Krise der WTO – eine Analyse der US-Kritikpunkte’ (2018) 23 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, pp. 976–982.Google Scholar
Glöckle, Caroline and Würdemann, Aike, ‘The Atypical Fashion of the US-China ‘Phase 1’-Deal: Context, Content and Perspectives’ (2020) 23(2) Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomula, Joanna, ‘Responsibility and the World Trade Organization’, in Crawford, James, Alain Pellet, and Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 791–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govaere, Inge, ‘Interconnecting Legal Systems and the Autonomous EU Legal Order’, in Govaere, Inge and Garben, Sacha (eds.), The Interface between EU and International Law. Contemporary Reflections (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019), pp. 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graafsma, Folkert, ‘The Revised Enforcement Regulation (No 2021/167) and Some Possible Effects on EU Trade Disputes’ (2022) 17(7 & 8) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Thomas R., ‘The Rise (and Demise?) of the WTO Appellate Body’, 5 March 2020, https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/files/t.graham.greenwaldlecture.final_.pdf.Google Scholar
Grey, Felicia A., ‘Arbitration as an Alternative Dispute Settlement Mechanism at the WTO’ (2021) 12 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, pp. 477–504.Google Scholar
Grieger, Gisela, ‘Review of EU Enforcement Regulation for Trade Disputes’ (2021) European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652021/EPRS_BRI(2020)652021_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, Lukasz, ‘The WTO and FCTC Dispute Settlement Systems: Friends or Foes’ (2017) 12 Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, pp. 105–134.Google Scholar
Guilliard, Simon, Beihilfenkontrolle zwischen Supranationalität und Intergouvernementalität. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Brexit (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackenbroich, Jonathan, ‘Protecting Europe from Economic Coercion: A European Toolbox for Countering Economic Coercion’, European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 20 October 2020, https://ecfr.eu/publication/defending_europe_economic_sovereignty_new_ways_to_resist_economic_coercion/?amp%3Bqid=9084882#protecting.Google Scholar
Hackenbroich, Jonathan, ‘Europe’s New Economic Statecraft: A Strong Anti-Coercion Instrument’, European Council on Foreign Relations, 1 April 2022, https://ecfr.eu/article/europes-new-economic-statecraft-a-strong-anti-coercion-instrument/.Google Scholar
Hackenbroich, Jonathan and Zerka, Pawel, ‘Measured Response: How to Design a European Instrument against Economic Coercion’ (2021) European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 23 June 2021, https://ecfr.eu/publication/measured-response-how-to-design-a-european-instrument-against-economic-coercion/.Google Scholar
Hagemeyer-Witzleb, Teoman M., The International Law of Economic Warfare (Heidelberg: Springer, 2020).Google Scholar
Hahn, Michael, ‘We’ll Always Have Geneva: The Existential Crisis of the US-led Multilateral Trading System and the EU Reactions’, in Govaere, Inge and Garben, Sascha (eds.), The Interface Between EU and International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019), pp. 269–292.Google Scholar
Hamann, Andrea, ‘Living without the WTO Appellate Body: Procedural Developments in International Trade Dispute Settlement’ (2021) 20 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, pp. 166–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Brian, ‘What Happened to Fortress Europe? External Trade Policy Liberalization in the EU’ (1998) 52(1) International Organization, pp. 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Rebecca, and Harding, Jack, The Weaponization of Trade: The Great Unbalancing of Politics and Economics (London: London Publishing Partnership, 2017).Google Scholar
Harrison, James et al., ‘Labour Standards Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Reflections on the European Commission’s Reform Agenda’ (2019) 18(4) World Trade Review, pp. 635–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, Roderick Edward Noël, ‘International Procurement Instrument’ (2017) EPRS Briefing, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/614610/EPRS_BRI(2017)614610_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Hazarika, Angshuman and Van Vaerenbergh, Pieter, ‘‘One Rule to Rule Them All’: Rules for Article 25 DSU Arbitration’ (2019) 36(5) Journal of International Arbitration, pp. 595–628.Google Scholar
Heath, J. Benton, ‘The New National Security Challenge to the Economic Order’ (2020) 129(4) Yale Law Journal, pp. 1020–1098.Google Scholar
Hegde, Vineet, Wouters, Jan, and Raina, Akhil, ‘The Demise of the Rules-Based International Economic Order?’ (2020) Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, Working Paper 224, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Helal, Mohamed S., ‘On Coercion in International Law’ (2019) 52(1) International Law and Politics, pp. 1–122.Google Scholar
Hinojosa-Martínez, Luis M. and Pérez-Bernárdez, Carmela (eds.) Enhancing the Rule of Law in the EU’s External Action (Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing, 2023).Google Scholar
Hiro, Dilip, After Empire: The Birth of a Multipolar World (New York: National Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘To AB or Not to AB: Dispute Settlement in WTO Reform’ (2020) 23 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard and Puccio, Laura, ‘EU Trade Policy: Challenges and Opportunities’ (2019) 2019/06 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Policy, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘The EU Public Procurement Regime on Third-Country Bidders – Setting the Cursor between Openness and Reciprocity’, in Kalimo, Harri and Jansson, Max S. (eds.), EU Economic Law in a Time of Crisis (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), pp. 76–88.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘The Devil Is in the Detail: A First Guide on the EU’s New Trade Defence Rules’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘Do Ut Des oder Tit for Tat? – Die Europäische Handelspolitik Angesichts Neuer Herausforderungen aus den USA und China’, in Herrmann, Christoph (ed.), Die Gemeinsame Handelspolitik im Europäischen Verfassungsverbund (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2020), pp. 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘Securing a Level Playing Field through EU Free Trade Agreements – from Traditional Competition Chapters to a Dedicated Title in the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement’, in Heger, Alexander and Gourdet, Sascha (eds.), Fairen Wettbewerb in der Europäischen Union sichern (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022), pp. 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Patrick, ‘Regional Integration and Trade in the Era of COVID-19: A First Look’, UNU-CRIS Working Paper Series, September 2020, p. 11, https://cris.unu.edu/sites/cris.unu.edu/files/WP20.3%20-%20Holden.pdf.Google Scholar
Hooijmaaijers, Bas, ‘China, the BRICS and the Limitations of Reshaping Global Economic Governance’ (2021) 34 The Pacific Review, pp. 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopeland, Kristen, Clash of Powers: US–China Rivalry in Global Trade Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘To B(TA) or Not to B(TA)? On the Legality and Desirability of Border Tax Adjustments from a Trade Perspective’ (2011) The World Economy, pp. 1911–1937.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sapir, André, ‘Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’ (2010) 33(11) The World Economy, pp. 1565–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert, ‘Distinguished Essay: Non-tariff Barriers and Climate Policy: Border-Adjusted Taxes and Regulatory Measures as WTO-Compliant Climate Mitigation Strategies’, in Herrmann, Christoph, Krajewski, Markus, and Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law (Berlin: Springer, 2015), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Hradilová, Kateřina and Svoboda, Ondřej, ‘Sustainable Development Chapters in the EU Free Trade Agreements: Searching for Effectiveness’ (2018) 52(6) Journal of World Trade, pp. 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary C., ‘China as an Economic Actor on the World Stage: An Overview’, in Abbott, Frederick M. (ed.), China in the World Trading System. Defining the Principles of Engagement (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), pp. 47–52.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Kim, Jisun, and Schott, Jeffrey J., ‘Can EU Carbon Border Adjustment Measures Propel WTO Climate Talks?’ (2021) Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/pb21-23.pdf, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary, Moll, Thomas, and Rubbini, Luca, ‘Investment Subsidies for Cross-Border M&A’, United States Council Foundation Occasional Paper No. 2, April 2008, www.uscib.org/docs/usc_foundation_investment_subsidies.pdf, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, ‘The End of Liberal International Order?’ (2018) 94(1) International Affairs, pp. 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Thomas, Gheyle, Niels, De Ville, Ferdi, and Orbie, Jan, ‘The Hegemonic Politics of “Strategic Autonomy” and “Resilience”: COVID-19 and the Dislocation of EU Trade Policy’ (2023) 61(1) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamnejad, Maziar and Wood, Michael, ‘The Principle of Non-Intervention’ (2009) 22(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juncos, Ana, ‘Resilience as the New EU Foreign Policy Paradigm: A Pragmatist Turn’ (2017) 26(1) European Security, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Jing, ‘The Presumption of Good Faith in the WTO “As Such” Cases: A Reformulation of the Mandatory/Discretionary Distinction as an Analytical Tool’ (2012) 46(4) Journal of World Trade, pp. 879–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassoti, Eva, ‘Between Sollen and Sein: The CJEU’s Reliance on International Law in the Interpretation of Economic Agreements Covering Occupied Territories’ (2020) 33(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassoti, Eva and Odermatt, Jed, ‘The Principle of Autonomy and International Investment Arbitration: Reflections on Opinion 1/17’ (2020) 73 Questions of International Law, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar
Kassoti, Eva and Wessel, Ramses A., ‘The Conclusion of Trade Agreements and the EU’s Duty to Respect Human Rights Abroad’, in Rodrigues, Nuno Cunha (ed.), Exterritoriality of EU Economic Law: The Application of EU Economic Law Outside the Territory of the EU (Cham: Springer, 2021), pp. 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassoti, Eva and Wessel, Ramses A., ‘The Normative Effect of Article 3 (5) TEU. Observance and Development of International Law by the European Union’, in Andrade, Paula García (ed.) Interacciones entre el Derecho de la Union Europea y el Derecho Internacional Público (Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2023), pp. 19–46.Google Scholar
Keck, Alexander and Low, Patrick, ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When, and How?’, in Hoekman, Bernard M. and Evenett, Simon J. (eds.), Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation (Washnigton, DC and New York: Palgrave Macmillan and The World Bank, 2006), pp. 147–188.Google Scholar
Khorana, Sangeeta and Garcia, Maria, ‘Introduction’, in Khorana, Sangheta and Garcia, Maria (eds.), Handbook on the EU and International Trade (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Song and Osgood, Iain, ‘Firms in Trade and Trade Politics’ (2019) Annual Review of Political Science, pp. 399–417.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Stefan, ‘More Fairness in Global Procurement: The European Union’s Future International Procurement Instrument Moves Closer to Reality’ (2021), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3913595.Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic, ‘Some Lingering Questions About Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1989) 22(3) Cornell International Law Journal, pp. 549–573.Google Scholar
Klimas, Tadas and Vaičiukaitė, Jūratė, ‘The Law of Recitals in European Community Legislation’ (2008) 15(1) ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Koch, Rika, Green Public Procurement under WTO Law. Experience of the EU and Prospects for Switzerland (Cham: Springer, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koen, Louis and Rammila, Davy, ‘The EU-Korea Panel Report: A Watershed Moment for the Trade-Labor Nexus or Mere Symbolic Victory?’ (2021) 7(2) Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law, pp. 53–58.Google Scholar
Koenig, Christian and von Wendland, Bernhard, The Art of Regulation. Competition in Europe: Wealth and Wariness (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, Robert, ‘Principles as Sources of International Law (with Special Reference to Good Faith)’ (2006) 53(1) Netherlands International Law Review, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstadinides, Theodore, ‘Customary International Law as a Source of EU Law: A Two-Way Fertilization Route?’ (2016) 35(1) Yearbook of European Law, pp. 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, ‘More on Autonomy: Opinion 1/17 (CETA)’ (2019) 3 European Law Review, pp. 293–294.Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, ‘The Reform of the Common Commercial Policy’, in Biondi, Andrea and Eeckhout, Piet (eds.), EU Law After Lisbon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratz, Agatha and Oertel, Janka, ‘Home Advantage: How China’s Protected Market Threatens Europe’s Economic Power’, European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 15 April 2021, https://ecfr.eu/publication/home-advantage-how-chinas-protected-market-threatens-europes-economic-power/.Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike, Nolte, Georg, and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds.), The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriener, Florian, ‘Intervention, Prohibition of’, in Anne Peters and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024), https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1434.Google Scholar
Kübek, Gesa, ‘Sustainable Development Chapters in EU FTAs and Dispute Settlement: Lessons Learned from Ukraine – Wood Products and Korea – Labour Rights’, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor. Ambitions, Values and Metrics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022), pp. 277–293.Google Scholar
Kugler, Kholofelo, ‘Operationalizing MPIA Appeal Arbitrations: Opportunities and Challenges’, in Elsig, Manfred, Polanco, Rodrigo, and van den Bossche, Peter (eds.), International Economic Dispute Settlement: Demise or Transformation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), pp. 68–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijper, Pieter Jan, ‘From Dyestuffs to Kosovo Wine: From Avoidance to Acceptance by the European Community Courts of Customary International Law as Limit to Community Action’, in Dekker, Ige and Post, Harry (eds.), On the Foundations and Sources of International Law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press Institute, 2003), pp. 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijper, Pieter Jan, ‘“It Shall Contribute to […] the Strict Observance and Development of International Law …”’, in Rosas, Allan, Levits, Egils, and Bot, Yves (eds.), The Court of Justice of the EU and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013), pp. 589–612.Google Scholar
Kumar, Manoj and Arora, Neha, ‘India Plans to Challenge EU Carbon Tax at WTO’, Reuters, 17 May 2023, www.reuters.com/world/india/india-plans-challenge-eu-carbon-tax-wto-sources-2023-05-16/.Google Scholar
Kunig, Philip, ‘Prohibition of Intervention’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), vol. 6, pp. 289–299.Google Scholar
Kurmayer, Nikolaus J., ‘Green industry: G7 Sets Out Terms for Global “Climate Club”’, 13 December 2022, www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/green-industry-g7-sets-out-terms-for-global-climate-club/.Google Scholar
Lacerda Prazeres, Tatiana, ‘Trade and National Security: Rising Risks for the WTO’ (2020) 19 World Trade Review, pp. 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamp, Nicolas, ‘Making WTO Dispute Settlement Work without the Appellate Body: How the Threat of Unilateral Retaliation Could Be Used to Incentivize the Adoption of Panel Reports’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 3 December 2019, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2019/12/making-wto-dispute-settlement-work-without-the-appellate-body-how-the-threat-of-unilateral-retaliati.html.Google Scholar
Lange, Bernd, ‘Comment: How to Make the EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument Work’, Borderlex, 7 December 2021, https://borderlex.net/2021/12/07/comment-how-to-make-the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-work/.Google Scholar
Lanz, Rainer and Maurer, Andreas, ‘Services and Global Value Chains: Some Evidence on Servicification of Manufacturing and Services Networks’ (2015) No. ERSD-2015-03 WTO Staff Working Paper, www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201503_e.pdf, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Laprévote, Francois-Charles and Lin, Wanjie, ‘Between State Aid, Trade and Antitrust: The Mixed Procedural Heritage of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation and the Overarching Principle of Non-Discrimination’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larik, Joris, ‘The Kadi Saga as a Tale of “Strict Observance” of International Law’ (2014) 61(1) Netherlands International Law Review, pp. 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1958).Google Scholar
Lavery, Scott, McDaniel, Sean, and Schmid, Davide, ‘European Strategic Autonomy’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 57–80.Google Scholar
Leal-Arcas, Rafael, EU Trade Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal-Arcas, Rafael, Faktaufon, Manuliza, and Kyprianou, Anna, ‘A Legal Exploration of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’ (2022) European Energy and Environmental Law Review, pp. 223–240.Google Scholar
LeClercq, Desiree, ‘The Panel Report under the EU-Korea Trade Agreement Concerning Labor Practices: What Are the Purposes of Trade Agreements as They Relate to the ILO’s Fundamental Labor Rights?’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 8 February 2021, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2021/02/guest-post-the-panel-report-under-the-eu-korea-trade-agreement-concerning-labor-practices-what-are-t.html.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen, ‘Direct Applicability and Direct Effect of International Law in the EU Legal Order’, in Govaere, Inge, Lannon, Erwan, van Elsuwege, Peter, and Adam, Stanislas (eds.), The EU in the World: Essays in Honour of Marc Maresceau (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2014), pp. 45-64.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen and Gutiérrez-Fons, José A., ‘To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice’ (2013) European Union Institute Working Papers AEL 2013/9, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Leonelli, Giulia Claudia, ‘Carbon Border Measures, Environmental Effectiveness and WTO Law Compatibility: Is There a Way Forward for the Steel and Aluminium Climate Club?’ (2022) World Trade Review, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Lester, Simon, ‘A Framework for Thinking about the Discretion in the Mandatory/Discretionary Distinction’ (2011) 14(2) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, Simon, ‘Can Interim Appeal Arbitration Preserve the WTO Dispute System?’ (2020) 77 CATO Institute Free Trade Bulletin, Hubert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, www.cato.org/free-trade-bulletin/can-interim-appeal-arbitration-preserve-wto-dispute-system.Google Scholar
Lester, Simon, ‘Questions About the MPIA and Article 25 Appeal Arbitration’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 1 September 2020, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2020/09/questions-about-the-mpia.html.Google Scholar
Lester, Simon, ‘Who’s Going to Pay for Supporting the MPIA?’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 15 June 2020, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2020/06/whos-going-to-pay-for-the-mpia.html.Google Scholar
Lester, Simon, Mercurio, Bryan, and Davies, Arwel, World Trade Law: Text, Materials and Commentary, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoling, ‘DSU Article 25 Appeal Arbitration: A Viable Interim Alternative to the WTO Appellate Body?’ (2020) 15(10) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Darren and Ferguson, Victor, ‘Informal Economic Sanctions: The Political Economy of Chinese Coercion During the THAAD Dispute’ (2022) 29(5) Review of International Political Economy, pp. 1525–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, Nicolas and Sheargold, Elisabeth, ‘In Search of Relevant Discretion: The Role of the Mandatory/Discretionary Distinction in WTO Law’ (2010) 13(2) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 379–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, Patrick, Marceau, Gabrielle, and Reinaud, Julia, ‘The Interface between the Trade and Climate Change Regimes: Scoping the Issues’ (2011) WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-1, www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201101_e.pdf, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Lowe, Sam, ‘The EU Should Reconsider Its Approach to Trade and Sustainable Development’ (2019a) Centre for European Reform, www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_SL_31.10.19.pdf, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Lowe, Sam, ‘Should the EU Tax Imported CO2?’ (2019b) Insight Centre for European Reform, www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_SL_24.9_19.pdf, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Lowe, Sam, ‘The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. How to Make it Work for Developing Countries’ (2021) Open Society European Policy Institute Policy Brief, www.cer.eu/publications/archive/policy-brief/2021/eus-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-how-make-it-work, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘Economic Warfare’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e292.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas F., International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luja, Raymond, ‘The Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Countering State Aid Beyond the European Union’ (2021) 20 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyu Shuping, Buts Caroline and Jegers, Marc, ‘Comparing China’s Fair Competition Review System to EU State Aid Control’ (2019) 18(1) European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 37–60.Google Scholar
Malkin, Anton, ‘The Made in China Challenge to US Structural power: Industrial Policy, Intellectual Property and Multinational Corporations’ (2018) No. 183 Centre for International Governance Innovation Papers, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Manners, Ian, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2002) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 235–258.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’ (2002) 13(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 753–814.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle and Wyatt, Julian, ‘Dispute Settlement Regimes Intermingled: Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO’ (2010) 1(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, pp. 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín Durán, Gracia, ‘Sustainable Development Chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements: Emerging Compliance Issues’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1031–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín Durán, Gracia, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Key Issues Going Forward’ (2021) 26(4) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín Durán, Gracia, ‘Carbon Border Adjustments: Ensuring Compatibility with the International Climate and Trade Regimes’ (2022) 16 University College London Research Paper Series, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Martinico, Giuseppe, ‘The Autonomy of EU Law. A Joint Celebration of Kadi II and Van Gend en Loos’, in Avbelj, Matej, Fontanelli, Filippo, and Martinico, Giuseppe (eds.), Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Axel, Ebert, Franz, Hachez, Nicolas, and Wouters, Jan, ‘Dispute Settlement in the Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters of EU Trade Agreements’ (2017) Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, https://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/publications/books/final-report-9-february-def.pdf, pp. 13-22.Google Scholar
Marx, Axel, Ebert, Franz, and Hachez, Nicolas, ‘Dispute Settlement for Labour Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Rethinking Current Approaches’ (2017) 5(4) Politics and Governance, pp. 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Hahn, Michael, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’ (2000) 11(4) European Journal of International Law, pp. 763–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., The Sources of WTO Law and Their Interpretation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzotti, Paolo, ‘Stepping Up the Enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters in the European Union’s Free Trade Agreements: Reconsidering the Debate on Sanctions’ (2021) European Law Institute, www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/YLA_Award/Submission_ELI_Young_Lawyers_Award_Paolo_Mazzotti_2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Mbengue, Makane Moïse, ‘Preamble’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1456.Google Scholar
Mbengue, Makane Moïse, ‘The Settlement of Trade Disputes: Is There a Monopoly for the WTO?’ (2016) 15 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, pp. 207–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Brad, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Rule-Making: One Crisis or Two?’ (2021) 55(3) Journal of World Trade, pp. 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order’ (2019) 43(4) International Security, pp. 7–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehling, Michael A. and Ritz, Robert A., ‘Going Beyond Default Intensities in an EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’ (2020) Energy Policy Research Group Paper, www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30315#metadata_info_tab_contents, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Mehling, Michael A., van Asselt, Harro, Das, Kasturi et al., ‘Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action’ (2019) 113(3) American Journal of International Law, pp. 433–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehling, Michael,van Asselt, Harro, Droege, Susanne, and Das, Kasturi, ‘The Form and Substance of International Cooperation on Border Carbon Adjustments’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 213–218.Google Scholar
Melo Araujo, Billy, The EU Deep Trade Agenda: Law and Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, Mario, The Legal Effects of EU Agreements. Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, Mario, ‘The Application of International Law by the CJEU’, in Bradly, Curtis (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messad, Paul, ‘Steel Industry United in Opposing Bloc’s Carbon Border Levy’, Euractiv, 23 December 2022, www.euractiv.com/section/emissions-trading-scheme/news/steel-industry-united-in-opposing-blocs-carbon-border-levy/.Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick, ‘The Beauty of Public Procurement in TTIP’ (2016) European Centre for International Political Economy Bulletin No. 1/2016, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Meunier, Sophie, ‘Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations’ (2007) 45(4) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, Sophie, ‘The End of Naivety: Assertiveness and New Instruments in EU Trade and Investment Policy’ (2022) European Union Institute Global Governance Programme, Policy Brief Issue 2022/55, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Meunier, Sophie and Nicolaidis, Kalypso, ‘The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy’ (2019) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 103–113.Google Scholar
Meyer, Timothy, ‘Taxing, Regulating, and Trading Carbon: An Introduction to the Symposium’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 191–195.Google Scholar
Meyer, Timothy and Tucker, Todd N., ‘A Pragmatic Approach to Carbon Border Measures’ (2022a) 21 World Trade Review, pp. 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Timothy and Tucker, Todd N., ‘Trade and Climate, Law and Politics: A Response’ (2022b) 21 World Trade Review, pp. 127–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheau, Claire, ‘Control of State Aid’, in Hofmann, Herwig, Rowe, Gerhard, and Türk, Alexander (eds.), Specialized Administrative Law of the EU (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 451–475.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., ‘Good Faith in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law, pp. 339–371.Google Scholar
Moens, Barbara and van der Burchard, Hans, ‘Europe First: Brussels Gets Ready to Dump Its Free Trade Ideals’, www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-joe-biden-trade-europe-first-brussels-gets-ready-to-dump-its-free-trade-ideals/.Google Scholar
Moore, Stephen and Laffer, Arthur B., Trumponomics: Inside the America First Plan to Revive Our Economy (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Moreno-Lax, Violeta and Gragl, Paul, ‘Beyond Monism, Dualism, Pluralism: The Quest for a (Fully-Fledged) Theoretical Framework’ (2016) 35(1) Yearbook of European Law, pp. 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, Jean-Frédéric and Rochette, Myriam ‘Transatlantic Convergence of PTAs’ Environmental Clauses’ (2017) Business and Politics, www.chaire-epi.ulaval.ca/sites/chaire-epi.ulaval.ca/files/publications/morin_and_rochette.pdf, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Moritani, Yuki, ‘The Partnership Agreements with Japan as a Part of Structural Foreign Policy’ (2020) 2(1) The Greater European Journal, pp. 72–78.Google Scholar
Moulin, Thibault, ‘Reviving the Principle of Non-Intervention in Cyberspace: The Path Forward’ (2020) 25(3) Journal of Conflict and Security Law, pp. 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruyama, Warren and Wolff, Alan Wm., ‘Saving the WTO from the National Security Exception’ (2023) Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Papers 23-3, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Müller, Andreas, ‘The Direct Effect of Customary International Law’, in Bordin, Fernando Lusa, Müller, Andreas Th., and Pascual-Vives, Francisco (eds.), The EU and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022), pp. 210–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Ibold, Till, ‘The Draft Foreign Subsidies Regulation’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Csongor István, ‘Foreign Subsidies, Distortions and Acquisitions. Can the Playing Field Be Levelled?’ (2021) 2(1) Central European Journal of Comparative Law, pp. 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, Yumiko, ‘Significance of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan in International Order’, in Nakanishi, Yumiko and Tambou, Olivia (eds.), The EU-Japan Relationship, Collection Open Access Book (Blogdroiteuropeen, 2020), https://blogdroiteuropeen.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/eu-japan-relationship-v3–4.pdf, pp. 20–26.Google Scholar
National Board of Trade Sweden, ‘Comments on the Commission’s Roadmap for a Mechanism to Deter and Counteract Coercive Action by Non-EU Countries’, 17 March 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12803-Trade-mechanism-to-deter-counteract-coercive-action-by-non-EU-countries/F2000578_en.Google Scholar
National Board of Trade Sweden, ‘The EU Proposal for an Anti-Coercion Instrument’ (2022), www.kommerskollegium.se/en/publications/reports/2022/the-eu-proposal-for-an-anti-coercion-instrument.Google Scholar
Neframi, Eleftheria, ‘Customary International Law and the EU from the Perspective of Article 3 (5) TEU’, in Eeckhout, Piet and López-Escudero, Manuel (eds.), The EU’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), pp. 205–222.Google Scholar
Neumann, Felix, Export des Europäischen Beihilfenrechts. Eine Analyse der Europäisierung des internationalen Subventionsrechts durch bilaterale Handelsabkommen (Cham: Springer, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Trung, ‘The Procedural Inconsistency of the Envisaged EU Enforcement Regulation with the EU’s WTO Obligations’, OpinioJuris, 30 October 2020, http://opiniojuris.org/2020/10/30/the-procedural-inconsistency-of-the-envisaged-eu-enforcement-regulation-with-the-eus-wto-obligations/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, Aleydis, ‘And So It Begins: Trade and Sustainable Development Recommendations by a Panel of Experts under a European Union Free Trade Agreement’ (2021) 7 International Labor Rights Case Law, pp. 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, Aleydis, ‘Not That Assertive: The EU’s Take on Enforcement of Labour Obligations in Its Free Trade Agreement with South Korea’ (2022) 33 European Journal of International Law, pp. 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novitz, Tonia, ‘Enforceable Social Clauses in Trade Agreements with ‘Bite’? Implications of the EU–South Korea Panel of Experts Report of 20 January 2021’ (2021) 6 European Trade Union Institute Policy Brief, www.etui.org/publications/enforceable-social-clauses-trade-agreements-bite.Google Scholar
Novitz, Tonia, ‘The Role of the EU in Making ‘Sustainable’ Labour Linkages in Contemporary Trade: Is Being ‘Assertive’ also ‘Good’?’, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022), pp. 124–141.Google Scholar
Odermatt, Jed, ‘Council of the European Union v. Front Populaire Pour la Libération de la Saguia-El-Hamra et du Rio de Oro (Front Polisario). Case C-104/16P’ (2017) 111(3) American Journal of International Law, pp. 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odermatt, Jed, International Law and the European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Seung-Youn, ‘China’s Race to the Top: Regional and Global Implications of China’s Industrial Policy’ (2021) 20(2) World Trade Review, pp. 169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbie, Jan, ‘EU Trade Policy Meets Geopolitics’ (2021) 26(2) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, David, ‘The European Union and the Multilateral System: Lessons from Past Experience and Future Challenges’, European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing PE 689.365, 5 March 2021, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/689365/EPRS_BRI(2021)689365_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Pacheco Restrepo, Yilly Vanessa, ‘Enforcement Practice under Preferential Trade Agreements: Environmental Consultations and Submissions on Environmental Enforcement Matters in the US-Peru TPA’ (2019) 46(3) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pander Maat, Eva, ‘The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the Challenge of Being a “Good” Climate and Trade Actor’, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor: Ambitions, Values and Metrics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022), pp. 141–157.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, George A. and Pedreschi, Luigi F., ‘Alternative Dispute Settlement and the Jurisprudential Legacy of the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body’ (2022) 56(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘How to Win a World Trade Organization Dispute Based on Non-World Trade Organization Law? Questions of Jurisdiction and Merits’ (2003) 37(6) Journal of World Trade, pp. 997–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Carbon Leakage Measures and Border Tax Adjustments under WTO Law’, in Van Calster, Geert and Prévost, Denise (eds.), Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013), pp. 448–506.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Interplay between the WTO Treaty and Other International Legal Instruments and Tribunals: Evolution After 20 Years of WTO Jurisprudence’ (2017), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2731144.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect?’ (2019) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 297–321.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The MPIA: What’s New (Part III)’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 6 March 2023, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2023/03/the-mpia-whats-new-part-iii.html.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost and Kleimann, David, ‘Trade Related Aspects of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Legal Assessment’ (2020) European Parliament Briefing Requested by the Committee on International Trade (INTA), www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/210514/EXPO_BRI(2020)603502_EN.pdf, pp. 5–17.Google Scholar
Pechstein, Matthias and Drechsler, Carola, ‘Die Auslegung und Fortbildung des Primärrechts’, in Riesenhuber, Karl (ed.), Europäische Methodenlehre: Handbuch für Ausbildung und Praxis, 4 ed. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015), pp. 181–208.Google Scholar
Peers, Steve, ‘The EU’s Accession to the ECHR: The Dream Becomes a Nightmare’ (2015) 16(1) German Law Journal, pp. 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peksen, Dursun and Jeong, Jin, ‘Coercive Diplomacy and Economic Sanctions Reciprocity: Explaining Targets’ Counter-Sanctions’ (2021) Defence and Peace Economics, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Perdikis, Nicholas and Perdikis, Laurie, ‘The Establishment and Development of the European Union and Its Trade Policy’, in Khorana, Sangeeta and Garcia, Maria (eds.), Handbook on the EU and International Trade (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Participation of the EC in the GATT: International Law and Community Law Aspects’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G. (eds.), Mixed Agreements (Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1983), pp. 167–198.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘How Should WTO Members React to Their WTO Crises?’ (2019) 18(3) World Trade Review, pp. 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Multilevel Judicial Protection of “Access to Justice” and the EU’s Duty to Contribute to the “Strict Observance and Development of International Law”’, in Avbelj, Matej, Fontanelli, Filippo, and Martinico, Giuseppe (eds.), Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, Duncan, ‘Judicial Interpretation at the European Court of Justice as a Feature of Supranational Law’ (2017) 20 European Union Law Working Papers, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Poiares Maduro, Miguel, ‘Interpreting European Law: Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2007) 1(2) European Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 137–152.Google Scholar
Poretti, Pietro, ‘Waiting for Godot: Subsidy Disciplines in Services Trade’, in Panizzon, Marion, Pohl, Nicole, and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 466–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porges, Amy, ‘Alternative Dispute Settlement in the GATT and the WTO’, in Bethlehem, Daniel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. 1042–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portela, Clara, ‘Enforcing Respect for Labour Standards with Targeted Sanctions’ (2018) Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/singapur/14689.pdf.Google Scholar
Prévost, Denise and Alexovičová, Iveta, ‘Mind the Compliance Gap: Managing Trustworthy Partnerships for Sustainable Development in the European Union’s Free Trade Agreements’ (2019) 6(3) International Journal of Public Law and Policy, pp. 236–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia, ‘Turkey–Pharmaceuticals: The First WTO Arbitration for Appellate Review’ (2022) 49(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 415-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quick, Reinhard, ‘Carbon Border Adjustment: A Dissenting View on Its Alleged GATT-Compatibility’ (2020) 4 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 549–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quick, Reinhard and Das, Isha, ‘Can Paris Strike Back? On the Paris Agreement’s Inability to Cope with Unilateral Trade-Related Carbon Measures Such as the European Commission’s CBAM-Proposal’, in Baetens, Freya and van den Bogaert, Stefaan (eds.), The EU and the WTO: Ever the Twain Shall Meet: Liber Amicorum Marco Bronckers (Aalphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2023), pp. 75–102.Google Scholar
Quick, Reinhard and Das, Isha, ‘The EU’s CBAM-Regulation stands in contrast to fundamental EU-obligations under the Paris Agreement’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 19 July 2023, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2023/07/guest-post-the-eus-cbam-regulation-stands-in-contrast-to-fundamental-eu-obligations-under-the-paris-.html.Google Scholar
Rajamani, Lavanya, ‘Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative Possibilities and Underlying Politics’ (2016a) 65 International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajamani, Lavanya, ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016b), pp. 291–302.Google Scholar
Rajput, Aniruddha, ‘The BRICS as ‘Rising Powers’ and the Development of International Law’, in Krieger, Heike, Nolte, Georg, and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds.), International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raju, Deepak, ‘Proposed EU Regulation to Address Third Country Coercion – What Is Coercion?’, EJIL:Talk!, 6 January 2022, www.ejiltalk.org/proposed-eu-regulation-to-address-third-country-coercion-what-is-coercion/.Google Scholar
Ranjan, Prabhash, ‘Russia-Ukraine War and WTO’s National Security Exception’ (2023) 58(2) Foreign Trade Review, pp. 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Steven, ‘Good Faith in International Law’ (2013) Bonn Research Papers on Public International Law Paper No. 2/2013, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Remy, Jan Yves, ‘Dispute Settlement at the WTO: How Did We Get Here and What’s Next for Commonwealth States?’ (2020) 166 The Commonwealth Trade Hot Topics, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Riesenhuber, Karl (ed.), Europäische Methodenlehre, 4th ed. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigod, Boris, ‘Global Europe: The EU’s New Trade Policy in Its Legal Context’ (2012) 18 Columbia Journal of European Law, pp. 277–306.Google Scholar
Ritzek-Seidl, Simone, ‘The Regulation on Foreign Subsidies Distorting the Internal Market: Outline of the Provisional Agreement’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, Choer Moraes, Henrique, and Ferguson, Victor, ‘Toward a Geoeconomic Order in International Trade and Investment’ (2019) 22(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzitti, Natalino, ‘Sanctions as Instruments of Coercive Diplomacy: An International Law Perspective’, in Ronzitti, Natalino (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law (Leiden: Brill Neijhoff, 2016), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubini, Luca, ‘“A Delphic Oracle?” What Does the Recent EU Commission’s Trade Policy Review Mean?’, EU Law Live, 24 June 2020, https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-a-delphic-oracle-what-does-the-recent-eu-commissions-trade-policy-review-mean-by-luca-rubini.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’ (1982) 36(2) International Organization, pp. 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Fabri, Hélène, ‘Is There a Case – Legally and Politically – for Direct Effect of WTO Obligations?’ (2014) 25(1) European Journal of International Law, pp. 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruys, Tom, ‘Sanctions, Retorsions and Countermeasures: Concepts and International Legal Framework’, in van den Herik, Larissa (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017), pp. 19–51.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Alejandro, ‘What Trade Lawyers Should Know About the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’ (2012) 7(6) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Graells, Albert, ‘Article 2: Definitions’, in Caranta, Roberto and Sanchez-Graells, Albert (eds.), European Public Procurement. Commentary on Directive 2014/24/EU (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2021).Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe, and Peel, Jacqueline, Principles of International Environmental Law, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, André and Horn, Henrik, ‘Political Assessment of Possible Reactions of EU Main Trading Partners to EU Border Carbon Measures’ (2020) European Parliament Briefing Requested by the Committee on International Trade (INTA), www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/210515/EXPO_BRI(2020)603503_EN.pdf, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Sato, Sakuya (Yoshida), ‘EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Will It Achieve Its Objective(s)?’ (2021) 56(3) Journal of World Trade, pp. 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaus, Malorie, ‘EU Trade Policy in Light of the New Industrial Strategy’ (2021) 56 Intereconomics, pp. 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, Luuk and Seidl, Timo, ‘As Open as Possible, as Autonomous as Necessary’ (2023) 61(3) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 834–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonberg, Morris, ‘The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Substantive Assessment Issues and Open Questions’ (2022) 21(2) European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sender, , Omri, ‘Coercion’, in Anne Peters and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, Online ed. (Oxford University Press, 2024), https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1749.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, Emerging Powers and the World Tading System: The Past and Future of International Economic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Gao, Henry, ‘A New Chinese Economic Order?’ (2020) 23(3) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 607–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siles-Brügge, Gabriel, Constructing European Union Trade Policy: A Global Idea of Europe (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17(3) European Journal of International Law, pp. 483–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Tams, Christian, ‘Reacting Against Treaty Breaches’, in Hollis, Duncan (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 568–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starshinova, Olga, ‘Is the MPIA a Solution to the WTO Appellate Body Crisis?’ (2021) 55(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 787–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Terence P., ‘European Union Moves to Authorize Retaliation Where There Is No Alternative to the Appellate Body Pursued’, Current Thoughts on Trade, 19 December 2019, https://currentthoughtsontrade.com/2019/12/19/european-union-moves-to-authorize-retaliation-in-disputes-where-there-is-no-alternative-to-the-appellate-body-pursued/.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E., Making Globalization Work (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006).Google Scholar
Stoll, Peter-Tobias, Gött, Henner, and Abel, Patrick, ‘Model Labour Chapter for European Union Trade Agreements’ (2020) Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/singapur/16089.pdf.Google Scholar
Sun Han, Ji, ‘The EU-Korea Labour Dispute: A Critical Analysis of the EU’s Approach’ (2021) 26(4) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczepański, Marcin, ‘EU International Procurement Instrument’ (2022) European Parliamentary Research Service, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2022/729459/EPRS_ATA(2022)729459_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Tamiotti, Ludivine, The, Robert, Kulaçoglu, Vasile et al., ‘Trade and Climate Change’ (2009) WTO-UNEP Report, www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/trade_climate_change_e.pdf, pp. 1–166.Google Scholar
Telles, Pedro, ‘SME Related Impacts, Thresholds and National Legislation’, in Detailed Appraisal of the European Commission’s Impact Assessment: Third Countries’ Reciprocal Access to EU Public Procurement (2013) European Parliamentary Research Service, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2014/508963/EPRS_BRI(2014)508963_REV1_EN.pdf, pp. 100–121.Google Scholar
Titievskaia, Jana, Morgado Simões, Henrique, and Dobreva, Alina, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Implications for Climate and Competitiveness’ (2022) European Parliament Research Service, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/698889/EPRS_BRI(2022)698889_EN.pdf, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Tladi, Dire, ‘The Duty Not to Intervene in Matters Within Domestic Jurisdiction’, in Viñuales, Jorge E. (ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An Assessment of the Fundamental Principles of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Tocci, Nathalie, ‘The Making of the EU Global Strategy’ (2016) 37 Contemporary Security Policy, pp. 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokas, Marios, ‘Playing the Game: The EU’s Proposed Regulation on Foreign Subsidies’ (2022) 56(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., ‘WTO Law Constraints on Border Tax Adjustment and Tax Credit Mechanisms to Reduce the Competitive Effects of Carbon Taxes’ (2016) Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-16-03.pdf, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Trapp, Patricia, ‘Das Weißbuch der Kommission zur Gewährleistung fairer Wettbewerbsbedingungen bei Subventionen aus Drittstaaten’ (2020) 22 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschafsrecht, pp. 964–970.Google Scholar
Trepte, Peter, ‘The Agreement on Government Procurement’, in Macrory, Patrick F. J., Appleton, Arthur E, and Plummer, Michael G (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (New York: Springer, 2005), pp. 1123–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘The Right to be Free from Economic Coercion’ (2015) 4(3) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, pp. 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter, ‘Is There a Future for the WTO Appellate Body and WTO Dispute Settlement?’ (2022) World Trade Institute Working Paper No. 01/2022, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter and Akpofure, Sarah, ‘The Use and Abuse of the National Security Exception under Article XXI(b)(iii) of the GATT 1994’ (2020) WTI Working Paper No. 03/2020, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the WTO, 5th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Van der Loo, Guillaume, ‘Law and Practice of the EU’s Trade Agreements with “Disputed” Territories: A Consistent Approach?’, in Govaere, Inge and Garben, Sacha (eds.), The Interface Between EU and International Law. Contemporary Reflections (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019), pp. 243–268.Google Scholar
Van der Schueren, Paulette, Mizulin, Nikolay, Gergondet, Edourd, and Geraets, Dylan, ‘European Commission Unveils its Anti-Coercion Instrument Proposal’, Meyer Brown Legal Update, 9 December 2021, www.mayerbrown.com/-/media/files/perspectives-events/publications/2021/12/european-commission-unveils-its-anticoercion-instrument-proposal.pdf, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
van Elsuwege, Pieter, ‘The Nexus Between Common Commercial Policy and Human Rights’, in van der Loo, Guillaume and Hahn, Michael (eds.) The Law and Practice of Common Commercial Policy: The First Ten Years after the Treaty of Lisbon (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 416–433.Google Scholar
van Gaal, Wester, ‘EU Negotiators Agree on Historic Carbon Tariff’, EUobserver, 13 December 2022, https://euobserver.com/green-economy/156534.Google Scholar
VanGrasstek, Craig, Trade and American Leadership: The Paradoxes of Power and Wealth from Alexander Hamilton to Donald Trump (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGrasstek, Craig, ‘The Trade Policy of the United States under the Trump Administration’ (2019b) EUI Working Papers, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies 2019/11, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van ‘t Wout, Demy, ‘The Enforceability of the Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters of the European Union’s Free Trade Agreements’ (2022) 20 Asia Europe Journal, pp. 81–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velut, Jean Baptiste, Baeza Breinbauer, Daniela, de Bruijne, Marit et al., ‘Comparative Analysis of Trade and Sustainable Development Provisions in Free Trade Agreements’ (2022) Trade Policy Hub, London School of Economics and Political Science Consulting, www.lse.ac.uk/business/consulting/assets/documents/TSD-Final-Report-Feb-2022.pdf.Google Scholar
Ventouratou, Anna, ‘The Law on State Responsibility and the World Trade Organization’ (2021) 22 Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 759–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, Ingo and Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Are Unilateral Trade Measures in the Climate Crisis the End of Differentiated Responsibilities? The Case of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)’, in den Heijer, Maarten and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2020: Global Solidarity and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities, vol. 51 (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022), pp. 187–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verlin Laatikainen, Katie and Smith, Karen E. (eds.), The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralisms (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Dion Sud, Juhi, ‘Are the EU’s Trade Defence Instruments WTO Compliant?’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Why Is There So Little Litigation under Free Trade Agreements? Retaliation and Adjudication in International Dispute Settlement’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 927–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Westphalia Strikes Back: The 2008 Trade Wars and Threat to the WTO Regime’ (2018) 2018/31 Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Living without the Appellate Body: Multilateral, Bilateral and Plurilateral Solutions to the WTO Dispute Settlement Crisis’ (2019) 20(6) Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 862–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘WTO Adjudication and the Security Exception: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed – Something Blue?’ (2019) 46(3) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogenauer, Stefan, Die Auslegung von Gesetzen in England und auf dem Kontinent (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001).Google Scholar
Voigt, Christina, ‘Up in the Air: Aviation, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the Question of Jurisdiction’ (2012) 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, pp. 475–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, Christina and Ferreira, Felipe, ‘Dynamic Differentiation: The Principles of CBDR-RC, Progression and Highest Possible Ambition in the Paris Agreement’ (2016) 5(2) Transantional Environmental Law, pp. 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vranes, Erich, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2005) 48 German Yearbook of International Law, pp. 265–290.Google Scholar
Vranes, Erich, ‘The Definition of ‘Norm Conflict’ in International Law and Legal Theory’ (2006) 17(2) European Journal of International Law, pp. 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rebecca, ‘The “Trade-Related” Conundrum of the EU–Korea FTA Expert Panel: Are FTAs a Novel Forum to Enforce Sustainable Development Goals?’ (2021) International Institute for Sustainable Development, www.iisd.org/itn/en/2021/10/07/the-trade-related-conundrum-of-the-eu-korea-fta-expert-panel-are-ftas-a-novel-forum-to-enforce-sustainable-development-goals/.Google Scholar
Wang, Heng, ‘Selective Reshaping: China’s Paradigm Shift in International Economic Governance’ (2020) 23(3) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Prosper, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law’ (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law, pp. 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinhardt, Clara, Mau, Karsten, and Hillebrand Pohl, Jens, ‘The EU as a Geoeconomic Actor? A Review of Recent European Trade and Investment Policies’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam D, and Liu, Imogen T (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 107–136.Google Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘WTO Procurement Rules: In Particular the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) and Services of General Interest’, in Krajewski, Markus (ed.), Services of General Interest Beyond the Single Market. External and International Law Dimensions (The Hague: T.M.C Asser Press, 2015), pp. 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘EU Multilateral Trade Policy in a Changing, Multipolar World: The Way Forward’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Interpreting Essential Security Exceptions in WTO Law in View of Economic Security Interests’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘The CETA Investment Court and EU External Autonomy’ (2020) 8(1) Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, pp. 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, WTO Law and Domestic Regulation (München, Oxford, Baden-Baden: Hart, Beck, Nomos, 2020).Google Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Enhancement of the European Parliament’s Monitoring for Better Coherence Between Trade Policy and Non-Trade Policy Objectives (NTPOs)’ (2021) 2021/68 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Paper, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/72240/RSC%202021_68.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, pp. 1-19.Google Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Ex Officio Third Country Subsidies’ Review’ (2022) 21(2) European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Handelsvergeltungs-VO’, in Krenzler, Horst Günter, Herrmann, Christoph, and Niestedt, Marian (eds.), EU-Außenwirtschafts-und Zollrecht (München: C.H. Beck, 2022), p. 112.Google Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘The EU’s Strategic Autonomy in Times of Politicization of International Trade: The Future of Commission Accountability’ (2023) 14(Suppl 3) Global Policy, pp. 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘The EU’s Strategic Autonomy and Rule of Law in External Affairs: What Future for Respect for International Law and Multilateralism in Trade Policy?’, in Hinojosa-Martínez, Luis M. and Bernárdez, Carmela Pérez (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law in the EU’s External Action (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2023), pp. 186–215.Google Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia, ‘The EU in Search for Stronger Enforcement Rules. Assessing the Proposed Amendments to Trade Enforcement Regulation 654/2014’ (2020) 23(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 865–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessel, Ramses, ‘The EU and International Law’, in Wessel, Ramses and Larik, Joris (eds.), EU External Relations Law: Text, Cases and Materials, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020), pp. 139–173.Google Scholar
Wessel, Ramses and Kaspiarovich, Yuliya, ‘The Role of Values in EU External Relations, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor: Ambitions, Values, and Metrics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022), pp. 92–106.Google Scholar
Whitsitt, Elizabeth, ‘A Modest Victory at the WTO for Ontario’s FIT Program’ (2013) 20(1) University of California, Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, pp. 75–103.Google Scholar
Will, Ulrike, Climate Border Adjustments and WTO Law: Extending the EU Emissions Trading System to Imported Goods and Services (Leiden: Brill Neijhoff, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Nancy, ‘The Resilience of Protectionism in U.S. Trade Policy’ (2019) Boston University Law Review, pp. 683–719.Google Scholar
Williams, Rhodri, ‘A New EU International Procurement Instrument (IPI)’, Henderson Chambers, 13 April 2022, www.hendersonchambers.co.uk/2022/04/13/alerter-by-rhodri-williams-qc-a-new-eu-international-procurement-instrument-ipi/.Google Scholar
Wolff, Alan Wm., ‘WTO 2025: Restoring Binding Dispute Settlement’, Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Papers 22-5, www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/wto-2025-restoring-binding-dispute-settlement, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Woo Kim, Jin and Luyten, Ann-Evelyn, ‘Op-Ed: Could the EU’s Chief Trade Enforcement Officer Enforce Sustainable Development Commitments under EU Trade Agreements Against Non-Compliant Third Countries?’, EU Law Live, 13 May 2020, https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-could-the-eus-chief-trade-enforcement-officer-enforce-sustainable-development-commitments-under-eu-trade-agreements-against-non-compliant-third-countries-by-ann-evel/#.Google Scholar
Woolcock, Stephen, ‘EU Policy on Preferential Trade Agreements in the 2000s: A Reorientation Towards Commercial Aims’ (2014) 20(6) European Law Journal, pp. 718–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolcock, Stephen, ‘Trade Policy: Policy-Making After the Treaty of Lisbon’, in Wallace, Helen, Pollack, Mark A., and Young, Alasdair R. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, 7th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 388–406.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, ‘Trade and Environment at the WTO’ (2004), www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_wto2004_e.pdf, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan, and Raina, Akhil, ‘The European Union and Global Economic Governance: A Leader without a Roadmap?’, in Chaisse, Julien (ed.), Sixty Years of European Integration and Global Power Shifts: Perceptions, Interactions and Lessons (London: Hart Publishing, 2020), pp. 193–216.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan, Odermatt, Jed, and Ramopoulos, Thomas, ‘Worlds Apart? Comparing the Approaches of the European Court of Justice and the EU Legislature to International Law’, in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds.), The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law: Constitutional Challenges (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 249–279.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan, Hoffmeister, Frank, De Baere, Geert, and Ramopoulos, Thomas, The Law of EU External Relations. Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Bixuan, ‘To Penalize Low Carbon Price or High Carbon Intensity? A Comparison of the EU’s CBAM and the U.S. Clean Competition Act’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 1 July 2022, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2022/07/guest-post-to-penalize-low-carbon-price-or-high-carbon-intensity-a-comparison-of-the-eus-cbam-and-th.html.Google Scholar
Wu, Chien-Huei, ‘The EU’s Proposed Anti-Coercion Instrument: Legality and Effectiveness’ (2023) 57(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Mark, ‘The “China, Inc.”: Challenge to Global Trade Governance’ (2016) 57(2) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 261–324.Google Scholar
Yanovich, Alan, ‘Canada – Renewable Energy and Canada – FIT Program – Debunking the Myth that the GATT 1994 Provides Carte Blanche to Discriminate in Government Procurement’ (2013) Global Trade and Customs Journal 8(11–12), pp. 430–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Alaisdair, ‘It’s the End of EU Trade Policy as We Know It: The Commission’s 2021 Trade Policy Review’, Reconnect Online Workshop, 15 October 2021, https://reconnect-europe.eu/event/reconnect-online-workshop-eu-trade-policy/.Google Scholar
Zamfir, Ionel, ‘Human Rights in EU Trade Agreements: The Human Rights Clause and Its Application’ (2019) European Parliamentary Research Service, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637975/EPRS_BRI(2019)637975_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Zamfir, Ionel, ‘Labour Rights in EU Trade Agreements towards Stronger Enforcement’ (2022) European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/698800/EPRS_BRI(2022)698800_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Zenglein, Max J. and Holzmann, Anna, ‘Evolving Made in China 2025: China’s Industrial Policy in the Quest for Global Tech Leadership’ (2019) Merics Papers on China No. 8, pp. 7–76.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng, ‘Chinese Exceptionalism in the Intellectual World of China’s Foreign Policy’ in Foot, Rosemary (ed.), China Across the Divide: The Domestic and Global in Politics and Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism without the Appellate Body: Some Observations on the US-China Trade Deal’ (2020) 20(4) University of New South Wales Law Research Paper, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan, ‘Rethinking the (CP)TPP as a Model for Regulation of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises’ (2021) 24(3) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 572–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Andreas R. and Baumgartner, Jorun, ‘Good Faith as a General Principle of (International) Law’, in Mitchell, Andrew D., Sornarajah, M, and Voon, Tania (eds.), Good Faith and International Economic Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Katja, ‘Beyond Pluralism and Autonomy: Systemic Harmonization as a Paradigm for the Interaction of EU Law and International Law’ (2016) 35(1) Yearbook of European Law, pp. 667–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurek, Karolina, ‘From “Trade and Sustainability” to “Trade for Sustainability” in EU External Trade Policy’, in Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina, Bremberg, Niklas, Michalski, Anna, and Oxelheim, Lars (eds.), The European Union in a Changing World Order: Interdisciplinary European Studies (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), pp. 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Wolfgang Weiß, University Speyer, Cornelia Furculita, University Speyer
  • Book: Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy
  • Online publication: 29 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009196529.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Wolfgang Weiß, University Speyer, Cornelia Furculita, University Speyer
  • Book: Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy
  • Online publication: 29 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009196529.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Wolfgang Weiß, University Speyer, Cornelia Furculita, University Speyer
  • Book: Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy
  • Online publication: 29 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009196529.016
Available formats
×