Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:11:33.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Taxes versus quotas: the case of cocoa exports

from Part Two - The small country assumption and trade reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

L. Alan Winters
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This paper is part of an ongoing research effort aimed at analysing the interactions among commodity exports, real incomes and trade policies. We are particularly interested in evaluating the concern that efficiency or policy-induced changes in the supply of exports of primary commodities may lead to such a large decline in the prices of the latter that export revenues and incomes of the exporting countries actually decline. The commodities in question include cocoa, coffee, and tea.

The possibility of income and revenue loss arises principally because the world demand for primary commodities is relatively inelastic. The natural instrument the exporting countries can employ to counteract this problem is trade policy. In doing so, one must, however, recognize that since the exporting countries are neither small nor monopolies in the world markets, their policies are interdependent. Because the conventional trade models rely on one of these two extremes, they fail to capture the interdependence of policies central to the problem under consideration.

In our recent work, we have analysed in detail the implications of interdependence among countries when the policy instrument is an export tax. In Panagariya and Schiff (1991a), we derive Nash optimum taxes in a 10-country model of the world cocoa market. In our simulations, we find that compared to the initial equilibrium, tax competition implicit in Nash behaviour leads to a loss in real income for 8 out of 9 exporting countries. In Panagariya and Schiff (1991b), we compare income and revenue-maximizing Nash taxes. A key result in this paper is that under plausible circumstances, revenue-maximizing Nash taxes can yield higher levels of income than income-maximizing Nash taxes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Open Economies
Structural Adjustment and Agriculture
, pp. 150 - 169
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×