Book contents
- Ontologies of English
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Ontologies of English
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Transcription Conventions
- Part I Introduction
- Part II English in/for L2 Learning and Teaching
- Part III English in Schools
- Part IV Assessing English
- 9 English Varieties and Targets for L2 Assessment
- 10 The Role of the L1 in Testing L2 English
- 11 Mind the Gap
- Part V English in Lingua Franca Contexts
- Part VI English and Social Practice
- Part VII Commentary and Conclusions
- Index
- References
11 - Mind the Gap
Dis/Continuities in the UK Assessment of L1 English Language
from Part IV - Assessing English
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2019
Book contents
- Ontologies of English
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Ontologies of English
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Transcription Conventions
- Part I Introduction
- Part II English in/for L2 Learning and Teaching
- Part III English in Schools
- Part IV Assessing English
- 9 English Varieties and Targets for L2 Assessment
- 10 The Role of the L1 in Testing L2 English
- 11 Mind the Gap
- Part V English in Lingua Franca Contexts
- Part VI English and Social Practice
- Part VII Commentary and Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores how the subject of L1 English Language is currently assessed in England at different stages of learning, drawing on official requirements as set out by the United Kingdom Department for Education (DfE), on test papers and assessment arrangements devised by the Standards and Testing Agency (STA), on the subject criteria as defined by the exams regulator for English qualifications (Ofqual), and on the qualifications that have been developed by the various exam boards, termed ‘Awarding Bodies’ or ‘Awarding Organisations’, within the United Kingdom.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ontologies of EnglishConceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment, pp. 209 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). In Holquist, M., ed. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., trans. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, B. (2017). Response to Ward (2017, 19 May). Exclusive: More Sats ‘chaos’ as two thirds of moderators fail to assess pupils’ work correctly. Times Educational Supplement. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-more-sats-chaos-two-thirds-moderators-fail-assess-pupilsGoogle Scholar
Busby, E. (2018, 18 May). ‘Worrying decline’ in pupils choosing English at A level. The Independent. Available from https://edition.independent.co.uk/editions/uk.co.independent.issue.250518/data/8368091/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., ed. (1991). Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum: The LINC Reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Davies, C. (2017). Sats tests for seven-year-olds in England set to be scrapped. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/mar/30/national-sats-tests-for-seven-year-olds-set-to-be-scrappedGoogle Scholar
Department for Education and Skills. (2006). Primary National Strategy: Primary Framework for Literacy and Mathematics. Norwich: OPSI.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2015). Policy Paper: 2010 to 2015 government policy: school and college qualifications and curriculum. Online. Accessed 1 August 2017 from www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-school-and-college-qualifications-and-curriculum/2010-to-2015-government-policy-school-and-college-qualifications-and-curriculumGoogle Scholar
Dombey, H. (2008). The simple view of reading – Explained. Online. Accessed August 2017. www.teachingtimes.com/news/the-simple.htmGoogle Scholar
Eaglestone, R. and Kovesi, S. (2013, 31 October). English: Why the discipline may not be ‘too big to fail”. Times Higher Education.Google Scholar
Goddard, A. and Beard, A. (2007). As Simple as ABC? Issues of transition for students of English Language A Level going on to study English language/linguistics in higher education. Report Series 14. The Higher Education Academy English Subject Centre.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, M. and Martin, N. (1988). The Word for Teaching Is Learning: Essays for James Britton. NATE. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mansell, W. (2017). Battle on the adverbials front: Grammar advisers raise worries about Sats tests and teaching. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/09/fronted-adverbials-sats-grammar-test-primaryGoogle Scholar
Ofsted, . (2013). Improving literacy: Moving English forward. Ofsted Schools Survey Reports. Online. Accessed September 2017 from www.gov.uk/government/publications/moving-english-forwardGoogle Scholar
Parliament Education Select Committee Report on Primary Assessment. Online. Accessed August 2017 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/68202.htmGoogle Scholar
Perera, K. (1984). Children’s Writing and Reading: Analysing Classroom Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richmond, J. (2015). Reading 3 to 7. English Language and Literacy 3 to 19: Principles and Proposals. Leicester: UKLA and Owen Education.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (2016). How to engage an audience? Good conjunctions and suffixes. [Irony alert]. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/how-to-engage-audience-good.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rosenkvist, M. (2010). Using student test results for accountability and improvement: A literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 54. Paris: OECD Publishing. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km4htwzbv30-enGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1976). Toward an interactive model of reading. Technical Report No. 56. San Diego, CA: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Russell Group. (2016). Subject choices at school and college. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://russellgroup.ac.uk/for-students/school-and-college-in-the-uk/subject-choices-at-school-and-college/Google Scholar
Ward, H. (2017). More Sats ‘chaos’ as two thirds of moderators fail to assess pupils’ work correctly. Times Educational Supplement online. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-more-sats-chaos-two-thirds-moderators-fail-assess-pupilsGoogle Scholar
Weale, S. (2017). More primary school children suffering stress from Sats, survey finds. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/01/sats-primary-school-children-suffering-stress-exam-timeGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, K. (2016). Top adviser calls for a rethink over ‘really demanding’ grammar test for 11-year-olds. Times Educational Supplement. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-top-adviser-calls-rethink-over-really-demanding-grammarGoogle Scholar
Wyse, D. (2017). Evidence given to the Parliamentary Education Select Committee: Primary Assessment, 3: Design and Development, Writing, para 34. Online. Accessed 31 July 2019 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/682.pdfGoogle Scholar