Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Author's note
- 1 Problems and assumptions
- 2 The Literary hypothesis: some preliminary tests (Mt 3:1 - 9:17)
- 3 Vocabulary and sequence: Matthew's version of Mk 2:23 - 6:13
- 4 More skimpings and bowdlerizings in Matthew
- 5 A turning point in the tradition (Mt 14:1, Mk 6:14, Lk 9:7)
- 6 Some passages about Peter in Matthew
- 7 From Caesarea Philippi to the Burial of Jesus
- 8 The end of Mark
- 9 Summary and prospects
- Appendix A M. D. Goulder on the Synoptic Problem
- Notes
- Index
9 - Summary and prospects
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Author's note
- 1 Problems and assumptions
- 2 The Literary hypothesis: some preliminary tests (Mt 3:1 - 9:17)
- 3 Vocabulary and sequence: Matthew's version of Mk 2:23 - 6:13
- 4 More skimpings and bowdlerizings in Matthew
- 5 A turning point in the tradition (Mt 14:1, Mk 6:14, Lk 9:7)
- 6 Some passages about Peter in Matthew
- 7 From Caesarea Philippi to the Burial of Jesus
- 8 The end of Mark
- 9 Summary and prospects
- Appendix A M. D. Goulder on the Synoptic Problem
- Notes
- Index
Summary
It is time to take stock. We have examined a great number of passages in the Synoptic Gospels, some from the so-called Triple Tradition, some from the basic Gospel framework that we identified in Chapter One, and many others besides. We have pointed to the difficulties involved in showing particular passages, let alone particular Gospels, as more primitive, and we have observed that even if in a particular passage it can be shown that either Matthew or Mark is the more primitive, it does not follow that he is necessarily also the older, let alone the source, of his more sophisticated parallel text. We have argued that in many places it is certainly incorrect to infer derivation from close similarities of wording.
It is also necessary to draw attention to a fact so obvious that it has been regularly overlooked. If we ask the question; ‘Did Jesus ever say the same thing twice, or even three times, in more or less the same words?’, we can only answer, ‘What preacher doesn't?’ So we should be surprised if we did not find in the Gospels very similar passages, regardless of whether or not we subscribe to a theory of literary dependence. And we might expect to find amalgamated versions of oft-told parables, and similar verbalizations of similar preaching in different places.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- On the Independence of Matthew and Mark , pp. 92 - 108Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1978