Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- A Tribute to Edmond Roudnitska
- OLFACTION, TASTE, AND COGNITION
- Section 1 A Specific Type of Cognition
- 1 Olfaction and Cognition: A Philosophical and Psychoanalytic View
- 2 Cognitive Aspects of Olfaction in Perfumer Practice
- 3 The Specific Characteristics of the Sense of Smell
- Section 2 Knowledge and Languages
- Section 3 Emotion
- Section 4 Memory
- Section 5 Neural Bases
- Section 6 Individual Variations
- Index
- References
1 - Olfaction and Cognition: A Philosophical and Psychoanalytic View
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- A Tribute to Edmond Roudnitska
- OLFACTION, TASTE, AND COGNITION
- Section 1 A Specific Type of Cognition
- 1 Olfaction and Cognition: A Philosophical and Psychoanalytic View
- 2 Cognitive Aspects of Olfaction in Perfumer Practice
- 3 The Specific Characteristics of the Sense of Smell
- Section 2 Knowledge and Languages
- Section 3 Emotion
- Section 4 Memory
- Section 5 Neural Bases
- Section 6 Individual Variations
- Index
- References
Summary
“Are you not ashamed to believe that the nose is a means to find God?” wrote Saint Augustine (1873) in his refutation of the Manichaeans in 389 C.E. Fifteen centuries later, Sigmund Freud, addressing the members of the Vienna Psychoanalytical Society, stated that “the organic sublimation of the sense of smell is a factor of civilisation” (Freud, 1978, p. 318).
These peremptory opinions expressed by the Christian philosopher and by the founder of psychoanalysis offer little support for any investigation into the sense of smell as a tool for knowledge. Furthermore, they are typical of an attitude widely held by both philosophers (Le Guérer, 1987) and psychoanalysts (Le Guérer, 1996). There are many possible explanations for the mistrust – indeed, the rejection – with which both groups have treated this sense, but all of them converge on its animal nature.
Philosophers have often slighted and underestimated the sense of smell. Plato (1961) and Aristotle (1959) maintained that the pleasures it provided were less pure, less noble, than those offered by sight and hearing. Aristotle also found it lacking in finesse and discernment. Descartes (1953) regarded it as vulgar, and Kant (1978) thought it a coarse sense and one best left undeveloped, leading as it did to more unpleasant experiences than pleasant ones. Schopenhauer (1966) considered it an inferior sense; Hegel (1979) eliminated it from his aesthetics.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition , pp. 3 - 15Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
Anzieu D (1985). Le Moi-peau. Paris: Dunod
Aristotle (1959). On the Soul. On the Senses. Nicomachean Ethics. In: Collected Works, trans. K Foster & S Humphries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Augustine (1873). Des moeurs des Manichéens. In: Oeuvres complètes. Paris: L. Vivès
Bachelard G (1960). La Formation de l'esprit scientifique, contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Originally published 1938.)
Candau J (1999). Mémoire des odeurs et savoir-faire professionnels. In: Odeurs et Parfums, ed. C. Fabre-Vassas et al. Paris: Editions du Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques
Condillac E B de (1947). Traité des sensations. In: Oeuvres philosophiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Originally published 1754.)
Cournot A A (1851). Essai sur les fondements de nos connaissances et sur les caractères de la critique. Paris: Vrin
Darwin C (1971). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Appleton. (Originally published 1871.)
Descartes R (1953). Oeuvres et lettres, ed. A. Bridoux. Paris: Gallimard
Diderot D (1955). Lettre à Mademoiselle de la Chaux. In: Correspondance (1713–1757). Paris: éditions de Minuit
Dolto F (1980). Les Cahiers du nouveau-né. 3: D'Amour et de lait. Paris: Stock
Féré C (1974). L'Instinct sexuel, évolution et dissolution. Paris: Payot
Ferenczi S (1974). Oeuvres complètes (1913–1919). Paris: Payot
Ferenczi S (1985). Journal clinique (January–October 1932). Paris: Payot
Feuerbach L (1960). Principes de la philosophie de l'avenir. In: Manifestes philosophiques, trans. L. Althusser. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Originally published 1843.)
Fliess W (1977). Les relations entre le nez et les organes génitaux féminins au point de vue biologique. Paris: Le Seuil. (Originally published 1897.)
Freud S (1961). Civilization and Its Discontents, trans. J. Strachey. New York: Norton. (Originally published 1929.)
Freud S (1978). Minutes de la Société psychanalytique de Vienne (17-11-1909). Paris: Gallimard
Freud S (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Belknap Press)
Harrus-Révidi G (1987). La Vague et la Digue, du Sensoriel au Sensuel en Psychanalyse. Paris: Payot
Hegel G W F (1979). Esthétique, trans. S. Jankélévitch. Paris: Flammarion. (Originally published 1832.)
Helvétius C A (1774). De l'homme, de ses facultés intellectuelles et de son éducation. Liège
Henning (1916). Der Geruch. Leipzig: J. A. Barth. (Originally published 1824.)
Holley A (1999). Eloge de l'odorat. Paris: Odile Jacob
& (1977). Transduction et codage des informations olfactives. Journal de Physiologie (Paris) 73:725–828Google Scholar
Jaurès J (1891). De la réalité du monde sensible. Paris: F. Alcan
Kant E (1978). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. V L Dowdell. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Originally published 1798.)
Krafft-Ebing R von (1931). Psychopathia Sexualis. Eine Klinisch-Forensische Studie. Paris: Payot. (Originally published 1886.)
Lacan J (1973). L'identification, Séminaire (1961–1962). Paris: Le Seuil
La Mettrie J O de (1745). Histoire naturelle de l'âme. Oxford: aux dépens de l'auteur
Le Guérer A (1998). Les Pouvoirs de L'odeur. Paris: Odile Jacob. (Originally published 1988.)
(1996). Le nez d'Emma. Histoire de l'odorat dans la psychanalyse. Revue Internationale de Psychopathologie 22:339–87Google Scholar
(2001). The psychoanalyst's nose. Psychoanalytic Review (New York: Guilford) 88(3):451–503Google Scholar
Monin E (1885). Les Odeurs du corps humain. Paris: Doin
Mouélé M (1997). L'apprentissage des odeurs chez les Waanzi. In: L'odorat chez l'Enfant, ed. B Schaal. Enfance 1:209–22
Nietzsche F (1971). Ecce Homo. In: Oeuvres philosophiques complètes, ed. G Colli & M Montinari, trans. C Heim, I Hildenbrand, & J Gratien. Paris: Gallimard. (Originally published 1888.)
Plato (1961). The Collected Dialogues, ed. E Hamilton & H Cairns. Princeton University Press
Pradines M (1958). Traité de psychologie générale (1943–1950). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Rousseau J J (1969). Emile, ou de l'éducation. In: Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Gallimard. (Originally published 1762.)
Schaal B, Rouby C, Maplier L, Soussignan R, Kontar F, & Tremblay R (1998). Variabilité et universaux au sein de l'espace perçu des odeurs: approches inter-culturelles de l'hédonisme olfactif. In: Géographie des Odeurs, ed. R Dulau & J R Pitte, pp. 143–65. Paris: L'Harmattan
Schopenhauer A (1966). The World as Will and Representation, trans. E F J Payne. New York: Dover. (Originally published 1818.)
Simmel G (1912). Mélanges de Philosophie Relativiste. Paris: Alcan
Sperber D (1974). Le Symbolisme en Général. Paris: Hermann
Tellenbach H (1983). GoÛt et Atmosphère. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Originally published 1968.)
Winnicott D W (1975). Objets transitionnels et phénomènes transitionnels. In: Jeu et réalité. Paris: Gallimard. (Originally published 1971.)
- 31
- Cited by