We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2022
Introduction
Traditionally, the RNF sector consisted of an assortment of rural households dependent on a variety of service sector livelihoods comprising artisans, barbers, petty food processors and vendors, craftsmen, milkmen, potters, tinkers, tailors and carpenters. They depended on the custom of the vast farming population whose demands they tried to cater to. However, given low productivity and low rural incomes, the demand for the services of these non-farm groups was low and unstable (mirroring unstable farm incomes), making their livelihoods quite precarious. This was the state of RNF in the 1960s and 1970s, before the advent of the GR.
The more recent development history of East and Southeast Asia and parts of South Asia suggests that rural industry and commerce expand in parallel with agricultural production, as linkages between the two deepen (Ranis and Stewart 1993; Yusuf and Kumar 1996; Bhattacharya 1996). Typically, RNF is viewed as having two distinct components: (a) a high labour productivity segment and (b) a low productivity segment. The former is associated with higher incomes, while the latter operates more as a residual. In the process of rural development, RNF is expected to gradually lose its residual character, giving way to more productive, better-paying activities.
In the context of poverty alleviation, it has been noted that non-farm earnings led to an absolute improvement in incomes of the poor, suggesting that a dynamic RNF sector will have a strong anti-poverty impact (Lanjouw and Lanjouw 1999; Lanjouw 1999; B. Sen 1996; Haggblade and Hazell 1989; Haggblade, Hazell and Brown 1989). In the context of the Indian literature, Lanjouw (2007) and Haggblade, Hazell and Reardon (2010) have argued that the impact is not automatic and in fact appears to be muted with a tendency to bypass the extreme poor. Experience from Bangladesh, however, paints a much more positive picture (Pitt and Khandker 1998; Khandker 2005; Khandker, Khalily and Samad 2016a).
Over a 20-year period (1991–92 to 2010–11), moderate poverty headcount declined from 78 per cent to 27.5 per cent, while extreme poverty declined from 64.8 per cent to 14 per cent.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
