Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:56:40.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Hasse principle for bielliptic surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Carmen Laura Basile
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
Alexei Skorobogatov
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
Miles Reid
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Alexei Skorobogatov
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

From the geometer's point of view, bielliptic surfaces can be described as quotients of abelian surfaces by freely acting finite groups, that are not abelian surfaces themselves. Together with abelian, K3 and Enriques surfaces they exhaust the class of smooth and projective minimal surfaces of Kodaira dimension 0. Because of their close relation to abelian surfaces, bielliptic surfaces are particularly amenable to computation. At the same time they display phenomena not encountered for rational, abelian or K3 surfaces, for example, torsion in the Néron–Severi group, finite geometric Brauer group, non-abelian fundamental group. This curious geometryis reflected in amusing arithmetical properties of these surfaces over number fields.

The behaviour of rational points on bielliptic surfaces was first studied by Colliot-Thélène, Swinnerton-Dyer and the second author in relation with Mazur's conjectures on the connected components of the real closure of -points. The second author then constructed a bielliptic surface over ℝ that has points everywhere locally but not globally; moreover, this counterexample to the Hasse principle cannot be explained by the Manin obstruction (see also, Ch. 8). D. Harari showed that bielliptic surfaces give examples of varieties with a Zariski dense set of rational points that do not satisfy weak approximation; moreover this failure cannot be explained by the Brauer–Manin obstruction.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×