Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:06:33.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2021

Stuart Casey-Maslen
Stuart Casey-Maslen
Affiliation:
University of Pretoria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Nuclear Weapons
Law, Policy, and Practice
 , pp. 229 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Avenhaus, R. C., Kremenyuk, V., and Sjöstedt, G. (eds.), Containing the Atom, New York: Lexington Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Ball, P., Serving the Reich: The Struggle for the Soul of Physics under Hitler, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Barass, G., The Great Cold War: A Journey through the Hall of Mirrors, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Beschloss, M., Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times, New York: Broadway Books, 2019.Google Scholar
Black-Branch, J. L., The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Legal Challenges for Military Doctrines and Deterrence Policies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R., Armageddon and Paranoia: The Nuclear Confrontation, London: Profile Books, 2019.Google Scholar
Brauch, H. G. (ed.), Military Technology, Armaments Dynamics and Disarmament: ABC Weapons, Military Use of Nuclear Energy and of Outer Space and Implications for International Law, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989.Google Scholar
Breyman, S., Why Movements Matter: The West German Peace Movement and U.S. Arms Control, New York: SUNY Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Burr, W. and Kimball, J. (eds.), Nuclear Weapons, the Vietnam War, and the ‘Nuclear Taboo’, reproduced in National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 195.Google Scholar
Burrows, W. E. and Windrem, R., Critical Mass: The Dangerous Race for Superweapons in a Fragmenting World, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.Google Scholar
Casey-Maslen, S., Jus ad Bellum: The Law on Inter-State Use of Force, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar
Casey-Maslen, S. (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Casey-Maslen, S. with Haines, S., Hague Law Interpreted: The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of Armed Conflict, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
Cochran, T. B., Arkin, W. M., and Hoenig, M. M., Nuclear Weapons Databook, Vol. I: U.S. Nuclear Forces and Capabilities, Cambridge, MA: National Resources Defense Council, 1984.Google Scholar
Cochran, T. B., Norris, R. S., and Bukharin, O. A., Making the Russian Bomb: From Stalin to Yeltsin, Boulder: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
DeGroot, G., The Bomb: A Life, London: Jonathan Cape, 2004.Google Scholar
Downing, T., 1983: The World at the Brink, London: Little, Brown, 2018.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., Non-international Armed Conflicts in International Law, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 6th ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Epstein, W., The Last Chance: Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control, New York: Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, F., Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War, New York: Touchstone, 2001.Google Scholar
Goldblat, J., Arms Control: The New Guide to Negotiations and Agreements, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, M., Memoirs, New York: Doubleday, 1995.Google Scholar
Gottemoeller, R., Negotiating the New START Treaty, New York: Cambria Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Ham, P., Hiroshima Nagasaki, London: Transworld Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
Holloway, D., Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939–1956, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Irving, D., The German Atomic Bomb, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1967.Google Scholar
Jacobson, H. K. and Stein, E., Diplomats, Scientists, and Politicians: The United States and the Nuclear Test Ban Negotiations, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Jungk, R., Brighter than 1000 Suns, trans. J. Cluegh, London: Penguin Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Keegan, J. (ed.), The Times Atlas of the Second World War, 1st ed., London: Times Books, October 1989.Google Scholar
Lavoy, P. R., Sagan, S. D., and Wirtz, J. J. (eds.), Planning the Unthinkable: How Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Louka, E., Nuclear Weapons, Justice and the Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
McCullough, D., Truman, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.Google Scholar
Nystuen, G., Casey-Maslen, S., and Bersagel, A. G. (eds.), Nuclear Weapons under International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
P5 Working Group on the Glossary of Key Nuclear Terms, P5 Glossary of Key Nuclear Terms, 1st ed., Beijing: China Atomic Energy Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pogany, I. (ed.), Nuclear Weapons and International Law, Aldershot: Avebury, 1987.Google Scholar
Powers, T., Heisenberg’s War: The Secret History of the German Bomb, London: Jonathan Cape, 1993.Google Scholar
Pullman, B., The Atom in the History of Human Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Reed, T. C. and Stillman, D. B., The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and Its Proliferation, Minneapolis: Zenith Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Reeves, R., President Nixon, Alone in the White House, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001.Google Scholar
Reischauer, E., My Life between Japan and America, New York: Harper Collins, 1986.Google Scholar
Rose, P. L., Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939–1945: A Study in German Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sandoz, Y., Swinarski, C., and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Commentary to the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Geneva: ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar
Shaker, M. I., The Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. Origins and Implementation 1959–1979, 3 vols., London/Rome/New York: Oceana Publications, March 1980.Google Scholar
Shultz, G. P., Turmoil and Triumph: Diplomacy, Power, and the Victory of the American Ideal, New York: Charles Scriber’s Sons, 1993.Google Scholar
Schlosser, E., Command and Control, New York: Penguin, 2014.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. I. (ed.), Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1998.Google Scholar
Shea, T., Verifying Nuclear Disarmament, 1st ed., New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Stahn, C., A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Skylark, T., Final Months of the Pacific War, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Speer, A., Inside the Third Reich, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2003.Google Scholar
Summers, A., The Arrogance of Power: The Secret World of Richard Nixon, London: Orion Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Weart, S. and Szilard, G., Leo Szilard: His Version of the Facts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Weintraub, S., MacArthur’s War: Korea and the Undoing of an American Hero, New York: Free Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The World Set Free, n.p., 1914.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. K., Japan’s Secret War, 3rd rev. ed., New York: Permuted Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Wolverton, M., Burning The Sky: Operation Argus and the Untold Story of the Cold War Nuclear Tests in Outer Space, New York: Abrams Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Zaloga, S. J., The Kremlin’s Nuclear Sword: The Rise and Fall of Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Forces, 1945–2000, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Allen, T. B. and Polmar, N., ‘The Radio Broadcast That Ended World War II’, The New Atlantic, 7 August 2015.Google Scholar
Allison, D. M. and Herzog, S., ‘“What about China?” and the Threat to US–Russian Nuclear Arms Control’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 76, No. 4 (2020), 200–5.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. V. and Nelson, A. J., ‘The INF Treaty: A Spectacular, Inflexible, Time-Bound Success’, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Summer 2019, 90–122.Google Scholar
Arimuko, A., Sujarwanto, E., and Marsono, A., ‘Measurements of Earthquake Moment Magnitude (Mw) to Estimate Detonation Energy of a Nuclear Bomb as Plutonium-240’, Journal of Physics Conference Series, March 2020.Google Scholar
Barth, K.-H., ‘The Politics of Seismology: Nuclear Testing, Arms Control, and the Transformation of a Discipline’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 5 (October 2003), 743–81.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1999), Symposium Article 3.Google Scholar
Bethe, H. A., ‘The Hydrogen Bomb’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 6, No. 4 (April 1950), 99–104.Google Scholar
Blix, H., ‘Safeguards and Non-proliferation: The IAEA and Efforts to Counteract the Spread of Nuclear Weapons’, IAEA Bulletin, Summer 1985.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. and Wheeler, J. A., ‘The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission’, Physical Review, Vol. 56 (1 September 1939), 426–50.Google Scholar
Bourantonis, D., ‘The Negotiation of the Non-proliferation Treaty, 1965–1968: A Note’, International History Review, Vol. 19, No. 2 (May 1997), 347–57.Google Scholar
Centre for Science and Security Studies of King’s College London and the European Leadership Network, The P5 Process: Opportunities for Success in the NPT Review Conference, London, June 2020.Google Scholar
Charap, S., ‘The Demise of the INF: Implications for Russia-China Relations’, RAND Corporation, Document submitted on 9 April 2019, to the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission as a statement for the record for the hearing on 21 March 2019.Google Scholar
Clarke, M., ‘Does My Bomb Look Big in This?’, International Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Cohen, A., ‘Most Favored Nation’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 51, No. 1 (January–February1995), 44–53.Google Scholar
‘Conscience, Arrogation and the Atomic Scientists’, Journal of the Federation of American Scientists, Vol. 47, No. 4 (July/August 1994).Google Scholar
D’Amato, A., ‘Legal Aspects of the French Nuclear Tests’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 61, No. 1 (January 1967), 66–77.Google Scholar
De-Villiers, J. W., Jardine, R., and Reiss, M., ‘Why South Africa Gave Up the Bomb’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 5 (November/December 1993), 98–109.Google Scholar
Eaves, E., ‘Why Is America Getting a New $100 Billion Nuclear Weapon?’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 8 February 2021.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S., ‘The Internal Constitution of the Stars’, The Scientific Monthly, Vol. 11, No. 4 (October 1920), 297–303.Google Scholar
Enkhsaikhan, J., ‘Mongolia’s Nuclear-Weapon-Free Status: Concept and Practice’, Asian Survey, Vol. 40, No. 2 (2000).Google Scholar
Field, M., ‘As the US, China, and Russia Build New Nuclear Weapons Systems, How Will AI Be Built In?’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 20 December 2019.Google Scholar
Field, M., ‘Strangelove Redux: US Experts Propose Having AI Control Nuclear Weapons’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 30 August 2019.Google Scholar
Firmage, E. B., ‘The Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 63, No. 4 (October 1969), 711–46.Google Scholar
French, B., Funamoto, S., Sugiyama, H., Sakata, R., Cologne, J., Cullings, H. M., Mabuchi, K., and Preston, D. L., ‘Measurement and Impact on Radiation Risk Estimates in the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors’, American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 187, No. 8 (August 2018), 1623–29.Google Scholar
Joliot, F., ‘Chemical Evidence of the Transmutation of Elements’, Nobel Lecture, 12 December 1935.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, B., ‘The Negotiation of the Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT)’, IAEA Bulletin, Vol. 22, Nos. 3/4 (August 1980), 73–80.Google Scholar
Gottemoeller, R., ‘The New START Verification Regime: How Good Is It?’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 21 May 2020.Google Scholar
Grant, R., ‘Dien Bien Phu’, Air Force Magazine, Vol. 87, No. 8 (August 2004).Google Scholar
Gusev, B. I., Abylkassimova, Z. N., and Apsalikov, K. N., ‘The Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site: A First Assessment of the Radiological Situation and the Test-Related Radiation Doses in the Surrounding Territories’, Radiation Environmental Biophysics, Vol. 36, No. 3 (September 1997), 201–4.Google Scholar
Halperin, M. H., ‘Nuclear Weapons and Limited War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 5, No. 2 (June 1961), 146–66.Google Scholar
Harahan, J. P., ‘On-Site Inspections under the INF Treaty, A History of the On-Site Inspection Agency and Treaty Implementation, 1988–1991’, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1993.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. R. and Michalowski, S., ‘Nuclear Weapons Safety: The Case of Trident’, Science & Global Security, Vol. 4, No. 3 (1994), 261–337.Google Scholar
Hill, S., ‘NATO and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons’, Research Paper, Chatham House, London, January 2021.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. S., ‘Spies Who Spilled Atomic Bomb Secrets’, Smithsonian Magazine, 19 April 2009.Google Scholar
Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia, Report, Vol. II, September 2009.Google Scholar
International Law Commission (ILC) Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries, 2001; text adopted by the ILC at its fifty-third session, in 2001, and submitted to the UN General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session, in UN doc. A/56/10.Google Scholar
IPPNW, Radioactive Heaven and Earth: The Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapons Testing in, on, and above the Earth, New York: Apex Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kirgis, F. L., ‘North Korea’s Withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty’, ASIL Insights, Vol. 8, No. 2 (24 January 2003).Google Scholar
Kirsch, P. and Holmes, J. T., ‘The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 1 (January 1999), 2–12.Google Scholar
Kohl, W. L., ‘Nuclear Sharing in Nato and the Multilateral Force’, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 80, No. 1 (March 1965), 88–109.Google Scholar
Kristensen, H. M., Norris, R. S., and Diamond, J., ‘Pakistani Nuclear Forces, 2018’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 74, No. 5 (2018), 348–58.Google Scholar
Kristensen, H. M. and Norris, R. S., ‘Russian Nuclear Forces, 2018’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 74, No. 3 (2018), 185–95.Google Scholar
Kristensen, H. M. and Korda, M., ‘Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2020’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 76, No. 6 (November–December 2020), 443–57.Google Scholar
Kristensen, H. M. and Korda, M., ‘French Nuclear Forces, 2019’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 75, No. 1 (2019), 51–55.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., ‘Russia’s Aerospace Forces Prepare Training for Kinzhal Hypersonic Missiles’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 17, No. 67 (May 2020).Google Scholar
McDowell, J. C., ‘The Edge of Space: Revisiting the Karman Line’, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 151 (October 2018), 668–77.Google Scholar
Meitner, L. and Frisch, O. R., ‘Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons: a New Type of Nuclear Reaction’, Letter, Nature, Vol. 143 (1939), 239–40.Google Scholar
Mills, C., ‘Replacing the UK’s Nuclear Deterrent: Progress of the Dreadnought Class’, Research Paper, House of Commons Library, 11 February 2020.Google Scholar
Minor, M. S., ‘China’s Nuclear Development Program’, Asian Survey, Vol. 16, No. 6 (June 1976), University of California Press, 571–79.Google Scholar
Nitze, P. H., ‘The Vladivostok Accord and SALT II’, The Review of Politics, Vol. 37, No. 2 (April 1975), 147–60.Google Scholar
Noddack, I., ‘Über das Element 93’, Angewandte Chemie, Vol. 47, No. 37 (15 September 1934), 653–55.Google Scholar
Norris, R. S. and Kristensen, H. M., ‘Global Nuclear Weapons Inventories, 1945–2010’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 66, No. 4 (2010), 77–83.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, T., ‘Security Council Resolution 1530, Evidence and the United Nations Security Council’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 29 March–1 April 2006, Vol. 100 (2006), 47–51.Google Scholar
Oestern, G. (ed.), Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor 2020, Oslo: Norwegian People’s Aid, January 2021.Google Scholar
Persbo, A., ‘A Reflection on the Current State of Nuclear Non-proliferation and Safeguards’, Non-proliferation Papers, No. 8 (February 2012), European Union (EU) Non-proliferation Consortium.Google Scholar
Pivot, S., Baroni, M., Bard, E., and Giraud, X., ‘A Comparison of 36Cl Nuclear Bomb Inputs Deposited in Snow From Vostok and Talos Dome, Antarctica, Using the 36Cl/Cl− Ratio’, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 124, No. 20 (27 October 2019).Google Scholar
Reif, K. and Bugos, S., ‘U.S., Russia Hit Impasse on New START’, Arms Control Today, October 2020.Google Scholar
Report by the Maralinga Rehabilitation Technical Advisory Committee (MARTAC) on the Rehabilitation of Former Nuclear Test Sites at Emu and Maralinga (Australia), 2003.Google Scholar
Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, UN doc. A/HRC/27/60, 13 August 2014.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. A., ‘American Atomic Strategy and the Hydrogen Bomb Decision’, Journal of American History, Vol. 66, No. 1 (1 June 1979), 62–87.Google Scholar
Rudesill, D. S., ‘MIRVs Matter: Banning Hydra-Headed Missiles in a New START II Treaty’, Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 54, No. 1 (Winter 2018), 83–115.Google Scholar
Sand, P. H., ‘Diego Garcia: British–American Legal Black Hole in the Indian Ocean?’, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 21, No. 1 (1 January 2009), 113–37.Google Scholar
Sechser, T. S., ‘Sharing the Bomb: How Foreign Nuclear Deployments Shape Nonproliferation and Deterrence’, Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 23, Nos.3–4 (2016), 443–58.Google Scholar
Shapley, D., ‘Nuclear Weapons History: Japan’s Wartime Bomb Projects Revealed’, Science, Vol. 199, No. 4325 (13 January 1978), 152–57.Google Scholar
‘The Position of the United States on Current Law of War Agreements: Remarks of Judge Abraham D Sofaer, Legal Adviser, US Department of State, 22 January 1987’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 2 (1987), 460.Google Scholar
Thielmann, G., ‘The Missile Gap Myth and Its Progeny’, Arms Control Today, May 2011.Google Scholar
Trebes, J. and Lavietes, T., ‘Monitoring a Nuclear Weapon from the Inside’, ‘Monitoring a Nuclear Weapon from the Inside’, Science & Technology Review, July/August 2008, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 12–19.Google Scholar
United States Department of the Air Force, International Law – The Conduct of Armed Conflict and Air Operations, Air Force Pamphlet 110–31, 1976.Google Scholar
United States Department of Defense, Law of War Manual, updated December 2016, Washington, DC, 2016.Google Scholar
United States Department of the Navy, Annotated Supplement to the Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations, Doc. NWP 9 (REV. A)/FMFM 1–10, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
Young, K., ‘The Skybolt Crisis of 1962: Muddle or Mischief?’, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 4 (2004), 614–35.Google Scholar
Walker, J. S., ‘Recent Literature on Truman’s Atomic Bomb Decision: A Search for Middle Ground’, Diplomatic History, Vol. 29, No. 2 (April 2005), 311–34.Google Scholar
Willrich, M., ‘The Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons’, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 77, No. 8 (July 1968), 1447–519.Google Scholar
Woolf, A. F., ‘The New START Treaty: Central Limits and Key Provisions’, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, updated 3 February 2021.Google Scholar
Woolf, A. F., ‘Strategic Arms Control After START: Issues and Options’, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, updated 6 May 2010.Google Scholar
Wright, C. M. and De Geer, L.-E., ‘The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: The Detected Double-Flash’, Science & Global Security, Vol. 25, No. 3 (2017), 95–124.Google Scholar
Wright, C. M. and De Geer, L.-E., ‘The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: Radionuclide and Hydroacoustic Evidence for a Nuclear Explosion’, Science & Global Security, Vol. 26, No. 1 (2018), 1–35.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×