from Section III - global institutions and the changing roles of judges and lawyers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
The contemporary Chinese legal profession has been built on the ruins of the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976). When the economic reform began in the late 1970s, the traditional social structure of the country had been bulldozed, and most state and market institutions had to be rebuilt from scratch. Reflections on the social and political turmoil during the Cultural Revolution made the Chinese leadership reconsider the importance of law and legal institutions in maintaining social order and promoting economic development. This generated the most comprehensive state-led legal reform in Chinese history, which has lasted until the present day.
The three decades of rapid reform have changed the landscape of the Chinese legal system in fundamental ways. In legislation, more than 10,000 laws, regulations, ministerial regulations, judicial interpretations, and local regulations have been promulgated and many revised more than once in less than thirty years (Cai 1999; Zhu 2007; Liu and Halliday 2009). In the judicial system, army veterans have been gradually replaced by law graduates, while Chinese courts and procuracies have become complex organizations with an internal bureaucratic structure (Woo 1991, 1999; Zhang 2003; Liu 2006a; Liebman 2007; He 2012). In legal education, more than 600 law schools have been reestablished or newly inaugurated (Zhu 2007: 520), and the knowledge basis of Chinese legal research and education has become Westernized and increasingly technical (Liu 2011b). In appearance, we seem to have witnessed a classic Weberian rationalization of law in the Middle Kingdom (Weber 1978).
Yet the legal system never operates in a vacuum – it always evolves through interactions with its market and political environments. As Chinese law develops into a complex and self-sustaining formal system (Luhmann 2004), its distance from ordinary social life is also substantially increased. The massive appropriation of foreign legal codes and institutions has resulted in the decoupling of formal law from law in action in almost every aspect of the Chinese legal system. Most important, the construction of the legal system is accompanied by rapid structural changes in both the Chinese state and the market economy it seeks to develop. This peculiar juxtaposition of law, state, and market has produced a highly fragmented market for Chinese lawyers in the reform period.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.