Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811869.007

7 - Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro

Edited by

Steven E. Lobell ,

Norrin M. Ripsman and

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro

Show author details

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro: Affiliation:
Tufts University
Steven E. Lobell: Affiliation:
University of Utah
Norrin M. Ripsman: Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Jeffrey W. Taliaferro: Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In the mid-nineteenth century, China and Japan faced the rising threat of western imperialism. Yet, despite the two countries' cultural ties and geographic proximity, their responses to that threat were quite different. When confronted with growing anti-Manchu rebellions at home and British demands for trade concessions in the 1830s, the Qing dynasty proved unable to mobilize the resources necessary to defend the empire. The first and second Opium Wars revealed disparities in military technology between China and the European great powers. Faced with internal unrest and the prospect of China's dismemberment, Chinese provincial leaders made an attempt at internal reform, the so-called Tongzi Restoration (1862–74), aimed at reforming the military, creating an arms industry, and strengthening traditional Confucian government. Although these and later reforms prolonged the Qing dynasty until 1911, they were insufficient to halt China's relative decline.

News of China's defeat in the Opium Wars, carried by Dutch and Chinese ships to Nagasaki and then relayed to the shogun at Edo (Tokyo), shocked Japan's feudal elite. The arrival of Commodore Matthew Perry and his “black ships” in Edo Bay in July 1853 ended Japan's two centuries of self-imposed isolation. The Tokugawa shogunate's inability to defend the country led to its overthrow in 1867–8 by a group of samurai from Satsuma and Choshu, who acted to “restore” the sixteen-year-old Emperor Meiji. The new leadership spent the next twenty years methodically emulating the military, political, and technological practices of the European great powers.

Type: Chapter
Information: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy , pp. 194 - 226

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811869.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ralston, David B., Importing the European Army: The Introduction of European Military Techniques and Institutions into the Extra-European World, 1600–1914 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), pp. 107–41Google Scholar

Kitaoka, Shin'ichi, “The Army as Bureaucracy: Japanese Militarism Revisited,” Journal of Military History 57, no. 5 (October 1993), pp. 67–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Presseisen, Ernst, Before Aggression: Europeans Prepare the Japanese Army (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1965)Google Scholar

Paine, S. C. M., The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

McNeill, William H., The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 185–215Google Scholar

Paret, Peter, “Napoleon and the Revolution in War,” in Murray, Williamson, Knox, MacGregor, and Bernstein, Alvin, eds., Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 123–42Google Scholar

Posen, Barry R., “Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power,” International Security 18, no. 2 (fall 1993), pp. 80–124CrossRef Google Scholar

Herrera, Geoffrey L. and Mahnken, Thomas G., “Military Diffusion in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Napoleonic and Prussian Military Systems,” in Goldman, Emily O. and Eliason, Leslie C., eds., The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003), pp. 205–42Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: Random House, 1979)Google Scholar

Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., “Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Reconsidered,” International Security 25, no. 3 (winter 2000–1), pp. 128–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Elman, Colin, “Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?” Security Studies 6, no. 2 (autumn 1996), pp. 7–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Posen, Barry R., Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar

Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, “Realist Environment, Liberal Process, and Domestic-Level Variables,” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 1 (March 1997), pp. 1–25, at p. 19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity,” both in Keohane, Robert O., ed., Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 204–54Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It,” International Organization 42, no. 2 (spring 1992), pp. 391–426CrossRef Google Scholar

Spruyt, Hendrik, The Sovereign State and its Competitors (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 11–21.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 116–21Google Scholar

Sterling-Folker, , “Realist Environment, Liberal Process and Domestic-Level Variables,” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 1 (March 1997), pp. 1–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Hobden, Stephen, International Relations and Historical Sociology (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 66–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Hobson, John M., The State and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 24–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walt, Stephen M., “The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition,” in Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., eds., Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W.W. Norton, 2002), p. 227Google Scholar

Tellis, Ashley J., “Reconstructing Political Realism: The Long March to Scientific Theory,” in Frankel, Benjamin, ed., Roots of Realism (London: Frank Cass, 1996), pp. 91–4Google Scholar

Vasquez, John A. and Elman, Colin, eds., Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003), pp. 1–22Google Scholar

Resende-Santos, João, “Anarchy and the Emulation of Military Systems: Military Organization and Technology in South America, 1870–1930,” in Frankel, Benjamin, ed., Realism: Restatements and Renewal (London: Frank Cass, 1996), pp. 193–260Google Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), p. 12.Google Scholar

Mastanduno, Michael, Lake, David A., and Ikenberry, G. John, “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action,” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 4 (December 1989), pp. 457–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn (New York: Knopf, 1966), p. 102.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A., A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957), pp. 326–8, at p. 326.Google Scholar

Wolfers, Arnold, “The Actors in International Politics,” in Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

Gulick, Edward Vose, Europe's Classical Balance of Power (New York: W. W. Norton, 1967), p. 14.Google Scholar

Carr, Edward Hallett, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edn (1945; New York: Harper and Row, 1964), p. 132.Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale, Origins of Major War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

Lamborn, Alan C., “Power and the Politics of Extraction,” International Studies Quarterly 27, no. 2 (June 1983), pp. 125–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Papayoanou, Paul A., “Interdependence, Institutions, and the Balance-of-Power: Britain, Germany, and World War I,” International Security 20, no. 4 (spring 1996), pp. 42–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, Marc, “The Question of Realism: A Historian's View,” Security Studies 13, no. 1 (autumn 2003), pp. 26–7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spykman, Nicholas John, America's Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance-of-Power (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1942), p. 25.Google Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G., “Dueling Realisms,” International Organization 51, no. 3 (summer 1997), pp. 445–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 133–4.Google Scholar

Goldman, Emily O. and Andres, Richard B., “Systemic Effects of Military Innovation and Diffusion,” Security Studies 8, no. 4 (summer 1999), pp. 79–125.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gouveritch, Peter, “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization 32, no. 4 (autumn 1978), pp. 881–912Google Scholar

Desch, Michael C., “War and Strong States, Peace and Weak States?” International Organization 50, no. 2 (spring 1996), pp. 237–68 at pp. 244–5CrossRef Google Scholar

Porter, Bruce D., War and the Rise of the State: The Military Foundations of Modern Politics (New York: Free Press, 1994), pp. 113–21.Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas J., “Perceptions and Alliances in Europe, 1860–1940,” International Organization 51, no. 1 (winter 1997), pp. 65–97.CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuels, Richard J., Machiavelli's Children: Leaders and their Legacies in Italy and Japan (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 53–62Google Scholar

Beasley, W. G., The Rise of Modern Japan (New York: St. Martin's, 1995), pp. 152–3.Google Scholar

Thomson, Janice E., “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research,” International Studies Quarterly 39, no. 2 (June 1995), pp. 213–33, at p. 216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, Theories of International Cooperation and the Primacy of Anarchy: Explaining US International Monetary Policy-Making after Bretton Woods (New York: State University of New York Press, 2002), p. 85Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, Confronting the Costs of War: Military Power, State, and Society in Egypt and Israel (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Rose, Gideon, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51, no. 1 (October 1998), pp. 144–72, at p. 147.CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedberg, Aaron L., The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Wohlforth, William Curti, The Elusive Balance: Power and Perception during the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1993)Google Scholar

Edelstein, David M., “Managing Uncertainty: Beliefs about Intentions and Rise of Great Powers,” Security Studies 12, no. 1 (autumn 2002), pp. 1–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., Balancing Risks: Great Power Intervention in the Periphery (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Walt, Stephen M., Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987), pp. 22–6Google Scholar

Walt, , Revolution and War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 18–45.Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall L., Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Friedberg, Aaron L., In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America's Anti-Statism and its Cold War Grand Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), chap. 4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., “Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Revisiting the Landmark Case for Ideas,” International Security 25, no. 3 (winter 2000–1), pp. 5–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas J., Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 11.Google Scholar

Evera, Stephen, “Hypotheses on Nationalism and War,” International Security 18, no. 4 (spring 1994), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

Brown, Michael E., “The Causes of Internal Conflict: An Overview,” in Brown, Michael E., Coté, Owen R., Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., eds., Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J., Tragedy of Great Powers (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001)Google Scholar

Labs, Eric J., “Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the Expansion of War Aims,” Security Studies 6, no. 4 (summer 1997), pp. 1–49CrossRef Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005), pp. 139–40Google Scholar

Evera, Stephen, Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997), pp. 39–40Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton, Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953), pp. 14–23Google Scholar

Berger, Thomas, Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrines between the Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain, Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar