Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:54:12.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Individual Differences at the Top

Mapping the Outer Envelope of Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2018

By
David Lubinski
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Nature of Human Intelligence , pp. 230 - 255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on educational achievement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., & Vantassel-Baska, J. (2015). A nation empowered (volume I). Iowa City, IA: Belin-Blank Center.Google Scholar
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., Vantassel-Baska, J., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2015). A nation empowered (volume II). Iowa City, IA: Belin-Blank Center.Google Scholar
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How “equity” can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 2, 249–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure and growth. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clynes, T. (2016). How to raise a genius: A long-running study of exceptional children reveals what it takes to produce the scientists who will lead the twenty-first century. Nature, 573, 152–155.Google Scholar
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.) (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., et al. (Eds.) (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1976). Measured mental abilities: Lingering questions and loose ends. In David, B. D. & Flaherty, P. (Eds.). Human diversity: Its causes and social significance (pp. 207–222). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Ferriman, K., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and sex differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gohm, C. L., Humphreys, L. G., & Yao, G. (1998). Underachievement among spatially gifted students. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Special issue on intelligence and social policy. Intelligence, 24.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). g: Highly general and highly practical. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 331–380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J. E. (2002). Measurement from a hierarchical point of view. In Braun, H. L., Jackson, D. G., & Wiley, D. E. (Eds.). (2002). The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 73–95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. (Ed.). Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe. IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L. G. (1962). Organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, E. B. (2011). Human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kell, H. J., & Lubinski, D. (2015). Intellectual abilities for counseling interventions, practice, and theory: Dismissing their significance for learning and work constitutes malpractice. In Hartung, P. J., Savickas, M. L., & Walsh, W. B. (Eds.). APA handbook of career intervention (pp. 303–326). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013a). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science, 24, 648–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013b). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831–1836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. New York: World Book.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D. (1996). Applied individual difference research and its quantitative methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904) “‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubinski, D. (2009). Exceptional cognitive ability: The phenotype. Behavior Genetics, 39, 350–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubinski, D. (2010). Neglected aspects and truncated appraisals in vocational counseling: Interpreting the interest-efficacy association from a broader perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 226–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubinski, D. (2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86, 900–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25, 2217–2232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R. V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.). Handbook of I/O psychology, 2nd edn., Vol. 3 (pp. 1–59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1997). Incorporating general intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences. Intelligence, 24, 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makel, M., Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Putallaz, M., & Benbow, C. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27, 1004–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matarazzo, J., D. (1972). Wechsler’s measurement and appraisals of adult intelligence (5th edition). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
McNemar, Q. (1964). Lost: Our intelligence? Why? American Psychologist, 19, 871–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (2006). The power of quantitative thinking. In Waller, N. G., Yonce, L. J., Grove, W. M., Faust, D., & Lenzenweger, M. F. (Eds.). A Paul Meehl Reader: Essays on the practice of scientific psychology (pp. 433–444). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1992). Multiple intelligences or multilevel intelligence? Selective emphasis on distinctive properties of hierarchy: On Gardner’s Frames of Mind and Sternberg’s Beyond IQ in the context of theory and research on the structure of human abilities. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. (1998). Income, inequality, and IQ. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2002). IQ and income inequality in a sample of sibling pairs from advantaged family backgrounds. American Economic Review, 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 4716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimfeld, K., Shakesshaft, N. G., Malanchini, M., Rodic, M. et al. (2017). Phenotypic and genetic evidence for a unifactorial structure of spatial abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Early Edition Online, 1–6. PNAS 2017 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607883114Google ScholarPubMed
Roznowski, M. (1987). The use of tests manifesting sex differences as measures of intelligence: Implications for measurement bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 480–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. E., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Does the Defining Issues Test measure psychological phenomena distinct from verbal ability?: An examination of Lykken’s query. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 498–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seashore, C. E. (1922). The gifted student and research. Science, 56, 641–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. P. (1967). The two cultures and a second look. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, R. E. (1999). Commentary: Expanding the breadth and depth of admissions testing. In Messick, S. (Ed.). Assessment in higher education (pp. 133–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D., III. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In Berliner, D. C. & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.). Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243–310). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In Linn, R. L. (Eds.). Educational measurement (3rd edn.) (pp. 263–331). New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. C. (2000). Helping students learn only what they don’t already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1924). The nature of intelligence and ability (III). British Journal of Psychology, 14, 243–247.Google Scholar
Tyre, P. (2016). The math revolution. Atlantic, 3, 50–57.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. E. (1961). The structure of human abilities (2nd edn.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wai, J., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Helping disadvantaged and spatially talented students fulfill their potential: Related and neglected national resources. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, J. H. (1971). Achievement and social mobility: Relationships among IQ score, education, and occupation in two generations. Social Biology, 18, 252–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×